General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Killed The Cat
CNN
comments

Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "Bogus Arizona election audit backfires on Trump" video.

🤣 WHERE MY DUDES AT!?!?! Ya know... The ones who have been on here screaming "JUST WAIT!". The ones, so SURE the election was stolen? What's your next excuse for being sore losers? 🤣
15
@glamclamm7970 Sure! We're the ones "getting played". Countless recounts and Audits and court cases with not a scrap of proof of the big lie that you choose to believe. Everything comes back BS on your side, but we're the ones "getting played". Please, feel free to prove that? We will wait
8
@thefederalist1713 🤣 Could you be grasping at any more straws? The dudes who did the audit just told you what it was. 🎼Let It Go! 🎶 Let It Go!🎶 🤣
5
@thereseogorzaly9280 Did you? And if so, what would be the difference? Other than getting the details of how absolutely full of s*** this whole thing has been from the beginning?
4
@tjcombo9328 Gotta love these rebels without a cause. Lol
4
@francescolevine3031 Prove it? We will wait.
4
@msabccbscnnoanfoxnews I'm the lone lib in my fam... We don't hate each other either. However... I have always found the shoot the messenger argument to be a bad one. This is just the media telling us the findings. That is the extent of their interaction. It's all public record if you want the details.
4
@cindykenyon8860 👈 deflection is, by default, admitting you know you can't defend.
4
@noahkb80 Oh! I love you guys!😁 I tell you what... If it makes you feel better to act like you are some kind "rebel" without a cause, blind "truth seeker", while everyone one else, who are simply pointing out the 👉lack of evidence👈, is some kind of "blind fool", you go right ahead. It's not going to make the facts go away.... And the fact is, you have been screaming something for almost a year now that you have had every opportunity to prove but still can't. Thanks for playing! 😉✌💙🇺🇸
4
@msabccbscnnoanfoxnews Oh... They always will... They will also always use personal attacks as a distraction from the lack of sense they are making. Which is why I am not the least bit ashamed of rubbing it in their faces, when they Re proven wrong, everytime.
4
@thereseogorzaly9280 then what is the difference and provide proof of it? If you've watched it several times, that's not going to be hard for you to do. Still waiting
3
Nobody You Know Why do you do this yourselves. Lol... Cool! Prove it? I'll wait.
3
@thefederalist1713 No... Its not.. Your assuming these people are rational. Also, your assuming the onus is on us to prove their baseless claim wrong. Its not. It's theirs to prove it to be true.
2
@thereseogorzaly9280 🎼🌬Let It Go!🎶👯🎶Let It Go!🎼🌬
2
@IAM REAL timestamp a video where you claim that these people said anything different? That's what CNN did. You do the same? If CNN's lying it's super easy to prove it, right? Post a link to the video and time stamp it where they say anything different?
2
@derekwang7330 Hi! And... Nope. 60+ court cases, 40+ audits and recounts.... Every Avenue availed of them to prove there was massive voter fraud and still nothing. It's been almost a year. He lost.
1
@jinjango8983 Bye Bye, Boo Boo Kitty! 😘✌🇺🇸💙
1
@derekwang7330 1. The only reason we're at a stalemate as you refuse to acknowledge anything that doesn't fit your false narrative, and you think people saying things magically makes them true. 2. Even if not all affidavits were retracted that means what? Just some more people saying stuff that can't be proven true after 60 plus court cases about two dozen Audits and recounts and almost a year. 👈 all the things you choose to ignore. 3. Where are you getting this from? And only takes a few people to overturn a state. In what law is that written? Because we find fraud every election. Especially every presidential election. It's just so minuscule that it doesn't even register as a 1% of the actual vote and therefore doesn't matter anyways. Nobody lost by the margin that they found. So if your statement was true then we would have had all our elections overturned.
1
@derekwang7330 doing the rest tomorrow. 1 am here
1
@derekwang7330 cool! Lets look at the Audit... Did it or did it not say this 👉 "The ballyhooed and controversially conducted hand count of nearly 2.1 million Maricopa County ballots still showed Biden defeating Trump, and though the margin changed by 360 votes it was actually Biden whose margin of victory grew from 45,109 to 45,469."
1
@derekwang7330 Cuz, your intentionally ignoring things you can't argue against. So... We will slow this down and take it little by little.
