Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "Federal office says Kellyanne Conway should be removed from government" video.

  1.  How are your ratings CNN?  Ummm... Yes! I don't understand why you guys keep bringing him up. Not one person on what you guys would call the liberal-left backed his play after they found out what happened. Don Lemon disowned him and he was one of the first people who called him to check on him after the "attack". Dude is a bad guy. I'm glad he lost it show. I'm glad he probably tanked his career. I think you should have gone to jail and that deal was b*******. So yes... Across the board! That includes anyone on any side caught breaking the law. Laws should be enforced across the board, or why have them.
    10
  2.  @alexocasio-gomez5267  why do you guys always think that invoking Hillary is going to make your guys not corrupt or Criminal? I tell you what, I'm fine with both of them going to jail. You?
    8
  3.  @btredinger  or... What about it being started by the Republicans. It's funny how you guys seam to always forget that part.
    7
  4.  @yourfriendlyneighborhoodla2091  Hatch Act! Breaking the law is bad! When you do so, you get punished. Or you should. Simple enough for you?
    5
  5.  @trixiewashington224  Lol... Get umm girl! 😉
    4
  6.  Mats K  don't forget several foreign and domestic emoluments laws.
    3
  7.  @yourfriendlyneighborhoodla2091  no. Because she broke the law.
    3
  8.  @chadclemen  whatever you want to tell yourself so you can sleep at night
    3
  9.  @girlonfire00net  Ha! Ha! Ha! This guy is laughing at the assumption that someone is breaking the law and could possibly get away with it.... and doesn't understand how stupid that makes him look! Ha! Ha! Ha!
    3
  10.  John Dunbar  Sorry... I don't do micropenis anymore. The tweezers and magnifying glass always seam to get in the way. 😂😂😂
    3
  11.  @btredinger  Which now Trump says is totally cool. So what ya talking about again? 😜😊😂
    3
  12.  @paulpaul3536  or Trump, Conway, Flynn, Papadopoulos, Manafort, Stone, Gates or Cohen.
    2
  13.  murder junkie  All anyone hears from you is that you to stupid to come up with substance, child. Stop embarrassing yourself... Or not. . lol
    2
  14. Prove it!
    2
  15.  @grassmastersmith4422  Sigh... Because he wasn't told to. It wasn't his mandate. It wasn't what this special Council was put together for. He was MANDATED to investigate Russian Election Meddling and the Connection it had with the Trump Campaign. Which is also why, when he found evidence of other crimes on Trump and others, he passed that off to other prosecutors. Which he did about 7 different times in the 2 years he was conducting the investigation. Its also why, several states, most likely New York, are considering Prosecuting Trump themselves after his term is up. Look... These are all basic facts of the case. I don't know where your getting your info, Fox News, right wing youtube bloggers or whatever, but it is not even giving you the basic facts of the investigation. Which is why your so uninformed. Here is the Wiki link of the facts. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Counsel_investigation_(2017%E2%80%932019) Wikipedia has a strict policy of not leaving any information that is not factually accurate up on their site without at least three credible, non bias sources. In other words.... This is not left or right leaning. It is simply the facts of the case. Read it please.
    2
  16.  @alexocasio-gomez5267  Really? Do you have any proof for any of this or are ya just guessing? Also, Trump just came out and said that doing what your talking about is totally cool now. So what are you even talking about? 😜😊😂
    1
  17.  @ruthingle1487  Thanks! You keep getting them girl! 😉
    1
  18.  murder junkie  I just wanted to say how much I appreciate your substance based arguments. Come back when you learn how to speak like an adult. Your just embarrassing yourself and you're too thick to know it.
    1
  19.  How are your ratings CNN?  How?
    1
  20.  @chadclemen  Yeah... I'm gonna be taking the illitrate ass hat, who is to stupid to know he is voting against his own interests' seriously when he tells me I'm the idiot..... No .... Wait... That would make me an idiot. Nevermind. 😉
    1
  21.  John Dunbar  Yeah... Don't do stupid either. Especially those to stupid to realize that Little Johnny was the real joke! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  22.  John Dunbar  Wow! You still think your relevant... Yeah... delusional is going to be a hard pass to. Too many memories.
