Comments by "David Macmillan" (@daydays12) on "NATO will only give Ukraine membership in exchange for strong ‘battlefield success’" video.

  1. Yes... appeasement, corruption, cowardice?
    9
  2. 1100% agree!
    3
  3. What is wrong with the the interviewer? He says Ukraine has received long range missiles. that is NOT true... Ukraine has no atacms for example., And the storm shadow and scalp missiles they have received are specially limited range versions. This interviewer does not inspire confidence that he knows much about the horrible war in Ukraine. Does he not know that much more has been promised than delivered? A lot of political game playing by Nato as Mr Townsend should know. The interviewer also quoted a negative remark by a UK defence minister who is no longer in office.... then he ended , after Mr Townsend's reply, by simply staring into space. Poor journalism.
    3
  4. Nato should pull its collective finger out and really help Ukraine to win....long range missiles, planes, helicopters, anti missile and anti drone defences...It is desperate and Nato is turning appeaser!! Hypocritical low life politicians;
    3
  5. Agree 1100% + aircraft/ helicopters air defence systems to protect their civilians
    2
  6. I so agree with you. It is shameful wilful lethargy!! The poor Ukrainians are suffering... -
    2
  7. Nato should concentrate on WINNING ... that is driving Russia out of all illegally occupied Ukrainian territory and that includes Crimea.
    2
  8. Looks like it. These politicians are beyond the pale hypocritical and may be corrupt.
    2
  9. Yes. Badly done by Times Radii
    2
  10. Only, as you well know, when they pushed both Czechoslovakia and Poland under the bus which led to world war. So craven and corrupt!!
    2
  11. Indeed.
    1
  12. Agreed. They have behaved shamefully by not honouring the agreement they signed.@decaesaris5093
    1
  13. Agree 110% @retorenfer8702 
    1
  14. I really appreciate your post. I smell some corruption... appeasementitis?
    1
  15. Exactly... so Nato ties one arm of Ukraine behind Ukraine's back... so as to make that as difficult as possible. Disgusting.
    1
  16. What is the name of the Nato official who made this nonsense Nato proposal , which is the title of this Times radio video?? Perhaps Mr Jim Townsend who is representing Nato in this video can enlighten us? The Nato official's proposal is ignorant , naive, and bad for morale ( or maybe this 'official' is working for Putin and wants to demoralise the brave Ukrainians). Does s/he not know that Putin is an indicted war criminal and has never kept any agreement he's signed or any promise he's made.? The proposal is outrageous. No mention of all the damage Putin has caused to Ukraine,! No mention of reparations. This Nato official gives a frightening indication of incompetence, ignorance, and perhaps corruption in Nato. What does MrTownsend think of this? Why is Nato intent on appeasement now?. Nato should be helping Ukraine to WIN the illegal war that Putin started rather than not supplying long range missiles, aircraft and helicopters, air defence etc.. Judging by this 'nameless' 'official' there seems to be a cowardly lack of will on Nato's part to seriously help Ukraine WIN this illegal war. WIN means retaking all the parts of Ukraine illegally occupied by Putin's 'army' including Crimea. This 'anonymous' 'official' disgusts me. We deserve to know this dangerous Nato official's name.
    1
  17. All your friendly Putin has to do is to stop his illegal invasion of Ukraine and withdraw Russian troops back to within the internationally recognised borders of the Russian Federation and there will be Peace, peace, peace. Why don't you go and tell Putin that?
    1
  18. While making it very difficult for potential winners to win. HYPOCRITES!
    1
  19. You don't think humans are capable of better? Or only worse? @steve-real 
    1
  20. Thank you very much for that.  @steve-real 
    1