Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "Iran says it will break the low-grade uranium stockpile limit" video.

  1.  @zerimor6ren470  where are you getting this information from? Because in May of 2019 the iaea certified that Iran was abiding by the main terms of the deal.
    2
  2.  @andrewschnatter4338  you are incorrect. On July 14th 2015 the deal was signed and certified by Iran and the five permanent members of the United States Security Council, China, France, Russia, United Kingdom's, United States and Germany. Not to mention the European Union. This was not a backroom deal.
    2
  3.  @joekillip6505  That's not true. 1. The whole thing was public. 2. The reason he couldn't go through congree is because the reps refused to let Obama get even one victory. Proven out by their shameful 911 first responders posturing, postponing, not bring to the floor and then finally having to be shamed into it. 3. It was verified by the five permanent members of the United Nations security Council. China, France, Russia, United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Not to mention the European Union.
    2
  4.  @pp-tx3bt  Well thanks! I mean... My momma did raise me to sit there and take shit.... But I do tend to treat people how they treat me. So if there kind and resonable, then we get to have a nice talk, and sometimes healthy debate. Which I like. ☺ So it works out.
    2
  5.  Josh Swett  That's not true. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Comprehensive_Plan_of_Action#Negotiations
    1
  6.  @Sandlin22  on April 30th of 2018 the United States and Israel said that Iran had not disclosed a past covert nuclear weapons program. In 2019 however the iaea certified that Iran was abiding by the main terms of the deal. There was however some question over how many Advanced centrifuges were allowed. Because that was not specified in the deal.
    1
  7.  @Steel-pr2hq  you are incorrect. Iran is pissed because the US and Trump backed out of the deal that was made, simply because Obama made the deal and Trump is childish. He gave no reason why the deal was bad. So if you think there is one please offer it? Then Trump decided to sanction them , when they started going back to doing the things they were doing before the deal was made, because Trump decided to break the deal for no good reason.
    1
  8.  W TF?  HEY! If it isn't Volvume 2 page 117 boy! Spent all day chilling at the house on youtube again, I see. Ya know... Sense your (no named) super successful company that you own is being run by all your "people", right? 😂😂😂😂😂😂 What we lying about today?
    1
  9.  W TF?  "Those are the facts folks." OMFG! I mean.... really guy? Lol you wouldn't know facts if they crawled up your ass and made you a brand new man. Which I believe we established last time, page 117 guy. Lol 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  10.  @Steel-pr2hq  😂😂😂 Great comeback! Really packing on the substance there! Good effort! 😂😂😂😂
    1
  11.  @andrewschnatter4338  so you're against executive orders? Being that it was in public, meant that it wasn't a backroom deal. Does that mean you're not okay with Trump backing out of this and many other deals all by himself? Without the approval of Congress? Because that's tantamount to the same thing, right?
    1
  12.  @Steel-pr2hq  In other words... You don't know what the deal was, can't support your own claims with actual facts and can't even be bothered to google it to get the actual facts. Instead your just gonna throw a 2 year old tantrum, take your ball and go home. Okay... Got ya. Thanks 😉
    1
  13.  @andrewschnatter4338  Hey, I like your argument so far. I'm gonna have to pick this up tomorrow though if you don't mind. I have work in the mprning and gotta get to bed. Thank you for your detailed and thoughtful response and I will get one back to you tomorrow. 😊 nite for now.
    1
  14.  @Steel-pr2hq    I underatand why you would need to see me as being "butt hurt", regardless of the fact that you have nothing to back it up. You need to feel like your getting back at me for calling you out on your lazy logic... But lets be clear... This is not the case. In fact your the one who seams a little touchy to me. Claiming I know your right, dispite all evidence to the contrary. If you need to lie to yourself about that then go ahead but don't waste my time with it. I will be more than happy to answer your questions as soon as you answer mine. Which I asked you first. What makes the Iran deal a bad one?
    1
  15.  @andrewschnatter4338  So... A lot had gone on with Iran and was not %100 on the timeline and technical. Sense I'm a big geek, ai looked it up. Here is what I found. Through Sep 10-17 5 votes for approval and disapproval came up in the house and Senate. None passed. They could not drop the discussion nor could they pass the bill. This was important because amid the negotiations of the deal back in April 14th 2015 the Senate Foreign Relations Committee unanimously passes legislation authored by Senator Bob Corker that will require the president to submit the deal to Congress for a vote of approval or disapproval. So you are correct on that point. Here is my argument though... When the debate began in this country and the Dems and Reps took sides, it was largely based on mega donors and not the people they are supposed to represent. Most of which apposed the deal. More accurately, there were donors on both sides but the donors on the side of against we're giving substantial more money. A few examples are Sheldon Adelson Paul singer and Haim Saban.... They gave all together 13 mil. Money.... Money is where I make my argument for due process. If your argument is due process then you would have to agree that congrees is elected to represent the people of their district, correct? Except thats not who they where voting for. They where voting for the mega donors. So if you where to argue that Obama didn't abide by due process then you would also have to argue that the congress did not as well.... Sense their vote is supposed to represent the will of the people that elected them and not big money donors, correct?
