General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Killed The Cat
CNN
comments

Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "Can Donald Trump nuke a hurricane?" video.

Meanwhile... Look at all these Trump Cultists on here, being all #SaltySpice5000! over their guy saying yet another stupid thing.... 😜✌
4
@themanwithnoname4385 Oh... I don't consider anything from any source to be true or false, with out investigation and proper analysis. I was simply providing my analysis, using that very logic. You claim to do the same, so it should be simple enough to come to the obvious portability, right?
3
Getting us further into space, in a shorter amount of time... And I'm guessing it would make a big ole hole when needed. 😁 I have also heard something about knocking astroids off course, if we catch them soon enough... But if I remember correctly... That's a little dodgy logic. 😉✌
3
@themanwithnoname4385 your message didn't go through. Like I said, I was reading your articles that you gave me. That's why I was so far behind. I was replying as I scroll down.
2
@Mister Morgan SoOoOo... Where you just counting on noone taking the time to read the link or look up the bill on Gov sites? That was a fools bluff.... - The last Dem to even touch the bill was Jimmy Carter, in 1979. - The bill was originally put in place in 1948. - Its original intent was not to do what you say. It was to strategically dispense propaganda and general information to foreign adversaries and allies, as needed. - It was also supposed to Shield the American people from it. - Except over the past 60 plus years, Republicans got to it. To be accurate, one Democrat and 6 Republicans. - The last few where Ronald Reagan in 1985, George HW Bush in 1991 and 1992.... - Then James Kenneth Glassman (R), the founding executive director of The George Bush Institute. - Several Dems have protested these changes to the original bill... A good example of which, is Edward Zorinsky, in 1985 tried to fight against these changes. - John M. Vorys (R) was the one to add the second provision to remove the stigma of propaganda. - The action in 2012 that you where referring to was by (R) Thornberry. (R) Smith was the other co signer. - They have tried to ammend the Bill to authorize the domestic dissemination of information and material about the United States intended primarily for foreign audiences, and for other purposes. The 2 BEST PARTS of your lies... 1. The amendment that you claim to allow this " propaganda " NEVER MADE IT PAST THE HOUSE.... For 2 reasons.... The first, Money..... Of course. The second, concerns about the freedom of the press provision and freedom of speech provision in the Constitution itself.... The limitation and overlapping of them. 2. OBAMA HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. Go look for yourself on https://www.congress.gov/bill/112th-congress/house-bill/5736
2
@brianwalsh7931 Don't worry about this Morgan guy. Ive ran into him before. He is one of those ignorant people who need to put down others because he can't defend his own lies. Go look at my response to him. It will make you feel much better! 😉👆
2
@themanwithnoname4385 That is very similar to my own... Except... Add an 8 year old little boy. Lol My main internal conflict tends to be the balance between accepting new information, and not letting other people bully you into changing your mind. You need to know what you know but at the same time, accept you could be wrong and, therefore, keep the most obvious discernible truth, above one's own ego. I'm pretty sure that's a common struggle though. So at least I'm not alone. Lol
2
@themanwithnoname4385 well, I'm a single parent. To an 8 year old little boy. When you do that oh, you get pretty used to the idea that you're never going to know a damn thing. LOL I know that seems contradictory to my previous statements about liking to new things... But as a parent that is the very first thing you have to accept in order to survive it LOL Though I do like geeking out. LOL
2
@themanwithnoname4385 Okay! So, per your clarification, I would absolutely mostly agree with your assessment on the Obama putting Maduro into office thing. The only clarification I would make, would be that he did not intended that. It inadvertently happened because he was doing his job, and it definitely benefited Maduro. See, I can agree! 😁
2
@themanwithnoname4385 nope, there it was. Apparently I was in a cult. LOL
2
@themanwithnoname4385 I think I made him mad then. If you told him you were a Native American and it pissed him off oh, I just got done telling him when I was little oh, my dad put me and my brother in the rainbows and the demolay. Which are basically the kid versions of the Masons and the Eastern Stars. I'm afraid to see his next comment after he reads that. LOL
2
@themanwithnoname4385 Dude... Don't poke the crazy bear! 😉✌
2
@themanwithnoname4385 LMAO! Apparently... We are not most people. Lol
2
@themanwithnoname4385 my mom is a retired cop. LOL I'm actually kind of the opposite of that. I'm literally the only person in my family who I hasn't joined some form of the military or government service. I'm the black sheep free spirit. I just happen to be a Super Geek as well. I like knowing things. I've always been that type of person that even if it's bad news, as long as I understand it, I can deal with it. You so far have been frustrating at times, but pretty intelligent, calm and respectful. Which is rare on here. So I appreciate that.
