General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Killed The Cat
CNN
comments

Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "Marjorie Taylor Greene has heated exchange with CNN reporter" video.

Listening to her reminds me, so much, of those face saving, vapid, mean girls in high school. It's like she never grew out of that phase.
42
Listening to her reminds me so much of those face saving vapid mean girls in high school. It's like she never grew out of that phase.
10
@nbk4dv9 Did you learn already that shooting the messenger is left to those without an actual argument? Guess not.
6
Listening to her reminds me so much of those face saving vapid mean girls in high school. It's like she never grew out of that phase.
4
Listening to her reminds me so much of those face saving vapid mean girls in high school. It's like she never grew out of that phase.
4
@julianpetkov8320 dude, you literally have no credibility as long as you keep making these silly excuses as to why you can't point out the claim you made in the Mueller report. Did I bring up the motor report? Yes. Did I make the claim that the Mueller report said there was no evidence of collusion found? No. You did that. All I'm doing is asking you to point out the page and the fact that you can't, says all we need to know. So keep referencing random s*** to try and deflect and distract but you need to know I don't get distracted. Provide proof for your claim and we can move on.
3
@Lisa-pb3qp Glad that's not just me. Like... I didn't want to go to your party anyways... That is what she sounds like. 🤦
2
@hueylongadmirer1829 Why does that question makes sense to you and nobody else?
2
@54margie Youtube sigue borrándolo en español, por alguna razón. 🤣
2
Kevin Soler When was the last time you ran across a "Bot" that had... - A personal Profile pic - Had their channel for over 5 years - Had videos on that channel, with comments and responses, from that channel, on them - Description in the channel description box - Custom Banner graphics for that channel If I'm a "bot" I'm the most elaborate "bot" on YouTube.... But... Thanks for further discrediting yourself, by telling that silly lie.
1
@54margie ¡Te tengo, chica!
1
@julianpetkov8320 why in the world would I have to produce a page number in the Mueller report for a claim you say is in there? Nice try though. You claim the Mueller report states that there was no evidence of Russian collusion found. I'll be waiting for you to produce that page? No more desperate attempts to switch it around because you can actually find the page either. That's just sad.
1
@julianpetkov8320 🤣 Does it? Where? What page? Quote it, or maybe just give the page number. I have a copy. I can look up the quote myself. I'll even post it. I can always tell those who have not actually read it. 🤣 Btw, what is volume 2 about? 🤣
1
@julianpetkov8320 still waiting...
1
@julianpetkov8320 Did I say the Muller report said it found no evidence of collusion or did you?
1
@julianpetkov8320 👈 Some ppl are just plain ole masochistic. Okay... gave you a shot stop discrediting and embarrassing yourself. Too bad you didn't take it. 👇 Timeline.... He bring up 👉"the "Russia Russia Russia" conspiracy theory. I bring up the investigation into the "Russia Russia Russia conspiracy theory". 👉"no sooner than you're going to read Volume 2 of the Mueller report." Logical next step, I think... 🤷 He counters with this claim about what is in the Mueller Report. 👉 " Seriously? You bring up a document which state's clear that they found, "no Russian collusion". (even using quotations) Being that I know he is lying, because I've actually studied the Mueller report. Both volumes... I ask him to give me the page it's on. 👉 "🤣 Does it? Where? What page? Quote it, or maybe just give the page number. I have a copy. I can look up the quote myself. I'll even post it. I can always tell those who have not actually read it. 🤣 Btw, what is volume 2 about? 🤣" At which point he disappears for 14 hours until I Puppet Master him back into the conversation with this... "Still waiting". He then starts to try and Flip It On Me by insisting that it is somehow my job to prove his claim. 👉" You are still waiting? You still haven't produced the page number that does!" At this point he also tries to deflect and distract onto another subject, for the first but not last time. Which I obviously find utterly ridiculous, because I know and he knows it's not in the Mueller report. So he's basically asking me to prove his point about something I know isn't in there. Yep... That is the logic he is using... 