Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "Buttigieg fires back at Rubio after his same-sex marriage remark" video.

@Brian Johnston And... Just a side not... I'm not sure anyone can commit to VD.... and Drug abuse, alcoholism, suicide, sexually transmitted diseases and assaults are certainly not exclusive to the LBGTQ community. So why are you only focusing on them?
23
@Brian Johnston God? Okay? Which one? And where did "God" say it?
20
@Brian Johnston why? Who says that's true? How could you possibly go about proving that? And why in the world would you want that to be true?
18
@Brian Johnston So you don't know which God and you don't know where they said it... and because of that, I'm playing with demons! 😂
17
@warren52nz They probably have better things to do than go around the YouTube comment section needlessly correcting grammar to try and make themselves feel important .... Just a wild guess.
14
@Brian Johnston so, are you saying someone can only lust after some of the same sex and can't love them? And what exactly would be stopping them from doing so?
12
@ryangrumbles2216 tell that to all the tax paying members of the LBGTQ community. What you mean is he hasn't done anything for you. Except you're not the only person in the world, now are you?
8
@billmoore7133 where in the bible?
6
@billmoore7133 ...and if someone came back from the dad I'm pretty sure we know about that. We'd have some kind of proof of this, for instance. Except...
6
@joep6017 OMFG! I needed that laugh today! 😂
5
@marcelmoulin3335 Like mistaking your for you're. How was that, incomprehensible? The point is you wanted to feel superior and so decided to be petty.
5
@jaymass1178 Not my job to prove your claim... Sorry. So... When did he say it?
3
@Brian Johnston 😂 Is that your sad boy excuse for not being able to answer the questions about your own claims! 😂
2
@marcelmoulin3335 It's not how I feel. It was what was being done. You could clearly understand what they where saying, regardless, yet still felt the need to correct them, instead of addressing the actual substance.
2
Why isn't this already done? Why isn't this a vote that's just as easy as voting to keep the lights on? All you literally have to do is mind your damn business.
1
@bethgriesauer3825 I don't know... I respect the courage it takes to be who he is and do what he does... but as a politician there's just something that's always put me off of him. Like he's way too polished of a politician and I tend to not trust those guys. Like I've never seen him just get real with us, ya know.... I just really like to see that
1
@yvonneplant9434 Yeah... Look... I'm not a far right winger. I can tell the difference between giving a smart answer and a slippery on. He is smart... But that's not the problem. Literally everything he says sounds like he rehearsed it in the mirror 13 times before he said it on air. Its prepared. I've never just seen him. You need to see who someone really is, before you know them enough to trust them.. Ya know?
1
@yvonneplant9434 Look... I like his actions... Though.. A little to cautious for my taste, at times, and he does a good just representing me and the the rest of the LBGTQ community. There are a ton of good things I can say about the man... I just need to see him.. Ya know?
1
@cdani9972 yeah, you're needlessly trying to correct others on something that couldn't matter more to the subject at hand or their point, so you can feel better then they are. That's not correcting grammar. That's being a s*** believe for absolutely no good reason.... And standing up to bullies is definitely worth someone's time.
1
@cdani9972 Especially when it's about a word that you can clearly still understand what they're saying. Like you're and your. I would be able to understand is it was something that was impeding you from being able to understand their point. I've had those convos with ppl here. I've genuinely not been able to tell what they were saying and so I had to ask. However, that's not the case.
1
@cdani9972 You mean *an*. Not "am". Guess you don't have any credibility for anything you said after you said "am" now. Except... Wait... That's silly.
1
@cdani9972 And... A math teacher I had once. Mostly because they were trying to embarrass a child in front of the whole class because they didn't understand the problems formula. I have never abided bullies.
1
@cdani9972 And... Once again.. They spelt you're wrong. That in no way impacted the understanding of their point of view. Pay a little more attention to the actual substance and less to the birthday cake dressing. Not today, not tomorrow and not any day after that will I take style over substance. Your credibility, for me, comes from your knowledge of the subject that you were speaking on. Not a misspelled word. In fact, I have found that the people who focus on The Superficial do so because they don't have anything substitute to say.
1
@cdani9972 As I have already stated.... There are times when somebody uses grammar that is so lacking that I can't understand their point. Oftentimes, on here, it's because they don't use enough punctuation and have their sentences running together. In that case I politely ask them to use punctuation or to clear up something I didn't understand. That is only in those few cases. I don't go around correcting every grammar mistake I find because it's pointless. I don't deduct credibility from a person because they made a grammar error. We all do that from time to time and it is not the end of the damn world. If I understood what they said, I'm good. Again, I focus on the substance. That is what matters.
1
@cdani9972 It's weird how you have loopholes to you making a mistake... That still mean you are credible. So your rules don't count for you. You see how childish and fickle this can get. It doesn't matter. If you can't understand what they are saying then ask them to clarify. If you can and it happens to be spelled wrong, then just reply to the substance. This is childish and ridiculous.
1
@cdani9972 Did I say every teacher was a bully? You were not teaching. The fact that you think you were means exactly what I've been saying. This is about you making yourself feel superior. Otherwise, you would care more about the substance than you do about someone spelled you're as your... 🙄 Stop trying to equate yourself as a teacher. You're not teaching anyone anything other than how to avoid the actual substance of the argument.
1
@cdani9972 Now you are mischaracterizing what I said. " no one should care of someone else's wrong and anything much less spelling or facts" 👈 I have repeatedly said now to pay attention to the substance. I have repeatedly said to ask them to clarify if you can't understand it. There is a difference between facts and substance, and a misspelled word. The primary difference in this conversation, would be, that I wouldn't get on to you about correcting someone on the facts. When you're making this damn big of a deal over a spelling error that did not affect you being able to understand what they were trying to say, that is bullying. It's also deflecting from the subject at hand. Which I'm guessing you get by now considering the amount of times you tried to mischaracterize what I've actually said.
1
@cdani9972 But.. Hey, whatever you need to tell yourself to actually stop this silly BS...
1
@cdani9972 Whatever you need to tell yourself.
1