1
@derekwang7330 Its their audit. Their numbers. Why would they point out "anomalies" and then not account for them in their final numbers?
1
@derekwang7330 I will get to it. We have to take it step by step now because you keep intentionally ignoring things.
1
@truthbeyond3624 Sigh... So... You can't come up with an adult rebuttal and, instead, decide to try and call me a Boo Boo head, vaguely reference some fantasized cherry picked argument, decide to be, both, super Ironic and dramatic, and then finally, try and throw in a little shoot the messenger, to highlight the fact that you know you could not present an effective argument against the actual message.... And you thought that was a good idea, why?
1
@derekwang7330 How is that "most likely"? They said 3 weeks and took almost 5 months. They are a company run by people with no experience in this in the first place. They won't even confirm their own, supposed suspicions, that we don't even know are there because they didn't bother to release the data collection. Only "their results". Which is the whole reason that after tons of court cases comma tons of audits and tons of recounts, people were objecting to this silly made-up audit by amateurs in the first place. So what is your basis for saying its "most likely"?
1
@truthbeyond3624 Did it? Very questionable? And that was said, where? Please provide proof of this?
1
@truthbeyond3624 British media you say? How intentionally vague. Which British media?
1
@truthbeyond3624 BTW... your comments are drowning in posturing and insecurity. Ya might wanna look into that.
1
@truthbeyond3624 "This specific claim can be found at the start of Volume III of the draft report. (That’s the volume that actually delineates the claims. The preceding two “volumes” are fairly short.) In short, the final list of voters who cast mail-in ballots in 2020 was compared to a commercial database of people who moved between households. It found that about 15,000 people had moved elsewhere in Maricopa County before the registration deadline, an additional 1,700 who moved elsewhere in the state and about 6,600 who moved out of state. What the review did not do is verify that the database results were correct, pointing out that “a small percentage of error is expected within these results.” It did not determine that those who might have moved were ineligible to vote. It acknowledged that “it may be possible for [the voter] to receive a ballot, for example, if they know the present occupant, or if the ballot is improperly forwarded” to them. In its report, the team leading the review, called Cyber Ninjas, recommended that the county do more research."
1
@truthbeyond3624 “The official canvass does not even match who voted, off by 11,592—more than the entire Presidential Election margin.” Here we have Trump layering an inaccuracy on top of what’s probably an innocuous claim. The Cyber Ninjas’s report asserts that the file they were given documenting cast votes had a different total than the official results. The discrepancy was about 3,400 votes, nearly all of them cast before Election Day. There’s no explanation of why that might be the case and, again, no suggestion that anything illegal occurred. Just: There’s this discrepancy. You probably noticed that 3,400 is not 11,592. Trump is using a figure that includes “both the counted and uncounted ballots” — meaning that he’s identifying as suspicious an unexplained discrepancy of 8,000 uncast votes. This is not strong evidence of an election tainted by fraud."
1
@truthbeyond3624 “Voters who voted in multiple counties totaled 10,342, and 2,382 ballots came from people who no longer lived in Maricopa County.” Here Trump considers two separate claims. In the first, he’s elevating a section of the review that found more than 10,000 instances in which people with the same first, middle and last names and the same birth years had cast ballots in more than one county. On its surface, this seems significant. But when I opened up Arizona’s voter file Friday morning (data collected by the firm L2), I quickly found that there were four John Smiths living in Arizona who are reported as being 43 years old. Two of them live in Maricopa County. This took me about 30 seconds. Again we see the same pattern: elevation of something that could be considered questionable without actually resolving it. And, again, Trump seizing upon it as proof of his point. As for the 2,382 ballots, this was essentially the in-person-voter version of the effort to match cast ballots against that commercial database of people who had moved. It’s not clear that these voters even moved, that they cast votes improperly, that they cast votes illegally or that they cast votes for Biden. Just another bit of doubt elevated in the review that Trump tacks onto his case.
1
@truthbeyond3624 “There were also 2,592 ‘more duplicate ballots than original ballots.’ ” This cryptic assertion, unexplained by Trump, is another discrepancy in metrics. In cases where a ballot cannot be read by an electronic voting machine, it is duplicated to be scanned. The county said it duplicated about 28,000 ballots, but the Cyber Ninjas counted about 27,000 ballots that were supposed to be duplicated and about 29,500 duplicates. What does this mean? Good question. Maybe the Cyber Ninjas miscounted. Maybe the county did. Maybe something got lost in the shuffle. Maybe something else happened. There is no evidence presented that this indicates that too many votes were tallied or even that too many votes were duplicated. It’s just a number, offered among many other numbers, as part of a review initiated to raise questions about voting in the 2020 election.