🤦 👉"why in the world would I have to produce a page number in the Mueller report for a claim you say is in there? Nice try though. You claim the Mueller report states that there was no evidence of Russian collusion found. I'll be waiting for you to produce that page? No more desperate attempts to switch it around because you can actually find the page either. That's just sad." But since, apparently, he has no other tools in his belt, he tries the same thing again. Claiming it's my "onus" to prove that his lie about what the Mueller report says is true. Then trying yet again to deflect to another subject. 👉" IKR, you brought it up so why would you need to provide a page reference. All you need to say is read the Mueller report and Wallah your report is made." Except, that ridiculous assertion was June to fail. Considering he literally pretended to quote a specific phrase in the Mueller report. Which can be easily looked up by the page number. Of course it would be easy to do so if what he claimed was in there is actually in there. It's not so he has to keep dancing. And, of course, Q the second attempt at distraction and deflection to another subject. Except the time I address it. 👉"dude, you literally have no credibility as long as you keep making these silly excuses as to why you can't point out the claim you made in the Mueller report. Did I bring up the motor report? Yes. Did I make the claim that the Mueller report said there was no evidence of collusion found? No. You did that. All I'm doing is asking you to point out the page and the fact that you can't, says all we need to know. So keep referencing random s*** to try and deflect and distract but you need to know I don't get distracted. Provide proof for your claim and we can move on." He has nowhere else to go and so is forced to keep making the same ridiculous assertion that it's my job to improve his lie about what in the Mueller report. This time citing that I'm the one that brought up the Mueller report so it's my job to prove his lie. except that's a ridiculous assertion because I'm not the one that made that claim. .. But he's desperate try and flip this on me because he knows he lied. 👉 " don't wait, read it and produce the reference page. You brought it up the onus is on you." And then he provides a second, trying to discredit the Mueller report after trying to use it as a reference himself.🤣 So he gets another question he's going to run away from momentarily. 👉"Did I say the Muller report said it found no evidence of collusion or did you?" And the latest golden nugget... 🤣 👉 " can you cite the page number that it did? "no" Well then why are you playing word games? Find something better to do." As you can see, a clear representation of him being completely full of s*** and not wanting to admit it. Let's see what funny pretzel shape he turns himself into now... In order to get out of his silly lie.😁
1
@julianpetkov8320 I'm not playing word games. I'm requiring you to back up your claim about the Mueller report with proof and you are hilariously turning yourself into funny pretzel shapes trying to get out of it because you know you lied. Did I say the Muller report said it found no evidence of collusion or did you?
1
@julianpetkov8320 Yep... Uaha.... that is the problem with lying. You tell one light and then you just have to keep making up new lies to cover up the first one. Except this is a thread, genius. Which means all anyone has to do to figure out you're lying is scroll up.... But.. You do you, sweetheart. Works out great for my agenda. Which is to help you discredit yourself. That way nobody makes the mistake of taking anything you say seriously. That is what the timeline is for. It's not for you. So thank for your help with that. 🤣 Now you keep going on with your silly lie. I'll just keep pointing out that it is one. Let's see who gets tired first. 😂
1
@julianpetkov8320 Did you or did you not say, "You bring up a document which state's clear that they found, "no Russian collusion". "?👇
1
@julianpetkov8320 👈 Some ppl are just plain ole masochistic. Okay... gave you a shot stop discrediting and embarrassing yourself. Too bad you didn't take it. 👇 Timeline.... He bring up 👉"the "Russia Russia Russia" conspiracy theory. I bring up the investigation into the "Russia Russia Russia conspiracy theory". 👉"no sooner than you're going to read Volume 2 of the Mueller report." Logical next step, I think... 🤷 He counters with this claim about what is in the Mueller Report. 👉 " Seriously? You bring up a document which state's clear that they found, "no Russian collusion". (even using quotations) Being that I know he is lying, because I've actually studied the Mueller report. Both volumes... I ask him to give me the page it's on. 👉 "🤣 Does it? Where? What page? Quote it, or maybe just give the page number. I have a copy. I can look up the quote myself. I'll even post it. I can always tell those who have not actually read it. 🤣 Btw, what is volume 2 about? 