General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Killed The Cat
CNN
comments

Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "Ex-officer charged with manslaughter in killing of Daunte Wright" video.

@fearlessfosdick160 Running away shouldn't cost you your life. We should have been punished for his crimes. Not murdered for it.
4
@louisbarrow4671 I imagine that's how your mother felt when she gave birth to you.
3
@rockugotcha as many people are arguing, we find it very hard to understand how a seasoned veteran of the force can mistake a taser gun for a real gun. One of those things they drum into you during training and every year when you have to take her qualifications is left side right side.
2
@Lord_Poyo that's why they're not charging her with Murder One.
2
Sam Spade Exactly! My mom is a retired police officer. They drum "left side right side" into you guys like crazy.
2
@mikalreyer3584 Because judge, jury and executioner is not in law enforcement officers job.
2
@louisbarrow4671 Bet your mom wishes your name was Dante right now.
2
@Lord_Poyo 1. That is not true. A variety of evidence is presented at court that isn't necessarily broadcast over the news. This could range from... - witness statements, - 2 character statements both the accused and the victim... - more than one person could have been taping - the 911 call - recorded audio and body cam footage - prior record of the officer And loads more. 2. The only difference between murder 1 and murder 2 is prior intent. Manslaughter is an unlawful killing that doesn't involve malice or forethought intent to seriously harm or kill or extreme recklessness disregard for life. 3. Logical deduction doesn't necessarily only pertain to what you can imagine. I'm not using emotional equivalent to make my argument. Merely the definition of murder 2. Which, again, does not require prior intent. 4. You seem to be mistaking what you think is logic as to what actually is logic when considering all relevant material. For instance, your assumptions about the taser and gun. As I am stated, one of the key factors that is drummed into your head, not only in Pryor police training but in every maintenance review, is left side right side. In most police departments you can actually get busted down a rank and lose pay for having your taser and your gun on the wrong side. This is not something officers forget or mistake. Especially not a seasoned officer of more than 20 years. It's the wrong Captain sees you... as for getting caught up, that's what your training is for, as well. That's why countless people are not only coming on here but going to the media not being able to understand how this person mistook the taser for the firearm. 5. If you claim to be a logical thinker, then you must consider all relevant material. Not just what fits your narrative. You continuing to make claims like, "which you can in no way prove", only shows your lack of logical Thinking by considering all relevant information. 6. You clearly don't have the training that these people do oh, by the mistakes you're making in your logic, yet you feel confident enough to say that "personal experience doesn't help here". That's not logical thinking.
2
@tsis-k-koj Yeah... Cuz cops of all colors and genders don't make these kinds of mistakes.
1
@Lord_Poyo 1. You can't claim that all evidence shows that. There hasn't been at a discovery or a trial yet. 2. Kind of like the emotion guided logic that you're using right now to make the assumption that I'm using emotion guided logic? 3. Yet again, you cannot make claims about the evidence because we do not have all the evidence available to the General Public. 4. I haven't heard the Attorney General's office or any of its investigators claim they are pressing the charges against her because he is black and she is white.I have certainly not said anything about that. That is you setting up a paper tiger in order to tear it down. 5. She's a training officer. In order to train for specific situations, like Patrol oh, you have to qualify to do so first. You quality by having the experience. 6. You're assuming bias on my part because I don't necessarily agree with you. That would be your bias towards being correct. If anything, my life experience would have me more so on your side, instead of less. My mother worked for 20 years as a Caucasian female patrol officer for the Bossier City Louisiana Police Department. She also doesn't understand why She would have even reached for that side. One of the primary things for training police officers that you get beat into you at every given opportunity throughout every scrap of training your entire career is "left side right side". 7. As I said, you are arguing the difference between murder 1, murder 2 or manslaughter. No one is just slapping anything anywhere. That is what a trial is for. Which is what she will have and have every opportunity in the world, as everybody else does, to prove her innocence.
1
@louisbarrow4671 Hey! You just count to write the jaunty tune your dad will sing when you finally leave this world.
1
@R T she's a police officer and trained to act differently. That is no excuse.
1
@louisbarrow4671 Na! Your confused, love. Your just to use to calling to many men, Daddy! 😘✌
1
@fearlessfosdick160 what a nice little paper tiger you just set up there. Did I say they should have ignored it? You making up fictional scenarios is also not an excuse.
1
@tsis-k-koj then, I'm confused as to why you brought race and gender into the scenario.
1
@fearlessfosdick160 Quote me where I said, " deliberately murdered"?
1
@fearlessfosdick160 He could have been tazed, like he should have been and would still be alive. Either all of us are equally accountable under the law for what we do or we are not. That includes police officers.
