Comments by "Achintya Nath Sexena" (@Achintyanath) on "Farooq Abdullah backs Rajnath Singh's comments, says Indian Muslims suffering due to partition" video.

Abdullah family were one of the biggest beneficiaries of the mistake of partition. They removed Hindu King of Kashmir from power and became Kings of Kashmir themselves.
100
@JA-sf3st If the British killed and looted everyone and the Indian Kings were so bad then how are you and me surviving now?
2
@ajaymehra4027 Yes Sir
2
@ajaymehra4027 Sir the game of politics is about divide and rule only no matter who plays it. British played it for their own interests and Nehru and Jinnah for their own. Jinnah especially was a fool who made Pakistan knowing fully well that he was going to die in next few months.
2
@ajaymehra4027 Yes I agree with you. Everyone ignores the millions of lives lost during partition.
2
@atyanthdutt6632 What independence? You mean the partition of India which led to massacre of millions of Hindus?
2
@atyanthdutt6632 My grandparents thought that after partition India should be a Hindu country. So did my parents.
2
@atyanthdutt6632 For my grandparents and great grandparents there was no country called Pakistan. For them it was India till the Balochistan desert.
2
@atyanthdutt6632 What facts? Define vassal
1
@atyanthdutt6632 I would suggest you actually meet the descendants of Royal Families of India and talk to your ancestors who lived in Indian kingdoms if any of them are alive today.
1
@atyanthdutt6632 My source of knowledge is my ancestors and people I personally know. I dont read books written by biased individuals.
1
@atyanthdutt6632 It is significant for me because I have inherited that legacy.
1
@atyanthdutt6632 For you your history may be a formality to be studied by school books but for me it is much more than that.
1
@atyanthdutt6632 You find it laughable because you don't have the capacity to connect with India's past. Which is your problem not mine.
1
@atyanthdutt6632 You tell me what is a vassal first. Then you tell me on what basis you have called Indian kingdoms as British vassals.
1
@atyanthdutt6632 The real twerp is your father who seems to have forgotten to teach you manners
1
@JA-sf3st No Indian kingdom was a British vassal. First learn the meaning of the word 'vassal' before carelessly throwing it about and showing your own ignorance.
1
@atyanthdutt6632 Have you studied the Rann of Kutch dispute between India and Pakistan and the stand of the government of India in the Hague?
1
@atyanthdutt6632 My now dead father would have broken all my teeth and kicked me out of the family home if I spoke in a tongue like yours.
1
@atyanthdutt6632 All the Indian kingdoms had their own administrative, judicial, military and revenue collection system. They collected revenue from British also. Anyone who says that these kingdoms were vassals is definitely biased.
1
@atyanthdutt6632 What stand did government of India take in the Hague vis a vis the Rann of Kutch territorial dispute with Pakistan?
1
@atyanthdutt6632 Before defining a territory or king as a vassal you must be clear about the definitions of vassal and sovereignty. Just by showing off your foul mouth won't convince others.
1
If Muslims of UP, Bihar and Maharashtra demanded Pakistan then why was Pakistan created in Punjab, Sindh and Bengal? First think then comment.
1
@JA-sf3st The so-called 'Princely States' were actually independent nations who had treaties with the British. They were independent in matters of internal administration and revenue collection and had their own military forces as well. They commanded respect of their subjects and relied on British only for conduct of foreign policy and deployment of their military forces. Nobody will tell you this fact.
1
@atyanthdutt6632 Then by your logic the partition of India along religious lines was also "inevitable" and therefore by the same logic, following secularism in divided India is foolishness.
1
@atyanthdutt6632 Inevitable????
1
@ajaymehra4027 But I don't agree with the idea that Punjabi Muslims did not demand Pakistan.
1