Comments by "DireWolf" (@direwolf7491) on "Indian Navy Scripts History: Will allow women in Special Forces to become MARCOS | Details" video.

@anupamraj3922 I know a person who has joined the women Navy now. She was the fastest swimmer I have ever seen. I have competed with her in hockey, foot ball, atheletics. She used to beat the best men swimmers here and she beat most men in the Navy too. She was pretty good in other sports too. She completed the Iron man triathlon. Abh bol.
3
@sriyanshumohanty6937 Lol
2
@sriyanshumohanty6937 Yeah rare case scenario probably. When you don't have anyother option left. During 26/11 our resources were pretty limited. Out forces were pretty overrun in Kashmir too by the terrorists and contrast that to today's scenario.
2
Fritillaria6536 Why hire an overly qualified man and give him a lower risk job? How the f is that equality? Or how is that even efficient? Then why join the army at all? Why not sit at home and eat chips if you don't want any risk? Lol Who do you think you are arguing with here? I don't care about politics not feminists, neither equality. War isn't about equality, it is about roles and the one's who can fit those roles will be hired simple as that. If there are women who can fit a certain role they should be allowed to do so. If there is man who can do it better then hire him, but if he can do more then put him in the front line. Simple logic.
2
@sriyanshumohanty6937 Did I say that they are same? Again you are running from the question. They(private armies) don't have to include women. They do it purely because there must be some benefits to using them. That is just simple logic. Something that you seem to lack. BTW private armies do involve themselves several special ops counter millitary coups, free hostages etc. Which isn't pretty different from the roles done by special forces like yourself gave the example of 26/11.
2
@ವೀರಶೈವ-ಘ5ಪ Not sure what stats are you referring to. Are you asking me to reveal her timing in swimming? Well My 100 m freestyle fastes has been 68sec (1:08 min) she beat me by almost 10 sec. Somewhere in the 50-60 sec. mark. Hope that is satisfactory. Also your logic is kinda flawed. Army/Navy isn't employing olympic level sportsmen. They are employing fighters. It's an entirely different thing.
2
Fritillaria6536 In the battle field it isn't just out physical strength, it is about strategy and roles. It takes just one bullet to kill. You can be a beast of a man or a wimp one bullet in the head will do it. You think the army doesn't know that? The women have a tiny percentage in the army and that to the best of them get there. Surely they'll lose to a wrestling match to an average guy, but give them a gun they'll shoot faster than you because of their training. It is the ability to learn, iq level and adaptibily that matters. Like I said there are roles in the millitary. And those roles can be given to women when men are alloted riskier roles. Don't just read stuff and copy paste. I have seen these things too. I have listened to these arguments too.
2
@ವೀರಶೈವ-ಘ5ಪ That is because of your limited knowledge. I don't want to reveal where I am from for obvious reasons. Also where I have had my education. I grew up with her that is all I can tell you. And you don't need to race together to compare your 100m freestyle or butterfly. You can compare timings also. Lol I don't care if you believe me or not. It's not my duty to convince you. It's just that I hate arm chair anlaysists who have the arrogance to think that they have figured out everything by watching a few YT videos. Lol
2
@sriyanshumohanty6937 You are confident, but can't answer a simple question. Why do private armies with no pressure or critics from feminists or politics, who are apparently poor quality than regular millitary are hiring women? You seem to be greater expert than our Navy too... Who have allowed women in the special forces. Confident defense expaarts like you should join the Navy. Don't waste your time here bro LMAO
1
Fritillaria6536 Your point being? Note we are talking about special forces not infantry. Training will be different. Also Indian and US army have different philosophies. US army focus on more physical strength and mass, whereas Indian army believe in being lean, agility and endurance. Which are well suited to the terrains and conditions we fight in.
1
@Deadman-walking Kisko chutya bola be? Tera baap hoga chutya joh tujh jaise 💚de ko paida kiya.
1
@sriyanshumohanty6937 Yeah so why do private armies use women? Are they dumb? They don't have to answer to women's rights. You bypassed my question.
1
@sriyanshumohanty6937 Then all the more they shouldn't be hiring women na? It would reduce their efficiency. Lol You are contradicting yourself now🤦
1
@sriyanshumohanty6937 Navy special forces won't necessarily fight terrorists on land. You claim yourself to be defense analyst. Do you know that private mercenaries have women in them? It is not for women's rights or feminism. They don't have to bother about those things, they are private, then why do they have them? I already know the answer, but I'd me more than interested to hear your analysis.
