General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Killed The Cat
CNN
comments

Comments by "Killed The Cat" (@killedthecat1034) on "Trump uses anti-Semitic tropes to criticize Jewish Americans" video.

The Israeli government is different than the Jewish religion. Why does someone have to explain that? 🙄
173
They are anti-semitic tropes. Predicated on the false reality that the Israeli government is the same thing as the Jewish religion. They're also rather old tropes. Which is why they call them tropes.... but you guys keep pretending reality isn't actually reality and history isn't actually history... and governments are the same things as religions.
11
Save 🇺🇸 What's your interest in choosing to believe these very specific lies?
8
Save 🇺🇸 Lord... I'm not playing these games with you. If you would like to cherry-pick data and facts... then claim how I need to free my mind... Well...
6
@kaihuang4970 👆 was just fixin to get to that. Ty!
5
@lilwhipskrrt9735 Ummm.. You replied to my thread, spanky. It's called a public forum. If you don't want people to respond. Don't post here. Is you can't handle opposition opinion, don't post here.
4
Save 🇺🇸 in 13 different states , the majority of which, already practice mail-in ballots and have for decades (with you guys not having a damn problem with it), pre-registered specified agents are allowed to turn in your ballot for you. Which is not for Democrats. It's literally for everybody. Why? Because while Republicans are gerrymandering and making up insane rules to bring down voter turnout, Democrats, oddly enough, want people to have their constitutional right to vote, even if their elderly or sick. Because we don't actually think that they get their rights taken away just because Republicans want to win election.
4
Save 🇺🇸 What you call the "truth" is actually something else called confirmation bias.
4
@bobbyhoffman5967 Yeah... I just don't get that. Why would that be a thing? What is the thought process behind that? One is a gov and one is a religion. All out presidents and most other leaders are Christian. It doesn't make this a Christian state. It just makes them Christian.
3
@lilwhipskrrt9735 If wishing made it so...
3
@bobbyhoffman5967 Oh... I agree... That's what I was b****in about. How can someone not know this.... Why is that confusing for so damned many... Its bananas.
3
Save 🇺🇸 I'm curious as to why you think deflecting to another topic is going to help you out?
3
Save 🇺🇸 I'm also curious as to whether you were just as concerned about the state of our country, when Republicans screw it up? Or whether or not you're just feigning outrage over things so you can attack the left?
3
@xkaiokenx10 Thanks! 😉 Happy New Year! 😉
2
@snoopygirl7741 If a smear campaign consists of just literally playing your words back, how is that a smear campaign? Also, you do understand TDs is just something to write came up with after running out of excuses for Donald Trump's Behavior, right? You know it's not real? Reality and it do not collide? You know that right?
1
@joeyGalileoHotto I don't know why you guys just don't say, "Hey, I actually have nothing of value to rebut anything in this video, so I'm just going to try and talk about a bunch of other random irrelevant crap, just cuz I want something to say." At least then you would be being honest
1
@joeyGalileoHotto Oh, you mean the thing where I told you what you really meant, but that you didn't say because you're apparently too much of a coward to even be real behind the keyboard?
1
@joeyGalileoHotto and, BTW, you'd lose that that. I am a liberal Progressive living in deep south Louisiana. Literally everybody I know voted for Donald Trump the first time. I don't know problem disagreeing with people no matter where I am. If you want to come visit I can show you? 😊
1
@Yasmin-jt1ux I mostly agree... But... No. We all have many supercomputers glued to our hands. Nothing the Israeli government does excuse is that kind of willful ignorance of General people.
1
@lilwhipskrrt9735 Yeah... What you say does not make sense. Ya know that, right?
1
@samuelluria4744 I don't know bc it's not logical. Anyone who knows the basic definition or really has any kind of basic understanding of what religion is and what government is, would be equally baffled.
1
@samuelluria4744 Trump spouted off old antisemitic troops. Which is, by far, not the only thing he has said that was either racist, bigoted, sexist or anti-Semitic. So from where you get the down playing of just another example of that, is beyond me, as well. Also, "anyone with a brain would know what he meant" 👈 this is called a false dichotomy. It's you trying to set up a scenario as to where either people agree with me or they must be stupid.
