General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Killed The Cat
CNN
comments

Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "Retired admiral: America is under attack from Trump" video.

@jakesnake165 Yes... How dare we advicate for people who have saved and fought beside American soldiers, to not get left behind to die. We are crazy that way! 🙄
9
To all the Kurdish soldiers, thank you for your service! 💜
5
@zbudda 1... " every time Trump did something that the Democrats were outraged and wanted Trump impeached over... Obama had already done the same thing." 2... "since 2016 the Democrats have done nothing but divide the country, obstructed Trump's Maga agenda, and focused on removing Trump from office by any means necessary." 3... "after two years of the Russia collusion hoax nothingburger," Just to help you out... And let you know what you need to provide evidence for... No need to thank me! It was no trouble at all... And 1 is gonna be super interesting to watch you try and qualify. 😜✌
4
@zbudda That was my bad.. I should of been more clear.... I meant other then some random dude copy and pasting from a masterious unlinked source. Give me where you copy and paste it all of that from. Please and thank you! 😉✌
4
@zbudda Yeah... I have come across you guys before. You claim to be the opposite of what you're arguing supporter in the past. You're trying to give yourself more credibility because you're about to make a bunch of claims that you can't back up.... But since you did mention you did your Google research, you would have no problem backing up all the claims you just made without actual evidence. In fact you probably know right where to go. But, I wouldn't suggest setting up any more false dichotomies, like the one you did at the end, where you suggested that if you don't agree with what I said then you're a moron. That just shows weakness. Back your s*** up. I'll check back in and see if you have! 😉✌
4
@zbudda Oh... One more thing.... let's entertain your claim that everything that Trump did, Obama did before that, for a moment. Did you think it was wrong and against the law when Obama did it? And if so, then you're saying that it's wrong that Trump is doing it, correct?
4
@zbudda the collision with Russia thing is just silly.... With Trump, not only did they have witness statements, document trails and Trump on camera asking Russia for their help but they also lay out 10 different ways that Trump tried to hinder the collusion investigation into whether he was working with Russia. What in the world does this prove? Obama told a Russian Ambassador that he would have more flexibility. Whoop T Do! I tell you what this does show though, if you think that's enough for you to make a statement like Obama colluded with Russia, then you have to, if you're going to have any credibility, say the same thing about Trump. Except you don't because you deny it.
3
@zbudda I really have no idea what the creepy guy all trying to hook up on the Secret Service so he could listen to a conversation that Obama was having with Putin, that we could not hear one word of, proves that Obama colluded with Putin... What in the world even was that! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 That guy looked obvious and funny as hell though! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
3
@zbudda also I'm going to stop looking at your links if you keep refusing to look at mine. You just keep trying to ignore everything you can argue against anymore. That's BS.
3
@zbudda Yeah... So... are you arguing that Papadopoulos didn't do anything wrong because a guy on the other side didn't get prosecuted?
3
@zbudda " and yet the FBI could find no Russian collusion with Papadopoulos, even after they tried a sting operation with an attractive FBI agent" And I gave you the link because it had the whole story... Not just the plead guilty part. Go read it.
3
@zbudda George Papadopoulos plead guilty and went to jail. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Papadopoulos
3
@zbudda Oh look... More but... But... But Obama... How original. 😜✌
3
@zbudda this is all public record. But when I get a chance to later on tonight, I can look it up and point it out for you, if you like?
3
@zbudda 1... No it wasn't. I already explained that. They used the Steele dossier for one fisa warrant application, along with a wealth of other information. After they found out that the Steele dossier was discredited or at least to the point where they didn't want to put you in the evidence for the warrants anymore, they took it out. There were eight other warrants issued with the remaining information, by seven different judges, without the dossier. 2... the Steele dossier did not start the Russia investigation. It is on record that the FBI did not receive the Steele dossier until 7 weeks after the Russia investigation was started. Papadopoulos started the Russia investigation. Not the Steele dossier. You're working on inaccurate information.
3
@zbudda I will say that attacking Trump's kids for anything other than what they may do in regards for working for him, is wrong and I do see that happening sometimes. I also think people who attack Barron Trump are assholes. I say that to them as well. I don't care what side you're on, you don't attack an innocent child.