1
@MalluMgtow Women are deployed in areas to gather intels, where quick extractions are required. May be not in a full blown warzone like in Ukraine. Violent and physical attacks aren't the only part of war. We are not in the age of barbarians, warfare is a lot more sophisticated now. There are roles that women can play in the millitary that is my point. It doesn't necessarily mean to go and wrestle with the enemy. I am sure the special forces would have all this data about men and women physical differences and make their recruitments accordingly. Apparently the national army doesn't think it is stupid.
1
@sriyanshumohanty6937 Yeah you write an essay after I already gave the answer to my own question. Lol So far you have proven yourself to be a defense exfart.😅 And again you are making assumptions that I am a feminist or whatever 'stuck in feminism' supposed to mean. I know Navy is not a fool, all this time you guys were questioning their decisions not me. Lol
1
@sriyanshumohanty6937 Private armies have political pressure to hire women? People are protesting on the streets and making petitions for women in private armies? Are you serious?😅
1
@peslover8935 Abe 💚de women olympic level pata h tujhe? Bhonkna bandh kar be chutye aur bhag.
1
@peslover8935 Abe jahil stats k chode... Tennis aur swimming dono alag sports h.😅 Katie Ledecky naam suna h? She can beat 99% of men on the planet when it comes to swimming. Can't believe these yt keyboard warriors have hard time believing that there could be women that can be top tier. Lol You think you can beat Serena Williams in tennis? Best of Indian men's tennis rank is 200+ (248 I think) Sala stats chodne aaye Idiot.😅
1
@ವೀರಶೈವ-ಘ5ಪ Man if calling me a clown helps you sleep better at night in your bubble👍
1
@peslover8935 Haan toh pura Indian men 248 k neeche rank mein hoga tennis mein. Abh stats ko reality mein dekh. She is better than all Indian men playing tennis. Physical standard kya hota h be? Thoda dimaag laga... Agar mein bolun women flexibility mein men se bohot aage h toh kya woh physical standard nhi hoga? Balance Beam mein men se aage h kyu ki men perform hi nhi kartein. Physical standard is a vast field. Physical strength aur speed mein compete nhi kar sakte women woh alag baat h. Mein swimming ki baat kar rha tha mein... Swimming mein men aur women mein zyada pharak nhi h olympic level mein bhi. Sprints mein men behtar h endurance mein zyada pharak nhi h. Joh kuch bhi YT mein sunta h woh yaha daal rha h tu... Mein bhi yeh saare video suna h like kiya h. Doosron ko gya pel ne k pehle saamne waale kya bol rha h soon liya kar. Tu joh bhi bola YT mein available h😅
1
@ವೀರಶೈವ-ಘ5ಪ Hi, biology expaart. What did I say that defies biology? Stop reading comments with emotions. Read my comment with logic. I said she beat men in swimming. Is that biologically impossible? I never said she beat the top 5 guys, but she beat the rest. Swimming is about stream line, buoyancy, mass to strength ratio, stamina etc. What is so biologically impossible in that?🤡
1
@ವೀರಶೈವ-ಘ5ಪ Heard about Katie Ledecky? You think 498th rank men swimmer can beat her? Are you kidding me? Inter gender competition was allowed from where we were upto the age of about 18 and we compared our timings even after that. And we are not in horse riding war era. War is more sophesiticated now, it isn't all about physical strength. There are several other aspects and roles that women can help make operations more efficient.
1
@ವೀರಶೈವ-ಘ5ಪ Idiot. Heavier and denser muscle and bones reduce buoyancy. Lol🤦 And you are preaching about biology and science.😅🤡
1
@ವೀರಶೈವ-ಘ5ಪ That's just 5 sec difference. You said men's rank 498 can beat her🤡 Also did you even read what I wrote about sprints and endurance? smh... Come back when you are more mature kid.
1
@ವೀರಶೈವ-ಘ5ಪ 💚de kaa biology😅😅 Sprint and endurace are biologically opposite. If you are a good sprinter you'll suck at long distance. Go out do some sports in in real life kid, until then I am done wasting my time on you.
1