Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "Van Jones: US Capitol riot is treason and rebellion. Period." video.
-
14
-
6
-
6
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Altair885 👈 Now let me explain why this one wouldn't answer that question.
Right now, in America, we have a group of radical right crazy extremists that have already attempted and are continuing to attempt to take one of our most fundamental freedoms away from us. The right of every American to pick our leaders. This is current state of events . My question was...
Would you expect slaves to come together with slave owners while those slave owners are fighting to keep them enslaved?
I asked that specific question because he keeps going on about how we need to unite even with the most extreme right-wing that are perpetrating this coup. He's making up all kinds of future... scenarios and trying to call the people in the building tearing stuff up, "sightseers". He also tried to change the question to another one he wanted to answer. If he answered this question, it would either destroy his whole argument or make him look silly. Probably both.
If he would have said "yes. I would have expected for slaves to unify with their slave owners while they were trying to still keep them slaves", I would have pointed out... how do you know that the unification was genuine, considering their slaves and have to do everything their masters tell them to do? He wouldn't have an answer for that. It's applicable for that reason. These people are currently trying to take our rights away to pick our leaders. They are currently inciting violence and literally killing police officers. We don't UniFi with people like that. We put them in jail for treason. His big thing where the people who weren't beating to death police officers with fire extinguishers, carrying pipe bombs or making a Gallows. All the other people who were just sitting around watching and cheering how to "hang Mike Pence" were apparently "innocent bystanders" to him. Never mind they also broke into the capitol. Nevermind they were accomplices under the law to murder, attempted murder, assault, attempted assault and treason. To name a few. They were just sitting there taking pictures, apparently.
This is all over these comments sections now. All the sudden it's finally gotten through to them that they are losing and that they lost the election and all three branches of government, to boot and so now they're about Unity. Now they want to try and claim some kind of moral High Ground, while still excusing and dismissing treason and an attempted coup. No thank you. That BS won't work.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Altair885 Would you expect slaves to come together with slave owners while those slave owners are fighting to keep them enslaved?
1. Ignored
2. Ignored
3. " Garden slaves and their owners, well again just look back to history, there are instances after the Civil War where former slaves did indeed coexist with their former Masters "
Except that isn't the question. You got the circumstance wrong.... 👉 while those slave owners are fighting to keep them enslaved 👈... And the core of the question itself. " Would you expect ". Not what happened.
4. " I think I did answer actually answered your question about slavery?
Except you didn't because you got the circumstance wrong and the core of the question wrong. As I just demonstrated a minute ago.
5. " The slavery question is obviously a play to imply Unity is not possible and so my ideals are flawed. But it means nothing because your hypothesis is based on past event that has a well-documented outcome, it has no relevance to the current affairs of which we are discussing unless you had another point you are trying to make.
The question is now, not "relevant". Except the past and histories the exact same thing you keep pointing out, that proves your point. So apparently we only listen to history when it supports your narrative.
On top of that, and once again, history is not what I'm talking about. Your expectations are the subject of the sentence.
6. " you answers from my on now answered questions first and I will. Thank You observe I've already answered a lot more of your questions then you have mine. "
Now it's time to divert to a silly lie, while simultaneously (passive aggressively) admitting that you haven't actually answered the question up till that point. Which led me to ask another question. I asked you to provide these questions I had not answered. You never did.
7. "Keep trying to turn us around lady, it looks to me like you're perhaps being a little bit of a hypocrite I'm afraid"... currently it seems that you are the one who is not even attempting to answer a number of the later questions I have put to you, why one wonders"
The point in the tactic list that you tried to draw attention away from himself and deflect On To Me, by literally telling me that's what I'm doing. Good times... Once again bringing up this list of questions I have "not" answered, that you claim are there.
8. " okay I'll make it easy for you and answer this one as fast I can even though you have not answered the last few I've asked you."
And do you know why. I told you that you needed to answer this question that you have been ignoring this entire time, and as soon as you did that I would answer whatever questions you like.
" ordinary I would assume no would be easy answer you'd expect. However history has shown that is not always the case, during the Civil War there were black slaves who willingly fought for the Confederacy"
This one is awful special. Cuz you presented an argument claiming that a Slave had a choice. Talk about not having a clue.