🤣" At which point he disappears for 14 hours until I Puppet Master him back into the conversation with this... "Still waiting". He then starts to try and Flip It On Me by insisting that it is somehow my job to prove his claim. 👉" You are still waiting? You still haven't produced the page number that does!" At this point he also tries to deflect and distract onto another subject, for the first but not last time. Which I obviously find utterly ridiculous, because I know and he knows it's not in the Mueller report. So he's basically asking me to prove his point about something I know isn't in there. Yep... That is the logic he is using... 🤦 👉"why in the world would I have to produce a page number in the Mueller report for a claim you say is in there? Nice try though. You claim the Mueller report states that there was no evidence of Russian collusion found. I'll be waiting for you to produce that page? No more desperate attempts to switch it around because you can actually find the page either. That's just sad." But since, apparently, he has no other tools in his belt, he tries the same thing again. Claiming it's my "onus" to prove that his lie about what the Mueller report says is true. Then trying yet again to deflect to another subject. 👉" IKR, you brought it up so why would you need to provide a page reference. All you need to say is read the Mueller report and Wallah your report is made." Except, that ridiculous assertion was June to fail. Considering he literally pretended to quote a specific phrase in the Mueller report. Which can be easily looked up by the page number. Of course it would be easy to do so if what he claimed was in there is actually in there. It's not so he has to keep dancing. And, of course, Q the second attempt at distraction and deflection to another subject. Except the time I address it. 👉"dude, you literally have no credibility as long as you keep making these silly excuses as to why you can't point out the claim you made in the Mueller report. Did I bring up the motor report? Yes. Did I make the claim that the Mueller report said there was no evidence of collusion found? No. You did that. All I'm doing is asking you to point out the page and the fact that you can't, says all we need to know. So keep referencing random s*** to try and deflect and distract but you need to know I don't get distracted. Provide proof for your claim and we can move on." He has nowhere else to go and so is forced to keep making the same ridiculous assertion that it's my job to improve his lie about what in the Mueller report. This time citing that I'm the one that brought up the Mueller report so it's my job to prove his lie. except that's a ridiculous assertion because I'm not the one that made that claim. .. But he's desperate try and flip this on me because he knows he lied. 👉 " don't wait, read it and produce the reference page. You brought it up the onus is on you." And then he provides a second, trying to discredit the Mueller report after trying to use it as a reference himself.🤣 So he gets another question he's going to run away from momentarily. 👉"Did I say the Muller report said it found no evidence of collusion or did you?" And the latest golden nugget... 🤣 👉 " can you cite the page number that it did? "no" Well then why are you playing word games? Find something better to do." As you can see, a clear representation of him being completely full of s*** and not wanting to admit it. Let's see what funny pretzel shape he turns himself into now... In order to get out of his silly lie.😁
1
@jessejohantaylor They really... Really didn't.... And, apparently was not prepared to back up his claim.... Or to even find someone who requires him to do so. Hence the silly mental gymnastics show. 😉✌
1
Kevin Soler Apparently.... Did you not understand, that was the entire point of the reference? It's called sarcasm to illustrate a point.
1
@julianpetkov8320 Hey Buddy! 😁 You wouldn't happen to of actually read the Mueller Report in the last 2 months, have you? Ya know... So you could stop lying about what is in it? Just curious! ✌😉💙
1
@cathythomas6768 Sorry... Truth... Well that requires evidence and proof of your claims. You guys can't ever seam to provide that. So... Basically.... Your saying the Rep party has nothing to offer.... But we all, already knew that, didn't we! 😁
1
TheTruth 👈 What about this baseless conspiracy theory... What about that baseless conspiracy theory! Please pay attention to anything other then what My party is doing! I know I can't defend them. That is why I have to deflect all the time! 😉✌💙
1
@jankycorruptworldplanx224 🤦 When you are going to come here and call ppl stupid... You should not make silly claims about algorithms, you clearly know nothing about, beforehand. Just a thought...
