Comments by "gacj2010" (@gacj2010) on "CNN commentator challenged on her religion and abortion stance. See her response" video.

Great logic .... get rid of it so it wont become a kid who is abused in life
4
@thesonsoflightt Her religion is MONEY .. she will say what keeps her in front of the camera
2
What is it any way ??/Biological waste ????/
1
correct .... great point
1
That covid jeopardized fake hispanic woman is not in line with hispanics in America
1
Yeah Man ... what you dint know or say ( as a foreigner) GUNS are in the constitution ; getting rid of it isnt.... It goes to the states (the people) when its not in the laws of the land , the Constitution.
1
@daviddavies3637 An education lesson .. If its not in the Constitution ; its for the people for make their laws in their states.. The Court Justices have one sole job and that is to interpret the Constitution as its written., not to legislate what is not in the document. Different in UK I know. Its worked for over 200 years and we like it.
1
@Heather Wine 100% ... Tell that guy David Davies fro UK .. he thinks he knows more
1
@daviddavies3637 I agree with almost all you said. Our Bill of Rights ( not present in your constitution) are simple and deliberately so. The right to carry a firearm is just that ;a right under our law. I agree some guidance is appropriate yet how much. The constant chipping away is a back door to literally eliminate it. In the Bill of Rights it doesnt say concealed or openly visible. To sculpture the right would set a precedent to curtail other rights in the B of Rts. I dont own a firearm , have no interest, never touched one, nor want to but I support others who are not mentally deficient and have training as that person my save many some day. Roe was on thin ice when it was decided in the 70s and according to RBG , said the same and said some day due to its standing , it will be reversed. It isnt without precedent that rulings are revisited. It was the case regarding Slavery. It was revisited with regard to woman voting. It was revisited regarding Prohibition, and others. The court represents the people indirectly as the people vote for the president who appoints and the congress who confirms. A citizen brought the case to the court as had been done several times in the past by interested citizens since its inception and with the changes in the make up of the court, it ruled as you know. Absolutely , the court should not legislate. In late years , policies the democrats could not pass legislatively were sent to the courts in hopes they would deliver the desired outcome.. This is destructive if from either party. If the majority of people want abortion to be a function of the federal government, it should be easy to produce a bill by 2/3 of congress voting to pass and we would have a new law. They know it is not a majority opinion ,so how great to have those state populations who desire it, vote it in their state. I am from Boston and of course we have full access. I am not a fan of it BUT its the majority view in my state , so I wont burn and destruct things but accept it or move to another state. The greatest upset is in states that have abortion in place. Regarding judges I agree they should be in the shadows BUT we have a media who if you were watching made a circus of conservative appointed justices. I dont know about UK butt the left here ( and the media is their voice) is the outrageous violent aspect of our country. When a senate leader stands up before the court and calls out a Justice saying he will ":reap the whirlwinds for decisions and he will not know what hits him" ... This is out left. I dont know if you heard that ,,, (youtube) believed
1
@donaldwilliamfry Exactly
1
@daviddavies3637 Thank you for your reply.. We had more common ground when talking about the role of different branches of government. However I see where you are coming from as you do me, and lobbying volleys back and forth will be just that . Being in the middle is perhaps a safe place to view what is good or not on either side. There is a swinging of things throughout history, as I have seen and we seem always to find the safe way in the end , then someone reinvents the wheel again and we try something long tried before , thinking , this time we know how to do it better . Its the nature of man to be restless and always trying to improve. On another thought.... I must say I studied how England ,before the War 2 was a dynamically strong nation.;so strong that ,it stood up to the Nazis and in the end defeated totalitarianism, then after the war England took a curve to the left and today its another country , so change is always in the making as now England has decided to be independent again from the Union. There are pluses and minuses in both decisions.
1
@shadowbanned636 for Polar Opposite you must be construing that ...well I am only guessing ..I dont know...But the rulings were interpreting the constitution as written. In one case a subject isnt mentioned or included in the Constitution ans thereby that subject goes to the people in their states. The other IS in the Constitution simply stating that citizens have the right to arms.
1
@shadowbanned636 Are you saying one is to kill life while the others is self -defense of life????????
1
@shadowbanned636 you are speaking like the Constitution is denying some procedure.. They are not denying anything that the people decide they want ... This simply says the fed gov. has no say in the issue which is not specifically mentioned in the document... Right go carry can not be denied in any state..it's specific to the Constitution.. What is unclear idk
1
@shadowbanned636 I believe you are a loose interpreter of the document; I am not that..
