Comments by "DireWolf" (@direwolf7491) on "The Alternative View" channel.

  1.  @ianrowley5762  Did she say all her ancestors?
    3
  2. I am Indian and never ever heard any Indian say that. This is insane
    3
  3.  @Vespa123  May be that's how she makes money, but it is unfortunate the woke in the UK talk against british empire, but the woke here in India praise them. smh
    2
  4.  @veronho1ness  Do you even read what I write? Ever heard of the Gupta empire? Maurya empire? Ever read what the Greeks wrote about India whether or not it was successful? Or the Romans? Or the Chinese? Which country had democracy 200 years ago? Did Britain have democracy when they came to Indian shores? Now who is doing the mental gymnastics? LMAO The Mughals became Indians after a few generations. There weren't extracting wealth from India into their homeland in Ferghana like the British were. They chose to live in India the British didn't. Let me address this British fallacy. So according to you England gave democracy to India... 😅😅 How come Somalia didn't become a democracy after the British left? How about Afghanistan or Sudan? Or the latest Palestine?🤣 Do u guys even hear yourselves? So it is the fault of the British because Palestinians are not a democratic nation and chose hamas to lead them. Lol Make up ur mind. Can't have it both ways. You can take the credit making India a successful democracy if you accept the blame for Palestine and Afghanistan. How about that? Lol BTW, did the British even rule India democratically? I don't remember Indians voting for the British government. Hmmm... So HOW on earth did the British make India a democracy? What do they teach in British schools seriously!! SMH
    2
  5.  @veronho1ness  You think India is successful because of britain?😅😅😅 Most ridiculous thing I have heard all day. So if someone robs you, you'll become more successful? India is successful in spite of Britain. Do you think all the countries that British colonized are successful? Africa, middle easts successful? Where is the logic man? She is a muslim probably doesn't have a caste. It's funny you guys bringing up caste system to defend the British empire. Did the British abolish caste system? No. Were British policies more discriminatory than the caste system? 100% yes.
    2
  6. @dianeunderhill8506  First of all you started your foolish chatter and moaning. 1/2 wit I didn't. Every single thing you typed here was wrong. I didn't even have the time to engage all of them. When u start saying dumb things learn to take the reply. I am not dying to have a conversation with you. And stop lecturing us about our space missions, pollution, our internal politics. British parliament and media seems to be moaning consistently about these things that doesn't concern them.
    1
  7.  @tonyk6153  British policies made the caste system look like high school rules. Lol Can you name whose land India stole? Even if India did it was nowhere as oppressive like the British empire. In fact there is no empire in history of the world that is more ruthless than the British empire. The only ones that could have rivaled them were the nazis, but they didn't survive the decade.
    1
  8. ​ @cg8397 The kind of money she propabaly has she could afford better living standards than UK in India.
    1
  9. What about the caste system? Europe had an identical class system wasn't that diabolical too? The British passed laws on Indians to be on all fours when they meet a Brits. Was that diabolical too? Why the Americans kick the British out, ever heard those stories of what the Brits did to their own peasants?
    1
  10. ​ @TwiztedHumor Are you running a high fever man? The British destroyed India.
    1
  11. Yeah actually India was. Why else do you think the greedy British empire wanted it so much? Logic!!!
    1
  12.  @sidstewart7399  No empire was as greedy and ruthless as the British empire. Even if there was one. None damaged the world nearly as much. Why not talk? (BTW I didn't yet) Is the truth too bitter?
    1
  13.  @sidstewart7399  I don't believe... I know. How about you name me the worst empire in your opinion and we can compare it with the british empire. With solid numbers.
    1
  14.  @sidstewart7399  No it is not. You have no idea what they have done. Does Hamas have an empire? Doesn't qualify. The barabarism haa been equal to hamas if not more. There are solid numbers. Let me ask you some questions: do you know what percentage of tax the British imposed on Indians? What tariffs were imposed on Indian products in India? What were the punishments if failed to pay those taxes? Just look up.