2
@themanwithnoname4385 you've made a few assumptions about me. Me being desperate me taking things seriously. It don't matter. Like I said, we don't know each other. All I seen that is is someone floundering a little bit. But every time you did it you went right back to the substance. So I don't care. It's not that big of a deal. Substance is more important and you stick to that. Which is refreshing. I'm going to go back and read that last link when I'm done catching up on the responses.
1
@ShadowMask1995 I didn't say he was nobody, I said it was nothing. As in no evidence. Like I said before, all you provided is a bunch of speculation and baseless attachments.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 And I quote... " Got proof he said that? You're a racist, I don't have any proof you're a racist, but you are one, prove to me that you aren't a racist." " How do you know what you're being told by CNN is the complete truth? Just because it sounds likely or in character, doesn't make it the truth. " Those and several other comments you have made, have suggested that proof is required. Proof is not you saying more words. Its that simple.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 I'm talking about you saying, " didn't say I never take them seriously." Then I went up to go quote you from your previous comment and saw that you edited it and added, "for the most part" at the end of your sentence that originally said, " I don't take anything both sides say seriously. " You went back and changed it. Then insisted you didn't say it. That's not honest and I have come across that enough, to screen shot my convos on here. So I have a picture of the original. You should not of done that. You could have just said that you misspoke and we would have moved on... But your not going to lie on me. So... You can either admit the act and stop playing this childish game or I can post a link to the picture. Its up to you.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 I did disreguard what you said. I'm holding you to the standard that you hold others. If you want me to address the issues you brought up, provide proof. It's that simple. I have no problem addressing them... When they are proven to be the fact that you claim them to be. Which shpuld npt be hard to find, if they are the facts that you claim them to be.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 You can characterize me as whatever you like. It's not going to change anything.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 All of it... Until you prove it to be true. Asking me to prove that something isn't true, that you have yet to prove is true, is not logical.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 Business Insider is a news orginizations. Which you have said, multiple times, that you do not trust. So I'm assuming if your presenting it, you have fact checked them, right? Why not give me the fact check stuff? Your claim is actually a stretch with the article you presented. Obama is not their president and his primary job is to protect the US. Another country's internal politics is, at best, collateral damage. Not something he actively done. As you suggest. This is what Obama did, according to the link that you provided. "Last week, President Obama designated 7 members of the Venezuela's socialist political elite as threats to the US and placed sanctions on those individuals."
1
@themanwithnoname4385 New York Times is also a media outlet. One I tend to consider accurate... But that's not what is in question. So far, both of your links have been media links. The thing you have been adamant about not trusting at face value coming from the jump. So I'm curious why you're choosing to trust some and not others? Why are you using them as proof and not their sources? New York Times also, didn't say what you did. At no point did it say that " Obama installed Maduro as the president of Venezuela in 2011." Maduro also did not make it a socialist country. You have still provided nothing for that. "Venezuela is a federal presidential republic. The chief executive is the President of Venezuela who is both head of state and head of government. Executive power is exercised by the President. Legislative power is vested in the National Assembly." This is socialism. "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole."
1
@themanwithnoname4385 In the third link YOU gave, it says it right up top... about weather Maduro is making it socialist or not. " increasingly authoritarian executive ". Your links are simply not proving your claims thus far. Two out of the three but I've looked at so far also happened to be major news outlets. Which I am, again, confused by, considering you've been saying this whole time that you don't trust the news. So why wouldn't you just give me the fact checked stuff, instead of the news outlet that you say you don't trust? Unless you didn't fact-check yet and are for some reason choosing to believe the news when it's convenient and not when it isn't, when it comes to your argument and your beliefs?