1
Kevin Soler Yeah... You should really look up the word "know" and its meaning. You can't possibly "know" the things your claiming you "know". The more accurate phrasing would be, "I'm making massive assumptions, about millions of total strangers, to attempt to provide validity to the narrative I'm trying to present, about a system of operation that I don't understand." "Playing on ppl of color" = Massive assumptions "The left" = Millions of total strangers "Socialism" = System of operation, you clearly don't understand
1
Kevin Soler "that white privilege" = Silly out of context assumption, your attempting to trigger me with. "You ain't that smart" = Hilariously ironic phrasing for the statement, your attempting to get across. "Was the party of slavery" = intentionally inaccurate historical reference to the southern Dems, more well known as the DixieCrats, who, in today's time, more accurately resemble the Rep party. Considering that is also where the majority of them went after they left. Which would be why the majority of the southern states are red now... Also... Another attempt to trigger. "Just a few decades ago" = intentionally inaccurate timeline of events, indicating less time has passed, being that, the majority of the DixieCrats left the Dem party by the mid 60's, after Pres. Johnson legislatively ended school segregation. Putting the "decade" count at 5+ or more accurately 57 years ago. "A few" is 2 or less.
1
Kevin Soler Oh... And your attempting to subscribe negative connotations to a system of operation, that could not possibly have them. Socialism is a system of operation. Meaning, like all other systems of operation, it's use and effect is strictly in the hands of the user.
1
Kevin Soler " the user would be Democrats" = a fundamental and most likely intentional mischaracterization of how our government works.
1
@julianpetkov8320 still waiting...
1
Kevin Soler " they can't even allow us to have a platform on social media" = attempted mischaracterization of corporations as democratic, which would strictly depend on the use of the word "us". All in an attempt to play the victim in every scenario thus far.
1
Kevin Soler " socialism is simply of the method to implement a new Global corporate government tell you to do ideas to track everything you do and give you social scores in order to control you." = insane right-wing conspiracy theory, for which you could provide no proof. Meaning that it is meaningless.
1
Kevin Soler " The solution doesn't print more money and hand it out but that's what your party is doing, simply compounding the future economic meltdown." = a baseless, one-sided, attempt at mischaracterization upon the Democratic Party, in order to simplify and villainize a complicated issue.
1
Kevin Soler 👈 I don't feel the need to continue to point out every attempt at failed logic, this person is presenting. They will just jump from one baseless and bias conspiracy theory to the next. 👆My goal was to help them present a pattern that would discredit their future words, which we have done sufficiently already. 👆 He is simply one of these people that need to feel special. He needs to feel more intelligent... More "in the know", then others. Its simply an over compensation tactic. These are always transparent and easily dismantled. Simply by calling out attempts at triggering for what they are, giving context to cherry picked and intentionally mischaracterized issues and insisting, the very obvious logic, that one must have evidence of their claims before they are considered valid. I do not expect him to stop. He need this to much. I would caution anyone to think twice before believing anything he claims to be or claims he has been. I would direct them towards the exchange up to, to see the clear pattern of his behaviour. With that in mind... This is the message this attention seeker will receive from me, from now on, and no more. Thanks 😉✌💙🇺🇸
1
Kevin Soler 👈 Like I said.... I am now various forms of "bad" because I require things like... - Evidence - Logical Thought - Full context - Facts Instead of the usual.... - Baseless claims - Massive assumptions of millions of total strangers - Attempted villainization of anyone who disagrees with you - Childish triggering tactics - Lies about one's identity to try and establish credibility This is what they do. Then call us the uneducated followers. 🤦
1