1
@marylamb7707 Well... I guess if you say it... It makes it true... Wait... No... That's not how reality works. Nevermind.
1
@samuelluria4744 Yeah... That was my point, actually. Religion and government are two separate things. They can be commingled but that doesn't make them the same. They can both be used to create the other but they're never going to be each other. That's why there can be Jewish people who are not Israeli and Israelis that aren't Jewish. I understand there's history. That's not the issue. People who tend to intentionally try and claim they're the same thing has a history of doing that for a very specific purpose. Usually not a good one. That's the history of that tactic all over the world. Basics... Their important. Once you try and distort the basics of reality itself, what in the world does anything mean? I'm not saying complexities aren't important. Full context is always important, but you have to have the basics down first or you're never going to get anywhere.
1
@samuelluria4744 Well... I know I'm free to think or say what I like. I don't actually need your "go ahead" on that one. And... It is a false dichotomy. It fits the definition of it. A definition I didn't make up. Whether I agree with you only partly or not at all and no matter who you are, I'm going to call a false dichotomy a false dichotomy because it's lazy logic. It's not introducing the possibility of you being incorrect. When you close off issues to that, you close off growth. For instance now you're forming your argument around the bases that you were absolutely right about this. That everybody just misunderstands Donald Trump. He holds no responsibility for his actions or words. That's why. I taught him he's our lazy logic. It's also why I pointed to his history. It's a predictable pattern of events. He has a lifetime of examples. Not just verbal. Your choosing to distort reality and perception by ignoring a full context. You changing your false dichotomy does not make it any less of a false dichotomy. Your thought process doesn't allow for the possibility that he may be responsible for his own actions. You put his words, his phrasings and his actions onto the perception of others. Attempting to absolve him of responsibility. You are using distorted logic. If everybody else is responsible for their choices, then so is he.
1
@samuelluria4744 ...but seriously though? That's what your using to avoid responding to my logical argument. That's the BS you're using an order to try and save face. Well thanks for showing your true colors. Come talk to me when you can actually come up with a logic based rebuttal.
1
@samuelluria4744 And... Yeah... I don't need you to tell me I have something that's obvious. Why would that even need to be said? The only reason you said it was so that you could deflect from your false dichotomy. You were trying to put it off, somehow, on how I "felt", instead of what it actually was, which was the literal definition of a false dichotomy. It was a deflection from me calling you out on your faulty logic. Which fits with your overall attitude of not wanting to let it enter into possibility that you may be wrong. Hence the false dichotomy in the first place.
1
@burtingtune The media is not responsible for what is wrong in your life. Try personal responsibility.
1
@burtingtune Na! It just means you want to blame CNN instead of addressing the actual topic. It's called diverting to shoot the messenger. Don't try and make it some kind of logical gesture Now by trying to flip it on me... It wont work.
1
@californigirl sorry boo boo kitty, you can't really blame everything on CNN. As much as you guys like to try. The last isn't the ones with the problem of confusing the two.
1
@ttta-s3r provide proof for your claims?
1
@lboogy85 I'm surprised by that everyday... And its baffling.
1
@lboogy85 I don't even know about that much. We all carry around tiny supercomputers in our hands. Do you really have to even look up the difference between a government and a religion? It's just crazy. Lol
1
@lboogy85 I'm atheist but I have a lot of Christian friends like you. Those that don't allow their religion to be a stopgap between their critical thinking skills and reality. I like you guys. You guys think more like me. Your belief in your higher being doesn't mean you have to also believe everything everyone tells you. I like debating religion with people with your mindset! ❤
1
@stevepest4143 1. What you call "ballot harvesting" is people like the sick or elderly who can maybe not get out of their houses but our actual citizens of the country and therefore have a right to vote, pre designating people who generally tend to be their family or someone who lives in their household with them, to turn in their ballot for them. This is done in 13 states. The majority of which have had mail-in ballots for decades now that you guys never had a problem with until Donald Trump started lying to you about stolen elections. If you have proof of illegal ballot harvesting, please feel free to presented or presented case where it has been proven to any significant point that would flip an election?
1
@stevepest4143 You don't actually get to take other people's constitutional rights away from them just because Republicans want to when elections. Sorry Not Sorry.