1
@truthbeyond3624 But you keep talking s*** Darren. We know it's all you have. 😘✌ You lost Boo Boo Kitty!
1
@derekwang7330 Both... And your ignoring my question. "What makes it "most likely"?"
1
@derekwang7330 I will be more then happy to address your other issues, just as soon as you stop ignoring my question and actually answer it.
1
@derekwang7330 In fact... Here is a copy of the AZ audit hearing, someone posted on youtube for me. 👉https://youtu.be/sAAu6O33rNE Time stamp where these things where said, in order to allow for full context.
1
@derekwang7330 Its not enough to overturn just because you have decided it is.
1
@derekwang7330 and what about everything else you keep ignoring, as you're grasping at straws?
1
@derekwang7330 so you've decided it was debunked for a bad reason and therefore it wasn't debunked?
1
@derekwang7330 so, you can't give the title or the site name like I did?
1
@derekwang7330 And what about everything else you keep ignoring, as your grasping at straws?
1
@derekwang7330 So... Not so much enough to overturn anything.
1
@derekwang7330 the "briefcase" video has been debunked in a court of law.
1
@phoenixstormjr.1018 cool! Then why don't you go ahead and prove it? We will wait! 🎼🌬Let It Go!🎶👯🎶Let It Go!🎼🌬
1
@tjcombo9328 Been waiting for ever now. Gotta love them sounding so mug with nothing to back it up but grown-ass adults acting like children and calling everybody a boo boo head who doesn't agree with their crazy. 🤦
1
@davidhale4647 They are grasping at every straw imaginable. Like fingers on the ledge of sanity, that are quickly slipping off. 🤦 And... Hi Friend! 😁✌💙🇺🇸
1
@derekwang7330 I can say I'm the god of gummy bears and hookers named Sandy. It won't mean anything without proof.
1
@derekwang7330 3. Prove that it would only take a few people to throw a presidential election?
1
@derekwang7330 1. So are the people you are claiming stole the election. For more then some silly charges like contempt. They would go away for treason. 2. You are also not considering all the court cases, the retractions of those affidavits, the ones that were proven in court couldn't have happened, all the recounts, all the audits, all the safe guards against these things, the fact that this is 1 state that wouldn't change the election anyways and about a million other things.
1
@derekwang7330 2. What's more likely, 7000 Trump supporters were saying what they were told to say, or hundreds of thousands of people are accomplices in a massive conspiracy spanning the entirety of the United States in order to steal the election from Donald Trump, for which there is absolutely no proof for other than 7,000 Trump supporters saying that happened and some of them being proven wrong in court? Occam's razor
1
@derekwang7330 now let's put that into a full context. 1. Many of these people who filled out this affidavit we're shown to be not telling what happened in those specific circumstances in court. Several others recanted. All of the people filling out the affidavit is we're also Republican Trump supporters. So if you want to talk about suspicion...
1
@Watermelon_Man92 🎼🌬Let It Go!🎶👯🎶Let It Go!🎼🌬
1
@thefederalist1713 I have no idea what my side or not has to do with anything... As I said... The people doing the audit just told you what the conclusion was. If you have any evidence to the contrary that they have said, please present it... We will wait
1
@crotononhudson7309 Cool! Prove it?
1
@thefederalist1713 you have to be reasonable with your expectations. People who choose to live in a lie and are so confirmed in it that they just flat out lie about anything that doesn't fit their narrative, are not going to listen to you. All you're doing is beating your head against the wall with those kinds of people. There are some that are rational but most aren't and you are wasting your time. They don't care about those facts. Not all are that way but a whole bunch are and you need to be able to spot which ones you're wasting your time with him which ones you're not.
1
@phoenixstormjr.1018 cool! Then prove it? We will wait...
1
@jinjango8983 Please provide evidence they said any different? We will wait... Like we have been for almost a year now.
1
Dagoth Ur Please provide evidence they said any different? We will wait... Like we have been for almost a year now.
