Comments by "Kameraden" (@Alte.Kameraden) on "Analysing Nazi Anti-Semitic Propaganda Imagery (so nobody falls for it in the future)" video.

Oh boy, a heavy heart subject. Really hope the idea of the "Money Changers" sticks with any Socialist who may watch this videos and where the origin of the very idea of a "Capitalist" came from.
39
"There was no redistribution of wealth in Nazi Germany from private ownership to the proletariat or working class." You're describing Marxism, not Socialism. Marxism is a Socialist movement but it isn't Socialism itself. Pre-Marxist Socialist for example had nothing to do with the Working Class. In fact they're often referred to as Utopian Socialist, Conservative Socialist or Bourgeoisie Socialist. The only consensus when it comes to the Definition of Socialism is "Social Ownership of the Means of Production." But what "Social Ownership" can mean can change wildly based on what Socialist movement you're speaking off. Marxism their "Social Ownership" is the "Working Class." Marxism aims to give control of the means of production and positions of leadership into the hands of the Working Class. In the case of the Nazis it's the Race, the Race is the Social Group. So their Socialism is Racial Socialism, and their socialization of the means of production is putting the means of production into the hands of the "Race." Which is why even mega Corporations like I.G. Farben were not immune and were forced to fire it's none German and Jewish staff, including two members of the I.G. Farben Board. One for being Jewish and the other was Swiss.
7
I think you missed the point entirely. The point is, Antisemitism LEAD to the Stereotype of "The Capitalist." The very concept of a Capitalist is built on the foundation of antisemitism. Socialist practice a anti capitalist faith fighting an enemy that is literally an antisemetic stereotype that had only just been rebranded under a new name. Issue with Socialist is, they don't realize it. Socialist use this terrifying stereotype to scare people. Whether they target Jews or not is irrelevant at this point. They literally took OLD Christian Antisemetic Propaganda and rebranded it for their own use. It's also socialist are not entirely immune to it either. There have been plenty of Marxist parties that have been Antisemetic. Taking some of the comparisons that Marx himself made between the "Jew" and the "Capitalist' seriously. The Czech Communist Party, the West German Communist Party, being good examples. Apparently the British Labour Party as well, caught with their pants down a few years back making some pretty nasty antisemetic comments. I still remember when the DNC emails were leaked, that many in the Democratic Party were calling Bernie Sanders a "Dirty J*w." So it exist, just not as in your face. So TIK's points are not irrelevant, or really misguided. It doesn't take much going from an Anti-Capitalist to becoming an Anti-Semite because the origin of the Capitalist came from antisemetism. Which is why TIK included this part in the video 25:30. Best example I can think of to ring home the point is how many radical Socialist keep pushing that the US Federal Reserve is "Privately Owned." Despite those running the Fed being appointed by Congress and officially being a State owned Corporation. They claim because the Fed was originally financed by selling shares to Major Banks in America so it's actually owned by a handfull of fat bankers. Ignoring the whole point of doing that was to make all Major Banks to be linked to the Fed, ie partial Nationalization of Finance. Giving the Fed roots into all major banking institutions. Issue is, Antisemites believe the exact same thing, but instead of big fat Bankers owning/ running the Fed, they just say Jew. They will use the same arguments. Why? Because the Propaganda is identical. The Propaganda has the same roots.
4
You see a lot of this style of imagery the children's book "The Fable of the Ducks & the Hens."
3
It's actually refreshing seeing his comparisons.
3
UshankaShow does it sometimes.
2
I have family members in their 40s who still let their parents vote for them. ie they don't pay attention to politics at all. They vote a party line without knowing who they're voting for so they ask their parents who exactly to vote for as multiple people of the same party are often on the ballets.