1
@stevepest4143 and how do Democrats taking away your votes? ... because you said something and then put the plain and simple behind it, it must be true? You actually show your ID and give your social security number quite a bit, like when you register to vote. Personally I don't care about voter ID. It's not that big of a deal it doesn't stop too many people from being able to access their voting rights. The problem is they sell you guys on voter ID and then you don't pay attention as to what else are in those bills that they're claiming are just voter ID bills. In the meantime we got you guys making problems where there isn't any. All because you want to believe a habitual liar about how he didn't lose an election he actually lost. If there was voter fraud oh, it would have been proven in the hundred plus court cases that were filed all around the country. Do you have any idea how much voter fraud has been proven in the last three presidential elections combined?
1
@stevepest4143 you guys are also worried about fake claims of massive voter fraud but, conveniently, none of you seem to be worried about voter suppression. Maybe that has to do with the fact of how much it actually helps Republicans get into office.
1
@stevepest4143 in Most states, if you have the wrong address on there other than the one that you registered to vote in, your vote goes into a provisional ballot status... But let me ask you this while you're taking off all the silly right-wing talking points about imaginary elections stealing, what are the voter protection safeguards that exist today, to ensure that it is damn near impossible to get away with voter fraud? and if you have to pre-register WITH THEM to turn in somebody else's vote, what effect does that have on your theory?
1
@stevepest4143 Now don't forget to be honest and sane, when running away from all these substance based questions that you're not going to want to answer!💋
1
@ax3792 please provide any actual evidence that 20 million votes were manufactured?
1
@ax3792 So let me get this straight, you want to rig the election, because you're salty about your dear Leader's lie about "rigging the last election", (that he lost) didn't end up with him still in office. So, you know you're crazy, right?
1
@stevepest4143 Yeah.. I mean... You can be childish... But that lonely have you pointing out that you're super insecure about the argument you're making. You do you. " Especially for 2020 and many states you did not have to prove who you were to get ballots. Inside many stayed automatically mailed out ballots even without being asked for. " This is why I asked you if you knew all the safeguards against things like voter fraud for the elections. Have you ever heard of voter registration? That's IDing. What you're talkin about is having them ID themselves a second time. Which is what makes it completely unnecessary. In my opinion it's not worth the argument and it probably won't stop most of anyone from voting so whatever... but it's still kind of pointless if you actually know how elections are run. " These same states did not reject the ellipse based on bad signature matches." Prove it? " Nor on invalid addresses" That's just flat-out wrong for every state I've ever heard of. You get a provisional ballot. Do you know what a provisional ballot is? If you did you wouldn't be making this statement right after. 👉 " and the balance get counted regardless" " I could legally vote for you." No you couldn't. Again educate yourself on all the safeguards and redundancies involved in elections. Because the very few that you're talkin about aren't even half. "Ballot harvesting means I can throw away your vote if it's for the wrong person." 👈 Again... No it doesn't. In order to turn in someone else's ballot for them you have to pre-register them to do so. When you do that you indicate your intention to vote. You have to name a specific person and you both have to go there together, give your consent and intent. Again.. More safe guards. No guy off the street can just take it in for you. " in many or most days working as a shins can Harvest ballots not just relatives" 👈 Prove it? They may live in the same house or just be a friend. Either way you have to pre-register and designate that person. " but then again Liberals are the best at this" 👈 Wrong again. You guys are just the best at being willfully ignorant and parroting back whatever your told without checking it first. " You ever stop to think how many lies Trump told that turned out to be true? " No... Because they didn't. You guys just like to cherry pick facts and pretend you know things you don't. Its called confirmation bias. For example... Russia... you guys like to scream about how there was no evidence of collusion found while completely ignoring volume two of the Mueller report which lays out nine different acts of congressional obstruction of justice which Donald Trump committed in order to block them from finding out anything about collusion. .. but you choose to ignore that so you can say no Russian collusion. Except your cherry picking while trying to pretend half of the damn report doesn't exist. Or... Another... Very fine ppl on both sides. What was one side comprised of and what were they they're protesting against? White supremacist. They were white supremacist. So if he says on both sides, he's calling white supremacist "very fine people". It's not that hard to understand. " what is any of these voting bills that suppresses any votes? " 👈 I'll be more than happy to answer that question just as soon as you answer the one I asked you first but you ignored.