Kevin Soler 👈 I don't feel the need to continue to point out every attempt at failed logic, this person is presenting. They will just jump from one baseless and bias conspiracy theory to the next. 👆My goal was to help them present a pattern that would discredit their future words, which we have done sufficiently already. 👆 He is simply one of these people that need to feel special. He needs to feel more intelligent... More "in the know", then others. Its simply an over compensation tactic. These are always transparent and easily dismantled. Simply by calling out attempts at triggering for what they are, giving context to cherry picked and intentionally mischaracterized issues and insisting, the very obvious logic, that one must have evidence of their claims before they are considered valid. I do not expect him to stop. He need this to much. I would caution anyone to think twice before believing anything he claims to be or claims he has been. I would direct them towards the exchange up to, to see the clear pattern of his behaviour. With that in mind... This is the message this attention seeker will receive from me, from now on, and no more. Thanks 😉✌💙🇺🇸
1
Kevin Soler and I repeat... And I forgot to add a penitent for DEFLECTION.👈 Like I said.... I am now various forms of "bad" because I require things like... - Evidence - Logical Thought - Full context - Facts Instead of the usual.... - Baseless claims - Massive assumptions of millions of total strangers - Attempted villainization of anyone who disagrees with you - Childish triggering tactics - Lies about one's identity to try and establish credibility - Deflection from anything they know they can't argue against - A powerful urge to save face comes along with the 📦 This is what they do. Then call us the uneducated followers. 🤦
1
Kevin Soler 👈 I don't feel the need to continue to point out every attempt at failed logic, this person is presenting. They will just jump from one baseless and bias conspiracy theory to the next. 👆My goal was to help them present a pattern that would discredit their future words, which we have done sufficiently already. 👆 He is simply one of these people that need to feel special. He needs to feel more intelligent... More "in the know", then others. Its simply an over compensation tactic. These are always transparent and easily dismantled. Simply by calling out attempts at triggering for what they are, giving context to cherry picked and intentionally mischaracterized issues and insisting, the very obvious logic, that one must have evidence of their claims before they are considered valid. I do not expect him to stop. He need this to much. I would caution anyone to think twice before believing anything he claims to be or claims he has been. I would direct them towards the exchange up to, to see the clear pattern of his behaviour. With that in mind... This is the message this attention seeker will receive from me, from now on, and no more. Thanks 😉✌💙🇺🇸
1
@jankycorruptworldplanx224 SoOoOo... The first 2 comments seem to be pointless posturing and babbling about a specific term... For some silly reason... So... Yeah... I don't really need to do anything with that. Moving on...
1
@jankycorruptworldplanx224 The third one is where it got interesting. 😁👇
1
@jankycorruptworldplanx224 Who said something about algorithms? You did! Except, for some reason, you referred to the YouTube algorithm as "they", when you were claiming "they keep deleting my comments". There is no "they".... You know that, right? It's a code. Do you think there's like an office building filled with cubicles of people scouring the YouTube comment section? If anything is deleting their comments, it's the algorithm. The algorithm is programmed to spot certain word clusters or singular words like, cuss words, hate speech, lies and conspiracy theories, abuse... Etc.... it filters them out and is programmed to do so. Why? Because YouTube doesn't have to allow that kind of thing on their platform. People always find a way around it. It's all about rephrasing. There is no "they".
1
@jankycorruptworldplanx224 and... " I'm pretty sure my message was erased already". Also... Not how it works. If the algorithm is going to flag and erase your comment for something that is in it, it's going to happen within 10 seconds of you posting it.
1
Kevin Soler Damn! I always forget the "bot" thing. That is another diversion.... Because.... When was the last time you ran across a "Bot" that had... - A personal Profile pic - Had their channel for over 5 years - Had videos on that channel, with comments and responses, from that channel, on them - Description in the channel description box - Custom Banner graphics for that channel If I'm a "bot" I'm the most elaborate "bot" on YouTube.... But... Thanks for further discrediting yourself, by telling that silly lie.