1
@themanwithnoname4385 "In all actuality most illegals are coming from Venezuela," Once again... Your link did not say what you are claiming. Its not "most". It's a top. The "most" for the last 6 years have been Central American countries. Of which, Venezuela is not one. Check out your own link and this one for my claim. https://www.wola.org/analysis/fact-sheet-united-states-immigration-central-american-asylum-seekers/
1
@themanwithnoname4385 I'm gonna lay out your links and why they are not proof. In one whole comment, momentarily. First, however, are you going to admit that you went back and edited that comment, and then tried to lie on me about it? Or do I need to post a link to the screenshot? Cuz all you had to do was say you misspoke. Instead you chose to try and call me a liar. I'm not Petty, which is why I haven't posted it yet, but I'm also not going to let people lie on me. I have laid out what you did into comments now and given you two opportunities to come clean, so that we can move on to other things. This is your last chance. Allow yourself to have credibility, and just make you edited it and added some words at the end, then tried to lie on me about it instead of admitting the truth... Or don't and I will show everyone. Last Chance. Up to you
1
@themanwithnoname4385 These are claims that you have made, that you have yet to prove.... " CNN Don Lemon and Como stated back in October - December that border situation wasn't that bad and that it was because of the president." 👆This one should be the easiest to find. All you would have to do is search YouTube for the key terms. Then single out CNN clips. Yet you have not done so. " In actuality most illegals are coming from Venezuela, due to the Socialist dictator Maduro. Who Obama installed back in 2011. " None of the links you have provided have said either of these 3. - Obama installed Maduro - Maduro has a socialist regime - most of the Asylum Seekers are from Venezuela You ignored half of what you said. Particularly the part that would have been the easiest to find oh, you did not prove your case on the rest with the links that you gave. None of them said what you said they did. Also half of your links were news outlets that you have been railing against from the start. which begs the question, why are news outlets correct when they agree with you and not to be trusted otherwise The long and the short of it is, you have proven nothing. Fact check then give it another go.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 well, thank you. If you read my comments below, where I mentioned the subject. Know that I respond to each comment as I go down. So if I'm still going on about it it's because I had not gotten to that comment yet. Anyways, so I don't appreciate you continuing to make assumptions about me. And I do take it personally when people try to lie on me. .. I'm going to stick to what I said I would do... thank you for admitting that you misspoke and I appreciate your honesty.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 except I did read it. I read all four. Which is why it took me so long to catch up to your comments. I even quoted some of them in my replies. It didn't say what you said it did. If I'm wrong go back and look and quote that. Tell me which link it is and I will go back and check myself.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 Obama didn't put him in power. Many societies have socialist aspects to them, without actually qualifying as being socialist. America has socialism. We are a democracy. More oligarchy esk but democracy.. yeah we have social security local police forces local firemen local ambulance and tons more. They operate on a socialist form. Venezuela has too much authoritarianism to be considered socialist. It simply does not make up the whole of the country enough to call it such. Maduro himself is a crazy ass dictator. I would be more than likely to call it a dictatorship then I would a socialist society. And to put this into perspective for you. I don't consider the vast variety of forms of government as good or evil. They are essentially, and I make this argument quite a bit to people who try to put down different forms of government, a system of operation. Plain and simple. The thing that makes them work or not work are the people who are running them and what they do with it.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 you have not proven that Obama put him into power. You'll merely showing that Obama did his job in protecting our country. You've also just changed your adjective when describing these people. Before you said asylum-seekers and now you're saying illegals. Illegals and asylum-seekers are two different things. Either way though... As I have proven and the links that you posted have actually proven, they are not the largest group. I'm not arguing they're not a big group, but they're not the largest. The majority of them are still coming from Central American countries. Unless you are limiting the asylum-seeking and illegal immigration to the southern border. But I don't know why you would do that. The southern border is only 33% of the reason people come to America illegally or seeking Asylum.
1
@ericmartin2470 Its Arizona. At least get the lyrics to the song right, if you're going to shoot the messenger instead of arguing the premise.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 no. You're not wrong about the Sudanese or the Drone bombing. Though I'm not sure why you would single out Obama for that. When Bush and Trump have done it as well. Honestly, it's pretty weird for me. I find myself more and more having to defend Obama. I genuinely am not a Obama groupie. I voted for him both times but that was just because they were better than the other guys. He certainly wasn't perfect. He frustrated the s*** out of me with his always carrot and never stick approach. Especially when it came to the Republicans. They're freaking body blowing him left and right and he's just standing there with his hands up. It pissed me off. He cared way too much about his perception than he did about actually getting s*** done. That's not to say he hasn't gotten a lot done. Dude was working hard. He just laid down and took too much for my liking, offer are the semblance of bipartisanship that nobody else cared about. He just let them steal a court seat. On the Supreme Court. He let them Jack the Supreme Court seat with barely a whisper. I was throwing s*** at the TV for three days on that one. But on the other hand, dude got s*** done. He could have done more if the last 4 years he wasn't fighting the Republicans all the time but as presidents go his track record certainly isn't bad. Then I see all these people on here talking about how he's the Antichrist now. Like nothing he ever did mattered. Except a lot of it helped everybody and everybody's just kind of forgetting about it because it's new guys a child... so now I defend Obama a lot more than I ever talked about him before. Again super freaking weird.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 you presented the New York Times as proof of your claims. At the same time you have been railing against the media and talking about how you don't ever trust s*** they say. Calm down I'm paraphrasing. With that I would assume that you would check the information on the New York Times article. Which makes me ask the question why didn't you just give me the stuff you found when you check the facts on the article instead of the article itself.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 I already did read them. I read all four. Almost every time I've asked you for the sources that you checked against the Articles you gave. You have yet to give them to me. So I don't have anything for it. Even the Articles you gave didn't say the things that you claimed they did. You're not giving me anything here.