1
@stevepest4143 to be clear anything I would have said you would have tried to twist into me proving your point. That's why I said you have confirmation bias. You see how I literally responded to everything you said and you just cherry-picked the parts you thought you could make massive assumptions about.
1
@stevepest4143 they and you are leaving out, editing out to mislead, the next five seconds"👈 I needed to quote you saying that lie so I could show you this. 😂👇 "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
1
@stevepest4143 This is the 5 seconds after that 👉 Reporter: "George Washington and Robert E. Lee are not the same." Trump: "George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner? So will George Washington now lose his status? Are we going to take down -- excuse me, are we going to take down statues to George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson? What do you think of Thomas Jefferson? You like him?" Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson."
1
@stevepest4143 Now.. We finally get to your " next five seconds" about five minutes later. In its context of course. I know how much that's important to you. Reporter: "I do love Thomas Jefferson." Trump: "Okay, good. Are we going to take down the statue? Because he was a major slave owner. Now, are we going to take down his statue? "So you know what, it’s fine. You’re changing history. You’re changing culture. And you had people -- 💥and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists💥 -- because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that group 👉other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.👈 Okay? And the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now, in the other group also, you had some fine people. But you also had troublemakers, and you see them come with the black outfits and with the helmets, and with the baseball bats. You had a lot of bad people in the other group." One side was the left and the other where all either neo-nazis white supremacist or Neo-Nazi and white supremacist supporters. So who exactly was he calling very fine people?
1
@stevepest4143 I was so wrong... But you just deleted the comment after I started proving you wrong by quoting word-for-word the transcript? Look you can try all these childish posturing tactics all you want. It's not going to make the facts go away.
1
@stevepest4143 but please feel free to quote me where I was wrong and prove that I was. Because you do understand that you just saying something doesn't actually make it true, right? Kind of like you just said 5 seconds later he said something about five minutes later in a completely different context than what you said he did? And then I went and quoted the whole thing for you.
1
@stevepest4143 or like you tried to claim there wasn't Russian collusion because you decided to ignore the entire second half of the Mueller report... Which is ironic because you didn't mention that after I'm brought up the second half. It's almost like you're just telling yourself things to make yourself feel better.
1
@stevepest4143 by the way, are you going to keep running from my original questions about your claims on the Electoral safeguards process? Or did you just really think your deflection was going to work?
1
@stevepest4143 I realize your going to try and tell another lie in order to ha e something to say, bc your delicate ego was bruised. I could have literally said anything, and you would have been like, "SEE!" While ignoring all the questions about your claims about election protection, bc you know you lied about those, as well.
1
@stevepest4143 BTW, if you where so accurate, why did you delete the comment? 😂
1
@stevepest4143 Ever plan on providing evidence for your all those silly things you said about voting? Still waiting.
1
@stevepest4143 SoOoOo... Lies about what you've posted. Why... "I'm shocked".
1
@stevepest4143 You have to read the posts dear. Your "5 seconds later comment", the one you just acknowledged was there before, it's not there now. And it wasn't the algorithm because when I was responding to it I went back to it several times and the algorithm deletes those comments within a minute. But... Plz keep lying. It's funny watching you embarrass yourself.
1
@stevepest4143 ...and are you ever going to get around to providing evidence of your voter non-security claims or did you just throw the baby out with the bathwater when I asked you to provide proof of them? 😂
1
@stevepest4143 Or... How about just stop trying to pretend that volume two of the Mueller report doesn't exist today? You know... baby steps?
1
@truthman9827 What part are you confused by?
1
@truthman9827 when are you guys going to realize that shoot the messenger doesn't work. All it does is point out the fact that you can't argue against a message.
1
@MegaAvids How original. An adult calling a white woman Karen, in lou of an actual rebuttal. How did you come up with that? Musta taken you all day. Clever boy.
1
@truthman9827 Oh.. It was an answer. It's just not the one you want. Much like this one. Why are you assuming that I have some kind of over-exuberant amount of trust for CNN? Because I'm here? Because your argument doesn't work any other way? What do you guys insist on blaming the media for what each of us should take our own personal responsibility for? Whether they're news or they call themselves news, they can say whatever they want. It's our responsibility to fact-check. Only if we actually want to know the truth, though. Every time you guys talk about the media instead of the subject at hand it's a cop-out and a deflection. Sack and address the issue.