1
Kevin Soler 👈 Like I said.... I am now various forms of "bad" because I require things like... - Evidence - Logical Thought - Full context - Facts Instead of the usual.... - Baseless claims - Massive assumptions of millions of total strangers - Attempted villainization of anyone who disagrees with you - Childish triggering tactics - Lies about one's identity to try and establish credibility - Deflection from anything they know they can't argue against - A powerful urge to save face comes along with the 📦 - and nonsensically calling ppl bots This is what they do. Then call us the uneducated followers. 🤦
1
Kevin Soler 👈 I don't feel the need to continue to point out every attempt at failed logic, this person is presenting. They will just jump from one baseless and bias conspiracy theory to the next. 👆My goal was to help them present a pattern that would discredit their future words, which we have done sufficiently already. 👆 He is simply one of these people that need to feel special. He needs to feel more intelligent... More "in the know", then others. Its simply an over compensation tactic. These are always transparent and easily dismantled. Simply by calling out attempts at triggering for what they are, giving context to cherry picked and intentionally mischaracterized issues and insisting, the very obvious logic, that one must have evidence of their claims before they are considered valid. I do not expect him to stop. He need this to much. I would caution anyone to think twice before believing anything he claims to be or claims he has been. I would direct them towards the exchange up to, to see the clear pattern of his behaviour. With that in mind... This is the message this attention seeker will receive from me, from now on, and no more. Thanks 😉✌💙🇺🇸
1
Kevin Soler how refreshing! Someone who openly admits he's an immature child and therefore shouldn't be listened to or taken seriously. Thank you so much for not wasting our time. Appreciate ya! 🤣
1
Kevin Soler 👈 Like I said.... I am now various forms of "bad" because I require things like... - Evidence - Logical Thought - Full context - Facts Instead of the usual.... - Baseless claims - Massive assumptions of millions of total strangers - Attempted villainization of anyone who disagrees with you - Childish triggering tactics - Lies about one's identity to try and establish credibility - Deflection from anything they know they can't argue against - A powerful urge to save face comes along with the 📦 - and nonsensically calling ppl bots This is what they do. Then call us the uneducated followers. 🤦
1
Kevin Soler 👈 I don't feel the need to continue to point out every attempt at failed logic, this person is presenting. They will just jump from one baseless and bias conspiracy theory to the next. 👆My goal was to help them present a pattern that would discredit their future words, which we have done sufficiently already. 👆 He is simply one of these people that need to feel special. He needs to feel more intelligent... More "in the know", then others. Its simply an over compensation tactic. These are always transparent and easily dismantled. Simply by calling out attempts at triggering for what they are, giving context to cherry picked and intentionally mischaracterized issues and insisting, the very obvious logic, that one must have evidence of their claims before they are considered valid. I do not expect him to stop. He need this to much. I would caution anyone to think twice before believing anything he claims to be or claims he has been. I would direct them towards the exchange up to, to see the clear pattern of his behaviour. With that in mind... This is the message this attention seeker will receive from me, from now on, and no more. Thanks 😉✌💙🇺🇸
1
Kevin Soler 👈 Lord! 😂 This one expects me to engage in a further "debate" with him, when All he has are ridiculous and obvious lies and/or conspiracy theories... has, several times, decided it was a good idea to mock the idea of having proof of his claims.... and who has some kind of schizo ADHD thing going on right now in regards to sticking to a subject.... But... I'm copy and pasting the same thing that he can't argue against, so, in his head, I'm the most elaborate "bot" in the YouTube comment section, here "using AI technology", just to prove his crazy, lying and baseless ass is, infact, that....
1
Kevin Soler 👆 Welcome to the reason it is pointless to engage with you about a subject, in a serious and earnest manner. You will just make s*** up, assume because you say it, it makes it true and then if I don't go along with that particular lack of logic, you'll just make up another lie, for which you have no proof... But one that conveniently (again, in your head) makes me the bad person and you the victim. Na! I'm good! I'll just continue to point out what you are actually doing, for which you can't argue against. You keep making s*** up... And we will continue to go on the journey of discrediting you, together! 😁✌
1
Kevin Soler When was the last time you ran across a "Bot" that had... - A personal Profile pic - Had their channel for over 5 years - Had videos on that channel, with comments and responses, from that channel, on them - Description in the channel description box - Custom Banner graphics for that channel If I'm a "bot" I'm the most elaborate "bot" on YouTube.... But... Thanks for further discrediting yourself, by telling that silly lie.