    1
  23.  John Dunbar  Oh... I forgot. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
    1
  24.  John Dunbar  Oh! Your 12.... Thanks for that. I'll be sure to report that to terms of service. Bye now! 😜
    1
  25.  John Dunbar  Don't worry... I'm sending them all of it in screen shots dumbass! Even if I didn't, they could look it up. It's called coded records little boy. Your fixing to have to make yourself a new troll account. Sad day for you. 😜
    1
  26. Because that would be abduction and he doesn't want to go to jail. Lol
    1
  27. So, you not finding him credible somehow negates the law?
    1
  28. Except... You know... The Hatch Act.
    1
  29. That's what I'm talking about. Since when a republican soft on crime? 🙄
    1
  30. Still wouldn't mean she didn't break the law.
    1
  31.  @grassmastersmith4422  First, Hatch Act!
    1
  32.  @grassmastersmith4422  Second... Your one of those... Fine... Why was it "phony"?
    1
  33.  @grassmastersmith4422  So... If your talking about the Hatch act... Then you kinda don't have to believe anyone. You just read the law.... If your talking about your claim that the Mueller investigation was "phony" then.... I take it your not going to tell me why it was "phony"? Just more obvious partisan craziness, with no actual evidence behind it? Okay... I got ya now. 🙄
    1
  34.  @grassmastersmith4422  Its also not "all you need to know". How we know that is, Trump is president and his public statments on the matter alone would have been enough to open an investigation in any jurisdiction.
    1
  35.  @grassmastersmith4422 "it has something to do with federal funds to support a candidate" That is only 1 part of it. Which is why I keep telling you that you are uninformed and should get informed before continuing to speak on this. When you do, you will find that they recently loosen the regulations on the Hatch Act. You will also find that even though they recently loosened those regulations, kellyanne Conway still managed to break them. "The Hatch Act of 1939, officially An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law whose main provision prohibits employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president, vice-president, and certain designated high-level officials,[1] from engaging in some forms of political activity. It went into law on August 2, 1939. The law was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico. It was most recently amended in 2012." This is what the Hatch act is. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatch_Act_of_1939
    1
  36.  @grassmastersmith4422   Grassmaster Smith  So let's break this down... " In that case all Democrats have completely violated the Hatch Act." Here is the problem with your argument. 1. Lets start with "all". How could you possibly know that without knowing or at least seeing all Dems do so? 2. The Hatch acts main provision prohibits employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president and the vice president.... Which can obviously not be all of them. 3. Those who fit that criteria should be punished irregardless of political party. I see that you were only speaking about the Democrats. I would be more than willing to prosecute democrats for that if you're willing to prosecute Republicans? "Accusing Trump of what they have been doing all along." 1. What have they accused him of that you think he is not guilty of? 2. Trump himself accuses people all the time of things that he simply knows nothing about. So glass houses... Is all I'm saying. 3. What democrates have spacifically been guilty of the things the dems accuse Trump of? "Democrates aren't able to survive any logical argument. They have to silence and censor their opponents to have any chance." I would just like to remind you that I have had to inform you of basic facts about the subjects that you have brought up several times now. Simple things, that took me only a moment to look up myself. So I would assume that "logical arguments" would begin with all pertinent facts and therefore you would have shown yourself to be ill equiped for such an argument, yourself. Also, I would remind you that the republicans have built a bad reputation for gerrymandering. Which is silencing people in the most importantent of forums. Their vote. "I think the Democrats need to man up and show they have some plans that make sense." Well... I have good news for you there. Many Dems have solid plans for lots of key issues. Healthcare, infrastructure, marijuana legalization, climate change, gun regulations and much more. I'd be happy to find some for you, if you would like? " They need to be able to honestly dispute Conway." They have, as I have already shown with the Hatch Act. Also... I should remind you that the original claim came from the Trump counsel office and the Republicans. Not the Democrates. As for your last comment... You do understand that this accusation of Hatch Act breach did not come from the Democrats, right? It came from the Republican White House counsel's Office. That's where the recommendation of firing her over the Hatch Act came from. So the people who you characterize as trying to censor her are Trump's White House counsel.
    1
  37.  @grassmastersmith4422  Look you have shown a clear bias and lack of pertinent facts, on the things you are speaking on. You should really reserve judgment until you educate yourself on these matters. Your simply not coming to educated conclusions. I'm not telling you to look at the situation from the democratic side or anything. Simply the facts of things.
    1
  38.  @grassmastersmith4422  Sorry sweetheart, your history on this thread tells a different story, but I understand why you would be reduced to baseless insults at this point. Please educate yourself on what your choosing to speak on in the future. If only to spare yourself further embarrassment.
    1