    1
  15. She'll do pretty well here in India. Trust me. UK is falling
    1
  16.  @JamesHinks-v6k  He is sus
    1
  17. You realize that is a logical fallacy right? Lol Ever heard of the Jallianwalabagh? The Bengal Famines? The indigo revolution? SMH
    1
  18. ​ @Trebor74 Who said the British banned Sati? The brits have a habit of taking credit that doesn't belong to them. The British didn't care about Sati. Sati was banned by Indian reformers Ram Mohan Roy, Vidyasagar etc. The British were the ruling government and the petition to ban it was taken by them and with great reluctancy it was passed. The British didn't do on their own. Lol As for the Thugees they were a nuissance to the British traders. It was in their interest to take them out. It wasn't done with the goodness of their heart. Lol
    1
  19. Yes you are. As an Indian I would support you, but I already think it is too late.
    1
  20. Why? Is the modern UK represent the British empire? Last I checked modern Brits don't want to be held accountable for the attrocities that were done by the empire. So which one is it?
    1
  21. Thank you some sensible comment.
    1
  22.  @Acheron666  Conservatively 5 million Bengalis died due to British induced famines during WW2 alone. About 29 million due to famines during the entire 200 years of British regime. This is just famines, excluding the wars, revolutions during the time. So hundreds of millions globally isn't a stretch.
    1
  23.  @Acheron666  You know the caste system is banned in India right? Lol It is not part of the legal system in India.
    1
  24.  @Acheron666  Do you know what oppressive means? A practice that is banned can no longer be oppressive to the society. Racial discrimination is banned in the UK, but it happens there too. Oppressive country right? Lol Lastly, even caste system was far less dehumanizing than the British policies.
    1
  25.  @Acheron666  A billion across the globe in the time span of 2-3 centuries. Could be. It is noticeable too.
    1
  26.  @Acheron666  No I am a right wing Indian. While you are the synthetic softy brit who can't hold an argument much less face the truth.
    1
  27.  @Acheron666  No I am a right wing Indian. While u are the synthetic softy brit who can't hold an argument much less face the truth.
    1
  28.  @Acheron666  No I am a right wing Indian. While you are the snowflake brit who can't hold an argument much less face the truth.
    1
  29.  @Acheron666  No I am a right wing Indian. While you are the synthetic brit who can't hold an argument much less face the truth.
    1
  30.  @Acheron666  No I am a right-wing Indian. While you are the weak brit who can't hold an argument much less face the truth.
    1
  31.  @Acheron666  No I am a right-wing Indian. While you are the brit living in denial who can't hold an argument much less face the truth.
    1
  32.  @alexanderjames6328  Which country was colonized by the British and is successful now? Do you mean India? India was successful before the British came.
    1
  33.  @veronho1ness  🤣🤣🤣 I am laughing at the stupidity incase u were wondering.
    1
  34.  @veronho1ness  You think India is successful because of britain?😅😅😅 Most ridiculous shit I have heard all day. So if someone robs you, you'll become more successful? India is successful in spite to Britain. Do you think all the countries that British colonized are successful? Africa, middle easts successful? Where is the logic man? She is a muslim probably doesn't have a caste. It's funny you guys bringing up caste system to defend the British empire. Did the British abolish caste system? No. Were British policies more discriminatory than the caste system? 100% yes.
    1
  35. According to which survey? Survey made by the British? Lol That too it is 11 years old survey. Lol
    1
  36.  @veronho1ness  Oh! Really? There was no single nation? Then why was it called the East India company? Lol You realise British divided India right? Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and not unify? The 800 year old Mughal empire was collapsing when the British arrived. That is why they were able to colonize, because they arrived when an empire was collapsing. Also, India had stable 400-500 years old empires spanning most of India which even includes Afghainstan in the past under one banner. How many years has your Britain has been under one banner? Please remind me again. Lol To me 500-800 years under one banner is a successful nation. Last I checked UK broke upart a few decades ago, must be a very unsuccessful nation. 😅
    1
  37.  @veronho1ness  Did you even read what I wrote? Because if you did this question is seriously stupid. I just told you an 800 year old empire was collapsing when the British arrived. Read some history books. I am not teach history on a YT comment section. Lol
    1
  38. I thought she said she didn't like the empire. What has that got to do with UK?
    1
  39. No not really. 15-29 million died just in British made famines in India alone. So 100 million is not too far away.
    1
  40. Is hating the british colonial empire mean automatically hating the modern brits? What makes you think she hates the modern british?