1
@IAM REAL There is a difference between you saying something and it being true. If it's all right there... Then prove it... Time stamp... Quote... Etc... Cuz there is clearly a large portion of people who don't see what you claim you did... And you apparently know right where to find it. We will wait.
1
@jinjango8983 I have. Everybody has. You're just lying about what is in there. Which is why your comments are going to remain super vague and you're never going to be able to provide timestamps or quotes from said audit. Your stalling and diverting, instead.
1
@jinjango8983 I'm finding it funny how confused your pretending to be, in order to not have to prove something you're clearly lying about. How does a copy of the audit hearing, prove anything you're saying, when your claiming it says something completely different then what actually happened? Hence the timestamp. Of course, if you're not completely full of s*** all you have to do is time sample where they said what you claimed they did.
1
@jinjango8983 Yeah... Ya know why that was ignored? Because you can cherry pick anything. You can also say something was said that wasn't. It's not proven until you can present both the full context and can prove it was saying anything like that at all. It's not that hard understand once you actually want to understand it. Though that wouldn't fit with your confirmation bias, would it?
1
@jinjango8983 you made claims about something happening at the hearing for the audit. Provide time stands as to where that happened since we clearly disagree on what actually happened.
1
@jinjango8983 Is that why you keep ignoring my question, while trying to turn your onus of proof for your claims on me?
1
@jinjango8983 If you are saying 1 thing was said in the audit hearing, and others disagree, then how is a copy of the hearing prove you are correct, without time stamps of it being said?
1
@jinjango8983 Using your logic... Couldn't I just claim that the audit hearing presented findings that Donald Trump committed crimes and should now be put in jail for tampering with the election? Then present a copy of the hearing and say that is the proof and if you don't agree, your obviously lying about watching it?
1
@jinjango8983 And now your playing like you don't know what I disagree with? Wouldn't that be obvious? The same thing I've been talkin about this entire time. Your claims. Do you not know what your claims are anymore?
1
@jinjango8983 And you mean, you can't provide those time stamps for your claims because your lying about what they said in the audit, as I have been saying all along. Thanks for admitting that, by default. Maybe next time try telling the truth. 😜✌💙🇺🇸
1
@jinjango8983 " you just want to hear things that people say and take screenshots so you can upload them to your YouTube channel" 👈 1. Thanks for admitting how much your bothered, by going to my actual channel. 2. I have to very recant videos made of a guy who has been stalking me all throughout the youtube comment section for a solid 5 months, no matter what I do. Which you would have known if you had, ironically, watched the videos that total less then a min long.... ... But nice try at a deflection and excuse. Shows your desperation quite well. 🤣
1
@jinjango8983 " you didn't watch the audit you" 👈 which is what you said to the original poster, who said, " that was like paying the wraps to fix the game but they didn't. Cyber ninjas just pocketed the money on walked away laughing, making Trump look like a buffoon" Then to me later 👉" here's the audit. Go watch it. It's got all the evidence you'll probably ignore"
1
@jinjango8983 you sure did intentionally leave your comments vague, but you did say there was "evidence". Several times, in fact. What is the evidence and where are the timestamps for it?
1
@jinjango8983 or do you still want to keep playing dumb so you don't actually have to backup the s*** you talk? Which says a whole lot all by itself. 🤣
1
@jinjango8983 no... I'm acting like you took a couple extra steps that most people that are secure in their argument, don't bother to do. But, if they did do it I'm sure they would bother to know what the hell they were talking about before bringing it up. So half-assing s*** seems to be your thing. As well as, telling on yourself.
1
@jinjango8983 I'll be waiting for your next b***** excuse
1
@jinjango8983 And we are back to being intentionally obtuse, while making definitive claims about the opposition. Acting like you can't understand simple concepts that where already explained to you, never saying anything about the "evidence" you claim is there, while insisting we are wrong and you are right... And... I see you've thrown in a little playing the victim at the end there, to try and give yourself a little face saving way to run off without ever being able to prove your "evidence" was there in the first place. Thanks for playing... Maybe next time come with some actual courage and conviction.
1
@jinjango8983 👈 And that would be a grand total of 12 different times this person has maintained we are wrong and he is right, while simultaneously being intentionally vague about so called "evidence" that proves it, while constantly trying to put the onus of proving this on anyone other then himself. Just... Ya know... If we are keeping count.
1
@derekwang7330 And... Once again... Why are you ignoring Everything else? Including this question, for the 3rd time now?
1