1
@ShadowMask1995 except America isn't a Christian Nation and I'm sorry but that kind of sounds like a conspiracy theory without any facts to back it up. This one Freemason said that and so it has to be true? I'm not trying to be rude. I just don't have another way to point out that your comment is lacking in substance. Or rather it's lacking in provable claims. The chosen one thing I will agree that it was stupid crazy and crazy stupid. I don't know what the hell that was about. All I know is that I was screaming 25th amendment at the screen when I saw it. Dude is crazy.
1
@ShadowMask1995 my brother was demolay and I was a rainbow. Basically the junior versions of the Masons and Eastern Stars. I know who the Freemasons are. I know about Jacques demolay and all the rest of them. A statue in Washington however, is just not much to go on hun. I don't think you're lying. Why would you lie about a statue being somewhere? I just don't think it says what you think it does.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 accept all other articles and news outlets aren't saying that it's a socialist regime. You know what, honestly this isn't a hill I want to die on though. Can we just agree to disagree about the Socialist thing. Cuz that's not really relevant that much. It's another country. We can do anything about it if we wanted to. I'm not even making the argument that Maduro is a good guy. Jesus he's evil. He is doing so much messed up shirt two people. And they're his own people. I don't have any love for the dude. I just don't happen to agree that he is running his country in a way that is mostly socialist. As I said before. I would probably refer to it as a dictatorship before I would have refer to it as a socialist state. It leans more towards that way, or at least he does in my opinion.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 I do agree with you about if most Outlets are reporting the same thing, it generally means that it's true. I just didn't seem most Outlets doing that. Also even when that happens, I tend to fact-check yet. I'm like a super research nerd like that. It's almost like an OCD compulsion. I just talked about politics a lot and I like to know what I'm talking about before I say something silly.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 so I don't think I'm in denial mode. I think that's something you're telling yourself in order to dismiss my reasonable claims and me asking you to quote where it says that in the articles that you actually provided. I'm still scrolling down but you have yet to do so. I have to read the one right above the one I'm replying to now. I genuinely don't care if I'm right or wrong. I just like accurate information. Which I understand can come across at times as stubborn denial..... You know what, I have an idea. I'm going to read that last link that you sent me but can you provide me with the reasons you think maduro's government is socialist? Like a little list of examples of socialism in his regime? That way I have a more clear picture of what you're referencing and I can give you examples of why I think it's more of a authoritarian dictatorship kind of thing. Deal?
1
@themanwithnoname4385 the ranks change? The people running the government? I'm not sure how that makes it socialist?
1
@ShadowMask1995 on this I tend to almost agree with you, but not necessarily in the kind of conspiratorial wave that you're saying it. That kind of makes me a little uncomfortable but there are actual studies that show the effectiveness of the American voters influence on the government and the laws and policies that we live by in this country. That has been on a steady decline for a couple of decades now.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 Facts can be proven. You have yet to do that. Therfore your own principle still applies. They are just words until you can provide proof. As I said, provide proof (and not just words) or admit your hypocrisy by default.... Up to you.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 Now....you can keep lying and I'll have to pull up my screen shot, which I do with all my convos on here that last more than a few comments, for reference and to make sure noone lies on me... Or you can say that you simply misspoke and we can move on.... Up to you.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 Did you seriously just go back and edit that part... Sigh... Seriously... Just say you misspoke. Don't add "for the most part" at the end. You just discredit yourself that way. You said, " I don't take anything both sides say seriously. " 🙄 Do better.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 SoOoOo... Your breaking your own rule. You suggested that just saying things does npt actually make it true. That os what you are doing right now. With CNN and Obama. Give proof or admit your hypocrisy by default.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 if you have shown me links about Don Lemon or Como, I haven't got them. Send them again?
