General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Killed The Cat
CNN
comments

Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "Hear Bill Clinton's message to Trump after California shooting" video.

When your country's leader is willing to leverage its people's lives, to avoid facing responsibility for the crimes he committed, while in office.... What more is there left to say... 🙄
58
@bridge4 and only a limited amount.
3
@bridge4 also we should make business and tax filings for every candidate mandatory. The people deserve to know weather there politician, their leader, is bought and paid for by anyone other than them.
3
fran bran So far, just with Ukraine, we can prove campaign Finance fraud and three counts of obstruction of Congress. We are also well on our way to establishing what the aid was held for and if we do that we have conspiracy bribery and extortion. Campaign Finance fraud is proven out by the transcript that he released. The three counts of obstruction of Congress are proven out by Trump having his lawyers send letters of Declaration to the house saying that he was going to commit obstruction of Congress and go against subpoenas.
3
@coolbeans6148 Yeah.... No-one cares he is Orange. We care when he breaks the law.
3
@hani lugtehul What is weak, is using blanket assumptions (bias media) (CNN), about people you have never met in your life, in order to avoid having to argue the substance.... Why is it weak,"you ask"? 😁 It's too easy to tear apart. 👇 And how do you know I get my facts from CNN? Because I am commenting on a CNN clip? Wouldn't that mean that you also get your facts from CNN? 😉✌
3
@mightymouse6848 It should def matter more then that! Everyone's child should matter.
3
s macca Well.... I'm the one arguing substance in detail and you're the one trying to use childish blanket dismissals because you can't. So I think I'm good! 😉✌
3
fran bran Oh... Lord! 🤣 Dude! 🤣 So... I'm torn between the hilarity of the lengths you will go to in order to insist that Trump is not responsible for his own actions, and the concern I have for you actually believing what you just said.
2
You are not wrong but would what he said be any less or more true if someone else had said it?
2
@NDFOOTBALL "Yes! Lets "deport" as many collage educated contributing members of Society as possible! Cuz, those are totally not the people we want immigrating to our country. That is just crazy talk!" 🙄
1
@presidentnotsure3273 Is that a serious question?
1
@applepie4970 Yeah... Not the only ones pushing for it, brain trust! 🙄
1
TheDalaiLamasGlasses Yeah... Who do you think has a history of blocking reasonable gun-control bills?
1
@presidentnotsure3273 There are more guns in America now then people. The NRA has a sordid history of blocking any kind of reasonable gun regulation. One that is public... And has been going on for a long time... Is there personal responsibility? Yes. Can more then just the shooter be responsible? Sure can! Making it more and more easy for people to get ahold of guns, means that people who are going to use them to do bad things don't have to go far to get them. How many people do you think would be hurt or dead in any number of mass shootings if they used a knife instead of a gun? The NRA has blocked things like making sure people who I have severe mental illnesses can't get ahold of firearms.... Government-sponsored gun education classes... studies on the cause of gun violence. Do you not understand that? Or did you just not know that? They have literally blocked people from just finding out the reason why mass shootings in America keep happening more and more often. Why would they need to do that? Block scientific studies? What is wrong with you... Is the question you should be asking. Educate yourself.
1
@presidentnotsure3273 Wrong again. The Constitution is written for a "well regulated militia". "Well regulated" being the key phrase there. How is studying gun violence and it's caused taking anyone's gun away from them? Why would you block a scientific study like that? Or government-sponsored gun safety classes? How is that taking anyone's going to wait from them?
1
@bridge4 Ty! I did like the idea of every American getting the same amount and then deciding who they want to give it to. It would really be a double confirmation on the will of the people a d who they want in that office. Just look at who has more money.
1
@presidentnotsure3273 Here we go with that silly argument.... One... you have emotion, I have emotion everybody else has emotion. I have no idea why you guys keep trying to shame people for being human beings. It's not a very good argument.
1
@presidentnotsure3273 That's your fear talking. Not of me. That's the fear you're letting your party put into your head, so you do exactly what they want you to do. Go scroll up and look at what I've said about gun control. At what point did I ever say I'm going to come and take your gun away? So far all I've mentioned is scientific studies, safety classes and the idea that maybe it's not the best idea in the world to have somebody who is severely mentally mentally ill have a gun. So... If you didn't get that from me then where? Maybe it's from the 9 million different times your side of the aisle decided to try and scare you come up by screaming about how the Liberals and the Democrats are coming to get our guns come everytime we want reasonable gun regulation. Which does not involve taking people's guns away. You are letting people manipulate you.
1
@presidentnotsure3273 Did you just say... responsibility is a slippery slope? I live with a black American. We have a child together. He has a master's degree in creative writing and runs the southern district of a popular store, while writing and publishing books. He has to do with the mediocrity of regulations on a multitude of levels because of all of that. But he also knows that they are here to keep us safe. They have reasons. Seriously... Though... You have a problem with regulations? How about the regulations that say you can't poison our drinking water with your toxic waste? It's a regulation, so are you not down for that? Do you not want your water to be drinkable? What about the one that says you can't build a prison within 10 miles of a school? You're not down for that? Show about the sex offender registry and all the regulations that people who have committed sexual offenses that are released back into the population have to follow? Is that not a good idea?
1
@presidentnotsure3273 What I know about black Americans.... Or at least the ones that I know.... They wouldn't want you thinking that you ever had the right to put words in their mouths and try to speak for them. You were getting more and more irrational with your argument. That's usually when it's time to call it off.
1
@presidentnotsure3273 so your idea is to turn America into a police state. .. cuz it's super funny how you seem to have the answer to that, with no explanation by the way, but you can't answer the questions I've asked you. Because you don't have good answers for them.
1
@presidentnotsure3273 How is studying gun violence and it's caused taking anyone's gun away from them? Why would you block a scientific study like that? Or government-sponsored gun safety classes? How is that taking anyone's going to wait from them?
1
@dustinhendricks951 Is it not used how I think or is it not used how I think, in your opinion?
1
@dustinhendricks951 BTW, if you think it's wrong... Please explain how?
1
@dustinhendricks951 Guns are a part of the problem... They are a part.... But only a part. They are certainly not doing all these mass shootings with a waffle maker. There are more guns in America then there are people. So, where there guns in the past? Of course! No where near this volume, though. Another factor is the state of tension in America today. Another is rising cost of health care, including mental health care. The opioid crisis.... Etc But to say that the tool they consistently use to commit these acts, doesn't have anything to do with the problem, is just not logical.
1
@presidentnotsure3273 Here is the problem... Guys like you don't see the irony in your own words... to make that statement you just made, you had to put words into my mouth that were not there to begin with. At the same time you're claiming that I'm the one that's closed minded or stubborn. First, you're right. I am stubborn. Mostly because I go where the facts Lead Me and then have silly people try and lie on me like I'm the one that magically made these facts actual facts. Cuz it's so much easier to attack me than it is to address the substance..... "you all who blame the NRA for every shooting"... do you want to scroll up and point out where I said that? Oh! That's right! You can't. Because I didn't say it. If you have to lie to validate your point of view, maybe consider your point of view isn't worth validating.