    1
  41. Value of pound is higher may be that's why.
    1
  42. And what are the facts?😅
    1
  43. Because the currency is stronger. Once it drops people will leave.
    1
  44. It happened
    1
  45.  @GSD-hd1yh  Facts such as?
    1
  46.  @GSD-hd1yh  What? Indian famines were caused due to building of infrastructure?😅😅 India has the faster growing infrastructure in the world. Past 77 years zero famines. Lol Try more like the British were forcing farmers to grow non-food crops or over taxing them to debt so that people didn't have the money to buy food. Nothing to do with infrastructure. They build hospitals for themselves not for the locals, they didn't make Indians into doctors either. Twisting facts are basically lies.
    1
  47.  @GSD-hd1yh  Yeah it hit a nerve with people who actually know the truth.
    1
  48.  @denisefisher4264  All the things you said Britain did was only after WW2. After facing an evil similar to that they themselves were. Until then the attitude of the British were quite different. Also, she'll get similar freedom of speech in India too, may be more. Not sure what you meant by that.
    1
  49.  @denisefisher4264  Who told you that the British banned Sati? Lol Did you learn that in your British history books? The british couldn't care less about Sati.
    1
  50.  @denisefisher4264  Yeah because he is manipulating facts to look earn brownie point from the Brits, by saying only half the story. You can always fact check me. Here are the facts: The British were instructed not engage with local culture. The British did care about Sati practices. It was Indian reformers like Ram Mohan Roy who went with the petition to ban Sati and Vidyasagar who wanted to implement widow remarriage. They went to the government in power which was the British to pass these laws. The British passed those with great reluctancy. Now they want to take full credit for it. Lol Did you read these reformer's name? Did the 'Indian' historian mention their names? Why didn't he?
    1
  51.  @denisefisher4264  Yeah because he is manipulating facts to look earn brownie point from the Brits, by saying only half the story. You can always fact check me there is the internet. Here are the facts: The British were instructed not engage with local culture. The British did care about Sati practices. It was Indian reformers like Ram Mohan Roy who went with the petition to ban Sati and Vidyasagar who wanted to implement widow remarriage. They went to the government in power which was the British to pass these laws. The British passed those with great reluctancy. Now they want to take full credit for it. Lol
    1
  52.  @denisefisher4264  Yeah because he wants to earn brownie points from the Brits, by saying only half the story. Can always fact check me there is the internet. Here are the facts: The British were instructed to not engage with local culture. The British didn't care about Sati practices. It was Indian reformers like Ram Mohan Roy who went with the petition to ban Sati and Vidyasagar who wanted to implement widow-marriage. They went to the government in power which was the British to pass these laws. The British passed those with great reluctancy. Now they want to take full credit for it. Lol Why did the historian forget to mention their names?
    1
  53.  @denisefisher4264  Do you know why that happened? Because of the hasty partition made by the British. They cut cultures, land, people, their lives and displaced millions from their homes because they were in a hurry to leave. I don't admire her, she is disrespectful and not very well read on this, seems like she has some agenda, but there is a lot more truth to what she says than the shady fat historian for sure.
    1
  54.  @denisefisher4264  Do you know why that happened? Because of the hasty partition made by the British. They cut cultures, land, people, their lives and displaced millions from their homes because they were in a hurry to leave. I don't admire her, she is disrespectful and not very well read on this, sounds woke, but there is a lot more truth to what she says than the shady fat historian.
    1
  55.  @denisefisher4264  Do you know why that happened? Because of the hasty partition made by the British. They cut cultures, land, people, their lives and displaced millions from their homes because they were in a hurry to leave. I don't admire her, she is disrespectful and not very well read on this, seems like she has some agenda, but there is a lot more truth to what she says than the fat historian.
    1
  56.  @denisefisher4264  Do you know why that happened? Because of the hasty partition made by the British. They cut cultures, land, people, their lives and displaced millions from their homes because they were in a hurry to leave. I don't admire her, she is disrespectful and not very well read on this, seems like she has some agenda, but there is a lot more truth to what she says than the shady historian.
