Comments by "John Vannisselroy" (@johnvannisselroy6197) on "Storm Shadow Used On Crimea? "Russia Has No Option But To Win War", Romania Confirms Drone Debris" video.

@Brandon-yg7mw Nope. Russia is the one losing badly. The Russian army has gained NO land in Ukraine in the 12 months since the Ukrainian army brought them to a halt. The Russian army has lost over 18,000sq km of Ukraine over those same 12 months. That's calling LOSING.
9
@bezbthatdude4558 Yes, Ukraine has "took back" 6 cities from the Russian army. Specifically Kherson, Izium, Chuhuiv, Balakliiva, Kupyansk, and Lyman - all within the last twelve months. How many cities has the Rusian army "took" in that period? the answer is: None, zilch, nada, not a sausage. So now you can L your own AO.
8
@Brandon-yg7mw But Brandon, Russia hasn't achieved a single one of it's stated goals, and it's 3 day takeover of Kyiv is now into it's 567th day and they are further from Kyiv than ever. You must be the most uninformed Russian troll I've seen today. The fact that you can say that goes to show how little you've been paying attention to this war recently.
6
@andrewmorgan5950 Your information must come from Russian sources, as it's wrong. With a population of 143million, Russia has only 3 times to popualtion of Ukraine, not the 6 times you assert. And your argument that millions of Ukrainians have fled is invalid, as millions of women and children have taken refuge (from Russian attacks), but the menfolk have been required to stay.
4
@mtklet Yes, I believe they killed over 60 of their own troops. Why? How many Russian troops do you think died in that "friendly fire" incident?
4
@Robolaralobarar It was the Russian who designed the latest T-80 cope cage who said it made the tank indestructible. He was wrong.
3
It was the designer of the latest T-80 cope cage who said it made the tank "invincible".
3
Paul, your eyesight must be bad, as there is now a very noticeable dent in Russia's frontlines. However if you are looking for Russia's gains, a magnifying glass will be no good - you'll need a high powered microscope.
2
@mat_j NATO is not getting its a kicked on the first line of defence.
2
Or "unstoppable".
2
@bezbthatdude4558 Keep crying yourself. And step away from the Russian propaganda machine as it's obviously addling your brain. - Russia withdrew from Kherson because Ukraine so restricted their supply lines that continued occupation became untenable. Victory to Ukraine. - Russia blew the dam. - I included no cities of less than 20,000 people. - Not a single thing you wrote is a real fact - only Russian BS. So maybe you should fact check before coming here making a fool of yourself.
1
@andrewmorgan5950 Medvedev is a drunken fool who makes radical statements in the hope of getting back into Putin's good books. I'm very surprised you take any notice of anything he says - it's like you think his words have any value.
1
@mat_j It's not.
1
@mat_j Actually Mat, Ukrainians they're not getting their a kicked. Yes they're making hard work of it, but they are gaining and Russia is losing. Russia's equipment losses are on average twice that of Ukraine - so we can extrapolate that Russian troop losses are similarly higher than Ukrainian troop losses. In fact the Russian army hasn't been able to capture ANY significant Ukrainian land in the last twelve months, but the Ukrainian army has been able to liberate huge areas in that time. Russia has been losing for a long time.
1
@mat_j You may not be Russian, but you are a Russian troll. We feel sorry for you, that you have been so sucked in by Russian propaganda.
1
@selmirvelic7109 Funny thing is, they did say their Kinzhal was "unstoppable" - only to find that the Patriot can stop it. Those poor Kinzhal engineers got arrested and jailed for making false claims.
1
@Brandon-yg7mw I'll be looking back a year from now, just to see if Russia still holds any of Ukraine.
1
Ukraine already has. They stopped the Russian army advances 12 months ago.
1
Sergei has overlooked another obvious option: that is for Russia to LOSE the war.
1
Russia can't field the T-14 Armata. It's is too unreliable and not fit for battlefield conditions.
1
@andrewmorgan5950 It's experimental!!! It's been "experimental" for a decade. It'll be obsolete before it's ready for production. It's years behind schedule - having been supposed to have gone into production at least three times so far. It's a lemon.
1
@CallmeBotakaOrc What a unrelated and stupid comment. More like the ghosts of over a quarter of a million dead Russian servicemen come back to haunt Russia's tank factories.
1