3
@zbudda Oh! That's what you where talking about... Didn't think of that. I was possibly really destracted by the funny lurker guy! 🤣 I don't have a problem with world leaders sometimes having private meetings. Especially if afterwards there's no bias shown towards them.... Or it wasn't later shown that something against the law happened during that private meeting. Except neither of those things are true when it comes to Trump. Correct me if I'm wrong but Obama was never shown to have any dealings or bias with people like Putin or Ukraine in any kind of inappropriate way outside of a private conversation or if we got hold of that private conversation. You can't say the same thing for Trump. If you look at all relevant information they are two different situations. You can't just single one thing out and ignore all the rest. That's called confirmation bias. If you're going to compare two situations, you need to compare them fairly and with all relevant information.
3
@zbudda Oh! Now I know what you where talking about. With Fusion GPS... AND ALL THAT! The Mueller Report was 2 years long. It had 152 agents and investigaters working on different portions of it. Fusion GPS dossier where one of the very first things investigated at the beginning of those 2 years. They reference in the Mueller report that this portion was done by Comey, before Mueller was hired on. Of which he was hired on to lead the investigation. Is it real irrational to think that he investigated each portion of this massive investigation, personally? Also, let me explain how the Steel Dossier is irrelevant, which is also in the Mueller report. The main issue with the dossier is it's used and getting the fisa warrants to tap Carter page. But if you know all the details of that. It is easily irrelevant. So they did use the dossier along with other evidence to get the very first Carter page cap fisa warrant. After the very first one, they then found out that Fusion GPS and the Steele dossier we're just credited in a couple of ways and could not trust that anymore. So they took the dossier out of the information to get the next warrant. After this happened the same judge that approved the first fisa warrant with the dossier approved a second one without the dossier in it adjust the other evidence. This not only happened the second time it happened the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and Ninth time. By 7 different judges in total. All without the Dossier in the evidence to get the warrant. Which makes that irrelevant. You can check the report and the gov records. And all the other evidence certainly dwarfs it anyways.
3
@zbudda Also... Yes... People are going after Trump.... But what makes you guys look way bias... Is you always frame it as they are doing it, just cuz... Like Trump's actions have nothing to do with it.
3
@zbudda Also... Have your sources avalible... Make sure they are credible across the board... That way when someone wants them, there isnt all this excusive dialoge back and forth, that looka like you are trying to hide them. That also hurts your credibility. Again... Just meant in a helpful way.
3
@zbudda Except those are not the only differences. Which I have laid out in my responses.... Look.... This is not me trying to be a dick... Honestly. Its me giving you advice on your technique.... Cuz, you can do better... Just with a few simple tweaks.... You keep hanging yourself on the way you phrase things. You phrase them for dramatic effect. Like... " 👉the only difference👈 between Obama and Trump, besides ethnicity and made could not make bracket, is Obama was a relative unknown,... " is just 1 example.... Which makes it easy for me to point out you are incorrect. You reference to much in absolutes. Which opens you up to being constantly discredited. Good points... Facts and substance do not need dramatic effect. The argument stands alone if it is based off of those things. That is one of the easiest ways we trip you guys up. Your tendency to over exaggerate. Let the other person over exaggerate. Just stick to the facts. People hang themselves in that manner. Just some suggestions. Like I said... No insult meant by it.
3
@zbudda Goodness! You're backsliding again sugar tits. You would first have to prove what you said to be true, before I would have to disprove it. At no point did you prove that... 👉 every time Trump did something that the Democrats were outraged and wanted Trump impeached over... Obama had already done the same Thing.👈 Which makes it extra funny that you're trying to laugh about it now.🤣
3
@zbudda " After two years of the Russia collusion hoax nothingburger, only a moron would continue to support the Democrats." Now I believe I've already done this but just for argument's sake, let's plan out the fact that you just set up a false dichotomy. You're basically saying if you don't agree with me on this subject then you have to be a moron. Except that's not the truth especially when it comes to the Russia investigation. That's simply you just trying to be right and not being able to handle when people disagree with you. It also shows that you have not read the Mueller report. There was some evidence of collusion, which is actually labeled conspiracy. Cuz that's its proper term. Not enough oh, but some. A large portion of that had to do with volume two of the Muller report. Volume two laid out 10 different detailed incidences of trump and his administration trying to obstruct Justice during the course of the collusion / conspiracy investigating. Before you get to this part of the script, it also States three different detailed reasons why they would not charge Trump with 10 counts of obstruction of justice. All of which are laid out to basically say they're not allowed because you can't charge a sitting president. The only reason he is not being charged with that is because his office is protecting him. Which kind of gives him good incentive to win the next election, don't you think.... so he can run out the clock on those charges.