1
@presidentnotsure3273 and you're still not answering my question. Which I'm pretty sure by now means you don't have a good answer for it. "How is studying gun violence and it's caused taking anyone's gun away from them? Why would you block a scientific study like that? Or government-sponsored gun safety classes? How is that taking anyone's going to wait from them?"
1
@dustinhendricks951 people have had access to it. No one is denying that. They have just not had as much access. That is the point. It's so much easier for anyone to get ahold of a firearm nowadays. They are everywhere. That is a contributing factor. I listed several things. Mental illness and the cost of healthcare is one of them. That was me pointing out that guns are not the only Factor. I'm trying to do a little thing called being honest about the whole picture. You're trying to do a little thing called trying to use my words against me and twist them. I don't believe I even came close to saying that mental health issues translates into a tool that is protected from governmental control. Which isn't necessarily True by the way. You see a whole lot of people running around with Bazookas or tanks or rocket launchers or nuclear weapons or most automatic machine guns? No. Why? Because someone thought it wasn't a good idea to give untrained civilians that kind of weaponry. Guns have been regulated in this country from the jump. For good reason.
1
@dustinhendricks951 now. I read the Constitution sweetheart. You're the one that called my use of Regulation into question and then I asked you to explain. Instead of doing this you decided to make assumptions about my level of Education. Which is very telling. It was a simple question. To actually. Was I not using regulation correctly in your opinion or was that a fact? And if I wasn't how wasn't I and what is the correct way to use it?
1
@dustinhendricks951 Ugh.... Dude... Just say that you where not prepared to back up that claim you made... This is like the 3rd time I have asked you to explain what you meant when you said I was not using regulation correctly. This is the third time you've dodged it. How was I not using the word regulation in the Constitution correctly?
1
@dustinhendricks951 No they where not. We didn't have as many... we certainly didn't have more Firearms than we do people in America in the 60s. Now you're just making things up.
1
@dustinhendricks951 Oh goodness! So you never had anything to back up your critique then. You just thought you'd throw out there that I wasn't using regulation right and then totally not be prepared to back that up with anything.... Think whatever you like about me... You keep dodging the substance. Not me. 😉✌
1
DB Stevens Wow! CooCoo Crazy puffs! Maybe you should check the owners manual again. It's obvious you haven't read it in a while! ✌😉
1
Melvin Cohen I live near a military base and my whole family is military. Not 1 Soldier cause anything that has Auto in front of it anything other than a weapon of war that should not be in the civilian population.... the Republicans that won't listen are the ones that are scared. That's what they don't want to say. They're letting their own leaders scare them with BS and that's why they need a gun. They feel scared. They just don't want to admit it.
1
@travesswolford2835 Sorry for butting in but any kind of registry would have to be done at the local levels. It's the best way to do it with how our government is structured.
1
@jesuschristislord77733 Oh... Goodness! 🤣 And you think that was a smart thing to say! When us "libtards" talk about the right and they're useful idiots oh, you're the one were talking about! ✌😉
1
cj p Still setting up those silly false dichotomies, to compensate for your little "ego", I see! Don't worry, Little Johnny! One day you'll be a real boy. 🤣
1
@dustinhendricks951 WAIT! ✋SoOoOo... Now you are telling me that you claimed I was wrong in the way that I use the word regulation, in regards to the Second Amendment, and now you're asking me how I used it? How did you know I was wrong if you didn't know how I used it in the first place?
1
@dustinhendricks951 DUDE! 🤣
1
@dustinhendricks951 SoOoOo.... Did you think that stuffing all those comments with irrelevant to the subject babble, was somehow going to discourage me from pointing out that you have yet to answer my question?🤣 Yes! I do keep asking the same thing. This right here. 👇 You said, "You might want to look closer how (regulated) in the Constitution was used. It's not what you think.". So, how is "(regulated)" used differently then how I think? BECAUSE... The first thing you said to me was this! 👇 "You might want to look closer how (regulated) in the Constitution was used. It's not what you think." AT NO POINT have you answered that question. All you keep doing is dancing around it and asking things that indicate that you don't know the answer, yourself. Like this latest one, here! 👇 "...? Ok "Do you mean federal government is responsible for monitoring how many Firearms are what kind of firearms in law-abiding citizens have?" WHICH WAS A RESPONSE to these 2, here!👇 "Ugh.... Dude... Just say that you where not prepared to back up that claim you made... This is like the 3rd time I have asked you to explain what you meant when you said I was not using regulation incorrectly. This is the third time you've dodged it. How was I not using the word regulation in the Constitution correctly?" "Oh goodness! So you never had anything to back up your critique then. You just thought you'd throw out there that I wasn't using regulation right and then totally not be prepared to back that up with anything.... Think whatever you like about me... You keep dodging the substance. Not me. 😉✌"
1
@dustinhendricks951 SoOoOo.... Why would you ask this 👇 "Do you mean federal government is responsible for monitoring how many Firearms are what kind of firearms in law-abiding citizens have?" If you knew that I was somehow getting the word regulation, in the Second Amendment wrong? Which... Again.... Is the very first thing you said to me... Here! 👇 "You might want to look closer how (regulated) in the Constitution was used. It's not what you think." Oh! No! Someone is caught! 😁
1
@dustinhendricks951 Now... What you have been doing os, trying to dodge, deflect and twist what I have said.... Like with this here! 👇 " You said mental issues as being one of problems didn't you not? Hum how does that translate into a tool that is protected from governmental control?" Because I said this here! 👇 "Guns are a part of the problem... They are a part.... But only a part. They are certainly not doing all these mass shootings with a waffle maker. There are more guns in America then there are people. So, where there guns in the past? Of course! No where near this volume, though. Another factor is the state of tension in America today. Another is rising cost of health care, including mental health care. The opioid crisis.... Etc But to say that the tool they consistently use to commit these acts, doesn't have anything to do with the problem, is just not logical." Which was one of the first things I said to you.
1
@dustinhendricks951 And then there is the issue of you contradicting yourself, saying this, Here!👇 " Yes the number of firearm ownership has been on a steady climb since the Industrial Revolution but that still doesn't negate the fact that people have had access this whole time." Then saying this! 👇 " Firearms were more easily accessible in the past than they are now." SoOoOo.... If "the number of firearm ownership has been on a steady climb since the Industrial Revolution" THEN how could " Firearms " be " more easily accessible in the past than they are now."???
1
@dustinhendricks951 That last one was ALSO ANOTHER example of you twisting what I actually said to something you could answer without conceding ground on your opinions. " You said I'm making stuff up about what guns were available in the 60s huh?" Which is when you gave me the silly history of guns... With no relevance to the conversation. Mostly because that's not what I said. Never mentioned what guns. I said how many. Specifically I said that we did not in the past have more guns than we did people in this country. What you agreed with that first and then changed her mind when it was convenient for your argument.
1
@dustinhendricks951 as far as health care, a government is set up to take care of its people. Almost every other first world country on the globe thanks that Healthcare should be a right and not a privilege just for the rich. Even in America, prisoners have the right to Health Care. It is mandatory to take care of their health care needs while we are imprisoning them. Our government recognizes Health Care as a right two prisoners but not too it's free non-criminal people.
1
@dustinhendricks951 and for your last two questions.... no! I don't want you to repost what a well regulated militia means again. I want you to post it for the very first time... Because you've never answered that question.