    1
  57.  @denisefisher4264  Do you know why that happened? Because of the hasty partition made by the British. They cut cultures, land, people, their lives and displaced millions from their homes because they were in a hurry to leave. I don't admire her, very disrespectful and not very well read on the topic, but there is a lot more truth to what she says than the shady fat historian.
    1
  58.  @denisefisher4264  Do you know why that happened? Because of the hasty partition made by the British. They cut cultures, land, people, their lives and displaced millions from their homes because they were in a hurry to leave. I don't admire her, very disrespectful and not very well read on the topic, but there is a lot more truth to what she says than the historian.
    1
  59.  @denisefisher4264  Do you know why that happened? It was because of the hasty partition made by the British. Severing cultures, land, people, their lives and displaced millions from their homes without proper consensus. I don't admire her, very disrespectful and not very well read on the topic, but there is a lot more truth to what she says than the sus historian.
    1
  60.  @denisefisher4264  I am simply pointing out the truth. Learn to accept it. I am not prejudiced. People in UK know nothing about their colonial past. None of the stories of attrocities made to the colonies ever reached mainland Britain. If you did know you wouldn't be so proud. We understand that todays brits even most brits back in the day had nothing to do with their colonial past. It was a handful people who ran the show and made money. But this is the age of information. Nothing stays hidden. Either you learn up and change mindset or stay in the dark, but people are going to speak. The Germans never say they are proud of the nazis. British colonialism was equivalent.
    1
  61.  @denisefisher4264  What do you mean by my truth? My grandparents lived through the british attrocities. It's like saying the Jews are prejudiced against antisemitism. I can give you verifiable evidence of what happened and what didn't. Let me ask you two questions: Do you really think the British empire made India better, was beneficial for Indians? Why so?
    1
  62.  @bunnychowmuncher  India had business with Europe long before the British even existed. Lol British cut/desrroyed all business with Europe and India. History knowledge is so poor. There was no outsourcing happening in India by the British. Everything happened after the British left. The values given to India by the British goes to negative not even zero. Lol Also, caste system seems to be the only argument brits have to defend their evil empire. Well England practiced the equivalent class system during the same period.
    1
  63.  @dianeunderhill8506  What?!! This guy commenting isn't Indian. Lol
    1
  64. @dianeunderhill8506  Part Indian means nothing. Lol Everyone is part Indian. Probably you are too. Get a DNA test. No his relatives in India never said it. Even he didn't say that. Lol Lastly, I know that everyone has the rights to speak. As an Indian I know that. We fought for that right from the British empire, also I too have the rights to call BS on him. Lol
    1
  65. @dianeunderhill8506  No he didn't. Lol He is just lying. Just because the Indians and Pakistanis went to England... Well of course life in UK was better. Poverty rate in India after Brits left was 98% now it is only 2% Also what percentage of Indians do you think go to the UK? One percent? You think the British gave us railways?😅 The railways were the biggest scam. They costed 4 times more than that of the US. Only made for extracting goods out of India. Who paid the price for this railways the poverty s
    1
  66. @dianeunderhill8506  No he doesn't. Lol He is just lying clearly. What percent of Indians go to UK? Less than one percent? So many wrong things you have mentioned here. Let me address a few... Well of course life in Britain would be better. After Brits left India had 98% poverty rate and now it is 2% You seriously think the Brits gave us railways?😅 The railway system in India is because of the British🤦 It was their biggest scam. It costed 4 times that of the price in the US, per mile. It was only build to extract goods out of India to Britian. India had to rebuild everything to suit it's public. This shows the lack of knowledge u people have. Again the British never stopped Sati, it was done by Indian reformers. British couldn't care less. They were instructed to not engage with the local customs. Indian reformers went to the British since they were the ruling power and convinced them to implement it. It is not the samething as British abolishing Sati. Education? Did u just say education? SMH Please go and check the literacy rate of India when the Brits left. It was only 15-18%. Now it is 70% Similar things I can say about infrastructure and building. Also buildings seriously? Haven't your heard about the Taj Mahal? Ever seen ancient Indian temples and monuments. Do you think we Indians needed Brits to teach us how to build? This is riddiculous. SMH If Germany won ww2 we would be all speaking German. So I don't see the logic of British giving us English language. Nothing great about this language either. The Grammer is a nightmare. India is not part of the common wealth. As for cricket, it became famous because Indians, africans wanted to prove themselves to the British by defeating them in their own game. It is is the psychology behind cricket😁 The British weren't bad they were horrible. Nearly as bad as the WW2 Germany. Killed over 30 millions in India alone.