1
@themanwithnoname4385 Its almost 8pm here... So picking it back up tomorrow is fine. As far as me not agreeing with anything, you're wrong. I've agreed with you here and there. The one that pops to my mind right now is the drones and that other one that was with that. Which I can't think of right now. But like I said, tomorrow if you have time... Just give me something to work with. Some examples of how Venezuela is now a socialist state. You don't have to provide the links. I'll literally look them up myself. I just need to know where you're coming from in more detail.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 That's lazy logic. I don't take anything either side says seriously? No one is always wrong. Not taking it at face value and fact checking it is one thing, not listening to any of it... Is a complete other. That means your not basing your opinions on facts, but on your bias against the media and polititions. That is not critical thinking or logical. Also, they are not reporting that its true. They are reporting that its there. Discussing the context of the possibility. Also a big difference.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 I once had a guy at a bar tell me this crazy conspiracy theory about how all midgets are robots who has buttons on the inside of each foot and if they click them together, they will explode. I still have no idea till this day whether that guy was serious or just really drunk. I'm hoping it's drunk but that was a lot of detail for being drunk. Lmao!
1
@themanwithnoname4385 Also, CNN is not the only one reporting it. So your shoot the messanger tactic is in question, as well.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 As I stated.... Probable analysis.... Using histoey, logic and critical thinking skills. CNN did not say that we didn't have a crisis at the border. That is propaganda. They have debated the context of the situation. They have not said there is not one. Unless you would like to use your own principle in order to prove me wrong? Instead of just saying it.... And all...
1
@ShadowMask1995 Did you really get the impression that I consider him to be anywhere approching my president? Little tip for the future... If you want people to actually care about your suggestions... Maybe don't act like a child...
1
@themanwithnoname4385 Well... Their is a long history of Trump saying stupid stuff to draw on.... Of him speaking before he thinks. Dispite having direct access to prominent experts the fields that he is commenting on. While that is not direct proof, it does directly depict a pattern of behavior on his part. Which means Occam's razor does apply... and it would certainly not be anywhere close to out of the realm of possibility. History is a powerful predictor of future behavior.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 wow, I can be pretty stubborn as well. LOL I'm the same way about censorship. With that and the combination of me being stubborn, I will get into these long drawn-out threads with people and it still takes me a lot to block someone. Cuz I don't have other commenters telling me that all the time. Like when somebody's being a super ass and just saying all kinds of fuckedupshit. Why don't you just block them. Cuz it's America let me get to say what we want. The only time I really block someone is if they start talking s*** about my kid and that's mainly for their own protection. Cuz I'm batshit crazy when it comes to him. LOL I'm also pretty good with code... If you're picking up what I'm putting down... So I don't want them to piss me off to the point that I do something stupid. So I tend to block those but other than that, my life has given me a pretty thick skin and I do not desire to be loved by strangers. So they can say what they want.
1
@ericmartin2470 Oh... Goodness... So you just decided to dive head first into the silly and asinine, instead, I see. Not the way... I would of choose.... But... I guess sense we are here. 🤦 You where quoting a George Strait song. Ocean front property. https://youtu.be/QCvW32n4z38 Now weather you where informed enough to know that at the time, is entirely up for debate... Because your second quote is now... Incomplete and incorrectly referenced. 🙄 Vladimir Lenin never said it or anything like it. A little bit of research and your gonna find out that the closest your gonna come is actually to Nazi Propaganda Minister Dr. Joseph Goebbels. “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it,” 😉✌
1
@ericmartin2470 Being... 2 for 2 in the misquoting AND in source of knowledge department, you thought it would be a good idea to claim to of read my comments, so that you could reference them in a negative context, yet you skipped over the evidence that I stated, and so, claimed that, " this is all the evidence there is an heresy is far from evidence. " ? 🤦 Dude... 🙄 Okay... When someone goes to trial, after being charged with a crime, and pleading innocent, one of the main factors that the prosecution uses in order to demonstrate this person is guilty of this crime, is prior Acts. History... And if Trump was on trial for saying stupid s***, the prior acts portion of the defense case, would take a month and a half to present. Also... "heresy" is not the word you're looking for. This is the definition of the word "heresy", your trying to reference. "opinion profoundly at odds with what is generally accepted." Your not qualified to reference General acceptance of the 327.2 million people who live in America. You could go with dubious, leery or even questionable. Heresy, it is not. 😉✌
1
@ericmartin2470 SoOoOo... are you aware that "Trump derangement syndrome", is actually, not a thing? I feel like I have to ask, because you've gotten so much wrong, so far. It's just a lazy thinking tactic, propagated by the right, in order not to have to try too hard to defend Trumps actions. Which makes you 2 for 2 on the shoot the messenger, to avoid having to argue the premise, tactic, as well.... SoOoOo... Congrats on that, I guess... 😉✌
1
Ugh... Trump is so dumb... He's just so dumb... Sigh...🙄
1
@themanwithnoname4385 That's pretty much me... As well. I need to know what I'm talking about before I talk.... Which oddly tends to piss people off more than anything. There are 2 main groups on the YouTube comment section... People who only want the information that parrots back their own preconceived notions, and those that want to understand, want to see the whole board.