1
@presidentnotsure3273 Oh! Are you offended! Do you think more or less offended then I should be for you trying to lie about what I've said? Or how about more or less offended then I should be about you trying this sad little attempt at turning what I said about you around on me? You keep making stuff up, sugar cheeks! Anybody who isn't blind, knows why you're doing it, at this point, anyways. You can't answer my questions without conceding ground on your opinion. Which is why this whole time you've been running from it.... 🤣
1
@presidentnotsure3273 And it's SUPER CUTE how you are trying to convince everyone that I'm the one running in circles.🤣 I've been asking you the same question from the start oh, sugar. You just keep bobbing and weaving and dancing though. I wonder why that is. Why do you have to spend so much of your time running away from a couple of questions? Let me think... Hmm.m.. 🤣
1
@presidentnotsure3273 So... For the hundredth time let's ask you the same question and watch you run away from it... Again..... "How is studying gun violence and it's caused taking anyone's gun away from them? Why would you block a scientific study like that? Or government-sponsored gun safety classes? How is that taking anyone's going to wait from them?" RUN FOREST! RUN! 🤣
1
@presidentnotsure3273 Less Kool-Aid, more independent thought. ✌😉
1
cj p Yeah... You really have always had the problem of saying one thing and then acting completely differently. The problem really lies in your lack of self-awareness, though. If you can't recognize you're doing it, then you're certainly never going to be able to change it. You're going to continue to put up ceiling false dichotomies that have people having to either agree with you or be all manner of bad things. Except, one does not need to set up a silly false I called me like that if they have the facts on their side. Unfortunately, you do not. Which is why you have to go on all these silly off-topic diatribes. Like I said, one day maybe you'll be a real boy. Fingers crossed! 🤞😉
1
@dustinhendricks951 no one said anything about science. Have no idea why you even brought that up. Probably just another distraction and I'm certainly not going to answer any more of your questions until you answer my very first one that I've been asking all along. So that whole comment was just wash for you.
1
@dustinhendricks951 You mean the whole.... Insisting that people give the recompense that they were given, by answering questions I'm not dodging them. How many questions have years have I answered already? You're still on my first one. My character is the put up and your character is the shut up... Basically... 🤣
1
@dustinhendricks951 Yes... You never answered the question... Not sure how much more clear that can be.... are you done dodging and stalling now or...? 🤣
1
@dustinhendricks951 the Constitution? Yeah a couple of times. Which is why I'm asking you to backup your original claim. I was getting it wrong. That you cannot explain to me how I was getting it wrong and you had to ask me what I meant by it.... which is super weird if you said I got it wrong. Shouldn't you know that already? 🤣
1
@dustinhendricks951 For the first time.... Scroll up and Stop lying... or keep lying and keep telling everybody how uncredible you are... Either way works for me. 🤣
1
@dustinhendricks951 wow, he can finally get an answer. That only took almost two days and a million comments.... except you seem to have left something out. Was I supposed to just believe the random dance I avoid a guy on the internet? Do you think just saying things make them true? Give your source.
1
@dustinhendricks951 oh, and now it's plain to me why you think you know what I meant and therefore got it wrong?
1
@dustinhendricks951 where did you post it above? Give me the comment right before the comment where you posted its first time so I can find where you posted it the first time. I will go look.
1
cj p dude, stop being a slow learner. If you're going to present information, you need to present something that backs it up more than crazy Randy guy on the internet saying that. Post blanks, give sources. By the way, how are gun deaths doing in the UK? Cherry-picking facts is always easy to tear down. I'll wait for you to source all the rest to give my reply! 😁✌
1
@dustinhendricks951 Well... maybe next time pointing out that you're answering somebody else's question. I kept asking that person that question because they kept telling me that somehow that was I was trying to take people's guns away. it's not. They are dodging that question just like you dodged yours. But now that I understand your original response a little better, we can begin knocking that down. Individual reality, morality and groupthink has been studied by scientists for decades now. One of the best examples of this is nature vs nurture. So yes, science has quite a bit to do with individual morality.
1
@dustinhendricks951 actually it's not there. There have been studies in the past. A good while ago and before major cultural changes became applicable to a majority of America. Government scientist have not been able to get funding to do any current studies because groups like the NRA are blocking it with their money and their bought politicians. But, since you brought it up, I'll ask you the same question... See if you dance around this one for 2 days... why? Why would they block the study of gun violence? Why would they have any reason to do that?
1
@dustinhendricks951 you weren't telling me how to think, nobody said anything about oxymoron and you'll get to show me how I was factually wrong and why you asked me what I meant by something if you are already assumed that I was wrong about it.
1
@dustinhendricks951 yeah, the only thing that showing is your desperation. I was answering as I went along. Which you discovered after reading further down yourself. Because you we're also responding as you went along. Irony.. 😆
1
@dustinhendricks951 You gave me the answer once. I have told you to tell me the comment above the first time you answered the question before now oh, so that you can prove that you did. I told you I would go find it. He'll get to do that. Mostly because you're lying and don't want to admit it but that's really nothing new.
1
@dustinhendricks951 I have also asked you to give me a source for the answer you only gave me once... And you have yet to do that. That coming anytime soon?
1
@dustinhendricks951 so you're saying you didn't understand my perspective and needed that to decide whether I was right or wrong and so you asked but only after accusing me of being wrong, is that what you're saying?
1
@dustinhendricks951 you've given me the answer a total of 1 time and no matter how many times you keep repeating that lie it's not actually going to be true.
1
@dustinhendricks951 Sure... Whatever you need to tell yourself... It's not like you can prove the lie anyways... 😉✌
1
@dustinhendricks951 But... Yeah... Gun owners.... Some more then others. 🤣
1
@dustinhendricks951 you being in the NRA or not has nothing to do with the question I asked. Also has nothing to do with your ability to answer it. Unless you want to make another excuse of course.
1
@dustinhendricks951 and look another silly ass why you can't qualify. How exactly would you know that the problem will requires absolutely no government scientific study to see? Because you have already figured out the answer... I imagine... But if you have the answer... Why is it not fixed? Hmmmm.... Logic...
1
@dustinhendricks951 Why would they need to block the study of gun violence?
1
@dustinhendricks951 A few things.... You answered more then just the one time you did today... First saying that gun ownership was going up since I believe the sixties and then saying they had more guns back then. Contradicting yourself for the convenience of the current argument you're attempting to make.
1
@dustinhendricks951 Oh lord... Here we go again... How many days will it take you come up with this one... I wonder... 🤣 So, you need sources for the material that you claim to be your answer. The well regulated militia and the common tongue that you claim was what they meant... You need to explain why you yet again just say gun ownership has continued to go up, yet you also claimed that there were more guns back in the sixties Also why the NRA would need to block scientific studies of gun violence You keep dancing if you like... It's apparently all you have... But know you are doing nothing but making yourself look less and less credible. ... Which is... Btw... Always my point with you guys who like to dodge and lie and contradict and try and put words into people's mouths etc.... . It's never to get you to admit you're wrong or Change your opinion. No fact in the world would do that. Especially for somebody who goes out of their way to ignore them. So when's the last is feeding you some rope and watching you hang yourself. Showing everybody just how uncredible you are. You guys always love to help me with that too.
