Comments by "First Last" (@First-Last_name) on "SpaceX Starship fails after launch: What does it mean? | DW News" video.

  1. A test that rapidly ended unexpectedly early, due to failure....
    11
  2.  @gamers-xh3uc  Correction, it flew for 4 minutes (13%) of the time It was planned to, because they had lost control and it tore itself to peices. At the rate they keep failing their tests I don't think they'll be on schedule for next year.
    7
  3. Well the 30 min test lasted 4, the self destruct computer wouldn't respond, and it made a huge debris feild in an unexpected location. If not a failure, please tell me how it was a success?
    5
  4.  @kpNov23  great engineer? He's never engineered anything in his life though. He went to a fancy school. His friend built his first company. All Elon did was use his friend who ran the bank of nova Scotia to get special banking privlages. He's a rich kid with connections. He's nothing else.
    5
  5.  @al0cer  lol, he's just an investor. He's never engineered a thing in his life. He went to a business school and got a bachelor of arts degree in economics. You should read something other then X and maybe you'd learn he's just a rich kid with connections.
    4
  6. They lost control 😂
    4
  7.  @cabanford  you can read what actually happened. It's not rocket science to read a play by play.
    4
  8. Elon has nothing to do with the science and engineering developing the rocket 🚀
    3
  9. It was the definition of failure. The 30 minute test lasted 4. It was out of control and the self destruct wouldn't work. It tore itself apart and scattered a huge debri field.
    3
  10. By definition it failed, live with it.
    3
  11.  @filipcamerman3473  what milestone? Multiple booster rocket failures, then explosion after separation. Rocket went off course and tore apart over an unexpected area. The self destruct function failed to respond. All they achieved was not destroying the launch pad everyone told them would fail last test.
    3
  12. What part of failure do you not understand? It lost control, the self destruct wouldn't respond, it scattered a huge debris feild in an unexpected location.
    3
  13. Well some of the booster rockets failed before separation. The booster exploded moments after separation, the rocket lost control, self destruct failed to function, it tore apart and scattered in a unintended location.
    2
  14. A failure is a failure. You fail to see that.
    2
  15. They've been failing a lot lately
    2
  16. Is that why the 30 min flight lasted 4? Just so overwhelmed by success it couldn't contain itself?
    2
  17. It was 4 minutes buddy. Not even half that. They lost control and the self destruct failed. It tore itself apart.
    2
  18. Oh, so the rocket successfully veered off course. Successfully uncontrollable flights. Sounds fun.
    2
  19.  @LorensoLorenso  it was planned for 30 minutes of flight. It flew for 4 minutes, it lost control, self destruct failed to function, it tore apart and scattered itself in a wider are then planned for. Please tell me where in the test it was successful? There's only 2 options and I don't see any "success".
    2
  20.  @karim.mmmmmmm    you really want to double down on the lame burn? I've never worked a minimum wage job like you. I went to school and have a career. The test failed, cope and seethe all you want, won't change the results.
    1
  21. Lol, so why'd the first one fail? It's 2 in a row now
    1
  22.  @karim.mmmmmmm  brilliant comeback. Excuses me while I step off my balcony. Lol, have any more theories besides Elon and Burgers?
    1
  23.  @karim.mmmmmmm  lol, when the argument fails the personal insults come out. Keep "trying". Fail enough times and you might succeed at a burn. Until then, keep failing trying my friend 😉
    1
  24. ​ @gamers-xh3uc yeah, NASA took what was originally an inaccurate wonder weapon and landed men on the moon with it. Space X just bought already existing tech and used connections to seal satalite launch contracts.
    1
  25. The booster was supposed to land. The engines started failing before separation, it exploded moments after separation. The rocket lost control and wouldn't respond to self destruct commands. It tore itself apart and scattered in a unplanned for location. The only one calling this success is Elon and pals.
    1
  26.  @dogman2387  "Honestly, it's such an incredibly successful day, even though we did have a rapid unscheduled disassembly of both the Super Heavy booster and the Ship," SpaceX quality engineering manager Kate Tice Translation everything blew up and they don't know why.
    1
  27. Lol, 😂😂😂 it was a failure. You fan Bois are hilarious
    1
  28.  @filipcamerman3473 my opinion is irrelevant and so is yours. They had a test, it failed. End of story. Meanwhile NASA a few days ago successfully sent HD video in a light beam 16 million Km into space, past the moon. As part of their upcoming moon base project Artemis.
    1
  29.  @filipcamerman3473  the launch pad was 100%, they just went back to an established design they were to cheap to implement the first time. They never had the chance to test decoupling last test due to hubris. This time the booster exploded and potentially damaged the second stage. Which lost control and failed to respond to a self destruct signal. If you set the bar near the floor, it's easy to clear, but nobody is going to be impressed.
    1
  30.  @Sneakoz  fans maybe, plenty of experts expected more from this launch Telling yourself won't make it so. Even the expert in the interview was a little let down.
    1
  31.  @Sneakoz  that's literally not true. It was planned to go further and operate properly. It didn't, it failed. All 33 engines did not continue to operate. There were multiple rocket failures and the booster unexpectedly exploded.
    1
  32.  @BBBrasil  what? Space X used a non reinforced launch pad against all logic and recommendations. It failed then they went back to the tried and true standard. What is picture perfect about multiple rocket failures from the booster? It sent the rocket off course by stage 1. When it decoupled it exploded moments later. The rocket in stage 2 had unstable wobbly flight. They tried to detonate it and it didn't respond. It tore itself up and scattered in unintended areas. You are living in a dream world if this is a success. There's only 2 options and this test failed. Live in reality friend.
    1
  33.  @supercadet111  it didn't respond though. The booster exploded prematurely, and the rocket wouldn't respond until it tore itself to bits.
    1
  34.  @Sneakoz  you failed to understand the analogy. There's only 2 options, success, or failure. The test was for flight of the rocket and to see if the booster could land. The booster engines failed and it exploded. The rocket lost control, failed to respond, and tore apart. Where's the success?
    1
  35. Try that line at school. Edit: better yet, try it in life. Test a brain transplant. Don't worry it can only end in "success" 😂
    1
  36. 😂😂😂😂
    1
  37.  @gamers-xh3uc  this video just now, the time they disintegrated their launch pad with stupidity. 2 launches in a row. If you mean ever? Falcon 1 failed 3 times in a row, and Falcon 2 through 8 had similar problems until they finally ironed out Falcon 9. Their "revolutionary satalites" also degrade rather quickly. There's already a high concern about the amount of floating space garbage orbiting earth they have caused.
    1
  38.  @daffyduck5585  tell that to a fisherman next time they unexpectedly shower down on an area not closed off for the test.
    1
  39.  @pointblank0020  no hate, I live in reality and his fan boys are spamming comments with hopes and dreams
    1