1
@themanwithnoname4385 I'd somewhat agree with that... Though I recently had a similar conversation with my mother. She always goes on about how the news used to be just the facts and she wants just the facts. Not the facts and then opinion. The main reason I disagreed with her is because a new station that offers fact and then the person's personal opinion on those facts, gives me more fact. Not less. Because it give me the facts about the point of view the person who is giving me these facts... It tells me where they and the station they work for are coming from.... Now she always argues the slippery slope to that. She's a Republican bye she recognizes a station like Fox News as intentionally and dramatically distorting facts on a regular basis and then giving opinion. She uses that as an example as the slippery slope. Which I can't argue much against, other than to say that there can be a balance in the middle.
1
@ericmartin2470 What a Trope you are... You misquoting and mislabbling 2 different quotes... Does make you wrong. 😉 You speaking before knowing what your talking about... does make you wrong.😉 You using a word that is completely misused and out of context... does make you wrong. 😉 You trying to paint me in a negative light because you screwed up... Does make you wrong. 😉 You not taking responsibility for that, and instead, trying to put your actions off on me... does make you predictable.😉 You trying to set up a childish premise, at the end there, that gives you an out no matter what I say does make you predictable. 😉 But you can keep posturing... Cuz its worked out so well for you, so far. 😜✌
1
@ericmartin2470 Or... You can explain how I took anything out of context??? I'd be super interested in hearing that. Especially if its what I suspect it is... Which is you trying to say that, cuz you couldn't figure out another way to excuse all your mistakes. That's gonna be funny as Hell! Can't wait! 😜✌
1
@ericmartin2470 OH! So its someone elses fault you where to lazy to check a quote before pointing it in someone else direction! I see now! 🤣 So when you were misquoting a George Strait song, that was somebody else's fault? How about when you were trying to misquote Vladimir Lenin? That's somebody else's fault as well? I'm shocked! Seams like nothing you do is your fault! 🤥😜 But please... Expmain to me how all these people MADE YOU type out their quotes, misquote the original quote and then try and put that off on someone else? I'm gonna love to hear that one! 🤣
1
@ericmartin2470 Though I am glad we both agree that "Trump derangement syndrome" is a stupid ass thing, and you should have never tried to claim that, you had evidence of me having it, in my comments! 😉✌
1
@ericmartin2470 BTW, you never did explain how I took anything out of context. Gonna get to that any time soon?!?! 😜✌
1
@ericmartin2470 Oh... And almost forgot... You didn't seam to mention anything about prior acts? Wonder why that was? Possibly because you know you can't defend your argument when egg knowledge eating all his past dumb-ass statements? Or is it maybe because you didn't want to admit that you didn't actually read any of my comments even though you reference them?😜✌
1
@ericmartin2470 If you didn't know where the quote came from, because you didn't look it up before you said it, you should not use the quote from George Strait. Which is exactly what happened. Which is exactly why you got the damn thing wrong, and it's not the only one. " if you believe this from CNN, I have some beachfront property in Idaho to sell you. " Cuz if you go down just a tiny bit, you would find you incorrectly quoted Vladimir Lenin. In terms of what was actually said and that Vladimir Lenin was not the one that said it. I don't blame you. I wouldn't want to quote a Nazi either, but that's what you did. Take solace in the fact that you incorrectly quoted him, but you did. " A lie told often enough becomes the truth " -Vladimir Lenin " This is why your a silly person. You come on here, trying to sound like you know what you're talkin about, when you genuinely don't. You think you have some piece of information that makes a difference, but you're too lazy to check it. You want to believe someone else's work. All because that person agrees with what you already think is true. Then you expect people to take you seriously. Stop being lazy when it counts, admit when you got something wrong and grow the hell up. Then maybe we will. Until then, I get to f*** with you for making all those stupid mistakes you make because you didn't do your homework. I come across you guys every single day. You're always super afraid to challenge your own opinions. Except you never ask yourself why. You should want to challenge your own point of view. You should want to know whether it is the correct one or not. 🙄
1
