Comments by "First Last" (@First-Last_name) on "Russia launches large-scale missile attack on Ukraine | DW News" video.

  1. The report was their current gen ICBMs were at 30%. Probably why russia uses AA, AShM, and foreign missles/drones from Iran and North Korea now.
    1
  2.  @benbo7042  russia is in Syria and lybia, they were in Afghanistan too. What's your point?
    1
  3.  @benbo7042  Read a book 📖. Syria and Lybia are colonial puppets of russia. russia causes instability. Then they swoop in to keep the dictator in power, while taking control of the nautral resources. russia owns and operates the hydrocarbons in Syria and Libya. It's straight up neo colonialism. russia currently occupies 9 countries in Africa and the Middle East. They are bandits stealing resources. russia was invited to Libya by 1 rebel faction to fight all the others and secure their grip on power. Syria has become a puppet ever since the Arab spring when he invited russia to secure the capital in exchange for letting them secure the hydrocarbons.
    1
  4. The report was certain ICBMs were down to 30%. Probably why russia uses a lot of Anti-Air and Anti-ship missles instead. They have also been buying up munitions from Iran and North Korea.
    1
  5.  @poppystars9005  haha quoting Ursula 🤣 She's made so many verifiably untrue claims. Like 1000 byraktar shot down every day. Back when almost 400 had ever been produced 😆 She's a 🤡 By the way russian military KIA is estimated to be 100,000. Gen Mark Milley USA November 10 2022. Al Jazeera confirms 👍
    1
  6. Keep coping. You can avoid reality only so long. Truth is russias desperate attacks will fail.
    1
  7.  @bonnie7898  NATO blew up some tankes with boats. Other then that they didn't step foot in lybia except for a few scrimmages with ISIS. Meanwhile russia has wagner in Lybia right now. They control the oil feilds in exchange for securing the capital and keeping the current regime in power. They do similar in about 10 African/Middle Eastern countries. Syria is russias problem too. When you bring up Afghanistan do you mean the time russia was there or the other time? As for Vietnam, are you talking about the vietcong puppets russia supported or Americas reaction to them?
    1
  8.  @jptrainor  right? They needed time to train their forces and restructure command. Their officers have all been retrained since then and their strategy and command structure reworked. Ukraine arguably could have benefited greatly with another few years to prepare. One reason Poutn finally stuck hard was because he realised the window of success was narrowly closing.
    1
  9. Iran and North Korea, plus a stock of less effective old soviet missles. Their good stuff purpose built for ground attack is in relatively short supply. Missles in general however, are not.
    1
  10.  @evita9284  with 100 missle strikes a day 1000 would only be 10 days. russia is low on systems like Kalibr. Here's an example. Before the war russia had 900 next generation Iskander 9M723 missles. Current estimate is they have 119. However russia has uses a large amount of old soviet x-22 and x-55 missles of which they had about 7,000. Not to mention their unknown stock of x-59 missles. They also have a lot of AShM missles like Onyx and AA like s-300/s-400. Their construction of new next gen x-101, x-555, Iskander, Kalibr and Tochka missles is slow. There's no way they can keep up with demand for these systems. There's a reason russia uses so many missles. They are getting low on accurate munitions. They rely on less accurate soviet systems and on systems not intended for ground attack. They probably aren't attacking playgrounds, feilds and pedestrian bridge's on purpose. It's because the systems they are using are old or repurposed.
    1
  11.  @alberthenriette8976  watch perun and educate yourself.
    1
  12. OK Neville Chamberlain. Appeasement worked so well last time.
    1