1
@shadowbanned636 yah but... If I want to ...say seduce the neighbors 17 yr old in the privacy of my home ...that just doesn't cut it... The fed gov has washed it's hands of finding out who had an abortion or frankly anything to do with it.. The people will decide in their states...and the fed gov will but out of our lives .. period I don't want the feds having any control over my life.. This was such an important thing in the forming of our country.. It's why every state has its own legislature ,Senate and executive.. Why do you want the feds to authorize it limit any activity.. I rely on the fed gov Only to deal with international affairs .protect borders and defense..maybe interstate roads.. Trouble is they have been slowly creeping into our lives ..as politicians lander to us to keep their jobs.. I say ..go Away... If a gov agent comes to you and says ...I'm from the government and I am here to help you...beware..run
1
@daviddavies3637 thank you for that revelation.. My dad was a union man too. then one day he said ..the unions are putting us out of business I liked that her for her strength.. Politics is too big and stops serving the people..it's all special interests and panders to groups or separates people to play one against the other.. I detest that.. The people are good ..the politicians are manipulating..a necessary evil. Yes I understand our liberal are equivalent to your conservatives A favorite saying if thatcher I liked was that socialism works....until all the people with money have run out I grew up in the 80s as well
1
@daviddavies3637 Thank you for those views. I can tell you something about US healthcare. We have social medicine for everyone except those who work. Some companies actually offer it or pay half of it. The workers, like myself however are taxed far less and choose their Insurance. Ill get back to that. Our retirees receive Medicare.. Its National health for anyone over 65 . Millions are covered. We also have Medicaid that is subsidized by the Fed Government and State governments. This is for anyone of all ages who are in poverty or dont work. Our second Federal gov health care is the VA or veterans administration. It cares for all those who were in our services. Also no one is ever refused to enter an emergency room at hospital. Fed government subsidizes all hospital emergency rooms for their "losses" in caring for critical care. The group who chooses its own healthcare, the workers have income taxes far far lower than those countries which offer their one size fits all healthcare. Generally 20% income tax. Some opt for an insurance of varying coverage and costs according their situation. I often hear bad about US healthcare and wasnt sure if you were aware of this. If stats show Americans dont live longest its more about overweight and lack of exercise . Regarding Bill Clinton. He was the kind of democrat that was successful. When he overreached in policies that for Americans , were seen as too left , he lost the house and congress. Then Clinton worked with Congress as they did with him and things were successful. That working together has disappeared. The Dems have gone far left (American view of left), and of course the push back comes from the opposing party as they drift further and further apart. That is today. Have you concluded that America is a more Conservative country than most others? I believe it is, although I see the way as just normal, and the policies of todays democrats as radical.(I am /was a dem from Boston as I mentioned earlier) . .I dont know if England is defending law enforcement policing. Our president calls half of Americans as racists and white supremacists.( Its not at all truthful) Stopping the Keyston Canada pipeline to US reduced the volume of petroleum on the world market along with other exec orders that went to war on energy the first day. We have a right of free speech but since Trump the Fed has been going after political rivals for speech ... I mean raiding their houses..some guy who was given a hard drive by a woman who stayed in a motel the day after a man stayed and left his laptop info . The was the presidents son. I heard there was real bad stuff involving minors. They went to the guys house at 5 AM and raided his house with a camera crew .. This kind of stuff never ever happened. Anyway .. its expected that both house and senate will change in 5 months due to our presidents shift to the left.We always swing like a pendulum in the middle . I think about it and how things work in other countries but I think America is just so big and diverse and the tradition was to not have a strong Federal power but each "colony" maintains its identity with changes done by the residents of those states. Its a pretty good thing. For example I live in New England, one cannot have fireworks to celebrate the break from the king on July 4th in my state. Although illegal in Mass. people still fire them off on Independence Day in my state. New Hampshire is just a 90 min drive away and that state sells fireworks . When I go to a different state , I have to be aware of their rules and laws . Its kinda nice. Anyway .. thanks for sharing understandings.
1
@daviddavies3637 Thank you for those views. I am one who eschews media in favor of hearing from real persons. I have become very skeptical about what media is , which in fact is hearsay, so I appreciate hearing first hand. We both grew up under different styles of governance and for each of us , it was safe, it worked , and its the only one we knew. Our mindset and expectations are also unique to our cultures and that too produces a satisfaction with the way we are organized and live. So Its not that one form is inferior to another but different from another. Its the expectations and tolerances of the people in one country that makes the system work and please. I understand where you are coming from as you do me and its great to know the differences . Both nations can assess and if they like what they see in another , give it a try. We are all people wanting the best we can have for ourselves , family and friends and neighbors. I am not an historian but merely a high school biology teacher on his free block taking a break from the kids. Best to you. Thank you for the reply.
1
The decision has been given back to the people in every single state ...What do you not understand
1
Thay latino is an embarrassment to the race
1
@jonyboi21 absolutely ...
1
@jonyboi21 Never ...
1
I was using sarcasm
1