    1
  67.  @dianeunderhill8506  Also I never get this funny logic of the Brits. Please explain it to me. I as an Indian have democracy, freespeech, infrastructure, space tech some how because of the British, but how come people in Sudan, Afghanistan, Syria etc. don't weren't they under the British as well. So because India became successful nation the credit goes to the British, but for the ones that are not successful the British won't be credited for their failure? Why?😅😅 I just can't get over this hypocrisy. Too funny
    1
  68.  @dianeunderhill8506  So where are the natives of Australia? Canada, New Zealand and USA? They barely exist. Just white people do. You can't compare them with India where Indians are thriving. Which african country? Kenya? Sudan? Nigeria? Lol 99% of what the British did were negative. There isn't much positive to talk about. YT deleted my previous comment where I said Sati wasn't banned by the British it was banned by Indian reformists who asked the British to implement the law. Similarly the railways costed 4 times the price of American railways per mile. Modern Indian railways has nothing to do with British railways. Do some research. As for why India fought in WW2 and WW1... It is very clearly mentioned in history that. The British said they'll quit India if India helped in the war. That was the only reason. Not sure what kind of colonial history they teach in England. Lol
    1
  69.  @dianeunderhill8506  Would haves and could have is all you have for logic. Lol If Germany would have won WW2 they too would have justified for their actions exactly like you are doing. Stop making excuses. Kenya and Nigeria are doing alright? Then why are British politicians banning immigrants from these countries. Lol The British didn't go build empire to civilize people, they did it to steal, kill and in some cases wipe out entirely and they succeeded. Learn to call a spade a spade and stop making excuses. India is advancing not because of the British, but of our own hard work and identity. You think Chinese labour made US railways cheap?😅 Serious lack of knowledge. Why didn't the British use some in India then? China is our neighbors. Lol Cost is relevant because the railways were build to make the British richer, it was a scheme to over tax Indians to build railways in our own country at Indian public risk. Indian railways is much better than UK railways, it connects 1.5 billion Indians and completely electrified and safer than railways of Europe. What British equipment are we using exactly in the railways? No Churchill himself never wanted to give India up, please go and check. There are no untouchables in India, it only exists in Western media. Lol Stop lecturing about pollution while u guys export them. India China has to make things for you to keep ur country clean. Also let's compare pollution per capita/per person. The British empire was evil, there is no doubt in that.
    1
  70. @dianeunderhill8506  Would haves and could have is all you have for logic. Lol If Germany would have won WW2 they too would have justified for their actions exactly like you are doing. Stop making excuses. The British didn't go build empire to civilize people, they did it to steal and in some cases wipe out entire civilization and they succeeded. Learn to call a spade a spade and stop making excuses. India is advancing not because of the British, but of our own hard work and identity. You think Chinese labour made US railways cheap?😅 Serious lack of knowledge. Why didn't the British use some in India then? China is our neighbors. Lol Cost is relevant because the railways were build to make the British richer, it was a scheme to over tax Indians to build railways in our own country at Indian public risk. Indian railways is much better than UK railways, it connects 1.5 billion Indians and completely electrified and safer than railways of Europe. What British equipment are we using exactly in the railways? No Churchill himself never wanted to give India up, please go and check. There are no untouchables in India, it only exists in Western media. Lol Stop lecturing about pollution while u guys export them. India China has to make things for you to keep ur country clean. Also let's compare pollution per capita/per person..
    1
  71.  @dianeunderhill8506  That is what brainwashed people do they stand by their lies. Everything I said is lot more sensible than the nonsense you've been saying.
    1
  72. @dianeunderhill8506  First of all you started your foolish chatter and moaning. Halfwit... I didn't. Every single thing you typed here was wrong. I didn't even have the time to engage all of them. When you start saying foolish things learn to take the reply. I am not dying to have a conversation with you.