1
Just Some Medic what video did you watch? And I'll stand as long as I damn well please, Sugarfoot. But I love to see you try and make me! 😘✌
1
Just Some Medic anytime, sweetheart. I'm all about meeting people where they're at. 😘✌
1
Just Some Medic right! You totally "don't care", that's why you responded with some silly childish posturing lie about who you are well calling me a boo-boo head! We "totally believe" that. That's "totally what people do" when they don't care! All before running away! Thanks for the Giggles! 😘✌
1
@VenoMous-s9d right, so the next time you do something stupid, I'm sure it's totally cool for a police officer to murder you. If you know anything about their training, or listen to any of the retired police officers in military you would know about left side right side and how ridiculous you sound.
1
@fearlessfosdick160 right. You keep talking about what the dead person is doing. I'm pretty sure he's already paid with his life for his actions. So I'm not entirely sure why everybody keeps bringing them up as some kind of excuse for her.
1
Bobby Link So... That means they should be above the law? They in force it, but don't have to follow it? That's how the best dictatorships in history started.
1
@Lord_Poyo 1. You don't know that. You have no way of confirming that. You are making that argument for the sake of your argument. They haven't even closed the investigation yet. There has been no discovery and no trial. Simply because that is all the info the general public has, does not mean there is no more evidence. You keep saying in this case... With NO WAY to prove your claim. Why? Because you are making a massive assumption to back up your argument.
1
@Lord_Poyo 2. What you think doesn't matter. Your "logic" is clearly colored by your desire to be right, despite not being able to prove a thing you say. Prosecutors prove Beyond A Reasonable Doubt, intent without premeditation all the time. And told the people in jail for murder 2. What you're going to say is this case is special... It's different because you say so... Even though you have no way of knowing or proving that... But that is not an argument. That is just you hoping, if you say it enough, it will magically become true. Sorry... Not how reality works.
1
@Lord_Poyo the speed bump you keep coming up against is you assuming that your logic is the only logic. That your opinion is the only opinion. That your truth is everybody else was truth. Except, unless you have some in with the prosecutors or the investigators in this case, you have no way of confirming that. Which means that is nothing but a narrative you have set up and are trying to stick to, because it's the only way you still have an argument.
1
@fearlessfosdick160 That... Is pretty apparent with the video and the whole being dead thing. You don't have to caveat her actions every time... That takes away from her responsibility.
1
@Lord_Poyo Well, I gave you a list, right off the bat. All of which except 2 that you ignored... I'm sure so you could still have a point.... But, sense you are trying to desperately seem so unbothered... I'm more than happy to give them to you again. - body cam footage - unnamed Witnesses - the police officers track record - police officer training expert Etc... Also, it is completely common for the police not to release all the evidence in a case, to the media. As for issue.... The only issue there is, is yours, by continuing to insist there isn't any other evidence, even though we both know there is no possible way for you to know that. The only reason you continue to make this baseless assumption is because your point falls apart if you don't. Not one time did I claim "all cases" had additional evidence held back by the prosecution. Now you are just making things up about my meaning.... But... Please feel free to quote me where I said that? I completely understand what you're telling me. You just don't understand that there's no way for you to quantify that into reality. No matter how many times you insist you know this, it doesn't stop the fact that you cannot prove that. It doesn't make your claim any less of a baseless assumption. That is not the only evidence that can show up. It's just the only thing you say could show up. Except... you saying things doesn't actually make them true. She wouldn't even have to have a direct confrontation with that specific person for it to apply. She could simply have a track record of similar encounters or even audio and/or video of her expressing opinions about similar situations, or the same situation. Even a history of online postings which paint a picture of clear bias. I'm simply just not willing to form an opinion without all the facts, unlike you. I'm also not willing to assume I have all the facts when I couldn't possibly know that, unlike you. As I have stated, you have no clue whether you have all the information you need to form an opinion, yet you've already decided what it was. Meaning the only one here who doesn't understand logic comes from a full and accurate reading of facts.. Would be you. I don't have to prove you wrong. You have yet to prove that it was true. Your claim, your burden of proof. The only thing you've presented as evidence to your claim that there's absolutely no more evidence in this case is, because you said so. Except you ignoring facts don't actually make them go away. So.. Let's end this with some questions, I'm sure you will try to ignore... Because you don't have good answers for them. If, in her history as a police officer,it turned out that in other (similar) situations, she had announced the taser procedure and pulled her gun instead, would that not establish a pattern of for thought and/or mindset? Could there not be body cam footage from the other officers? Given that this didn't happen in the middle of nowhere and everyone has phones, could there not possibly be other video of the encounter and/or other witnesses? If the prosecution has not announced The video is the only evidence and you have no way of knowing whether or not there is other evidence or not, how can you be so sure there isn't any???
1
@Lord_Poyo And the last bit of you message, where you try and save face while running away, consists of you trying to posture enough to convince yourself you actually won something. Except those that do don't have to spend quite so much time trying to convince themselves of it. So I guess keep running along. After all, running from facts that don't fit your narrative seems to be what you do.