1
DB Stevens I love you little boys who show up to pop off silly little insults because you can't argue substance. You always think it's such a good argument to begin with. All anyone else ever seen these is your massive inferiority complex and your inability to address the facts. 🤣
1
DB Stevens I don't even think I want to know what you mean by losers of society... I'm a little curious as to who you think decides that... And could you be more transparent. LOL🤣 so let me ask you a question little one, while I have you on my couch... Why do you feel the need to feel better than other people? What does that validate for you? 🤣
1
DB Stevens I know... I know... You guys like to call sacked emotion because you think it's a really good idea to shame human beings for having what every human being has. Emotion. .... Oh my God play ever do... I have emotion! I'm sure there's a pill for that. LOL And how are you going to claim that these are all emotions and then address the facts that were put forth? Do you even think before you type? 🤣 And I love that logic by the way. Laws don't work! That's why we have been delanty's running about and no order in the streets and the justice system has absolutely just collapsed. Prisoners are out running everywhere. People are declaring martial law... Except they can't do that because laws don't work... Wait oh, no. That's silly. Which means where it came from was silly. LOL
1
DB Stevens yes, before reasonable gun regulation it was easier to get a gun. Getting a gun and having the quantity of guns in America as a whole are two different things. Are more guns in America today than there ever has been since America started. You're not arguing with me. You're arguing with scientific statistic. In fact I could get you that scientific statistics.
1
DB Stevens I never really got you guys who cherry-picked some stat that you just feed off the other people without looking at the entirety of the picture. You think it's going to make you sound smart enough to scare somebody else away for some reason. Yes.... Our gun problem in America is a multi-pronged problem. Our mass shooting problem in America is a multi-pronged problem. If you want to slow or stop mass shootings guns are not the only thing that need to be addressed. If you want to stop mass shootings taking away all guns is not necessarily the answer and it's not what anyone wants. You guys are letting the right-wing scare you into thinking we're trying to take all your guns away all the damn time. I don't give a damn about your gun. I grew up down south. I'm still here now. I do a reasonably dangerous job on a daily basis. Ain't nobody taking my gun from me. What I also have is regular gun safety courses, a clean bill of Mental Health, regular maintenance on my firearm oh, the ability to only carry it when necessary and be responsible while I'm doing so and I don't need a goddamn hand Cannon to get the job done. Because... If you need an auto, semi-auto or a bump that basically makes yours a semi-auto to be able to hit what you're firing at, you ain't got no business carrying that gun in the first place. The good ideas for gun regulations that I've heard of would be annual proficiency exams paid for by the government for anyone who wants to open carry Scientific studies to determine the specific problems that cause the gun violence epidemic in America getting rid of what most people call the Gun Show loophole but is really the private seller loophole making people who have been diagnosed with severe and mental illnesses not able to get ahold of a firearm Government-sponsored firearm safety classes And the only thing that I would probably consider Banning would be bumps that turn regular guns into semi automatics.... but I'm still a little iffy on that one. Now, drama queens like you will hear nothing but.... oh my God these crazy Democrats are trying to take our guns away. .... that right there is exactly what the right-wing feeds you every time anyone wants to put a new gun regulation up except it's b***** and you're being there useful idiot.
1
cj p did you really just hear that? Go read back your own comment. They started having a knife ban and then they took knives away to so people can't murder each other... Stop the madness. Where does it end. Jesus Christ... how dare they stop trying to get people to kill other people. By the way, the overall homicide rate has gone down dramatically in the UK since guns have gone. Even with the knife problem. Why? Because you can kill more people in a shorter amount of time with a gun than you can with a knife. It's common sense.
1
cj p and look a little boy giving more bulshit excuses because he can't back up his own s***. I'm shocked! This is how it works in the adult world. You say something, you provide the evidence to back up your claim. Otherwise you get embarrassed like this... So you're telling me that I have to go and find the claims you've been making that I disagree with and prove them right, right? It's my job to prove your claims are true? That's what you're saying? Something really doesn't seem right there... LOL
1
@dustinhendricks951 SoOoOo... That is an interesting article.... it's super late so I'm probably going to get to the rest tomorrow but the first thing that struck me was the definitions. In the sentences from the dictionary, it seems to be saying that it's kept... Or kept up.... orderly... Organized even.... well regulated. That actually doesn't go against the understanding of the regulations to keep it that way. Were you ever in the military? I'm not. My whole family is though. Literally. My entire family except me and the generation below me. There's commonality between the military regiments. Air Force, Army, Navy, Coast Guard... It doesn't matter. They all have what they call Regs.... obviously short for regulations. Most of the founders themselves were military men. So I could see them placing well-regulated there. It doesn't discount the regulations about gun control. It back some up. Regs are Universal in the military. You have regulations for almost everything when you're in the military. From your guns, to how you wear your clothes and even your family and house if you live on base. Which I'm sure you know we're basically rules. Do this a certain way. It's done that certain way for a purpose. There's always a purpose. So when they use that with gun control and regulations... Or well regulated, they're talking about regulations. Wench, again we have always had with firearms from the jump. There has always been some kind of regulation on a firearm since we have had the birth of the right. That is because they are recognized as deadly tools. Yes, they can be tools but they can also hurt and kill people, innocent people. Whether it's on purpose or by accident. Regulations are meant to mitigate damage.
1
@dustinhendricks951 You are 33... I'm 35. 1984. Both my grandfathers where in World War 1 & 2. 1 Army 1 Navy. Both my grandmothers were Army nurses. My dad's brother was in Vietnam. My dad guarded Air Force One under two presidents. My mom and her three sisters we're all Air Force. My brother is Army and has done two tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. High school when the towers went down. I had an uncle in tower 2. No one did anything that day but watch the TV screens. There were teachers crying in the hallways. Everybody was really quiet. I had not registered until my dad came to pick me up from school that, Uncle Len was in tower 2. I felt bad about that for years. I just didn't think about it. I had been watching all day.... I almost got suspended two days later forgetting in this fight because of my Uncle. This stupid girl overheard me telling a friend about my uncle and I had not remembered he was there. I said something about how he was not blood related. I believe it was... he wasn't my uncle uncle... Uncle Len and my dad had known each other basically back since sandbox days and so he was my uncle. That's the part this stupid little girl overheard, what's around and said do you think you would have remembered him if he was your real Uncle. I sat there stunned for about half a second. Long enough to see the smile form on her face and then I lunged.... pretty sure the only reason I got a pass was because of the whole Uncle Tower thing. I've actually read that before. Bluster and posturing aside, I really do make it my business to know the facts about what I'm talking about, before I speak on it. Not enough people do that nowadays.... Which is why I am unclear as to why you gave me this to read? What are you trying to prove out? And I section them out in different comments, so its easier all around to track the topics... BTW. I don't try and comment flood for nefarious purpose, or anything. I'm just a little OCD like that.
1
@dustinhendricks951 That points out the flaws in a current system. They certainly have some. Any would... But it's about what helps the most people. It is also what almost every other first world nation has figure it out, besides America. There are all kinds of selling misnomers about what would happen if we went to something like socialized medicine. Except you say the countries that do that and they don't have those problems.
