Comments by "DireWolf" (@direwolf7491) on "The Alternative View" channel.

  1.  @denisefisher4264  Yeah because he is manipulating facts to look earn brownie point from the Brits, by saying only half the story. You can always fact check me there is the internet. Here are the facts: The British were instructed not engage with local culture. The British did care about Sati practices. It was Indian reformers like Ram Mohan Roy who went with the petition to ban Sati and Vidyasagar who wanted to implement widow remarriage. They went to the government in power which was the British to pass these laws. The British passed those with great reluctancy. Now they want to take full credit for it. Lol
    1
  2.  @denisefisher4264  Yeah because he wants to earn brownie points from the Brits, by saying only half the story. Can always fact check me there is the internet. Here are the facts: The British were instructed to not engage with local culture. The British didn't care about Sati practices. It was Indian reformers like Ram Mohan Roy who went with the petition to ban Sati and Vidyasagar who wanted to implement widow-marriage. They went to the government in power which was the British to pass these laws. The British passed those with great reluctancy. Now they want to take full credit for it. Lol Why did the historian forget to mention their names?
    1
  3.  @denisefisher4264  Do you know why that happened? Because of the hasty partition made by the British. They cut cultures, land, people, their lives and displaced millions from their homes because they were in a hurry to leave. I don't admire her, she is disrespectful and not very well read on this, seems like she has some agenda, but there is a lot more truth to what she says than the shady fat historian for sure.
    1
  4.  @denisefisher4264  Do you know why that happened? Because of the hasty partition made by the British. They cut cultures, land, people, their lives and displaced millions from their homes because they were in a hurry to leave. I don't admire her, she is disrespectful and not very well read on this, sounds woke, but there is a lot more truth to what she says than the shady fat historian.
    1
  5.  @denisefisher4264  Do you know why that happened? Because of the hasty partition made by the British. They cut cultures, land, people, their lives and displaced millions from their homes because they were in a hurry to leave. I don't admire her, she is disrespectful and not very well read on this, seems like she has some agenda, but there is a lot more truth to what she says than the fat historian.
    1
  6.  @denisefisher4264  Do you know why that happened? Because of the hasty partition made by the British. They cut cultures, land, people, their lives and displaced millions from their homes because they were in a hurry to leave. I don't admire her, she is disrespectful and not very well read on this, seems like she has some agenda, but there is a lot more truth to what she says than the shady historian.
    1
  7.  @denisefisher4264  Do you know why that happened? Because of the hasty partition made by the British. They cut cultures, land, people, their lives and displaced millions from their homes because they were in a hurry to leave. I don't admire her, very disrespectful and not very well read on the topic, but there is a lot more truth to what she says than the shady fat historian.
    1
  8.  @denisefisher4264  Do you know why that happened? Because of the hasty partition made by the British. They cut cultures, land, people, their lives and displaced millions from their homes because they were in a hurry to leave. I don't admire her, very disrespectful and not very well read on the topic, but there is a lot more truth to what she says than the historian.
    1
  9.  @denisefisher4264  Do you know why that happened? It was because of the hasty partition made by the British. Severing cultures, land, people, their lives and displaced millions from their homes without proper consensus. I don't admire her, very disrespectful and not very well read on the topic, but there is a lot more truth to what she says than the sus historian.
    1
  10.  @denisefisher4264  I am simply pointing out the truth. Learn to accept it. I am not prejudiced. People in UK know nothing about their colonial past. None of the stories of attrocities made to the colonies ever reached mainland Britain. If you did know you wouldn't be so proud. We understand that todays brits even most brits back in the day had nothing to do with their colonial past. It was a handful people who ran the show and made money. But this is the age of information. Nothing stays hidden. Either you learn up and change mindset or stay in the dark, but people are going to speak. The Germans never say they are proud of the nazis. British colonialism was equivalent.
    1
  11.  @denisefisher4264  What do you mean by my truth? My grandparents lived through the british attrocities. It's like saying the Jews are prejudiced against antisemitism. I can give you verifiable evidence of what happened and what didn't. Let me ask you two questions: Do you really think the British empire made India better, was beneficial for Indians? Why so?
    1
  12.  @bunnychowmuncher  India had business with Europe long before the British even existed. Lol British cut/desrroyed all business with Europe and India. History knowledge is so poor. There was no outsourcing happening in India by the British. Everything happened after the British left. The values given to India by the British goes to negative not even zero. Lol Also, caste system seems to be the only argument brits have to defend their evil empire. Well England practiced the equivalent class system during the same period.