    1
  73. May be, but less evil than the empire
    1
  74. Then why do you get angry when she bad mouths the empire. You are not the empire and not responsible. Right?
    1
  75. What did Indians do? Pray tell.
    1
  76.  @joygibbons5482  This I agree.
    1
  77. Is she hating the British people though or the empire? Couldn't tell from the video
    1
  78. She is against the empire not the brits. Or do you think there are the same?🤔
    1
  79. Yeah actually that is about right.
    1
  80.  @annlord928  The historian is empty too.
    1
  81. Yeah but genocide did happen by the British in India. The French too colonized parts of India, but there were no genocide there. So colonialism isn't genocide, but the British did commit. Acknowledge things that happened.
    1
  82.  @vatsal7640  India's gdp wasn't because of population, but industries. May be read some history books.
    1
  83.  @Chalto  What technological advancements?
    1
  84. ​ @tonycaniggia Her hatred towards who? The empire or the people?
    1
  85. Fact check first. India doesn't take any foreign aid from anyone.
    1
  86. ​ @ianarmstrong9594 India doesn't take foreign aid from UK. Lol
    1
  87. ​ @hvidhavn1 What??😅😅
    1
  88.  @francissmallshaw5318  That historian is very sus. Lol
    1
  89.  @andrewdaley5480  India doesn't take aid from the UK. Fake News alert.
    1
  90. What do you think it did?
    1
  91. What's so funny? She'll live quite well in India. More wealthier life than in the UK. It is more affordable.
    1
  92.  @Julia56401  You mean greater scammers than the British empire?
    1
  93.  @Julia56401  Do you mean greater than the British empire? Lol
    1
  94.  @Julia56401  Are you sure it's not a self reflection?
    1
  95.  @Julia56401  Last I checked you are the one tried to troll and failed. I know the facts better than you do. My ancestors lived it. Can't believe the audacity of the british. SMH
    1
  96.  @Julia56401  I am more educate that you are. Lol And I caught you trolling first.
    1
  97.  @Julia56401  He is not an Indian historian. Real Indian historians would have him for breakfast in a debate. The guy is sus on good day. This guy probably never visited India. They got a nobody to debate with him. Go read a book. Study real history not the sugarcoated version in your schools. You like his 'facts' because they make you feel good. The British empire was the worst thing after Nazi Germany. Now that's a fact.
    1
  98.  @Julia56401  He is not an Indian historian. Real Indian historians would have him for breakfast in a debate. The guy is sus on good day. This guy probably never visited India. They got a nobody to debate with him. Go read a book. Study real history not the sugarcoated version in your schools. You like his 'facts' because they make u feel good.
    1
  99.  @Julia56401  May be do a research. The dudes a Kenian and not Indian. He was born in Kenya. His bio says historian, author, commentator. Anybody can claim to be historian these days. The guy has never been to India. Lol He is half Sikh that's all. There is nothing Indian about him. I am not sure you are capable of debating with me or anybody.
    1
  100.  @Julia56401  Again self reflection. I am talking with facts while you are with personal attacks. Grow up.
    1
  101. Actually people will. UK is collapsing
    1
  102. Does hating the British empire equal to hating the British? Think twice before answering
    1
  103. She would be happy, but may she wants to make more money before she leaves.
    1
  104.  @MillywiggZ  So the Holocaust wasn't a genocide, because there are Jews left to talk about it? RIP logic.
    1
  105.  @jamesafb4887  More were killed in India by the British than the Holocaust.
    1
  106.  @jamesafb4887  About 30 million people killed in India by the British.
    1
  107.  @tonyk6153  Aren't those clothes made in China or Bangladesh?
    1
  108.  @tonyk6153  What did India steal?
    1
  109.  @clivemitchell4316  That is what we call them in India. Britishers That's ther term we use.
    1
  110.  @tonyk6153  May be it is being flagged as misinfo.
    1
  111.  @tonyk6153  Well I can't judge if it doesn't show. Lol
    1
  112. ​ @MrMr-ws3tv Because you let them in😅
    1
  113.  @tonyk6153  Firstly, TikTok is banned in India so don't lecture me on it. Never used that app. Also I am not gen z I know more history than you do. How did India get their land? How about you tell me history buff. I repeat no empire was as ruthless as inhuman as the British empire. The only ones that could have rivaled them were the nazis. No other empire had the technology or means to be as ruthless. British empire fought against slavery😅😅 Now that is something one might find on tiktok. Lol People fought against slavery, good people not the empire. The empire lost their property. Compensations were demanded and paid to calm them down. Read real history. Come back when you are done.