3
@zbudda and the Mueller report... Just for you. You're going to find what I said and the descriptors at the beginning of both volumes. If you want more details you'll have to read the whole thing but that should be sufficient enough to prove my work... https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955118-The-Mueller-Report.html#text/p9
3
@zbudda It really shouldn't make you look more smart. I just ran through most of those and most of it was b*******. Also now I understand why you were bobbing and weaving trying not to give any of those sources. 🤣
3
@zbudda Adam Schiff? Dude... Go back and look at your requirements for sources again, cuz that was just a joke, right?
3
@zbudda Now.. Libya was messed up all around. You will not get me to argue with you on that one.
3
I love how all the chicken hawks on the right are all the sudden holding up big ✌ peace ✌signs because daddy Trump told them to!
3
@nadiasilvershine4630 He did! Didn't he! Forgot about that. Thanks! 💜
3
@zbudda " Since 2016 the Democrats have done nothing but divide the country, obstructed Trump's Maga agenda, and focus on removing Trump from office by any means necessary." This is another silly claim. This is from a 2 second google search. So you have no excuse for this comment you just made. You don't know what they have done because you didn't look.👇 "House Democrats haven’t been squandering time. In addition to their investigations, they’ve been passing legislation at a rapid clip. In all, the House has taken up 51 bills, resolutions, and suspensions since January — 49 of which they’ve passed. This includes a slate of bills to attempt to end the longest government shutdown in history, the result of a protracted fight between Trump and Congress over border wall funding. Ironically, over the past two weeks, the House has passed bills to address most of the issues Trump mentioned in his tweet. They recently passed a bill to lower prescription drug prices, and another one to protect preexisting conditions. The House also passed nine bills on veterans issues this week alone, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi noted at her weekly press conference. On Thursday, Democrats tried to present Trump their infrastructure plan before he walked out of their meeting." https://www-vox-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2019/5/24/18637163/trump-pelosi-democrats-bills-congress?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D#aoh=15716870959031&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.vox.com%2F2019%2F5%2F24%2F18637163%2Ftrump-pelosi-democrats-bills-congress
2
@nadiasilvershine4630 Well... I'm not going to disagree with that... He is for sure a bad guy.
2
@zbudda Same thing with the IRS.... so you're saying Trump is responsible for everything the IRS is doing while he's in office?
1
@zbudda spying on Trump's campaign... That's just silly spin. What happened was the FBI. 9 different fisa warrants 2 tap Carter page. They legally obtained these from several different judges. They did so with a good deal of credible evidence and within the confines of the law. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carter_Page
1
@zbudda What comment did I delete?
1
@zbudda So... I'm pretty sure you're making the I was an Obama supporter thing up but on the off-chance you're not... you didn't do your research on Obama? As you willingly admit. No one in this world will claim Obama was perfect. I got a lot of beefs with the way he went about things.... Probably would not of expected that from me, because it's clear throughout your array of responses, you've already painted me of some brainwashed crazy person. Which I think has more to do with the fact that you need to do that to ignore what I actually say but... I digress. I'm also not a never Trumper. I think a good deal of what he does he does in a really stupid way. I certainly wouldn't call him an example or a role model of any quality. He's most definitely self-serving.... but some of that isn't new for the presidents we've had. He may be a little louder about it but it's not new. Those last two things I also wouldn't call Bill Clinton, but he did get us out of debt for the first time in about fifty years and set us up for the next four years before Bush. In there and screwed everything up. Show people of low moral character can do good things. People who don't think things out all the time can do good things. People who are self-serving and do good things. Trump saved the Special Olympics from his education secretary trying to defund it. He worked with Democrats on Criminal Justice Reform and got that passed. He even had a decent point about China and intellectual property rights. He went about it in a stupid way but he had a good point about it. Unfortunately his Ledger is way too far in the red and he has no respect for our democracy. Which puts me on the side of no Trump. Not because I'm brainwashed or whatever b***** I'll like to claim is going on with us so you don't have to defend his actions. .. But because I choose to take a full account of what he has done in office and to get to the office.