1
@dustinhendricks951 What? You can't compare us to any other country? Of course you can't. How? Democracy, Republic, monarchy, socialism, dictatorship, etc... what do they all have in common? They're all systems of operation. Not good or evil. Simply in the hands of the user. And look you can even compare that to other things other than systems of governing. It's much like religions. Certain sets of facts and rules and brought to the hands of the user to do what they want with it. Another really good comparison is exactly what you just said. The myth of American exceptionalism. You can take that and see that it helps the best of us strive for better things and it helps the worst of us alienate people and become apathetic. All in the hands of the user. We don't have to be the best to be okay... that mindset can actually be a hindrance to progress. Evolution doesn't happen in that way. So not only can we compare ourselves to other nations, we should. If you don't recognize your faults how can you fix them?
1
@dustinhendricks951 and it's a Democratic Republic. Where's lots of socialist programs, most of which are on the right. Even though they rail against it and don't really know what it is. What I found that you service in the most is not being able to step outside of your own perspective. Who are the few? How are they breaking the law? What governmental
1
cj p what do you do? Well first you assume it's stupid because it's not what you think and then you make a crap ton of claims that you're not ever willing to back up. Then you try and blame your laziness an inability to verify your own claims off on other people. Because in the world you live in, everything is always somebody else's fault or responsibility. I'm not going to verify you were claims. It's my job to verify my own. I'm not doing my job and your job. You can keep making excuses for why you can't back up your claims but nobody is buying it. Like nobody. Why? Because that doesn't make any damn sense. All you persist on doing is showing everybody you cannot verify your claims. In other words the only thing you were doing is showing everybody that you are lazy and lying. 😉✌
1
cj p if I spent two seconds of my life doing what you do then I would also be a lazy liar. Nah! I'm good! 😉✌
1
cj p well, I feel like it shows that I'm an adult who expect other people to be adults and expect people to be accountable for their own claims. I would certainly not had any problem backing up any claim that I make with the source I got it from. That is, of course, if I got my information from a credible source. Maybe that's your problem. You know your sources incredible and so you won't get it. 😳🤣
1
cj p this is what happens... Why you should back up your claim is because if you do not then you were expecting the person you were telling your claim to, to disprove your claim which is not possible because it's not one that you have proven. You cannot prove or do not have to prove the claim that has never been proven. You can just outright call Ally. You would know all this. You just keep making excuses. In short, you are lazy, lying and afraid to reveal your source.🤣✌
1
cj p Which also means nothing you say matters. Cuz that's a consequence of not having proof for the things you say. Sorry sugar tits.🤣
1
@dustinhendricks951 Sigh... That I got well regulated incorrect. Even though you later had to ask me what I meant by it. Which negates your claim that I was getting it wrong.... You asked me what I meant by it. Why would you have to do that if you knew and therefore determined I was wrong? Also I read what you said and I was not using it wrong even to the evidence that you provided. Which I explained. So, since full firearm regulation is in fact sensible and you ignoring everything that doesn't fit your preconceived notions just not discount that. No matter how many times you keep repeating it. And it didn't turn into accessibility of more modern Firearms. That's what you tried to turn him into when you contradicted yourself. Sad firearm ownership has been going up since the 60s and then because that didn't say your argument later you tried to say that there were more guns in the 60s than there are now. And then when that didn't fit your argument you then tried to change it to finally what you landed on, the accessibility of more modern firearms.
1
@dustinhendricks951 I know I only said you were making things up I actually pulled the quotes. Let it all out nice and simple. Then you probably ignored that. Which seems to be a pattern for you. Ignoring things you can't argue against.
1
@dustinhendricks951 well regulated disagrees with you. At the end of the day it's not going to matter. At the end of the day we have always had regulations on Firearms. At the end of the day we should. So, you keep repeating it over and over again and see if it comes through but I'm going to live in reality. Thanks.
1
@dustinhendricks951 you are literally just another guy who is convinced he is right and doesn't see the lack of logic and the blanket dismissals of evidence and repeated non provable claims are contradictions in his own argument. You simply dismiss anything that doesn't fit your preconceived notions even if that means you have to contradict your own self. That's not logic. That's needing to be right.
1
@dustinhendricks951 yet we still have a Democratic Republic system of government, with socialist programs in it. I'm not sure why you thought mentioning that it wasn't in the Constitution made a difference. That doesn't actually make reality conform to what you want it to be. It is simple fact that we have a Democratic Republic with socialist programs throughout.
1
@dustinhendricks951 though it doesn't surprise me that you're one of those. You guys aren't new. They're always guys like you on here convinced till your dying breath that you know what other people don't because you have a need to feel special. That right there is also why I don't try and convince you people of anything. I just get you guys to present your lack of logic and reason. I get you two to show everybody exactly why you shouldn't be listened to. You have certainly done that in spades. You've lied, you've contradicted yourself, you've set up false dichotomies, you blatantly ignored information, you've tried to Quest words and put words in my mouth and on and on and on. All things people have to do when they are not operating on fact.
1
@dustinhendricks951 so, do you have a problem with fire department, police department, ambulance services or how about social security? What about local government? You don't know what socialism is. The only people who talk about socialism in the manner that you are, are the ones that are brainwashed by the right-wing to think that it's some evil crazy thing. In actuality you guys push for socialism more than we do. Which is the irony. You just don't know what socialism is.
1
@dustinhendricks951 Okay! Whatever you need to tell yourself. As I said.... I have already laid out in several comments, outlined by both of our quotes, word for word what actually happened. Again, when I'm dealing with people who are clearly not honest actors I don't really how to do anything but let you discredit yourself. What you guys always do. You continuously trying to say different isn't going to matter. All anyone has to do is read. So, good luck with that I guess.😉✌
1
@dustinhendricks951 and it's super cute how you're trying to act all above that now. When you were the one starting off calling people boo boo heads because they didn't agree with you. Lol
1
@dustinhendricks951 I know, I know. I have to be stupid and brainwashed and indoctrinated and all these horrible things that you're trying to characterize me as, me being a complete stranger to you, all because I don't agree with your point of view. Could you be more insecure? 🤣
1
@dustinhendricks951 so, why did you say that gun ownership has been escalating since the sixties and then go back and say that we have more guns in the 60s then we have now?
1
@dustinhendricks951 why did you tell me I was wrong about the way I was interpreting well regulated and then asked me what I meant by well-regulated?
1
@dustinhendricks951 since you're so against socialism, I'm assuming you don't like your local fire department, police department, ambulance services or Social Security? I'm assuming once you do at 65 you're going to turn down that Social Security, correct? Since it's a socialist program at all... 🤣
1
DB Stevens I know... I know.... I'm all these awful things. Probably delusional, brainwashed, apparently a cupcake, ranting... lacking substance... I don't on that last one, though... Considering that you provided no examples of all of this... it's weird. It's almost like you just tried to lay a blanket dismissal out so you can have to argue the substance anymore. Period. But that can't be true, because that would just make you a hypocrite... 🤣
1
DB Stevens projection, would need to have some kind of substance based example of that beforehand ordering. Yet again, no example of this. Your basic argument here is... I know you are, but what am I... But I'm the 1 projecting and lacking substance. Irony! 🤣
1
DB Stevens I'm pretty sure I laid out my points... You on the other hand! 🤣
1
DB Stevens Oh... Goodness.... are you not very good at multitasking? You know you can use both at the same time, right? Both emotion and logical thought can be combined. Once again it's called being a human being. Maybe you should learn how to be one of those before you go telling everybody else what to do. Actually Einstein didn't crack the theory of relativity until he started sleeping with his cousin. He had his wife but ended up leaving her after setting up a strict regimen for study that she couldn't cope with and he wasn't happy with. Left her, got with his cousin, called her his Muse and then all the sudden he figured out the theory of relativity. He also credits her for the support in one of his papers. It's called multitasking. Human beings are set up to use their heart and their head same time. You think we didn't have emotion can a man on the moon? You think the human spirit and drive had nothing to do with that? Face it, cyborg. No matter what we're doing, we're never better when we combine our heart and our head. You guys trying to shame people for using one of those is just ridiculous and asinine.