9. And finally... After all of that... " no I haven't, you just can't accept the answer I've given you, but just to reiterate it for you my answer was yes and no if you don't understand."
So not once did you ever say yes or no. If you had, we would have moved on by now. Now I was going to ask you what that cop out of an answer meant, but directly below you giving a yes and no answer, you once again start talkin about what you claim to be historical facts and how we can't change them. Except you don't need to change them to answer the question.
" I'm sorry you didn't like the way I answered but I can't change history or go back and ask them why they made the choices they did."
So, what does historical facts about history have to do with your expectations of them? Nothing...
If you contest this, please feel free to go up top and quote me and you to disprove the track record you have of avoiding a question. As well as any discrepancies in the timeline.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Altair885 your queen of not being able to give a definitive answer gets washed down the BS train as soon as you look at your track record on the 20,000 different ways you tried to avoid answering this question. Some of which had nothing to do with your claims from history now. All illustrated here. 👇 You are just lying. Plain and simple. 👇
@John Chilton Would you expect slaves to come together with slave owners while those slave owners are fighting to keep them enslaved?
1. Ignored
2. Ignored
3. " Garden slaves and their owners, well again just look back to history, there are instances after the Civil War where former slaves did indeed coexist with their former Masters "
Except that isn't the question. You got the circumstance wrong.... 👉 while those slave owners are fighting to keep them enslaved 👈... And the core of the question itself. " Would you expect ". Not what happened.
4. " I think I did answer actually answered your question about slavery?
Except you didn't because you got the circumstance wrong and the core of the question wrong. As I just demonstrated a minute ago.
5. " The slavery question is obviously a play to imply Unity is not possible and so my ideals are flawed. But it means nothing because your hypothesis is based on past event that has a well-documented outcome, it has no relevance to the current affairs of which we are discussing unless you had another point you are trying to make.
The question is now, not "relevant". Except the past and histories the exact same thing you keep pointing out, that proves your point. So apparently we only listen to history when it supports your narrative.
On top of that, and once again, history is not what I'm talking about. Your expectations are the subject of the sentence.
6. " you answers from my on now answered questions first and I will. Thank You observe I've already answered a lot more of your questions then you have mine. "
Now it's time to divert to a silly lie, while simultaneously (passive aggressively) admitting that you haven't actually answered the question up till that point. Which led me to ask another question. I asked you to provide these questions I had not answered. You never did.
7. "Keep trying to turn us around lady, it looks to me like you're perhaps being a little bit of a hypocrite I'm afraid"... currently it seems that you are the one who is not even attempting to answer a number of the later questions I have put to you, why one wonders"
The point in the tactic list that you tried to draw attention away from himself and deflect On To Me, by literally telling me that's what I'm doing. Good times... Once again bringing up this list of questions I have "not" answered, that you claim are there.
8. " okay I'll make it easy for you and answer this one as fast I can even though you have not answered the last few I've asked you."
And do you know why. I told you that you needed to answer this question that you have been ignoring this entire time, and as soon as you did that I would answer whatever questions you like.
" ordinary I would assume no would be easy answer you'd expect. However history has shown that is not always the case, during the Civil War there were black slaves who willingly fought for the Confederacy"
This one is awful special. Cuz you presented an argument claiming that a Slave had a choice. Talk about not having a clue.
9. And finally... After all of that... " no I haven't, you just can't accept the answer I've given you, but just to reiterate it for you my answer was yes and no if you don't understand."
So not once did you ever say yes or no. If you had, we would have moved on by now. Now I was going to ask you what that cop out of an answer meant, but directly below you giving a yes and no answer, you once again start talkin about what you claim to be historical facts and how we can't change them. Except you don't need to change them to answer the question.
" I'm sorry you didn't like the way I answered but I can't change history or go back and ask them why they made the choices they did."
So, what does historical facts about history have to do with your expectations of them? Nothing...
If you contest this, please feel free to go up top and quote me and you to disprove the track record you have of avoiding a question. As well as any discrepancies in the timeline.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1