1
@MegaAvids Bc you say so? Or is it just because you're so massively insecure that you can't seem to formulate an adult response? You can keep calling me a boo-boo head instead of addressing the substance, but it's never going to be anything more then an attempt at a childish character assassination, because you can't argue against the substance. I'm simply an easier Target for you.
1
@truthman9827 Yeah... Scroll up and check your "math" again, Spanky. Unless you're literally incapable of addressing the actual substance of the video you chose to comment under? Which seems to be more and more the truth. Blaming the media for all your problems is the only answer you seem to have. Except it's a bad one. You are a grown-a** adults. Stop repeating someone else's narrative and actually think for yourself. Obtain all the facts of a given situation and then use that to come to the most logical conclusion. Like the one up top you keep trying to run from by shooting the messenger. Stop using sad cop-outs like it's all the media's fault. Own your s***. It's that simple.
1
@MegaAvids Wow! Name-calling really is all you have. How sad. No need for an original response here.... I mean... If your not going to use one. I repeat... You can keep calling me a boo-boo head instead of addressing the substance, but it's never going to be anything more then an attempt at a childish character assassination, because you can't argue against the substance. I'm simply an easier Target for you.
1
@truthman9827 Cool! So actually address the substance of the video you keep commenting under but don't talk about, because you're too busy with the "fake news" narrative? I'll wait?
1
@truthman9827 Is it truth because you stay it's truth or is it truth because you can prove it to be true? Because those far the only thing you're willing to addresses calling the news fake news a million different ways. You won't actually address the substance.
1
@truthman9827 but if your conspiracy theories are also very true that I'm sure you won't have any trouble proving it right now?
1
@MegaAvids Are you an actual adult? I'm genuinely asking because I don't really know an adult that wouldn't be embarrassed enough by now just to shut the hell up because all they can do is call another adult a boo-boo had a million different ways.
1
@MegaAvids you know you can just stack up at any given time and actually addressed the substance instead of prattling off some silly assumption laced narrative?
1
@truthman9827 No... No... No... That's not how it works. I didn't say send me down a rabbit hole of crazy. I said, provide proof of your claims. You claim these things are true so all you have to do is show where you found this proof.
1
@truthman9827 yeah, I get it. I know exactly what you're saying. It's still a cop out. You're not even willing to broach the subject on the video that you chose to comment under. It's all some big Democratic conspiracy to you and you don't want to look at the other side. That's why you don't want to comment on the video. I'll tell you like I tell all the rest of your false narrative friends. Clean up your own house then come talk to me about mine. Until then all you're doing is feigning outrage so you can attack the other side. You don't really care about any of this.
1
@MegaAvids How? Are you magic? Or do you believe your magic? Do you believe you have the magical ability to just say things and they pop into existence? Does explain why you have to do nothing but childish cleaning call people. Your brain is not firing at the hydrologic Spectrum. " I'm going to call you a bunch of names and assume that they're all true, with absolutely no basis for them, then I'm going to try and make it your job to prove my baseless assumptions wrong." Crazy pants... 😂
1
@MegaAvids I'm not playing your games, little boy. I don't have to deny anything you have failed to show any evidence for. You really expect me to deny any name you wanna call me? Boy please.
1
@MegaAvids Any chance you can slip your big boy pants on for 2 seconds and actually address the substance?
1
@truthman9827 I don't know why you thought your lies would surprise me at this point. Spent this whole time spouting far right wing talking points. Not all about Trump... And now your gonna try and claim not to be right wing just as soon as I point out your feigned outrage, like every other lying right winger here. Why... "I'm shocked!" Except... Not really bc that is what you all do these days. That's why all you can do is deflect from the right actions. You don't want to have to try and defend them because you know you can't. Including Donald Trump.
1
@truthman9827 Trump 2016 - 306 to 236 Biden 2020 - 306 to 236 Then I'm assuming you agree in 2020 he lost big?