1
@Lord_Poyo If, in her history as a police officer, it turned out that in other (similar) situations, she had announced the taser procedure and pulled her gun instead, would that not establish a pattern of for thought and/or mindset? Have prosecutors used similar histories to establish patterns when trying to convict defendants, in past cases? And wouldn't that negate your claim that, there's no way to establish her mindset, at the time?
1
@Lord_Poyo Could there not be body cam footage from the other officers? Couldn't there be dash cam footage from the 3 different cruisers that where there? Considering this happened on a public road and not in the middle of nowhere, couldn't there be the possibility of a witness recording a video on their phone?
1
@Lord_Poyo If the prosecution has not announced The video is the only evidence, and you have no way of knowing whether or not there is other evidence, how can you be so sure there isn't any???
1
@Lord_Poyo Actually... Up until now, your point has been there could not of been any new evidence other then prior history with that specific person. Would you like me to count how many times you insisted that was the case?
1
@Lord_Poyo " body cam footage from the other officers provides no new details" 👈 So, in the history of video recording, a separate angle has never offered any new details then the original angle? No... Have they released any other angles other than the front and the back angle? No Then what are you basing your claim on, that another angle would not give you further details?
1
@Lord_Poyo " the evidence you listed would only help if we were trying to determine why he was shot, the situation surrounding the shooting, who shot him, etc" 👈 So a history of similar decisions on the officers part, social media posts, videos, pictures... Etc... would not provide a likely mindset and/or intent?
1
@Lord_Poyo " I don't understand why you're so hung up on the idea of eyewitness and body cam footage would starve to prove intent". 👈 the only one hung up on anything, seems to be you. You keep trying to angle my argument in a manner as to which you would have a way to argue against it. All throughout, my argument has consistently been that I am not willing to 👉form a definitive opinion without all the evidence presented.👈 That is why there is an investigation. That is why there is a trial.
1
@Lord_Poyo You have already decided what is and is not true. I have presented multiple different examples of you only paying attention to what fits your narrative. Which is what happens when we decide what's the truth before having all the evidence. It's called. 👉confirmation bias. 👈
1
@Lord_Poyo " If you can explain to me how any sort of eyewitness report or body cam footage from a different angle could show any more proof towards murderous intent, more so than the one body cam footage we already have guys, that I might concede this point." 👈 No you won't.... your confirmation bias won't let you. However, it doesn't have to be of the less than 2 minute interaction on the body cam footage we have already seen. We have seen no body cam footage or any other footage for that matter, or witness testimony as to what happened directly before or directly after. What was shown or said. They have it, yet have not released it. They are charging her. Yet another example why you're consistent claim of there is no other evidence, is severely flawed.
1
@Lord_Poyo " Seldom do you see a cop pull out a taser and not use it. " 👈 Another sign of your confirmation bias. How often do you see or hear of an officer reaching for their gun and mistaking it for their taser, especially when they beat left side right side and do you all throughout your training and service? Especially when you've been on the force for over 20 years.... you're willing to consider that caveat but not the other blatant caveat. Confirmation bias.
1
@Lord_Poyo not to mention, no one's gotten into her history before now. Which is pretty odd considering the fact that that's the first thing the news would go to. However, being a cops daughter, I know there are many ways the police departments can fudge paperwork. They need to and probably are, taking a deeper look at her jacket. More things we don't know. More reason to hold off forming an opinion as to what intent was or was not, until they specifically charged her and prove the case in court with all the evidence.
1
@Lord_Poyo There are simply entirely too many variables to make a definitive opinion at this time. Or at least to do so responsibly.
1
@Lord_Poyo If the prosecution has not announced The video is the only evidence, and you have no way of knowing whether or not there is other evidence, how can you be so sure there isn't any???
1
@Lord_Poyo " you need to stop talking about what evidence could is is and start answering my questions of what would said evidence provide" 👈 No I don't. I've already done that. Your confirmation bias just makes you ignore that part of my response.
1
@Lord_Poyo but in all actuality, I really don't need to explain what the evidence could find that we don't already know. Just that there is some and that it could. Which demonstrates you being wrong about already coming to a conclusion without having all the facts. Your confirmation bias
1
@Lord_Poyo tell me where I out right claimed that they may be covering up her history? It's a possibility. It's been known to happen quite a few times before when it comes to police officers. Again, yet another reason why coming to a conclusion this early on is inadvisable and not logical.
1
@Lord_Poyo I'm not entirely sure why you find me saying that you're clearly demonstrated confirmation bias, would "set you off", other than the fact that you're sensitive about the fact that you do have confirmation bias. I'm merely stating the fact that you do. Which you have demonstrated throughout.