    1
  16.  AC Milan Blog 1899 Channel  William H is crazy pants hun. Not trying to put him down. But litterally. Had interactions with him before. Dude believes some crazy shit. He is off in the head. So probabaly not worth screaming into the wind... Is all I'm saying.
    1
  17.  @pp-tx3bt  I think your misunderstanding me sweetheart. I was not talking about a bomb. The Nuke program is primarily about power. I know that. I don't believe I said anything along the lines of bombs of weapons. I could be wrong but it was not my intent? Can you let me know where your getting it from?
    1
  18.  @andrewschnatter4338  Well... I feel like the not passing it has to do with the vote and the people who vote for it. I mean... It has to be taken into account. These are the same obstructionist Republican majority at the time that went so far as to not pass the 9/11 responders Aid bill 4 years until finally being shamed and arm-wrestled into it... Just because they didn't want to give Obama a win. So yes... We vote for them to make these decisions on our behalf... But would you not agree that this means they should make the decisions that are 1. Best for the people and 2. What the people want? Big money donors should not factor in.
    1
  19.  @andrewschnatter4338  whether it was legally binding in your opinion or not is not the only factor. Also... Our opinion as americans are not the only ones that matter. Also, other than saying its not a good deal... What was the reason for getting out?
    1
  20. @synco pated When you use ignorant phrases like that from the jump... I'm really not surprised at your critique being completely devoid of actual substance. I said bill instead of treaty. Give you a f**** cookie. 🍪 Come back and talk to me when you have something to say that doesn't amount to Nana Nana Boo Boo, child! This is the grown ups table.
    1
  21.  @Steel-pr2hq  Still waiting... ??? 😊
    1
  22.  @Steel-pr2hq  Again with the substance. I don't really understand why ppl like you think you have scored a point with childish references like that. It just screams "childish sad BS coming from what is supposed to be a grown ass man". No, to this precious.The response you conveniently didn't see because it called you out on your b*******. " @Noah Seiter    I underatand why you would need to see me as being "butt hurt", regardless of the fact that you have nothing to back it up. You need to feel like your getting back at me for calling you out on your lazy logic... But lets be clear... This is not the case. In fact your the one who seams a little touchy to me. Claiming I know your right, dispite all evidence to the contrary. If you need to lie to yourself about that then go ahead but don't waste my time with it. I will be more than happy to answer your questions as soon as you answer mine. Which I asked you first. What makes the Iran deal a bad one?"
    1
  23.  @Steel-pr2hq  So... As I said.... Still waiting???
    1
  24.  @Steel-pr2hq  For you to learn to read apparently.
    1
  25.  @Steel-pr2hq  You didn't answer my question. So I will be more than happy to answer yours as soon as you answer mine, which I adked first.
    1
  26. @Noah Seiter  Again... This was my response to yours. With the question again stated in it.   I underatand why you would need to see me as being "butt hurt", regardless of the fact that you have nothing to back it up. You need to feel like your getting back at me for calling you out on your lazy logic... But lets be clear... This is not the case. In fact your the one who seams a little touchy to me. Claiming I know your right, dispite all evidence to the contrary. If you need to lie to yourself about that then go ahead but don't waste my time with it. I will be more than happy to answer your questions as soon as you answer mine. Which I asked you first. What makes the Iran deal a bad one?
    1
  27.  @Steel-pr2hq  So... Still waiting???
    1
  28.  @andrewschnatter4338  Lets not forget ones like Mitch McConnell and alike... But yes! Absolutly! There is something we both agree on and in all those ways. 😊 Thanks! We may not agree on everything but it's cool. We don't have to. Both our view points matter and you where very thoughtful and respectful in your response. So thanks again. 😉
    1
  29.  @andrewschnatter4338  I understood why you said what you did. I agree with it as well.... If I had not said before... Due process is important. But when the Congress who votes on it to make it that way is doing so for currupt reasons and not reasons for which they where elected, its not right to not have it done. That's all I was saying. I don't think the American people have proper representation now. We should.
    1
  30.  @andrewschnatter4338  I would also say that all the deals, whether finalized or not... That Trump is backing out of with little to no explination, give us bad standing not only in terms of trade wars and such but also in trust and safety. Its not helping us at all. Basically.... I think he is a jackass idiot child with way to many racist leanings BUT if he was a jackass idiot child with way to many racist leanings and was helping us as president, if he was putting us over all in better standing and solving more problems then he creates.... Well you would hear little from me. I'm about results.... And facts. Not party lines. It just behooves some to paint people like me that way. It makes our thoughts and ideas easier to attack. I'm sure you run across some on my side that do the same to you.