1
@zbudda SoOoOo... I'm going to go ahead and assume that you could not prove this statment 👉" every time Trump did something that the Democrats were outraged and wanted Trump impeached over... Obama had already done the same thing."👈 Cuz, well... That was a silly statment to begin with and there are clearly not enough comments and links to come close to showing that.... but since you finally got to work, we'll just check out off the box as you just over exaggerating for dramatic effect.😉✌
1
@zbudda Yay! We can finally move on to subject matter. Jesus that took forever. You guys are always thrown by having to back up what you claim, with actual evidence.... Now let's see...
1
@zbudda Is your fault you didn't bother to 👉Prove👈 them in the first place. You tell me... How much sense doesn't make to expect somebody to disprove something you have yet to prove to be true in the first place? 😉✌
1
@zbudda And it wasn't associates... It was 1. Carter Page.
1
@zbudda Deleting comments now!?!? 🤣
1
@zbudda The Youtube footage for what?
1
@zbudda Yeah... When that DOJ review comes out with the actual info... We can revisit this... I said the same thing about all those people speculating about the what the Mueller report would say. It was silly.
1
@zbudda You ignored my question.... on the IRS and the ATF. Would you then hold Trump accountable for every single investigation that the IRS and the ATF does under his administration?
1
@zbudda yes. But every time they do you guys try and paint it as being some crazy irrational conspiracy. And completely disregard his actions.
1
@zbudda can I ask you why you were ignoring White Fusion GPS and the Steele dossier are not really relevant?
1
@zbudda Na! Your just lying and making more excuses for why you can't prove your own claims... But it's cool. This will work as well. 😉✌
1
@zbudda Oh... No... Did you miss this? I covered your ass on that. 👇 "Oh... Is that it... You got them from tinfoil hat sights and don't want to show it because of that. Well... That is telling in all manner of ways... I'm not only shows what you consider reliable sources... To be... Well lets just say.. Flawed... but once more it shows that somewhere inside of you, you know it. Which is why you're practically breaking your back to posture. Oh shit! This just got fun! 😁 So... 1... I'm not doing your homework for you. Provide proof or be dismissed as a poorly educated propaganda artist. And 2.... I will accept gov sources, accredited news outlets, clear video, Gov documents.. And pretty much any kind of original source. I will not accept opinion pieces with bad or no source material... Cuz... Well... That is just stupid story telling. Now you have me on record saying all this and if I do not keep to my word, you can certainly shove this statment in my face after.... Now that your ads is covered.. Source material. 😉✌" You have no excuse now to not show your source. Prove your own claims or keep showing everyone you can't. I'll be waiting... 😉✌
1
@zbudda You gonna come up with that source material?
1
@zbudda Dude... Everytime you make some crazy claim... I say no... Its crazy because of this and you move on to the next... Maybe consider... Where you are getting this info... Is not a good source and fact check the source...
1
@zbudda This was ATF... Not Obama. Would you expect Trump to be liable for every investigation that ATF conducted under his time in office?
1
@zbudda Oh... And did you see these? 😁 1... " every time Trump did something that the Democrats were outraged and wanted Trump impeached over... Obama had already done the same thing." 2... "since 2016 the Democrats have done nothing but divide the country, obstructed Trump's Maga agenda, and focused on removing Trump from office by any means necessary." 3... "after two years of the Russia collusion hoax nothingburger," Just to help you out... And let you know what you need to provide evidence for... No need to thank me! It was no trouble at all... And 1 is gonna be super interesting to watch you try and qualify. 😜✌
1
@zbudda and I have no idea why you're bringing up Andrew McCabe.
1
@zbudda and Nope to what? 🤔
1
@zbudda Lmao! What in the world do you think that means?🤣
1