1
Kevin Soler 👈 Like I said.... I am now various forms of "bad" because I require things like... - Evidence - Logical Thought - Full context - Facts Instead of the usual.... - Baseless claims - Massive assumptions of millions of total strangers - Attempted villainization of anyone who disagrees with you - Childish triggering tactics - Lies about one's identity to try and establish credibility - Deflection from anything they know they can't argue against - A powerful urge to save face comes along with the 📦 - and nonsensically calling ppl bots This is what they do. Then call us the uneducated followers. 🤦
1
Kevin Soler 👈 I don't feel the need to continue to point out every attempt at failed logic, this person is presenting. They will just jump from one baseless and bias conspiracy theory to the next. 👆My goal was to help them present a pattern that would discredit their future words, which we have done sufficiently already. 👆 He is simply one of these people that need to feel special. He needs to feel more intelligent... More "in the know", then others. Its simply an over compensation tactic. These are always transparent and easily dismantled. Simply by calling out attempts at triggering for what they are, giving context to cherry picked and intentionally mischaracterized issues and insisting, the very obvious logic, that one must have evidence of their claims before they are considered valid. I do not expect him to stop. He need this to much. I would caution anyone to think twice before believing anything he claims to be or claims he has been. I would direct them towards the exchange up to, to see the clear pattern of his behaviour. With that in mind... This is the message this attention seeker will receive from me, from now on, and no more. Thanks 😉✌💙🇺🇸
1
Kevin Soler Thanks for proving my point, yet again, before trying to save face, while running away! Come back when your on your meds again. Tootz! 😉✌🇺🇸💙
1
Kevin Soler Hey, buddy! What happened? I thought you where leaving? 😂
1
Kevin Soler Oh... And... I'm sorry! I didn't mean to give you the impression that I wanted you to stop lying about me being a "bot". Please! Continue to you so. Like I said, my goal here is to help you discredit anything you say. You continuously lying about me does that just fine! 😁 Ready! Lets do it again!
1
Kevin Soler Where is your proof that I am a "bot" using "AI Technology"? I mean.. You do have evidence of this, correct? Cuz, if you don't then you would be lying about that, right? Which would put anything else you may claim into question, right?
1
Kevin Soler Oh... So you where lying then! Great! Thanks for admitting it. Even if you had to try and save face with your attempted "trolling", while doing so. Now you can keep blathering on all you want... And about whatever you want... And it won't matter... Because your a liar now and nobody really has to take you seriously. Not that they were before but... 😂
1
Kevin Soler .... in the future, if you're curious about the exact moment you became my b** 😁 it was the moment you tried to say "goodbye", I said you were "running away", and you actually CAME BACK! 😂 Who falls for that s***? 👆 This guy! That's who! 😂
1
Kevin Soler Gee! I'm sorry, Sugar pits... I'd love to believe you but you've already admitted that you're a big fat liar. So I'm afraid anyting you say from this point forward has to be considered not credible. To bad! I'm sure you where just going to get around to having some kind of point... Any min. That's just to bad... 😁✌💙🇺🇸
1
Kevin Soler BTW... Welcome Back, My B****! 😂
1
Kevin Soler Aww! I'm sorry! You being an admitted lair renders anything you say completely not credible. If I considered the opinion of an admitted liar, it would make me as willfully ignorant as you... So... I'm afraid that's gonna be a hard pass. Thanks for trying, though! See you in the morning, My Fab B****! 😜✌💙🇺🇸
1
Kevin Soler Aww! I'm sorry, Sugar Foot! I can't really take an admitted liar and trolls, opinion seriously. See, ppl like you are all about saving face, at all cost to your dignity, morals and credibility. There's not really a point in engaging with someone like that. It would be a waist of time to do anything other then help you expose yourself for the sad creature you truly are.... And... We already accomplished that goal, together. So, that's gonna have to be a hard pass for me. Thanks for the offer, though! 💙😁✌🇺🇸💙
1
Kevin Soler Aww! I'm sorry, Sugar Foot! I can't really take an admitted liar and trolls, opinion seriously. See, ppl like you are all about saving face, at all cost to your dignity, morals and credibility. There's not really a point in engaging with someone like that. It would be a waist of time to do anything other then help you expose yourself for the sad creature you truly are.... And... We already accomplished that goal, together. So, that's gonna have to be a hard pass for me. Thanks for the offer, though! 💙😁✌🇺🇸💙
1
Kevin Soler Aww! I'm sorry, Sugar Foot! I can't really take an admitted liar and trolls, opinion seriously. See, ppl like you are all about saving face, at all cost to your dignity, morals and credibility. There's not really a point in engaging with someone like that. It would be a waist of time to do anything other then help you expose yourself for the sad creature you truly are.... And... We already accomplished that goal, together. So, that's gonna have to be a hard pass for me. Thanks for the offer, though! 💙😁✌🇺🇸💙
1
Kevin Soler Thank you for discrediting yourself further... But it's really not necessary at this point. Your pretty much a joke at this point already. I do, however, appreciate your work ethic! 😘✌💙🇺🇸
1
Kevin Soler no you're a boo boo head. Know your boo boo head. How old are you? LOL
1
@ghostballs1874 seriously? I know you are but what am I. That's the best you got?