1
DB Stevens are you really that desperate? You're trying to be a grammar Nazi. Hey, you know who needs to be a grammar Nazi? People who don't have real arguments. 🤣 So thanks for that! 🤣
1
DB Stevens and ya skipped some stuff... what's wrong? Got your feels all up in it because you didn't have a good response! 🤣 "And I love that logic by the way. Laws don't work! That's why we have vigilantes running about and no order in the streets and the justice system has absolutely just collapsed. Prisoners are out running everywhere. People are declaring martial law... Except they can't do that because laws don't work... Wait oh, no. That's silly. Which means where it came from was silly. LOL" "yes, before reasonable gun regulation it was easier to get a gun. Getting a gun and having the quantity of guns in America as a whole are two different things. Are more guns in America today than there ever has been since America started. You're not arguing with me. You're arguing with scientific statistic. In fact I could get you that scientific statistics." "I never really got you guys who cherry-picked some stat that you just feed off the other people without looking at the entirety of the picture. You think it's going to make you sound smart enough to scare somebody else away for some reason. Yes.... Our gun problem in America is a multi-pronged problem. Our mass shooting problem in America is a multi-pronged problem. If you want to slow or stop mass shootings guns are not the only thing that need to be addressed. If you want to stop mass shootings taking away all guns is not necessarily the answer and it's not what anyone wants. You guys are letting the right-wing scare you into thinking we're trying to take all your guns away all the damn time. I don't give a damn about your gun. I grew up down south. I'm still here now. I do a reasonably dangerous job on a daily basis. Ain't nobody taking my gun from me. What I also have is regular gun safety courses, a clean bill of Mental Health, regular maintenance on my firearm oh, the ability to only carry it when necessary and be responsible while I'm doing so and I don't need a goddamn hand Cannon to get the job done. Because... If you need an auto, semi-auto or a bump that basically makes yours a semi-auto to be able to hit what you're firing at, you ain't got no business carrying that gun in the first place. The good ideas for gun regulations that I've heard of would be annual proficiency exams paid for by the government for anyone who wants to open carry Scientific studies to determine the specific problems that cause the gun violence epidemic in America getting rid of what most people call the Gun Show loophole but is really the private seller loophole making people who have been diagnosed with severe and mental illnesses not able to get ahold of a firearm Government-sponsored firearm safety classes And the only thing that I would probably consider Banning would be bumps that turn regular guns into semi automatics.... but I'm still a little iffy on that one. Now, drama queens like you will hear nothing but.... oh my God these crazy Democrats are trying to take our guns away. .... that right there is exactly what the right-wing feeds you every time anyone wants to put a new gun regulation up except it's b***** and you're being there useful idiot."
1
cj p Stay vague, pointless and desperate. It doesn't suit you, but it's really fun for me! 🤣
1
DB Stevens 🤣🤣🤣 You still trying to sneak back to pretend like you can't see the substance base material Ivory Post in like four or five times now? Well all you seem to be able to do is find different ways to try and call me a boo boo head because your intellectual growth has obviously never grown past the third grade.... How cute!🤣🤣🤣🤣
1
DB Stevens well.... You keep doing that juvenile craziness and I'll keep reposting the things you can argue against! Deal?😁✌
1
DB Stevens Maybe if you where better at the multitasking you do a better job at being logical when you're all emotional like this! 🤣
1
DB Stevens Oh... Goodness.... are you not very good at multitasking? You know you can use both at the same time, right? Both emotion and logical thought can be combined. Once again it's called being a human being. Maybe you should learn how to be one of those before you go telling everybody else what to do. Actually Einstein didn't crack the theory of relativity until he started sleeping with his cousin. He had his wife but ended up leaving her after setting up a strict regimen for study that she couldn't cope with and he wasn't happy with. Left her, got with his cousin, called her his Muse and then all the sudden he figured out the theory of relativity. He also credits her for the support in one of his papers. It's called multitasking. Human beings are set up to use their heart and their head same time. You think we didn't have emotion can a man on the moon? You think the human spirit and drive had nothing to do with that? Face it, cyborg. No matter what we're doing, we're never better when we combine our heart and our head. You guys trying to shame people for using one of those is just ridiculous and asinine.
1
DB Stevens and ya skipped some stuff... what's wrong? Got your feels all up in it because you didn't have a good response! 🤣 "And I love that logic by the way. Laws don't work! That's why we have vigilantes running about and no order in the streets and the justice system has absolutely just collapsed. Prisoners are out running everywhere. People are declaring martial law... Except they can't do that because laws don't work... Wait oh, no. That's silly. Which means where it came from was silly. LOL" "yes, before reasonable gun regulation it was easier to get a gun. Getting a gun and having the quantity of guns in America as a whole are two different things. Are more guns in America today than there ever has been since America started. You're not arguing with me. You're arguing with scientific statistic. In fact I could get you that scientific statistics." "I never really got you guys who cherry-picked some stat that you just feed off the other people without looking at the entirety of the picture. You think it's going to make you sound smart enough to scare somebody else away for some reason. Yes.... Our gun problem in America is a multi-pronged problem. Our mass shooting problem in America is a multi-pronged problem. If you want to slow or stop mass shootings guns are not the only thing that need to be addressed. If you want to stop mass shootings taking away all guns is not necessarily the answer and it's not what anyone wants. You guys are letting the right-wing scare you into thinking we're trying to take all your guns away all the damn time. I don't give a damn about your gun. I grew up down south. I'm still here now. I do a reasonably dangerous job on a daily basis. Ain't nobody taking my gun from me. What I also have is regular gun safety courses, a clean bill of Mental Health, regular maintenance on my firearm oh, the ability to only carry it when necessary and be responsible while I'm doing so and I don't need a goddamn hand Cannon to get the job done. Because... If you need an auto, semi-auto or a bump that basically makes yours a semi-auto to be able to hit what you're firing at, you ain't got no business carrying that gun in the first place. The good ideas for gun regulations that I've heard of would be annual proficiency exams paid for by the government for anyone who wants to open carry Scientific studies to determine the specific problems that cause the gun violence epidemic in America getting rid of what most people call the Gun Show loophole but is really the private seller loophole making people who have been diagnosed with severe and mental illnesses not able to get ahold of a firearm Government-sponsored firearm safety classes And the only thing that I would probably consider Banning would be bumps that turn regular guns into semi automatics.... but I'm still a little iffy on that one. Now, drama queens like you will hear nothing but.... oh my God these crazy Democrats are trying to take our guns away. .... that right there is exactly what the right-wing feeds you every time anyone wants to put a new gun regulation up except it's b***** and you're being there useful idiot."
