Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Can Patriot Anti-Air Defense REALLY intercept missiles?" video.

  1. But Russia is resorting to Iranian weaponry, which is below peer and already used in Saudi Arabia where Patriot is deployed. Nothing new under the sun.
    3
  2. ​ @chrisclements1169 That's rich considering how much propaganda Russia put out about their weapons.
    2
  3. This isn't for drones.
    2
  4. How? By missing the target like 90% of all their current strikes?
    2
  5. ​ @brostoevsky22 Capturing? They're gonna rush Kiev again?
    2
  6. Russians have anti-radar missiles, but their SEAD doctrine is ass. The United States wrote the book on suppression of enemy air defenses. Russia read the summary on wikipedia.
    2
  7. Japan thought a quick decapitation strike would allow them to control the Pacific. That's how it started.
    1
  8. ​ @rsKayiira the scrap found in downed Iranian drones is worth more than 30k. The purposeful lowballing of their cost is a propaganda tool.
    1
  9. ​ @abelincoln8885 The drone could be 10x higher than the cost you cite. 10k wouldn't cover the electronics alone.
    1
  10. It was. It broke the Russian army's spine.
    1
  11. ​ @huntergatherer7796 the Javelins took out the rushing tanks. The M777s gave Russian artillerymen a taste of tungsten and steel.
    1
  12.  @huntergatherer7796  How would need to cope? It's Russians who got defeated by a dozen trucks.
    1
  13. His best minds have either fled the country or been "silenced". Tyrants surround themselves with dumb yes men, if you try to outsmart Putin you are able to overpower him. If you're too smart for your own good, off a window you go.
    1
  14. Because the potential threat is ballistic missiles from Iran.
    1
  15. There wasn't. The X-35 competitor was the X-32 and everyone knew it was a dog.
    1
  16. Ammo is being made.
    1
  17. Russia can have peace whenever they want. They can just go home.
    1
  18. ​ @thr0waway Okay. Let's compare Putin to Putin. The day after Minsk II was signed, he ordered his DPR minions to assault Ukrainian army positions. Any deal you make with the Russians has to be made under the belief that deals restrict the Tsar, and the Tsar cannot have his authority threatened.
    1
  19. ​ @prunabluepepper Russia bombed NS. Why would they leave one NS2 pipeline undamaged? Hint hint it's to tell Germany they can get gas if they back off their case. If the US had done it, they'd destroy NS2 and not NS1.
    1
  20. Cope, botski.
    1
  21. Okay and S-400 ate sh!t already in this conflict.
    1
  22. "Glorious battery" lol you mean strikes on playgrounds and pedestrian bridges. Even then, the wild goose chase after a Patriot kill while Putin's army is defeated is par for the course for an authoritarian regime - losing sight of the big picture.
    1
  23. There's a difference between a couple of weeks of firing at the range and doing movements in the woods, and actually sitting down people in a classroom to teach them to use advanced weapons. Most joint training is more about promoting cooperation and helping countries understand how to integrate better, but in the end it's the equivalent of summer camp. The training we're talking about is the equivalent of a university degree.
    1
  24. ​ @vorosjanos77 modern weapons crushed the Soviet/Russian "genius" tine and time again.
    1
  25. Nice cope. The "small" area coverage protects population and infrastructure instead of empty fields. Not all land mass has the same value. And if Russians focus on the Patriot while they lose the actual war, we gave them the biggest wild goose chase of the 21st century. Just like Hiler's attacks of London allowing the RAF to compose thenselves and beat the Germans.
    1
  26. 40k wouldn't even cover a pair of ring laser gyros.
    1
  27. The dummies would cost as much as the real thing. The propulsion and guidance is more expensive than explosives.
    1
  28. They won't. These are for ballistic missiles.
    1
  29. A 400 dollar drone is a DJI. You're no attacking infrastructure with those.
    1
  30. Nope. Russia claims it, because they're the sorest losers on the planet.
    1
  31. They scored what, two strikes and failed a hundred?
    1
  32. So Russia wastes their only strategy trying to destroy one Patriot while their army loses on the battlefield. We'll jus send a new one. A wild goose chase while Russian men become am endangered species.
