Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "American HIMARS Rocket Artillery is Better Than You Think" video.

Tempt the bear into pouring more weapons? They've already brought everything.
4
@karlyo6937 The Ukrainians get HIMARS - Ru posters come online to cope and seethe about it.
4
They haven't captured HIMARS. Patrick Lancaster has moved dead bodies to fake battle scenes. He's a ghoul, a liar.
3
The problem is that they need to put several vehicles in position and fire volleys. They're area weapons. The number of GLONASS guided rockets isn't known, but most are unguided. With HIMARS, a single hit hits depots with several tons of ammunition. The hundreds of trucks need rockets for their tubes. A non-negligible number of those rockets burned like fireworks.
3
No. The Russian MoD spliced two videos together. First is thermal imaging of them missing four trucks (why would they be so close?) in a parking lot near buildings. Then it switches to visible spectrum footage of something burning in a bush. No parking lot or buildings.
2
Nah. They hit a transport truck for a M777 and claimed it to be HIMARS. The video of "two" HIMARS being hit was faked. Two different videos spliced.
2
Concern trolling. The civilians will stop suffering when the invasion ends.
2
Thanks for the daily MoD update, Markovski.
2
Saltpeter that goes off like fireworks. Those are propellant grains and chunks of rocket fuel. Nitrates blow in a single blast, no secondaries.
2
"So it will be easy for the Russian military to track them down and destroy all four of them" - They're much more mobile than anything else. Even if you track them, they're no longer where you've found them.
1
Saltpeter depots that throw off burning chunks of rocket fuel and artillery warheads that look like fireworks in the night sky. Sure thing, Joeski from Florida Oblast.
1
Because they hit several tons of ammo. The US Army has a handbook on how to fight Russian forces, and one of their points is that their supply depots are unsafe and can be obliterated in a single hit. The Russians put that hell near civilian areas. No wonder people were killed, they put massive amounts of explosives and propellant in unsafe storage.
1
@whatsmolly5741 I don't care what Zelensky said. I saw the explosion and that was obviously a munitions depot. Russia operates that rocket. They ran an article saying they delayed the retirement before the war. Ukraine has showed the tail sections of Tochka-Us fired from Belarus. And now they sent them to the separatist republics. They stopped talking about Kramatorsk because even more atrocities happened. The Russian state media already said that the target location was given by US spy satellite. Why would a spy satellite be giving information on civilian targets? The humanitarian aid depot with uniformed men and ammo crates inside? I think I saw those telegram screenshots.
1
@whatsmolly5741 I'm delusional but Russian media says American spy satellites stop in mid air.
1
They're not down to three. They had MLRS, the Soviet style - spray and pray rockets. With HIMARS a single rocket does the job.
1
@Lubet0TheGreat Pretty sure they already used thermobarics. They can't use nukes, it's completely irresponsible. The rest of the world would shun them.
1
@ashfield1425 They openly advertise what they have.
1
@ashfield1425 Volumes can be estimated from contracts, revenue, power consumption, etc. There's rooms full of people calculating how much X or Y is being produced by looking at trucks full of raw materials arriving on factories.
1
Effect so negligible, they're already coping and seething and faking videos to claim they took them out.
1
@morwickchesterham3875 Changing the subject is an admission you lost. We're talking about HIMARS.
1
@karlyo6937 Baghdad bob is claiming all ammo depots were fertilizer storage warehouses.
1
@karlyo6937 You come to these videos to cry.
1