Comments by "Tomas Vrabec" (@tomasvrabec1845) on "The Western European Demographic Revolution." video.

Thanks for the useless comment which summarises the Author of this Video's point of view and conclusion...
36
@GrosPointRouge Actually... My comment at least informs you that you managed to summarise this view. Without it copying the video nor trying to create some sort of moral point which was talked about anyway. The topic even being concentrated around the problems of Mass Migration rather than pure migration as it talks about rate of migration and rate of assimilation, with an underlying contextual differences affecting these rates. The legalism or illegalism of migration becomes increasingly null with the rate being so high... As measures are need to limit even legal migration (thus by default affecting illegal migration).
12
Please don't. Eastern Europe suffered enough by forced Christianisation and crusades which killed of our ancestors.
5
Well you might want to look into that... You would realise that it not "Europeans" as much as 14 countries out of 40... In Europe. What you mentioned was done by Western Europeans.. not central nor eastern Europeans. These did not have colonies, often did not even had empires... And often underwent cultural eradication policies themselves. This includes Slavery... The biggest slavery before Atlantic Slave trade was out of Eastern Europe... This includes Crusades (yep... Just like into middle east, there were crusades east...)
4
@curious_one1156 lol that is one of the most uneducated comments... "Immigration is a recent concept"... No it isn't Even the Romani Gypsies are immigrants from India that came during... Middle ages.
3
 @joshjonson2368 yeah Right... Because it wasn't the Germanics whom ended up sacking Rome...
3
@jerzyzbiaowiezy6249 um.. that the 1400s not the dark ages...
2
@feliz2892 He did not say Muslims are the only ones with kinship... Christians can too. In fact, you whole explanation supports his expansion as High levels of Kinship groups (basically extended family and keeping things to the family) is what actually results in smaller, but more distinct groups... As explained by you. Because if your extended family keeps remarrying around their relatives like second, third cousins.. of someone from other branch of the wider clan, they will keep retaining their features... Hence making a smaller group, but more different from the outside.
2
 @asmirann3636 you totally missed what was written in the comment...
2
@EB-jf5oi yeah Belgian, British, Danish, Duch, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish and Swedish. Adding to it the Imperial power of Austria-Hungary
1
@EB-jf5oi @EB well, as far as the colonial period goes, Russia was western at the time more than eastern. They very much competed with Western powers, adopted Roman title of Caesar (Tzar) and claimed to be the successor of Roman Empire. Besides... The topic was European... Which Russia still was and is. Not western or eastern colonialism. Besides.. Russia overall is and was the biggest coloniser of Asia... One of the mentioned continents. They were also the biggest Humiliates of China, taking most from them which is a little ironic.... But just further goes to show that at the time, Russia was very much a European Colonial Power.
1
 @FOLIPE yes. Mainly biological warfare and seigne tactics.
1
@greyralph1637 plus it would be trickier in Eastern Europe for historic reasons. EE is mainly Slavic. There is still a lot of memorandum regarding the enslavement of Slavs for Arabic Slave Trade and for the Ottoman Empire. Including theft of children, raising them for war, and sending them back to kill their own mothers. So the society as a whole is on a "look out"
1
@FOLIPE um. Slavic migration was in 5-6th century into the regions of far eastern Europe (Russia) and southern Europe (Balkans). Slavic "homeland" is in Eastern Poland and Western Ukraine.... As far as 1500BC... So yeah. Slavs did not really migrate. I'll also add context of history. The Slavic migration begun once Rome fell and Germanic tribes moved out of East Germania, and after the Huns mixed power up in Europe. There after, from the 5th century onwards you have the emergence of Slavic states. There all begun as Rod (Clan) confederacies. Most notably Unification of Poland under the Polanian Slavic tribe. With majority of unifications happening from 8-10th century when Germanic tribes stabilised in the West and begun reconquering the east Germania (which they left, they didn't not get conquered). Germanic expansion Eastward, Magyars incoming from the east and Byzantium turning into Theocracy where Christians could not be enslaved (but pagans could) triggered a wave of unification among Slavs. That why Kievan Rus emerged, Great Moravia, Poland... It's also why Slavic Monarchies traditionally do not/did not have Divine Right. Monarchies of Slavs traced their heritage to Farmers and Plovers. The Bohemian kinds even had peasant shoes during coronations. But hey... The Germanics still went eastward and hold and behold they turned Prussia Germanic... Conquered Poland and Habsburgs then got hold of what was great Moravia. Meanwhile Kiev fell and got conquered by Moscovites whom had adopted the tactics and aims of their Mongolic overlords (that rules them for a century or two). This all having a pinicle in WW2 where France and Britain would just disregard the sovereignty of Czechoslovakia, appease Hitler... Hitler expanding eastward and killing off people.... Or claiming the land because there were German colonists. So as far as East Central and Western East Europe goes.... It had indeed been in a Struggle where foreign powers and ethnicities tried to take over the region for 1500 years... Even through, historically, Slavs were extremely Hospitable even to those whom were enemies ... As even Christian Missionaries and Crusaders recorded how Hospitably Slavs were to them as individuals and did not blame them for actions of other Christians (that burned the Slavic temples).
1