    1
  114.  @tonyk6153  Firstly, tiktok is banned in India so don't lecture me on it. Never used that thing. Also I am not gen z I know more history than you do. How did India get their land? How about you tell me history buff. I repeat no empire was as ruthless as inhuman as the British empire. The only ones that could have rivaled them were the nazis. No other empire had the technology or means to be as ruthless. British empire fought against slavery😅😅 Now that is something one might find on tiktok. Lol People fought against slavery, good people not the empire. The empire lost their property. Compensations were demanded and paid to calm them down.
    1
  115.  @azillliasmith2734  That is what we call those colonizers. It's not racist to be racist with other racists😉
    1
  116.  @azillliasmith2734  What has banning tiktok got to do with democracy? Explain
    1
  117.  @azillliasmith2734  No Hindus started defeating muslims long before the Brits arrived the Mughal empire was disintegrating already. That is why the Britishers were able to take over.
    1
  118.  @tonyk6153  Fought against whom? Themselves? Lol Which year?
    1
  119.  @tonyk6153  Tell me which year did they abolish slavery.
    1
  120.  @tonyk6153  You keep repeating the same thing. I asked you which year was it abolished by the British empire according to you. How old are you? Just answer that then I can move forward to the next point.
    1
  121.  @tonyk6153  Sounds like you don't know much. Are you going to answer my question? Lol Which year was it abolished? I have already made my point earlier. The British empire didn't abolish it.
    1
  122.  @vatsal7640  Exactly, that is the answer. That is what I was looking for. Good that you said it. Now here is my point: The keyword is the British abolished it. Not the British empire. They are different. It took another 24 years to abolish it from the colonies so clearly the empire wanted its slaves. That is exactly what I said in my earlier comments. The British empire didn't abolish slavery, good, honest British people did. Also I am an Indian nationalist and proud to be one.
    1
  123.  @tonyk6153  The amount of caste system in modern India is equivalent to racism in the UK. Let's put it that way. Lol I walk around never noticed caste based discrimination ever. Hear it in News debates sometimes, but the way you make it sound like it all that there is. Also, how is that an excuse for what the British empire did to Indians?
    1
  124.  @tonyk6153  Ok have you seen it? Name one incident of caste based discrimination in India. Also, hundreds of years ago? It's only been 75 years. Lol My grandparents were alive back then. Similiar timeline to the WW2. Wake up. Start making more sense. The effects of the evil empire are still plaguing India.
    1
  125.  @tonyk6153  British rule of India ended in 1947. You didn't know that? Are you serious?😅 Do you think only the son a minister gets to become a minister without election in India? Or a son of a scientist automatically inherits his post? Or the son of a doctor becomes a doctor, the same with soldiers? Are you serious?😅 We eradicated caste system when we became a democracy. Hope that answers your question.
    1
  126.  @tonyk6153  Not sure what I have to make up my mind about? Colonization is also a form of slavery, it didn't end till 1947. I think you are very confused about history. Do you know millions of Indian soldiers fought for the British in both world wars? Why would Indians fight an European war if we weren't forced by the empire to do so? Clearly Brits learn nothing about their colonizing history in schools.Only learn about caste system, rail roads and sati. That too only half the story. It is for people like me to teach them on YT comment section. Please find a good book and read. Learn the other perspective. The kind of colonial history you know is like knowing the history of ww2 from germany's perspective. If u want I can suggest some names.
    1
  127.  @vatsal7640  Did you know slave owners of the empire were given compensations for giving up their slaves? So if they fought against slavery why would they demand compensation? Makes it make sense before calling me a bigot. Also, last I checked speaking the bitter truth isn't being a bigot.
    1
  128.  @vatsal7640  Thanks for the self-contradiction. Lol The slave owners were memebers of the British empire/East India company whatever name they went by. So the statement that the British empire fought for anti-slavery is false. Majority of members of the empire were pro-slavery. Like you said yourself if they weren't compensated they would have been continuing the slave trade. It was different British people with conscience who were against the slave trade. I rest my case.
