Comments by "Kameraden" (@Alte.Kameraden) on "Why Oswald Mosley turned to Fascism" video.

Fascism is terrible like Socialism because they're cousins. 😅
3
 @j.harrison6744 Well that is far from right. Capitalist want to dismantle that hierarchy. So do Libertarian and Classic Liberals. Who are all against a strong central hierarchy. 😂
2
First half of this video is literally one of the greatest works by TIK in his career in my opinion. 😂
2
USSR and CCP were also Ultra Nationalistic.
1
 @j.harrison6744 well that is nonsense. Capitalist, Classic Liberals and Libertarians are against a strong central hierarchy.
1
@markpower9081 irrelevant, as it's replaced with Party Privileged in a Socialist Society. Do you really think Selfishness that is applied to The Capitalist just vanishes in Socialism? No.. the same nonsense continues. Why do you think every attempt to build a Socialist Society turns into a top down bureaucratic nightmare or worse a Single Man or Single Party Dictatorship? That hierarchy nonsense applies to ALL ORGANIZED SOCIETIES. What matters is how much power do you give to that hierarchy. In a Socialist system you whether you want to believe it or not you surrender that power to the State, even if you try to claim Democracy, the GROUP has POWER OVER YOU and you're not free. Who is in charge of the group, gathers the most support, gains the most power will dominate you. It has happened every single time Socialism has been tried. If you say take away that Authority away you also take away the POWER needed to enforce a Socialist Society. Without that Authority you cannot prevent Capitalism or the Natural Economy as Individuals practice what Individuals Practice. Which is the Self. Despite how much preaching, no matter how much propaganda you throw. SOCIALISM CAN NOT EXIST WITHOUT A STRONG CENTRAL HIERARCHY.
1
@edlawn5481 Not exactly. Stalin believed in exporting revolution, and believed the only way to do so was to focuses on Socialism in One Country first. His Imperialism was Socialism Imperialism, to expansion of Socialism by way of Wars and Revolution. But it required one strong powerful Socialist State that could fuel those wars and revolutions. Otherwise who's going to give them guns? USSR actually continued this policy well into the 20th Century pretty much giving weapons away in mass to revolutionary movements.
1
Yes it does. 😂 you see this in California recently when they increased minimum wage for Fast Food. It lead to mass layoffs within a year and increaed automation. Those jobs are not coming back either and more layoffs will come once experiments with full automation is finished. The only reason unemployment isn't higher is because it isn't reported. USA in particular if you're not drawing unemployment you're not counted and there are limits on how long people can draw unemployment before getting abandoned by the system.
1
Supporting a planned economy has work? 😂 Bashing it is very justified as planned economies do not work.
1
Throwing out the political spectrum? Hmm saves me time trying to explain to people how the term Far Right only exist to confuse people.
1
It's a universal problem. USA Democrats and Republicans might as well be the same party. They have different followers but the politicians not the voter makes decisions. All the Dem/Reps do is disable/enabled the same kind of legislation year after year after year. Often paying lip service at best. Good example being the Affordable Care Act was gutted of real substance despite Democrats could of passed it without the Republicans. Biden's recen Student loans bailout has basically been reverse by his own party, under the rug so to speak. Republicans almost never support the Libertarian values when actually in Washington and only give it lip service to rob the Libertarian Party of votes. Just goes on forever. Then you can easily answer why poverty is a serious issue in Democrats Cities despite being the Party For The Poor but only seems interested in keeping people poor for voters so they have poor people to preach to.
1