Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "How Ukraine Wins" video.

  1.  @modigrey  I don't watch CNN or BBC.
    3
  2. Who cares about what Jordan Peterson has to say about war?
    3
  3. Do they seem to be losing?
    3
  4. The railroad burned for a long time, the concrete and rebar were certainly affected.
    3
  5. They have runways, but ferries would be more efficient.
    2
  6.  @modigrey  Here's the facts - the first wave of mobilization is a mess. A second wave would expose even more rot.
    2
  7. If you don't want nuclear war you have to call out nuclear bullying.
    2
  8. Cope.
    2
  9. They seem pretty demotivated on social media.
    2
  10. Russia has attacked multiple Ukrainian bridges. Either way, there's plenty of videos of this bridge being used to transport huge amounts of heavy military equipment, such as armored fighting vehicles and rocket artillery launchers.
    2
  11. Russia would either have to go mad and launch the nukes, or throw every able bodied men at the front. Both cases would also kill Russia in the process.
    1
  12. I agree with the physics of the bridge collapse, but regarding the suicide attack it could be done. It's unethical, but in a warzone it's not difficult to find people who lost everything and no longer have the will to live.
    1
  13. Azerbeijan saw the opening and attacked Armenia, which was supposed to be protected by Russian peacekeepers.
    1
  14. Nukes don't cauae tsunamis. We did sea tests.
    1
  15. It's the bridge supplying the resources to the Russian military. The East to South rail cannot be used by Russia because it's within range of Ukrainian artillery, so they have to supply their forces through Crimea.
    1
  16. Lol real life is CNN
    1
  17. It's a Bukhanka, or "bread" van. Almost looks like a VW camper and it's iconic because in the beginning of the war you saw armored columns and rocket launcher vehicles rolling down the street and between them cute vans were riding along.
    1
  18. No, it's Russia's centuries old wish to subdue Ukraine.
    1
  19. It's not Russia's best general. Winter defeated the Soviets in Finland. Winter defeated the Russians in Ukraine this Feb 2022.
    1
  20. Ruh-roh!
    1
  21. Educated in what? Moscow University of Shilling?
    1
  22. 777s changed the game as they allowed Ukraine to have accurate fires and get 155mm shells supplied. HIMARS killed supplies and commanding officers. Russia is winning? They're being folded like laundry.
    1
  23. It's not done. They filmed the opposing lane.
    1
  24. Yeah and Antonovsky bridge is fine too. We all saw the russkie propaganda.
    1
  25. No, it hasn't.
    1
  26.  @hivezphone  One of the reasons the bridge was built was how much money Russia was bleeding into Crimea. It was one of the areas in Russia that got the most subsidies. Yes, Crimea was supplied before the bridge. But it was an extremely inefficient task that cost Russia money, and usually you want to profit off the land you acquire.
    1
  27. It's not terrorism and it wasn't suicide. Explosion cane from underneath and lifted the bridge off the support bearings.
    1
  28. He doesn't control any of them.
    1
  29. The video proof literally has the broken bridge visible in the background.
    1
  30.  @frankiep1387  Slow moving trains without cargo. Same as the Antonovsky bridge stunts.
    1
  31. Why would they need NATO forces? NATO isn't super serum, and Ukrainian troops are more battle hardened than the vast majority of NATO.
    1
  32. Fires burned long enough that it seems to have buckled. I'd hire a team of engineers and wait for their findings.
    1
  33. So Russia attacking Ukrainian bridges is terrorism? Or is it different?
    1