1
@resistthedonkey Apparently so do you. 🤦
1
@chanelnumba_5 Using capitalization at the beginning of sentences and commas between quotations, is also a wonderful thing, know nothing. 😉✌
1
@gibbyswife9218 that is what the Republican Party gripes about all the time. Why shouldn't it apply to Congress. 😉✌
1
Lucy Ricardo "I never once said these things since I was elected to congress" Once again admitting it went past 2018. Whoever is telling her to calm down with the qanon stuff since she got elected also needs to start writing her speeches.
1
@chanelnumba_5 👈 He No Like it when the Salt Gets thrown back on him! 🤣
1
@steveshapiro326 Right!
1
@steveshapiro326 so often, I find my phone wondering if they really know what they sound like. Because in my head I'm like, why would you want to go on national TV and sound that way...
1
Lucy Ricardo Sorry... Your silly silly assumptions and suggestive comments, about me a total stranger to you, doesn't really get you anywhere. Other than me pointing out how silly and immature they are.
1
Lucy Ricardo Na! That would be you just using a nonsensical excuse because you apparently can't handle people just agreeing with you. You shouldn't use words you're not qualified to diagnose.
1
@julianpetkov8320 probably no sooner than you're going to read Volume 2 of the Mueller report.
1
Lucy Ricardo Abortion should be very rare, safe and available to all that need it.
1
Lucy Ricardo Is it any better when their children are murdered by people who are American? I promise you, as a parent, I don't give a damn what country they're from if they murder my child.
1
Lucy Ricardo the Democratic Party has been largely silent on the issue of War waging. To all of our detriment. However, in the last 90 years oh, the majority of the wars we got in to have them because of the Republican charge to do it.
1
Lucy Ricardo the American people should be our Focus. Their lives should be precious. No matter how much money they have.
1
Lucy Ricardo volume two of the Mueller report lays out 10 different cases of obstruction of Congress, committed by Donald Trump during the investigation into Russian conspiracy. Not collusion. Collusion is not a thing under the law. So anyone saying that it had been proven false, is not taking everything into context and merely pushing their own narrative.
1
Lucy Ricardo " I was allowed to believe things" what does that mean? Does she think she shouldn't be allowed to believe whatever she wants in America? Is this her just trying to put the onus on other people?
1
Lucy Ricardo " I wouldn't be standing here today and you couldn't point a finger and accuse me of doing anything wrong" explain her conspiracy theory video post from 2019?
1
Lucy Ricardo earlier she claims that when she started to see things online that she knew were not true she stopped listening. Later she claims that 911 absolutely happened. Then why did she make that video about the Pentagon and the plane? Is that not her contradicting her own statements?
1
Lucy Ricardo then she goes on to blame the media for her statements.
1
Lucy Ricardo cancel culture is a real thing coming from both sides.
1
Lucy Ricardo setting up a false dichotomy using transgender bias is, one, inaccurate. Considering that's not why her poster being taken down. She doesn't have one post taken down because she said she believed in God or that God made male and female. Social media platforms are private businesses that can choose to take down an accurate political or scientific statement from the larger platforms. You guys would call that propaganda until you your side is doing it.
1
Lucy Ricardo there's actually no scientific proof of a higher being of any form. If you want to learn about your body, turn to science.
1
Kevin Soler " what do you think is going to happen when Democrats have the power to decide who gets good necessary for life." = baseless assumption, easily disproven by historical records, both recent and past, in a failed attempt to villainize an entire party of people you don't know.
1