2
"Free Palestinian from the River to the Sea." Defining the Colonial British borders if Palestinian. A common quote used by Palestinian Nationalist, and now Collage kids. Nationalist btw who advocate a Jewish Free Palestinian State, a position they've held since the 1930s. Palestinian Nationalism exist to create a Nation State that has never existed. They define that Nation State on Ethnic/Religious lines. As a result the 1936 Arab Revolt also Targeted Jews in Palestine, not just the British Colonial Government. Meanwhile the Jewish State Palestinians advocated removing has over 1 million Arab Palestinian Citizens within it's borders. This implies that Israel isn't the bad guy in this scenario. Palestinians just live in a mental/physical prison of their own creation. They started the conflicts and lost them. Failed to gain State hood in the process and proclaim to be victims of the fields they sowed. If it wasn't for Palestinian Nationalism being ethinc Nationalism there likely would be a Palestinian State with millions of Jews and Muslims. Their violence toward the Jews gave rise to the Jews declaration of their own Nation State.
2
Perhaps the rest of humanity have been living under the same "The Evil Money Changers" Propaganda for countless generations, and resort to blaming those they deem as the Money Changers for all of society's ills. Same Rhetoric is passed down generation after generation. Used by Christians, Marxist, and Nazis alike. They all relatively believe the same thing that the evil Money Changers by whatever name they wish to call it, are the poison of society. In short, it isn't the Jews who are the problem. It's society as a whole which believes the centuries old propaganda against them. It's easy to blame a minority for the failings of the majority in short.
2
@togarnis8096 He presents a number of quotes in a few of his videos that implies just that. From Marx, Hitler, Goebbels and Gentile. Goebbels was quite direct when he said all Socialism is Antisemitism. In fact the Money Changers is a term quite commonly used by Socialist at this time in history. Despite the phrase originated as well from Antisemitic origins. Even FDR gave a speech about the "Money Changers" when praising the existence of the Federal Reserve. It's why I included in my comment. Those who study antisemitism know it's usage quite well. Another phrase used to mask antisemitism is International Bankers. Being Jews are often considered not National so are not members of the Nation. So are International. Even the Soviets viewed the Jews like this.
2
Maybe you should show them TIK's video on David Irving.
2
@TheImperatorKnight It's tragic because how did Sun Tzu put it? "To know your enemy, you must become your enemy." Implying if you bury your head in the sand and do not know your enemy, do not listen to them, see how they view the world, you will never understand them. If you don't understand them you literally know nothing about them. If you know nothing about them, you have no right to claim 'what they are.'
2
Issue with that argument is. Marx defends the Jews by reinforcing people's antisemitic views of the Jews. Time and time again he repeatedly associates the Jews with the foundation of "MONEY." With the only criticism not being really in defense of the Jews, but how much the rest of the Christian world has become like the Jews. In short, he doesn't actually defend the Jews in the book. It's the other way around, he damns Christians for being like Jews. This is most notable during the 2nd half when he goes on the offensive, and he repeats/reinforces it time and time again.
1
@TheImperatorKnight I find it funny, that they claim he was defending the Jews in On the Jewish Question. I'm assuming they read an article in which someone critiqued the book and well made up what the book was about rather than actually reading On the Jewish Question. It's baffling how people will say Marx was defending the Jews in On the Jewish Question, when you just have to read it, and it's quite clear he wasn't. And the version I read was on Marxist Dot Org. It's why I've made the joke a few times when people try to bring that up going. "Yes lets defend the Jews by spouting out Antisemitism." Even if you say claim Marx was perhaps being Sarcastic, which I've heard someone use. We already know many people have a hard time understanding when someone is being sarcastic, so many will take it literally, including his followers.
1
@rodrigorafael.9645 Nah, I find it great. Definitely when he shows that they resort to even using the same colors. 😆
1
@togarnis8096 He's done that many times over over a dozen videos. Hence why he resorts to colors because people are unable to grasp what's being said.
1
@rodrigorafael.9645 So you're admitting his made up term "Commiservative" is an accurate assessment of socialist since you're calling TIK's position "Liberalism." hehe I think you and Gentile would agree on much. As he also stated the position that TIK supports is Liberalism. =3
1
@togarnis8096 Tell that to his critics then. Again he resorted to colors because people fail to grasp basic principles.
1
@togarnis8096 Ya that isn't how it works. You're making a false equivalence fallacy to justify your position. Try again.
