Comments by "xXxSkyViperxXx" (@xXxSkyViperxXx) on "1.3 Billion: Breaking Down the Han Chinese Ethnicity" video.

the northern and southern han chinese do have differences but not in the way you described. the southern han aren't just cantonese. there's many groups within southern han like hokkien, hakka, teochew, hokchew, hinghwa, cantonese, taishanese, hunanese, shanghainese, wenzhounese, hokchia, etc etc. these southern groups all had a history before of migrating over and displacing and/or assimilating previous ancient populations in southern china that preceded them before there. in china, those are called baiyue, but realistically, it was the ancient ancestors of modern southeast asian groups today. the northern han were the han that stayed in northern china and spread northeast and northwestwards and had other northern migratory peoples come over and assimilate into their population like mongols, khitans, manchu/jurchen, etc. etc. northern han mostly speak mandarin and jin now.
5
lol only the sino-xenic loans in korean and vietnamese. the core of those languages are koreanic and austroasiatic respectively, which are separate from sino-tibetan.
3
naga people are tibeto-burmese people. naga are cousin to peoples of myanmar, tibet, and china.
2
of course, they are Han ethnic Chinese = ethnic Han
1
@oneviwatara9384 the "chinese national" in china is different from "ethnic han chinese". there are of course other ethnic groups that are chinese national and ethnic chinese that are not chinese national.
1
@oneviwatara9384 that is because tai-kra peoples are same haplogroup as austronesian peoples. proto-tai-kra split off from ancient proto-austronesian thousands of years ago in the area around modern southern china. it is part of the austro-tai hypothesis and austric family theory
1
@oneviwatara9384 the german ethnographer and linguist, wilhelm schmidt coined these words to describe peoples with common shared language ties. the genetic tests only give further credence that the commonalities are more than the linguistic ties. u keep saying Lao people but their language is also part of the tai-kra linguistic family, which there are several existing theories showing their relationship with austronesian language family. Them having common genetics just further proves those linguistic theories further. such tests do not say ethnic austronesian taiwanese aboriginal groups to be ethnic Lao, it just says they have common genetic traits pointing to common ancestry. Ethnic Lao people as its own ethnic group did not precede the formation of austronesian ethnic groups in taiwan, so of course, their shared genetic tests tells common ancestry from older ethnic groups that split off elsewhere, such as continental southeastern china.
1
@oneviwatara9384 this text just says the same. proto-tai-kra and proto-austronesian split off earlier in the asian continent before austronesian distributed to taiwan and other parts of island southeast asia. the groups in taiwan and island southeast asia have always had a cousin relationship than direct ancestor relationship, as with any simultaneously existing group. Also, this "Daic" group it labels might as well be proto-austro-tai if the sample they have was the split off.
1
@oneviwatara9384 well, u just described what a language family is. The ones who named that family also took spellings coming from mandarin pinyin due to those groups they find in china. Those are Tai people, not Dai or Kadai. Letter D is mandarin pinyin logic substituting /t/ to that letter.
1
@oneviwatara9384 years? I haven't kept track. I just know people been talking about stuff like this for the past years now and ive just read the same things u tell me or text u copy paste in places like quora or wikipedia or here on youtube or other people who are interested in stuff like that or those youtube mapping videos by those usual mapping channels
1
@oneviwatara9384 whats with this ethnic Lao people you keep mentioning. these ancient cultures have been long gone for thousands of years and have produced many descendant people groups. Lao is just one of many more. there was another girl long ago here on youtube comments in another video raving the same things you're saying but saying austronesian instead of this Lao Lao you keep moaning about. Also, the part about the japanese origins, I had already guessed that path of origin many years ago and they're just now confirming what i had guessed long ago. Im sure many people have guessed the same before too.
1
@oneviwatara9384 u go ask urself the same question. all this stuff is on wikipedia anyways and the source documents they put there or otherwise someone on quora or youtube here will be raving about the same things
1
@oneviwatara9384 is that so? i guess Laos can now be carved up so that all those people groups can reclaim their supposed ancient ancestral homeland now, wouldn't u say?
1
rounding error? ahahahahahaha
1
@oneviwatara9384 what is this grass is not grass. ethnic chinese is not ethnic chinese you are saying.
1
this comment is like grass is grass. yes, Chinese are Han Chinese.
1
because the chinese mainlanders are bitter over the fact that their last imperial rulers weren't the same ethnicity as them
1
northeast india have many tibeto-burmese people groups. tibeto-burmese peoples are cousins of chinese sinitic peoples, under sino-tibetan family.
1
the area of china proper was an ancient cradle of many people groups. it's only the chinese sinitic group that ended up dominating the area while many other groups from the area got pushed out or assimilated. most all groups around southeast asia inevitably trace origins back to around southern china many millennia ago. their ancestors just got kicked out or migrated away themselves gradually.
1
proto-japonics come from eastern coasts of modern china many millennia ago, just north of proto-austronesian urheimat
1
@missplainjane3905 that's one of the current theories so far. the other is pointing to liaodong peninsula
1
@missplainjane3905 what's different? u mean to japonic and sinitic? of course, different. there's videos here on youtube showing radically different ancient old japanese and ancient old chinese language being spoken. if there was common heritage, it would have been many more millennia before there in the asian continent.
1
@missplainjane3905 so different obviously.
1
@missplainjane3905 No obviously different.
1