    1
  129.  @vatsal7640  Did you read my first comment? I have been saying from the beginning that the British did abolish slavery, the empire didn't. As a matter of fact there were Americans who opposed the abolishment of slavery same with the British. The people of the empire were pro-slavery. Nothing to laugh here it is true. Go and do a research.
    1
  130.  @tonyk6153  The empire belonged to private enterprises. Like the east India company. You mean the people were part of it? Your people benefitted from it. Ok suit yourselves, so all the British must be held accountable for the horrors done by the empire. Why are u crying when she is calling out the British in the video? Lol It was an evil empire take accountability. The bogey man left 75 years ago. When they left India had 90%+ poverty rate below 12% literacy rate. That's how a bang up job the British empire did in India. Now the literacy rate in India is 74% and poverty rate is below 3% on much much larger population. This is what is happening under my NOSE. Have some self-respect please before commenting.
    1
  131.  @tonyk6153  If you don't want to take accountability then stop defending the empire... Can't have it both ways. During that perior my ancestors were boiling tree barks, mango leaves to survive the Bengal famines, because Churchill decided to hoard all the grains from Bengal, Orissa for the war. Killing conservatively 5 million people. The five times the number of Jews killed by Hitler. Feeling the pride yet?
    1
  132.  @tonyk6153  Who is asking to pay retribution? Nobody pays any retribution. But now that you are emphasizing that the British people and the British empire are the same then may be we should ask for reparations.
    1
  133.  @tonyk6153  I am still saying the British people did. The empire were waelthy elites of Britain who didn't want to give up slaves. You are the one saying empire and people are the same. So by that logic the people should pay reparations.
    1
  134.  @tonyk6153  The empire owns the navy? Not your government?
    1
  135.  @tonyk6153  Oh! I am racist. Do you know what the word means? So when the British empire wrote in places of India Dogs and Indians not allowed. They were represting the British people or the empire? Ever read what Churchill said about Indians? I doubt I can write that on YT. So that is the British people too right? But I am the one who is racist. Lol
    1
  136.  @tonyk6153  There is nothing to admit. Show me what action or sentence of mine shows racist behavior. If you can't then stop using meaningless buzz words to distract others from the argument.
    1
  137.  @tonyk6153  According to your own logic. You and every british person is racist, because the British empire was racist and they represent the british people. How about that?
    1
  138.  @tonyk6153  Firstly That was a rhetorical. Secondly I said that after you called me a racist. Please stop this conversation if u r going to use dishonesty as ur argument.
    1
  139.  @tonyk6153  Alright! Ottoman empire, Mongol empires were called barbaric. So why are the Brits complaining when we call the British empire barbaric? After all they acted as all other empires did right? Lol Self-distruction😅 The British empire puts the Romans and the Mongol empire to shame in ruthlessness and inhumanity. Do you think India is the fastest growing major economy, one of most flourishing countries in the world by treating people like in the middle ages? If so then the whole world should start doing it. Lol My culture is the father of ur culture, whatever little culture anglo-saxon vikings developed came from the Greeks and the Romans, both of which shared values and cultures with mine.
    1
  140.  @tonyk6153  Irrelevant. I said it after you already had accused me of being a racist.
    1
  141.  @tonyk6153  Are you for real? Millions of people trapped in poverty in India? Nobody is trapped in poverty here. Where are you getting this information from? Spit it out! Where did you hear this nonsense? India is the largest democracy a better democracy than the UK and runs via capitalism just like the UK. Are people in the UK trapped under poverty? Then why should anyone in India would be? Where is the logic? We are singling out the British because it is the single worst empire. India was colonized by the French, the Portuguese the Mughals, but none were as bad as the british empire. If you had the basic honesty you'd ask me why? But guess too afraid to face the truth.
    1
  142.  @tonyk6153  May be they were detected for disinformation.
    1
  143.  @alexanderjames6328  None did is worse and as ruthlessly than the British. The only ones that could have matched the British were the Nazis, but they lost in a decades time.
    1
  144.  @tonyk6153  Huh?
    1
  145. India is not racist not anymore than the UK. Where did you get that from?
    1