@ericmartin2470 You claim there are so many more important things, but you don't bother to find out the truth. You don't bother to challenge your own ideals. You don't bother to try and prove yourself wrong on what you've heard and what you apparently agree with. There are more important things! You're just not an honest actor and not a serious actor. So I'm not going to go there with you. That would be a waste of time! Wasting your time, on the other hand... well that just stops you from wasting someone else's. My little contribution! 😉✌
1
@ericmartin2470 I love when people reply... Laughing about how your still responding..... WHILE THEY ARE RESPONDING! 🤣 It really makes you look smart! 🤣 Okay... Its called personal responsibility. I'm not responsible for what you say. I'm not responsible for you taking a turn of phrase, not knowing where it comes from, and then saying it to someone. That's on you, sweetheart. That's called being a grown ass man. I'm a grown ass woman. Which means I'm responsible for everything that I say. I however I'm not responsible for what you say. That's something your mother should have taught you a long time ago. 😉✌
1
@ericmartin2470 again what you're saying is it's got to be a liberal agenda to make Donald Trump look bad. What you don't understand is he does that all by himself all day long every goddamn day. You like to ignore history. It doesn't fit with what you're trying to defend. Yet it never crosses your mind that if you have to ignore so much, in order to defend this guy, maybe he's just not worth defending. It's not like he gives it a rest. Your philosophy is shoot the messenger. It never works because it's just the messenger. Tell your guy to stop doing stupid s*** and they'll have nothing to report. 😜✌
1
@ericmartin2470 it's amazing how you always go back to ignorant dismissals, when you can't defend your argument anymore. Like that ever worked in the first place. Did you just forget? Do you think this is new? It's a childish tactic. 😉✌
1
@ericmartin2470 Sorry, sweet cheeks! You not being able to defend your Fool's errand anymore, does not make me stupid or a troll. It just makes you the useful idiot you've always been for your Dear Leader. SoOoOo... Have fun with that I guess! 😁✌
1
@ericmartin2470 I'm constantly amazed at your complete lack of self-reflection. Ignorant dismissals has been your entire argument. But I understand why you have to keep putting your actions off on me. Its all you have! 😜✌
1
@ericmartin2470 how are you always the victim and nothing is ever on you? You try to determine vert from the actual subject in the video I miss quoting a George Strait song. I pointed that out and then you went on to misquote Vladimir Lenin.... You don't want civil discourse. You want to be a right and others to be wrong. That's why nothing is your fault. Which coincidentally is the mentality of the guy you keep trying to defend. Everyone else's actions are their fault and your actions are their fault. You're always the victim and everybody else is always doing something to you.
1
@ericmartin2470 You seem to have no ability for self-evaluation.... You can't even do a simple... Oops... My bad. Shoulda checked my source. How are your actions always someone else's fault? You have no answer for that. All you can do is keep putting everything off on me.
1
@ericmartin2470 so I tell you what, I'll be here when you grow up and start taking personal responsibility for your own actions and words. Then maybe we can have what you refer to as "civil discourse". 😉✌
1
@ericmartin2470 Oh... No! You've lied and ignored. You have yet to admit your misquoting and mislabling... Your completely ignoring the fact that you accidentally tried to quote a Nazi because you didn't look up the quote before you send it. 😁
1
@ericmartin2470 Aww! Are we back to being childish because we can't defend our own argument again! I'm shocked!😜✌
1
@ericmartin2470 Although the "mentally challenged" part, is probably where you think that comment makes you look clever, and not just desperate! 😜✌
1
@ericmartin2470 Cuz that's what happens every time I bring up your mistakes, you play the victim or you act like they magically disapeared! 🤣🤣🤣
1
@ericmartin2470 🤣Shockingly enough it's all about me again. Cuz everything has to be about me and how I'm acting. Cuz you certainly couldn't do anything wrong. It's much easier to make assumptions about somebody's life you've never met, then to admit that you have a victim complex and you can admit you've done even the stupidest littlest thing wrong. Clean your own house before you come poking your nose into mine, sweet cheeks! 😜✌
1
@ericmartin2470 And we are back to being the victim! I'm shocked! 😳 Yes. That's never been up for debate. I mentioned that you miss quoted something while you were trying to divert from the actual subject of the video. I think I've said that about 12 times now. I'm not quite sure why you keep bringing that up. Always brings us back to you getting all uppity About me correcting your miss quotes and your miss labeling of them. Would you get all cranky about..... 😉✌
1