1
DB Stevens blah blah blah. .. to say that I'm projecting means that you would have to point out a point in time where I have done what I am telling you that you are doing. You keep saying projecting because you think it's a blanket statement that can just shut me up. But here's the difference between us and you. We need proof and not just some crazy person on the internet saying some stuff. So if you would like to tell me what I am projecting on, where I did it in the first place, then you may have some semblance of an argument but just saying projection every time you have nothing else to say, is not an argument sweetness. Sorry
1
DB Stevens dude if this is not the pot calling the kettle taupe. What are you doing? Just talking a bunch of s*** and using a bunch of buzzwords you don't know what the hell they mean. You have absolutely no substance and just because you're ignoring my substance doesn't actually mean it goes away. So suck it up buttercup🤣
1
DB Stevens one. Yes that is what the Constitution is written for. To govern us. The fact that you're trying to throw the entirety of the Constitution into two words, well regulated does not mean that makes any f**** say. Well regulated is in the Constitution under the Second Amendment. I don't even know what the hell you were reaching for their. What in the world did you ever hear me say anything about well-regulated was the entirety of the Constitution or militia for that matter? You just get more and more desperate as you go along, don't you. LOL
1
DB Stevens too, have you not noticed that all you are doing when you are constantly feeling the need to call me a boo boo head every 2 seconds, is screaming out loud how insecure you are about your own argument. For some reason you don't think that the fax can stand alone so you have to name calling like a third grader. That's so damn special LOL
1
DB Stevens what part of Heller and McDonald killed a collectivist argument and what makes you think I am making a collectivist argument?
1
DB Stevens oh no you tripped yourself up there again. They ruled on what now? The word right in the Constitution, correct? Then say s*** about well-regulated. You're just trying to piggyback that in there because you don't have an argument. Which is cute but super transparent
1
DB Stevens yeah we've already been over your home well regulated at the time meant this thing. It didn't prove your argument. It actually hurt your argument. Do you need to go and scroll up and remember how that happened so you stop embarrassing yourself? LOL
1
DB Stevens and then of course a paragraph of juvenile chit talkin posing as being an actual adult that means a damn thing blah blah blah blah blah. The fact that you think I care what an a**** like you thinks about me, you were just a way overestimating your importance, sweetness. LOL
1
DB Stevens Have you notice every time I ask you for details ending of the things you say, you run away like a little b** while trying to call me a BOO Boo Head!?!?! Cuz, everyone else has! 🤣
1
DB Stevens yeah, no matter how many times you repeat your silliness.. it still doesn't answer the questions that I have asked you to back up what you have claimed. You are not magic. You just saying things just not actually make them true. Either you can back them up or you can keep humiliating yourself and showing just exactly how full of s*** you are. Either way is fine with me! 🤣✌
1
DB Stevens how long how I'm the moron but you're the one that can't read. I have a low IQ but you're the one that keeps running away like a little bit from questions he can't answer. LOL... you keep telling yourself whatever you want to special ed.! I'll keep pointing out that you can't back up s*** you say. LOL
1
DB Stevens dude, even the things you're saying about me and what I'm doing are alive and you're just completely fine sailing has that. That 8s to LMAO! 🤣 Whatever you need to tell yourself, little Bitch Boy! Don't get all up in your feelz about it! I'm sure your mom is going to give you a gold star and a :-) just for being able to spell your name! 🤣
1
DB Stevens what question do you think you've answered? Absolutely none. You keep running away from them like a little bit. Little b** boys afraid of words. And it is hilarious! 🤣 Keep going little Bitch boy! I'm enjoying my daily entertainment. Especially since now I'm getting you all up in your feelz! I really matter so much to you! When you are nothing but a good laugh at the end of the day for me! 🤣 Maybe you should get a girlfriend or something! Lol
1
DB Stevens Little Boy... Little Boy! I see YOU are pretending again! Have no idea why you keep thinking that is a good strategy... But sure! I can just quote myself where I addressed that and show your lying again. Which will further discredit you! So thanks for that one! 😜✌
1
DB Stevens And look.... Sad little boy gas to keep lying to himself and he thinks it makes him look good! 🤣🤣🤣 Na! Try again! Or don't either way you don't matter. You've already proven your a willfully ignorant liar. So I'm good! 🤣
1
DB Stevens Where in the world did that come from? And roll your eyes at what? Who the hell said anything about advertisements face? You are getting more and more desperate little one. You keep trying to set up them Paper Tigers and I'll keep swatting them down! 🤣
1
DB Stevens you can also keep trying to come back later when you think I won't come back oh, so you can try and get the last word. See how well that works out for you LOL
1
DB Stevens Your the silly ads popping up weeks and days later trying to sneak it in well I got two year old. LOL babbling on about craziness. But you keep lying and talking about how we didn't talk about all this stuff and discrediting yourself all you want. It's super fun! 🤣🤣🤣
1
DB Stevens And my points have all been destroyed, huh? Wait... Watch again! I'm going to give you another dose of your Kryptonite! Ready! Prove it! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
1
DB Stevens Oh! Goodness! So anyone who comes on here we'll see first and foremost but the only thing anyone has to do to turn you into a babbling ranting 3 year old, is to insist that you prove the things that you are saying. The second thing they will notice is the 9 million lies you have to tell in order to make yourself feel better. You do you! In the meantime why don't you back up that claim of destroying all my arguments with actual proof. It shouldn't be that hard all you have to do is scroll up in copy and paste, right? All the quotes are about! Have fun with that! 🤣
1
DB Stevens now we're going to watch and see how he makes a million excuses as to why he can't do that. It's pretty funny to watch him flounder! 🤣🤣🤣
1
DB Stevens Okay... So nothing again! Look this is my shocked face! 😏 Anyone else notice that there where no quotes from me.... No rebuttal evidence... No mention of any other subject.. While still claiming that he destroyed all my points... You think he could prove that one at least. Just by scrolling up... But... Nope... Still nothing. Just empty words and toddler logic! 😉✌
1
DB Stevens Okay... So nothing again! Look this is my shocked face! 😏 Anyone else notice that there where no quotes from me.... No rebuttal evidence... No mention of any other subject.. While still claiming that he destroyed all my points... You think he could prove that one at least. Just by scrolling up... But... Nope... Still nothing. Just empty words and toddler logic! 😉✌
1
fran bran Do you mean all together or just this time?
1
@mightymouse6848 I can't argue with that for the most part! And that is crazy! There are quite a few civilian dems and a couple of leader dems that have been saying that for a long time now. So... Your not alone.
1
@BdewithShlinda Thanks! That's kind of you to say! ❤✌
1
@warren286 campaign Finance fraud - trying to get a foreign government to investigate his political opponent in the next presidential election is campaign Finance fraud. The thing is, he could have done that and not given the Democrats a leg to stand on for impeachment. Is he had either asked Ukraine to investigate back when the original investigation was open or is he had the justice department, of which he is the head, do an independent investigation and had been work with Ukraine oh, he wouldn't be getting impeached right now. So either he is ignorant of the laws of the country that he runs or he didn't care about breaking them. He had options. He chose this one.