    1
  13.  @dianeunderhill8506  What?!! This guy commenting isn't Indian. Lol
    1
  14. @dianeunderhill8506  Part Indian means nothing. Lol Everyone is part Indian. Probably you are too. Get a DNA test. No his relatives in India never said it. Even he didn't say that. Lol Lastly, I know that everyone has the rights to speak. As an Indian I know that. We fought for that right from the British empire, also I too have the rights to call BS on him. Lol
    1
  15. @dianeunderhill8506  No he didn't. Lol He is just lying. Just because the Indians and Pakistanis went to England... Well of course life in UK was better. Poverty rate in India after Brits left was 98% now it is only 2% Also what percentage of Indians do you think go to the UK? One percent? You think the British gave us railways?😅 The railways were the biggest scam. They costed 4 times more than that of the US. Only made for extracting goods out of India. Who paid the price for this railways the poverty s
    1
  16. @dianeunderhill8506  No he doesn't. Lol He is just lying clearly. What percent of Indians go to UK? Less than one percent? So many wrong things you have mentioned here. Let me address a few... Well of course life in Britain would be better. After Brits left India had 98% poverty rate and now it is 2% You seriously think the Brits gave us railways?😅 The railway system in India is because of the British🤦 It was their biggest scam. It costed 4 times that of the price in the US, per mile. It was only build to extract goods out of India to Britian. India had to rebuild everything to suit it's public. This shows the lack of knowledge u people have. Again the British never stopped Sati, it was done by Indian reformers. British couldn't care less. They were instructed to not engage with the local customs. Indian reformers went to the British since they were the ruling power and convinced them to implement it. It is not the samething as British abolishing Sati. Education? Did u just say education? SMH Please go and check the literacy rate of India when the Brits left. It was only 15-18%. Now it is 70% Similar things I can say about infrastructure and building. Also buildings seriously? Haven't your heard about the Taj Mahal? Ever seen ancient Indian temples and monuments. Do you think we Indians needed Brits to teach us how to build? This is riddiculous. SMH If Germany won ww2 we would be all speaking German. So I don't see the logic of British giving us English language. Nothing great about this language either. The Grammer is a nightmare. India is not part of the common wealth. As for cricket, it became famous because Indians, africans wanted to prove themselves to the British by defeating them in their own game. It is is the psychology behind cricket😁 The British weren't bad they were horrible. Nearly as bad as the WW2 Germany. Killed over 30 millions in India alone.
    1
  17.  @dianeunderhill8506  Also I never get this funny logic of the Brits. Please explain it to me. I as an Indian have democracy, freespeech, infrastructure, space tech some how because of the British, but how come people in Sudan, Afghanistan, Syria etc. don't weren't they under the British as well. So because India became successful nation the credit goes to the British, but for the ones that are not successful the British won't be credited for their failure? Why?😅😅 I just can't get over this hypocrisy. Too funny
    1
  18.  @dianeunderhill8506  So where are the natives of Australia? Canada, New Zealand and USA? They barely exist. Just white people do. You can't compare them with India where Indians are thriving. Which african country? Kenya? Sudan? Nigeria? Lol 99% of what the British did were negative. There isn't much positive to talk about. YT deleted my previous comment where I said Sati wasn't banned by the British it was banned by Indian reformists who asked the British to implement the law. Similarly the railways costed 4 times the price of American railways per mile. Modern Indian railways has nothing to do with British railways. Do some research. As for why India fought in WW2 and WW1... It is very clearly mentioned in history that. The British said they'll quit India if India helped in the war. That was the only reason. Not sure what kind of colonial history they teach in England. Lol
    1
  19.  @dianeunderhill8506  Would haves and could have is all you have for logic. Lol If Germany would have won WW2 they too would have justified for their actions exactly like you are doing. Stop making excuses. Kenya and Nigeria are doing alright? Then why are British politicians banning immigrants from these countries. Lol The British didn't go build empire to civilize people, they did it to steal, kill and in some cases wipe out entirely and they succeeded. Learn to call a spade a spade and stop making excuses. India is advancing not because of the British, but of our own hard work and identity. You think Chinese labour made US railways cheap?😅 Serious lack of knowledge. Why didn't the British use some in India then? China is our neighbors. Lol Cost is relevant because the railways were build to make the British richer, it was a scheme to over tax Indians to build railways in our own country at Indian public risk. Indian railways is much better than UK railways, it connects 1.5 billion Indians and completely electrified and safer than railways of Europe. What British equipment are we using exactly in the railways? No Churchill himself never wanted to give India up, please go and check. There are no untouchables in India, it only exists in Western media. Lol Stop lecturing about pollution while u guys export them. India China has to make things for you to keep ur country clean. Also let's compare pollution per capita/per person. The British empire was evil, there is no doubt in that.