    1
  33. No, you'd set up a defense prior to attack.
    1
  34. ​ @Siempre1978 No HIMARS have been destroyed and they drive close to the frontline. The Patriot will be in the heart of Ukraine, protected by Buks, S-300s, MIM-23 Hawks, IRIS-T and NASAMS.
    1
  35. ​ @John-hu9qg No HIMARS has been lost.
    1
  36. They are rockets, not air breathing jets that can just circle around.
    1
  37. S-300 supplies are finite and the Patriot links to NASAMS.
    1
  38. ​ @reclaimatorerebus6531 they won't be used on drones, this is due to the potential threat of Iranian missiles
    1
  39. lel the problem is that good luck getting to that last line
    1
  40. Nothing, but Russia would waste a ton of munitions. Essentially the Patriot would become a decoy that would protect Ukraine by forcing Russia to stop attacking stuff that actually matters and eventually lose the war on the ground.
    1
  41. But it was Russia that was bombing Belgorod with their own failed missiles on an almost nightly basis a couple months ago.
    1
  42. How are they going to capture it? Rush Kiev again?
    1
  43. ​ @Thunder_playz_331 they're way more expensive than 30k, there's way too many high cost components inside recovered Iranian drones
    1
  44. Anything trying to target the Patriot will have to fly through countless layers of defense. And cope, botski. Your boss tells you to post this because Russia is BEGGING for the war to stop. It hurts them. It will hurt more. Tell your boss your posts don't work, and that each Ruble he pays you is one less bullet in the magazine of your fellow Russian man.
    1
  45. ​ @SaintFacetious Bruh the Armata is vaporware. They need foreign contracts to built them, and nobody wants it.
    1
  46. Butler was a good person but shortsighted.
    1
  47. They've been probably been training already. Nobody knew the US had sent AGM-88 HARM until Russians took photos of the debris near blown up radars.
    1
  48. The people facing them also cry about combat mosquitos and genetically engineered supersoldiers on drugs. What they say is worthless.
    1
  49. Meh, after 9 months it gets tiring to hear that.
    1
  50. ​ @avroarchitect1793 15 years ago there were ceramic armor plates that could sustain 60 hits of AK fire.
    1
  51. Nope. They'd keep fighting knowing that they only have to reach Russia's breaking point.
    1
  52. How is it DC's problem that you have crappy mayors? The wastelands are there because your neighbors keep voting for them. You want to defend borders with HIMARS? Kind of psychotic, bud.
    1
  53. And the barrage starts getting intercepted when it crosses the border. Basically this is the goalkeeper to defed from the real strikes after the lesser defense systems take out the volume.
    1
  54. What escalation? Putin is already trying to genocide a country. He's the one escalating. This is deescalation. Defense. Protecting lives.
    1
  55. Does Russia have the SEAD/DEAD doctrine to get anywhere near a Patriot with anti-radiation missiles? Thank you.
    1
  56. Youtubers make videos about current subjects to ride the algorithm? No, must be the CIA.
    1
  57. Why?
    1
  58. Saddam expected a massive air campaign in 2003 and planned his defense around it. Then an undersized US Army went in and toppled him.
    1
  59. We gave a lot of military equipment to Iraq.
    1
  60.  @hypothebai4634  They ended up needing it due to ISIS.
    1
  61. ​ @tomstarcevich1147 costs you less than a cup of coffee per day, and it probably doesn't cost you anything because you most likely complain about taxes while living like a bum
    1
  62. Patriot has already been tested against Russian and Iranian crap.
    1
  63. It's to shoot down ballistic missiles, not drones.
    1
  64. It has. A couple mediatic failures but hundreds of successful intercepts.
    1
  65.  @63phillip  So the intercepts are fake?
    1
  66. Or training started 3 months ago and they're working weekends.
    1
  67. ​ @BlackjackCZ No need to sit at a table. Putin can just call it quits. It's that easy.
    1
  68. ​ @BlackjackCZ We're having dialogue. Russia is a sore loser and wants to hold what it has now. But we know that if the fight continues, they'll give it up. Why would I let my mortal enemy get away and recover if I can end him right now?
    1
  69. And who'd buy a system they cannot get training or ammunition for?
    1