    1
  31.  @andrewschnatter4338  Indeed Sir! I mostly call myself a liberal because my believes tend to lean that way and it saves time.
    1
  32.  @andrewschnatter4338  Oh goodness... Now we done started a whole new dabate. My bad! Lol I'm gonna get back to you tomorrow. Starting with the racist thing. Cuz boy, do I have some facts fpr you on that one. Lol talk to you then. 😉 Hope you have a great night
    1
  33. @synco pated What post are you talking about and what in the HELL have I posted that makes you think that I in anyway am supporting Trump or putting down Obama for the Iran deal?????? I have even said in several posts the exact same thing you did about how the bill was approved by other nations and they would monitor Iran as well. What in the hell are you talkin about? I have said literally nothing about a bomb. By the way, using one word instead of another by accident doesn't mean you don't understand what those two words mean. It just means you used one word instead of another by accident. Dude oh, you don't know what the f*** you're talkin about. Go read some of my other post on this thread. Me and you're making the same points. You got me all wrong and you're acting ignorant towards me because of it. You need to back your s*** up.
    1
  34. @synco pated Are you talking about this? "on April 30th of 2018 the United States and Israel said that Iran had not disclosed a past covert nuclear weapons program. In 2019 however the iaea certified that Iran was abiding by the main terms of the deal. There was however some question over how many Advanced centrifuges were allowed. Because that was not specified in the deal." That was in context of what the other person said and where not my words. They where facts from Wikipedia. I was arguing that they had followed the deal. That there had been claims that they did not and some had to do with spacific things they said where for 1 thing (bombs) but where actually for energy. Also... Look at my convo with Andrew. Ive been arguing that Obama had to make the deal the way he did because of the Republicans. There is a difference between correcting asshole Trump troll and picking a fight with everying just cuz. Even some of the Trump people you can have a decent debate with. I'm having one with Andrew right now. You don't have to just start off and continue to be a dick just because you disagree. Especially when you apparently don't bother reading more than a sentence or two and then decide on your own that this person is a piece of s*** and therefore you must treat them that way. I've been arguing the same things you have throughout the whole thread and you didn't bother looking at one of those damn things. I was an a**** because I disagreed with you. It turned out I didn't and you were the a******. Bring it down dude. Sometimes it's just unnecessary.
    1
  35. @synco pated well... Thanks.... I think. Lol have a good night hun
    1
  36.  @pp-tx3bt  Its totally cool. I think I might have said something at some point. Cuz your the second one that made that mistake on here. It was probably that bit where I was talking to someone else and gave a small bit of a fact in a seprate post. It was a thing... No worries though. ☺ I agree that lots of people think that Iran's nuclear program is a front for building bombs. I have a lot to do with American spin as well. Mostly people who want us going to war with Iran. Or have other motives to villainize them. Not that they have the greatest track record. So they don't make it super hard for them to do it but in this case they just want freaking nuclear power. Also, I agree that the only country in the world that has ever dropped a nuclear bomb on a civilian population does not then get to lecture other countries about how having nuclear weapons is a bad idea. When the rest of the world talk about arrogant Americans I can see what they mean sometimes. Besides ... Your correct again... This time they do seam to be minding there Ps and Qs with what they are doing. ... But that rocket scientist in the white house doesn't seem to need a reason passed, Obama did it, to pull out of the deal. 🙄 But Trump is making money with Saudi Arabia so of course he turns a blind eye to them. where in lockstep sweetheart. I know exactly where you're coming from.
    1
  37.  @pp-tx3bt  Oh dude! Just call WTF "Page 117". It's funny. So he tried to claim the Mueller report had the Democrats caught doing messed up stuff. I asked him to quote where that was. He proceeded to tell me it's on page 117 of volume two. However he refuses to quote it even after being asked several times. So my geeky ass finally looks up page 117 v2. The hilarity ensues when I find out that on page 117 not only was the word Democrat never mentioned, but there wasn't even a person who was a Democrat on that page, at all. I'm guessing he didn't think I was going to look it up. The best part, in the midst of trying to convince me about this mythical page 117, he also tries to convince me that he owns this big (no name) company and he's a 1% ER, who doesn't have to work. So he just sits around and chills in the YouTube comment section all day. This is that guy! Lol So don't worry about what he says... Lol
    1
  38. @Andros I actually agree with that... Kim Jon crazy pantz needs them to much to fill out his pantz!
    1
  39.  Trumpy Bear  he couldn't get Congress to approve anything because the Republicans ran Congress and refused to give President Obama even the appearance of any kind of win. As demonstrated by their shameful stalling, excusing and general ignoring of even the 911 first responders bill that Mitch McConnell and the Republicans had to practically be arm wrestled into after years. But I'm sure you know that.
    1