    1
  20. @dianeunderhill8506  Would haves and could have is all you have for logic. Lol If Germany would have won WW2 they too would have justified for their actions exactly like you are doing. Stop making excuses. The British didn't go build empire to civilize people, they did it to steal and in some cases wipe out entire civilization and they succeeded. Learn to call a spade a spade and stop making excuses. India is advancing not because of the British, but of our own hard work and identity. You think Chinese labour made US railways cheap?😅 Serious lack of knowledge. Why didn't the British use some in India then? China is our neighbors. Lol Cost is relevant because the railways were build to make the British richer, it was a scheme to over tax Indians to build railways in our own country at Indian public risk. Indian railways is much better than UK railways, it connects 1.5 billion Indians and completely electrified and safer than railways of Europe. What British equipment are we using exactly in the railways? No Churchill himself never wanted to give India up, please go and check. There are no untouchables in India, it only exists in Western media. Lol Stop lecturing about pollution while u guys export them. India China has to make things for you to keep ur country clean. Also let's compare pollution per capita/per person..
    1
  21.  @dianeunderhill8506  That is what brainwashed people do they stand by their lies. Everything I said is lot more sensible than the nonsense you've been saying.
    1
  22. @dianeunderhill8506  First of all you started your foolish chatter and moaning. Halfwit... I didn't. Every single thing you typed here was wrong. I didn't even have the time to engage all of them. When you start saying foolish things learn to take the reply. I am not dying to have a conversation with you.
    1
  23. May be, but less evil than the empire
    1
  24. Then why do you get angry when she bad mouths the empire. You are not the empire and not responsible. Right?
    1
  25. What did Indians do? Pray tell.
    1
  26.  @joygibbons5482  This I agree.
    1
  27. Is she hating the British people though or the empire? Couldn't tell from the video
    1
  28. She is against the empire not the brits. Or do you think there are the same?🤔
    1
  29. Yeah actually that is about right.
    1
  30.  @annlord928  The historian is empty too.
    1
  31. Yeah but genocide did happen by the British in India. The French too colonized parts of India, but there were no genocide there. So colonialism isn't genocide, but the British did commit. Acknowledge things that happened.
    1
  32.  @vatsal7640  India's gdp wasn't because of population, but industries. May be read some history books.
    1
  33.  @Chalto  What technological advancements?
    1
  34. ​ @tonycaniggia Her hatred towards who? The empire or the people?
    1
  35. Fact check first. India doesn't take any foreign aid from anyone.
    1
  36. ​ @ianarmstrong9594 India doesn't take foreign aid from UK. Lol
    1
  37. ​ @hvidhavn1 What??😅😅
    1
  38.  @francissmallshaw5318  That historian is very sus. Lol
    1
  39.  @andrewdaley5480  India doesn't take aid from the UK. Fake News alert.
    1
  40. What do you think it did?
    1
  41. What's so funny? She'll live quite well in India. More wealthier life than in the UK. It is more affordable.
    1
  42.  @Julia56401  You mean greater scammers than the British empire?
    1
  43.  @Julia56401  Do you mean greater than the British empire? Lol
    1
  44.  @Julia56401  Are you sure it's not a self reflection?
    1
  45.  @Julia56401  Last I checked you are the one tried to troll and failed. I know the facts better than you do. My ancestors lived it. Can't believe the audacity of the british. SMH
    1
  46.  @Julia56401  I am more educate that you are. Lol And I caught you trolling first.
    1
  47.  @Julia56401  He is not an Indian historian. Real Indian historians would have him for breakfast in a debate. The guy is sus on good day. This guy probably never visited India. They got a nobody to debate with him. Go read a book. Study real history not the sugarcoated version in your schools. You like his 'facts' because they make you feel good. The British empire was the worst thing after Nazi Germany. Now that's a fact.
    1
  48.  @Julia56401  He is not an Indian historian. Real Indian historians would have him for breakfast in a debate. The guy is sus on good day. This guy probably never visited India. They got a nobody to debate with him. Go read a book. Study real history not the sugarcoated version in your schools. You like his 'facts' because they make u feel good.
    1
  49.  @Julia56401  May be do a research. The dudes a Kenian and not Indian. He was born in Kenya. His bio says historian, author, commentator. Anybody can claim to be historian these days. The guy has never been to India. Lol He is half Sikh that's all. There is nothing Indian about him. I am not sure you are capable of debating with me or anybody.
    1
  50.  @Julia56401  Again self reflection. I am talking with facts while you are with personal attacks. Grow up.
    1