1
@rodrigorafael.9645 He isn't tricking anyone. Only people who burry their head in the sand think they're "NOT" Socialist in turn the sheep that follow their writings. I'm honestly tired of hearing arguments which use "Marxist" Socialist ideas and counter pose those ideas to prove the Nazis are not Socialist because the Nazis were opposed to some of those ideas. Which ONLY PROVES THEY'RE NOT MARXIST which is a big DUH. This is why he resorts to COLORs. The word "Color" is used as a alternative to "Socialism." While the other Colors are "Colors" (Socialist) they're not the same color (same kind of socialist). Marxist influences socialist do not have a monopoly on the term socialism. Definitely being the term had existed before Marx. Even when Marx was around not all Socialist movement's followed his beliefs. Conservative Socialism or Bourgeois Socialism didn't just vanish from the world. When I mean Marxist influenced, ie I'm referring to class Conscious Socialist. Which can include Social Democrats, Marxist, Communist, Syndicalist, Democratic Socialist, etc etc. I mean the very fact that many denialist are now resorting to calling the Nazis a Cartel and compares them to a Mafia makes me fall over laughing. As the word Cartels and Syndicates are Synonyms of each other. Unions, Cartels, Syndicates, Soviets, Leagues, Cooperatives, Corporations, and many other terms often used to define a "Union" of sorts. So ironically when they use the word Cartel, I go "DUH!?" But that doesn't change a thing really. Just makes me laugh at this bad argument.
1
@rodrigorafael.9645 Oh I know what Liberal means. The rights of individuals is to be held up above the rights of society as a whole. Basic foundation of Liberalism in one sentence. This also means all Socialism is Anti-Liberalism. Pre-Marxist Socialist understood this when they claimed Socialism as the polar opposite of Individualism. So Liberal ideas of Individual Rights were in conflict with Socialist at the time. Which isn't a surprise as Socialism was created by Aristocratic Thinkers who hated the rise of Liberalism, the Middle Class, and lessening of power of the Aristocracy and Nobility. Any Socialist movement which claims they're Liberal are well... promoting a contradiction, as if you're propping the greater good of society as a whole over the rights of individuals, then you're not really a Liberal. I've heard people argue that "Left Wing" Liberalism = Social Liberalism, and that "Right Wing" Liberalism = Economic Liberalism. They ignore that important part when saying that though. Without Social Liberalism you can not have Economic Liberalism. Because the Liberal Laws, Social Acceptance, and Liberal values themselves need to be in place for Economic Liberalism to really exist. So no... Left Wing Liberalism isn't Social Liberalism. When you read up on Left Wing Liberalism it's nothing more than really just a Mask for Social Democracy. Not actually Liberalism, it's more about equality at the expense of liberty and liberty is where the term liberal comes from. They're totally fine with stripping people of their rights of man if it helps the greater community, which makes left wing liberalism not liberalism.
1
Ask Thomas Sowell. It's all a scam. I'd argue Racism is deeply rooted in Left With Academia. The Foundation for Economic Education did a great video on Lord of the Rings and the out rage a few years back about Tolkien's works. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJyN41f93QQ does a pretty good job making left wing activist look different than what they outwardly seem. It's actually realizing this myself which is why I left the left a few years back. The Left isn't that Pillar of Liberalism I believed it to be. I'm even questioning whether it really ever was anymore.
1
@occidentadvocate.9759 No, just informing. The fact the propaganda really hasn't changed in multiple generations since the fall of the National Socialist regime. It's a good example that even today Nazis still believe what Hitler's preached. It's also still available on YouTube, being it's in the form of a children's book and people who've not studied National Socialist beliefs will not notice the subtleness of it. Basically Hitler's entire world view of the Jews is literally presented in The Fable of the Ducks & the Hens right down to the fall of civilization. I often refer to the book for those who want a "For Dummies" understanding of National Socialist antisemitism.
1
@soulknife20 I think it was written by him. Ironically the same guy who allied himself with Black Nationalist who to this day dawn the Marxist Fist but in Black. I actually think it was that alliance that saw him murdered. Some of the more well die heart members saw the alliance an affront despite both the American Nazi Party and Black Nationalist both supporting a segregated society.
1
You do know David Cole has gone back on some of his past beliefs similar to David Irving and Eric Hunt?
1
Man I just love watching this one. The transition from Nazi propaganda to Marxist and Socialist Propaganda, is just too good.
1