Comments by "DireWolf" (@direwolf7491) on "UK PM 'regrets' Jallianwala Bagh massacre: 'Shameful scar in our history'" video.

  1. If the British are truely for justice and appology, they must remove the graves of Michael O'Dwyer and the people involved in Jaliyan walabagh. Those criminals don't deserve a proper burial.
    52
  2. If the British were truely for justice they must remove the graves of Michael O'Dwyer and the people involved in Jaliyan walabagh. Those criminals don't deserve a proper burial.
    43
  3. If the British are truely for justice and appology, they must remove the graves of Michael O'Dwyer and the people involved in Jaliyan walabagh. Those criminals don't deserve a proper burial.
    33
  4. If the British are truely for justice and appology, they must remove the graves of Michael O'Dwyer and the people involved in Jaliyan walabagh. Those criminals don't deserve a proper burial.
    16
  5. If the British are truely for justice and appology, they must remove the graves of Michael O'Dwyer and the people involved in Jaliyan walabagh. Those criminals don't deserve a proper burial.
    1
  6.  @x66Hawk66x  Indians are cremated😂😂🤡
    1
  7.  @x66Hawk66x  Nobody keeps record of that. 🤡 But the British continue to hail Michael O'Dwyer see the difference??
    1
  8.  @x66Hawk66x  Which assertion is baseless? Why do you feel the need to defend O'Dwyer here? And where did I blame any modern British in my original comment? An appology is a jesture of acknowledgement of the terrible past here, that is all it means now. So if you want to do it... It must be done properly. That is all I am saying. Clearly my comment hit your colonial nerve somewhere. As for the Germans... The German Chancellor Willy Brandt did kneel and pay respects at the Warsaw ghetto in 1970. The British leaders until today, never paid a visit or paid respect to the Jaliyan Walabagh memorial. Never got a formal appology for Jaliyanwala bagh... Again there is a big difference. Come back when you have learnt the facts.
    1
  9.  @x66Hawk66x  Ok where did I claim/said Number 1, 2, 3? Are you assuming it? Because I didn't say it. You can read my comments. I said if you want to appologize do it sincerely. Just getting an MP to say it in the parliament to get votes from the Sikh community isn't enough. Don't give O'Dwyer a proper burial. Treat him as a criminal. And why do you have problem with that? You got triggered out of the blue, because I said that clearly I hit a nerve... I am just assuming it is the colonial one😄 Number 6: Neither do I care if Willy Brandt kneeled or not. You are the one who compared the situation with Germany, so I just told you something Germany has done but your government hasn't. There was a survey done on British public which showed that majority(I think 70%) of British citizens believe that their colonial history was something to be proud of and was a force for good. I too didn't want to believe that modern British have a colonial mindset, but seeing guys like you getting triggered(you are not the first one) is changing my perspective.
    1
  10.  @x66Hawk66x  His full name is Sir Michael Francis O'Dwyer. Remind me again what does the title Sir stand for? It still says that on his tombstone. The revolutionary who assassinated him was labelled a teππoπist, got death penalty and Michael O'Dwyer was hailed. You think I don't stand by my argument? Lol Also it is funny that the comment vanished it should be there. The poll was done by YouGov in the year 2020 and I was wrong 43-44% of British and not 70% were proud of British colonial history.
    1
  11.  @x66Hawk66x  Now your comment regarding the points you made has disappeared.😅 Anyway, I am not sure what you mean by: "...because that's a response to an argument that was not even presented..." This is the whole argument. My very first statement was remove his burial he does deserve a proper burial when he deniel hundreds of people including children and women proper funeral rites. Him being knighted is hailing him, his burial site is giving him way too much respect he doesn't deserve. I am still not sure why did you got triggered. How about you explain your response to my first comment. TBH it's 75% years there are way too many things to appologize for Bengal Famines, Indigo Revolution, Partitions. Even today your government tries to interfere in India's internal issues, be it the farmer's protest, CAA bill, Kashmir. What makes them think they can do that? If it's not the colonial mindset I don't know what is.
    1
  12.  @x66Hawk66x  Let me know when the Brits are educated on what he did. 75 years have past already, clearly your leadership had no remorse until now. And me saying the Brits continue to hail him was a rebuttal to your statement regarding the Indian soldiers who carried out that deed. We don't even remember them, have no memory of them, but O'Dwyer does. I think I have made my point plenty clear. You unable to process your emotion and getting triggered regarding the matter suggest signs of colonial mindset.
    1
  13.  @x66Hawk66x  I don't care if you think it is cheap or crap rebuttal. Michael O'Dwyer may not be a hero today, but was given titles and respects which have not been stripped off him yet. Your statements are hypocritical since you started off triggered in beginning to my original comment you had a problem with my suggestion of removing O'Dwyer's burial and stripping off his titles. So don't give me that crap. Also, he may not be hailed as a hero in England(since you went there). Do you know who is? Winston Churchill. The chauvinistic guy who has the blood of millions of Indians in his hands. I am editing my comments to edit typos. You are editing your comments.🤦😅
    1
  14.  @x66Hawk66x  Ok so I am editing out because you are saying that I am editing out. Circular reasoning and a Red herring.😅
    1