@ericmartin2470 But you tell yourself whatever you need to about me, in order to justify your lack of the ability to admit you've done anything wrong and your constant need to be the victim. 😜✌
1
@ericmartin2470 Ya know what I love? All the dancing your doing. It's really showing you're limited strategy repertoire. Its basiclly 3 things. 1. I'm always the victim and never do anything wrong. 2. Look at my clearly bias news, which I try and discredit "yours". 3. A group of millions of amaricans who I have never met in my life, suck! Just cuz I said so! 😉✌
1
@ericmartin2470 Hey! Tell me something? Its super frustrating when people try and ignore or/and nonsensically discredit all the substance you keep putting in their face, with simplistic shoot the messenger arguments, that amount to nothing, when examined using proper context, isn't it? You have just spent 2 days walking in a Liberals shoes, in reguards to talking to you guys. Congrats! 😉✌
1
@ericmartin2470 tell me, if you were trying to talk to somebody who was constantly the victim and never did anything wrong, how well do you think the conversation would go? You think it would be productive? Have you ever tried to speak to somebody in a serious manner who seems to have no capacity for self-reflection? If you have then you understand why it would be pointless to have a conversation with somebody like that, correct? I'm sure you think that's me at this moment, unfortunately it's been you all along. I know you're not going to agree. Fortunately for me that's just going to prove my point. 😜✌
1
@ericmartin2470 The first thing I said to you was.... if you're going to shoot the messenger instead of argue the premise, you could at least quote the George Strait song right. It was Arizona. Much like with Donald Trump and CNN, pointing out that you're wrong is not a personal attack. Those are just facts.😜✌
1
@ericmartin2470 OH NO! another right-wing attack, that's going to go nowhere... that you guys are preemptively getting excited about. Oh boy.... will you be embarrassed when absolutely nothing... happens like every other time before. #NeedASafeSpace 😜✌
1
@ericmartin2470 Against anyone, and it would have to be lagit. I... Unlike you... Am not bias. I... Unlike you... Have no issue admitting fault on both sides.... Which is why I could not have a serious exchange of ideas with you, because you are unwilling to admit fault on your side. It would be useless. Nothing you guys do is your fault. Everything we do is our.
1
@ericmartin2470 You are not an honest actor.
1
@ericmartin2470 Sure haven't... We have not gotten to anything... Sense your not willing to acknowledge the mistakes you made with misquoting two different people, doing so incorrectly and that you were trying to divert from the original topic at the front, by attacking CNN instead of addressing the premise of the video..... oh and now that you're trying to say that I attacked you from the start by simply pointing out that you were trying to divert from the premise of the video by misquoting George Strait. That wasn't an attack that was a correction and me trying to point out your diversion tactic. We have yet to get past all of that. And we're going on day 3 now. You're not really showing that you're someone who I need to be talking to about any of this stuff. I pointed that out several times now. What's the point? You've already shown you're always the victim, you guys never do anything wrong and we're always wrong.
1
@ericmartin2470 So... Yes I have the nerve... As I have said .. And you keep trying to divert from.... from the beginning you miss quoted a George Strait song.... Didn't know who you where quoting from the start. Then Miss quoted Vladimir Lenin and actually quoted a Nazi. Which you apparently want to ignore all together. All in an attempt to divert from the subject of the video from the start and instead just attacks CNN who happened to be reporting what was in the video. All of which you called me attacking you for pointing all of that out. It's been about 3 days and you have yet to admit any of that. So we have yet to go on to any other subject. You have tried, yet have not gotten the message that that's not going to work. Either you show that you are willing to have the conversation you keep claiming you're willing to have by being an honest actor or we don't have it. So how could I have gone on to anything else when I've just been speaking on this, because you won't tell the truth about it?
1
@ericmartin2470 so you can keep putting up as many hypotheticals and throwing out as much as you want, but you're not going to divert me off of your mistakes with any tactic you keep throwing up. you're going to show that you're an honest actor and simply stop being childish and just go hey my bad I misspoke or we're not going any further and you can throw up as many hypothetical is as you please
1
@ShadowMask1995 This is nothing...
1
@themanwithnoname4385 Your being hypocritical by insisting that others must prove their claims, yet not doing the same, yourself. Prove your claims, or they are, infact, not facts.
1