1
@warren286 that's why I only said three obstruction of Congress claims. He's not stopping himself. He's stopping other people and other things from other departments. He tried to use executive privilege to curtail a witness statement. He tried to block another witness form even testifying and he tried to stop the release of documents that had been subpoenaed.
1
@warren286 quid pro quo, would be extortion or bribery. Which they are close to proving. They haven't yet. Campaign Finance fraud is different than quid pro quo.
1
@warren286 You and the people you heard it from are using heresy incorrectly. The definition of heresy as you are using it is, opinion profoundly add odds with what is generally accepted Or Harrison law and legal definition. Heresy is the rejection of one or more established the leaves of a religious body, or adherence to the other believes. It may also refer to an unorthodox religious belief. It is a historic criminal offence compromised of the act of division or denial of church or religious system.
1
@warren286 "Only heresy, feelings and opinions were given", is just straight out incorrect. Just saying things doesn't actually make it true.
1
@warren286 They have instituted an impeachment inquiry. Which the impeachment process has begun.
1
@warren286 So far they have nothing, is also, flat out wrong. I already laid that out above.
1
@jueshua148 Yeah... Not sure why you thought that was going to work... Lol
1
@goesgoodwithcoffee1029 Na! Not going to be able to take the word of someone who thinks childish name-calling is an appropriate rebuttal, in political discourse. You discredit yourself to much. Sorry, sugar! 😁✌
1
s macca And How did the Mueller report go? 😁 How many crimes where are laid out in the Mueller report? And what were they? What volume where these crimes laid out in? How many reasons were given for not pursuing charges? What were these reasons? How was the Steele dossier used in the Mueller report? in what volume of the Mueller Report, was the Steele Dossier Mentioned?
1
@coolbeans6148 Yeah... sorry, sweetheart. Just saying things doesn't actually make them true. 😉✌
1
@MrButtlettuce That is such a silly claim. How you guys make all these blankets assumptions about people you've never met in your life in order to avoid arguing the substance.... and yes! Trump's actions are in fact Trump's fault. Why? Because he's a grown ass man and he makes his own decisions. 😉✌
1
@mightymouse6848 I have a mixed race child. His dad tells me all the time that he was lucky enough to get my complexion.... Because he doesn't have to worry so much about getting shot all the time... And no one caring. Before I had my son... I couldn't really understand comments like that... Cuz... Well... I'm white as hell! Lol... Like... Last year we did this ancestry.com thing and it turned out that I was like Irish, English and Polish. The father of my child said I was a KKK members wet dream! Lol Anyways... I get what you are saying. I worry about my little boy in school now... But now I do see him not having to worry about being other places... But then I worry that it's just because of his skin color... And that people don't see his dad in him. He is a good man!... And he is someone I do worry about being hurt or killed.... And people not caring... Because my son will... We will.
1
@MrButtlettuce Dude! Can you not present an adult argument? Is that not in your bag pf tricks? 🤣
1
@MrButtlettuce Oh and way to prove you didn't watch the video you commented under. 🤣 You have no clue what I was commenting on in the first place. Yet still felt compelled to respond. With California shooting being his fault? 🤣
1
@kyliesmith9199 Some wont ever... But a lot are already. Trump is literally in my town right now. Bossier Louisiana. He's doing a rally at the CenturyTel right now. So many that down here are not going to Vote for him again. That is why he is coming here.
1
fran bran Na! I'm good! 😉✌
1
@coolbeans6148 I already do... Which is why I don't just say things. I can back them up... What about you?
1
@kyliesmith9199 Thanks love! 😉✌ I appreciate the support!
1
@mightymouse6848 Thank you hun! You are very kind.... As you can tell... We pick on each other about those kinds of things. Lol... But we have sat and talked to our son about things and will in the future... Mostly.. Just giving him the overall impression that the value of someones life should have nothing to do with the color of their skin.... And yeah... It is a lot of Black on black here... But I live down south, louisiana bible belt... So it about evens out with the white on black as well.
1
@kyliesmith9199 Exactly... It's a good sign! 😉✌
1
@kyliesmith9199 Hopefully people will start caring more about what's right and less on what team they are on.
1
HIGH ENERGY Not sure what you thought that comment meant, other than that you are obviously so blinded by your partisanship....
1
t1tacal Why would I do that? You guys are such good teaching tools. 😉✌
1
@armyismylight6034 I have an 8 year old little boy. He is going to be 9 in 8 days. For the past two years, on the first day of school, you get handed those packets and in ours were scheduled Mass shooter drills for the year. My little boy is in the third grade. This can't be how we're supposed to live in the land of the free and the home of the brave. Thank you for sharing! I will keep you and your family in my thoughts. 💜✌
1
@vickimccoy7764 Hmmmm.... You are incorrect. Also... The one nitpicking. Irony. Warren R. Said.... " Only heresy, feelings and opinions were given in the testimony by Kent and Taylor during the impeachment probe keyword probe, meaning the Congress has yet to commence an impeachment, they are still hunting for evidence." My comments on heresy word to him... they also only came after he brought up heresy.
1
@vickimccoy7764 But... Here is the thing.... Either way.... It's still Not true... While we are nitpicking... Lol... 1... July 25th transcript, edited version but still showing a crime. Campaign Finance fraud. When he asked the Ukrainian president to investigate his political opponent in the next presidential election. 2.... letters of notification from Trump and his lawyers confirming that three different charges for obstruction of Congress. What involving trying to curtail a witness statement, when involving trying to block a witness from testifying and one involving blocking documents that had been subpoenaed. Those documents contain evidence of the aid being put on hold, as well as a meeting in the Oval Office not being sacked until the president of Ukraine agrees to investigate those two issues that Trump asked him to during the phone call.
1
@vickimccoy7764 hearsay is the right terminology. It's not correct but it's the right terminology. My point being, these are things that this person was just parroting back, without checking them first.
1
@tomjones239 You could not possibly qualify that statement. Which means all that does is discredit anything you might say beyond that.
1
@armyismylight6034 I really really really could not agree with you more. Thank you for your kindness! 💜✌
1
fran bran What? Glenn Beck? Ya might wanna check again.... But that does explain a lot about your train of thought! https://www.politifact.com/personalities/glenn-beck/statements/byruling/pants-fire/
1
@Uncle Ed Okay... And it's happening now.... How about we fix the now. Can't do anything about the past without a time machine...
1
Gerardo Argueta Yeah... That's what that person said.... it's somebody else said it, when it make it any more or less true?
1
@tuckmcgee3343 Here is what's wrong with what you said... Other then your silly right wing troop about showing emotions, which everyone has, is somehow a bad thing now... 🙄 You don't seam to understand that there can be evidence and no conviction at the same time. One does not necessarily disclude the other. For instance.... There is plenty of evidence of Trump committing crimes while in office.... Yet for some reason the Republicans are not only acting like they are blind, deaf and dumb to the evidence, but they are also acting like they don't know what the House Rules say or the Constitution. So most is going to ignore all of that and vote party above country, when the time comes.... And people like you will defend that.
1
Joe Dirt How does what he said any less true?
1