Comments by "Titanium Rain" (@ChucksSEADnDEAD) on "Peter Zeihan || COVID: What Really Happened in Wuhan?" video.

  1. Serial passage through humanized mice.
    5
  2. ​ @markrobinowitz8473  SARS-1 was traced back to the cave where the bats lived. This one wasn't.
    4
  3. WTC 7 was hit by burning debris. Three diesel generators inside. Buckling of steel girders, house of cards.
    2
  4. I don't remember specifics, but I remember how those articles were rushed. The fact is that you can create a virus in a lab by just forcing a natural virus to change. Thus leaving you with a virus that looks natural, as no human hand tinkered with the genetic code directly.
    2
  5.  @jameslawrence3666  In the early 2000s college students writing a paper proved it was possible to order the components to manufacture a bioweapon virus. It's possible.
    1
  6.  @GodGuy8  Eyewitnesses are terrible. Most people never heard an explosion in their lives. The "thousands" of engineers are mostly people who don't use their degree and hold other jobs like real estate agent. Classic demolitions look very different. Sequenced explosions. Sounds like a cannon firing multiple bursts. There were WMDs in Iraq. Many US soldiers suffered neurological damage from being exposed to them.
    1
  7.  @GodGuy8  Yes. And to steal and repurpose a quote eyewitnesses are the worst type of evidence after we try everything else. Eyewitness accounts are known to be unreliable because a) people lie and b) people misremember events. That's why eyewitnesses can be cross examined. Unfortunately the video doesn't seem to be on youtube but there's an old TV show experiment where people were exposed to a car crash they weren't expecting, and by being asked the question "at which speed did the cars collide" and "crash", those who were asked "crash" said numbers 10-20 mph faster than those who were asked "collide". A simple word is enough to make people remember the event differently. Eyewitnesses are not worthless. But they are suspect. If an eyewitness claimed you committed a murder, certainly you'd defend your innocence. Does that mean you think eyewitnesses are worthless? Be honest. Most people have not heard a real explosion in real life. People who were there on 9/11 were panicking. You can't just say "they heard explosions, smoking gun proof!"
    1
  8.  @GodGuy8  Not really. You can see the building comes down in phases, it comes from the inside, and it's only when the outside face collapses that you see it fall. There isn't a strong case. Look at actual demolitions.
    1
  9.  @GodGuy8  Perfect demolitions are phased. You can see the sequence.
    1