1
@Lord_Poyo if you don't like me pointing out that you have confirmation bias, stop having confirmation bias or run along.
1
@Lord_Poyo and what information haven't you decided means exactly what you were originally of decided it means from the jump?
1
@Lord_Poyo Though... I suppose a better and more accurate statement would be... You are using confirmation bias to affirm your preconceived notions and have been doing so, from the start.. There.... Feel better now... Or do you need to childishly call me a Boo Boo head, again?
1
@Lord_Poyo Nope! See... It's been about your 👉 using confirmation bias to affirm your preconceived notions and have been doing so, from the start.👈 they haven't closed the investigation yet, confirmed any charge whatsoever or even begun to speak to a court of law, but you've already decided exactly what it should be because 1 piece of evidence has been released to the public... You "that there is no other evidence, but wait... There could be... But only 1... But wait there could be more... But only one other kind... Okay fine! More then 1 only kind... But sense I can't say what that is, at the beginning of the investigation I'm going to make yet another massive baseless assumption that they have none and.... I'm clearly right and you are clearly an idiot."
1
@Lord_Poyo " your entire argument has just crumbled to dust because you have not been feeling a word you don't even know the meaning of" 👈 this whole thing where you try and convince yourself that you're right all the time, only points to your insecurities about your argument. I am not sure why you keep doing it but I would suggest you stop.
1
@Lord_Poyo Cool! All the phrasing is right there. Prove it? All you have to do is quote me. Or did you think you simply making yet another untrue claim, was, in some way going to hold validity, at this point? You saying things don't magically make them true. Prove your point? To be very clear about my claim... I am saying, You are using confirmation bias to affirm your preconceived notions and have been doing so, from the start. Please feel free to use my quotes above, and in context, to prove your latest diversion tactic? I'll wait...
1
@Lord_Poyo Oh! And here's the definition of preconceived notions, for which I'm sure you're going to need to prove your case 👉 Definitions of preconceived notion. noun. an opinion formed beforehand without adequate evidence. Just thought I'd help you out 😘✌
1
@Lord_Poyo Nothing... Huh? That's what I thought. Next time come up with a better excuse for not wanting to man up and admit your preconceived notions and confirmation bias.
1
@Lord_Poyo Na! I just meet people where they are. 1. Straight out lying about what I said several times 2. Hurling childish insults 3. Excuses 4. Diversions 5. And the complete and total inability to take responsibility for your own actions and thoughts At the end, always making some inocuos and irrelevant excuse to run away when you get challenge to prove your claim, and you know you can't. All because, you were jumping the gun and didn't want to admit it... but you think I'm the one acting childish. Whatever you need to tell yourself, Sugarfoot.
1
@Lord_Poyo But... If you really are running away this time... Lets give you the send off of dissecting your the last silly argument. 👇😁
1
@Lord_Poyo "relaxing on a Saturday" 👈 seriously, how long does it take you to type a comment? And I love how you been lying this whole time and you have tried to run away twice already but I was just supposed to take your word on the fact that you were just taking your damn time. Right!
1
@Lord_Poyo " arrogant, naive, spout both nonsense and words you don't understand, I'm pretty much just debate like a child." 👈 Translation 👉 you're a boo-boo head, you're a boo-boo head, you're a boo boo head and I have no ability for self-reflection.
1
@Lord_Poyo " words you don't understand" 👈 well, not only did I give you every opportunity to scroll up and quote how I miss used the phrase (not "word", BTW) "confirmation bias", you been giving you the definition for preconceived notions, and instead you decided you were taking your ball and going home. How am I to take that other than your running off because you have made yet another claim that you know you can't back up but your egos all bruised and s*** so you won't actually admit it.... it's not like it's the first time it's happened in this Exchange.
1
@Lord_Poyo " We have been running in circles here" 👈 we been doing no such thing. You do not actually speak for what I've been doing. As much as you would like to. You have been making baseless claim after baseless claim, diverting excusing deflecting and getting all touchy about being called out for doing so and I have been discrediting you, this whole time. You are free to make up whatever silly narrative you want to in your head. I understand it's what you need to do. However, reality doesn't relieve function by basing it off of whatever you want to be true, being true. Which is pretty much something I've been trying to get through to you from the start. You continuously saying things doesn't actually make them true. You're not magic. You're not a wizard. You're just another guy in the YouTube comments section who's got his ego bruised a little bit... and is still trying to find an excuse to run off while Saving Face.
1
@Lord_Poyo " If you can't see that then you're even more of the Lost Cause than I imagined" 👈 while you're looking up the proper terminology for your "confirmation bias" issue, you might want to take a gander at what a 👉false dichotomy👈 is.
1
@Lord_Poyo So, that's a no one the whole using my own words to prove that I am using "confirmation bias" in the wrong context? She says for the third time... that's what I thought.
1