Comments by "Ungoogleable o_O" (@oO_ox_O) on "Rosetta Project Scientist's Shocking Shirt. Sexist?" video.

  1. ***** > Keep biting the bait. So you are just baiting? Does this make you a trollese?
    8
  2. *****  > men are here telling me that men are obviously smarter that's why there are more men in science fields Just wondering, if someone were to present the argument to you that there will always be more men in certain fields because either more testerone on average or being more inclined to a certain side of the autism spectrum is advantageous you wouldn't entirely dismiss it, would you? (mind you, that doesn't mean there aren't also cultural problems making it less likely for women)
    7
  3. *****  > because I am a male. Don't know how it helps your arguments. > since when were females lesser than males in nature To be fair he didn't say "lesser", he just sort of repeated the (natural) inherent roles argument. What you consider lesser of those is pretty much subjective, someone could come round and tell you how it actually tells you how men are considered lesser in nature because they were more disposable/exchangeable and also have more inherent illnesses (both of which might explain why more males are born). If you want to debate him on a more reasonable level try to show him why generally natural arguments are fallacious, why we don't have to follow the old paths evolution might have paved us and how being gender neutral makes us as a whole more successful.
    6
  4. ***** > The fact that most people are disagreeing with me here just proves my points. TYT comment section is full of sexist and misogynistic men. Who disagrees with you is a sexist misogynist man?
    4
  5. *****  > It happens ALL the time. OK, and how do you feel about it?
    3
  6. ***** > But nature is equal In what sense?
    2
  7. ***** > more testosterone... hummm ok What about the autism spectrum point? > tell me now about how men are biologically more inclined to build spacecrafts. I'm reeeeally interested. You might have missed I was talking really in general, more testosterone might help in politics and reaching high political positions in companies. With engineering/research the autism spectrum thing might apply. > NOT Why? Don't like to think about such things?
    2
  8. rockheimr  > For a clearly very clever man it wasn't the smartest clothing choice is all. No mention of his tattoos?
    2
  9. ***** > Equalism is the progression of the past moving into the future. Depending on what you mean with "equalism" not all people would aggree. I think you should clarify you mean equality of opportunity and not quality of results, i.e. that you still want competition.
    1
  10. inb4 "Ana internalized sexism"
    1
  11. Coos Oorlog > thus reinforces gender stereotypes So if it showed male scientists it also would be sexist to you? (you know, males are logical trope)
    1