1
@MegaAvids Which I will be more then happy to answer just as soon as you address the substance of the original video that I have been asking you about from the jump. What you won't do is try and make this about me bc you want to deflect. So... Anytime your ready?
1
@truthman9827 Oh.. I don't the Republican party, that would be you assuming that I think like you. I live in Trump country. Literally everybody I know voted for Donald Trump the first time around. Literally nobody I know voted for him the second time around. I knew he was going to lose before the election. If I were to hate all right-wingers, I would literally be hating my entire family. I just called BS when I see it. Which is exactly why you STILL can provide NO PROOF for your claims.
1
@MegaAvids So you really did just come here to call ppl names like your in the third grade. Thanks for playing! 😂
1
@MegaAvids You know if you spent a little more time on self-improvement, you wouldn't need to come here to seek out some vapid juvenile sense of self-esteem. You would also probably respect yourself a little more, then to have to embarrass yourself on here like this, all the time. Just a thought.
1
@MegaAvids Now... You have my permission to go back to calling me a Boo Boo head a million different ways, in order to try and fail to make yourself feel better about how your life turned out. I know you really need it.
1
@MegaAvids Aww! Na! You came to try and get some sense of self esteem... and you will leave disappointed much like you do in every interaction you have here, no matter what the other person says.
1
@MegaAvids As I said... Self reflection. Less debasing yourself, like a third grade bully on the playground. Your a grown a** man.
1
@MegaAvids Na! You just don't want to pretend this is about anything other then your constant need for validation. You do you, though.
1
@MegaAvids This is why you need self-reflection. You spend almost two days calling me a boo-boo head 9000 different times and then you want to be taken seriously all the sudden. 😂
1
@MegaAvids Na! I'll pass! Cuz what would be my motivation for doing so?
1
@MegaAvids Na! You've been childishly name calling for 2 days.... But plz keep lying. It just discredits you. Thanks 💋
1
@truthman9827 truth and facts can be proven. You have proven nothing and apparently cannot do so but still keep insisting that it's true merely because you keep saying it.
1
@truthman9827 No... No it doesn't. Those are very particular claims. You repeatedly repeating something over and over again does not actually make it true. The fact that you still choose to believe these outlandish claims that you're making when you don't know them to be true says a lot about your flawed State of Mind.
1
@truthman9827 Which part? That you can't prove your claims, or that facts can be proven?
1
@MegaAvids that's how insecure you're feeling right now. You're trying to recruit! 😂
1
@MegaAvids Again... What is my motivation to engage with you in a serious political debate, if you can't go one or two comments without reverting to childish name-calling?
1
@MegaAvids Yes.. Yes . I know... I'm a big Boo Boo head. Gee, I wonder why I wouldn't want to have an adult debate with you.
1
@truthman9827 provide evidence of your claims
1
@MegaAvids try some self-reflection. Your life would go a lot better if you stopped trying to validate Your Existence by focusing on trying to make others feel bad. Also, you're bad at it. So you can't even get that right
1
@truthman9827 provide evidence for your claim. Making more claims that you cannot backup is not evidence for your claim.
1
@truthman9827 Then you will be able to provide the proof for it. It's not my job to prove your claims. You should already know where it is if you know its true. So why is it so difficult for you to do so?
1
@truthman9827 I sure will as soon as you can give me one example of anything they have in that book that shows me proof of any of your claims. 1 example. 1.
1
@truthman9827 Provide proof of your claims?
1
@truthman9827 I'm not watching something that's an hour and 17 minutes long. Timestamp it. Or provide one example of the evidence you're talking about that I will find in that video. If it's in there and if you have already watched it, it shouldn't be that difficult.
1
@truthman9827 baby, it's been 4 days. You ain't got nothing. If you had something you would have shown it by now. So why you believe in s*** that you can't prove to be true? Why do you need to believe these things?
1
@truthman9827 your standard of proof is insane. Project mockingbird from the cold war.. on some silly-ass overdramatized documentary making vague implications about today. The cold war began in the 40? Man! Its 2021! That has nothing that proves that CNN in 2021 has any of this s*** going on. It certainly doesn't have anything that proved anything in this video wrong. Which is exactly what you need. Is the CIA probably still doing shady s***? Sure. It's the CIA. Does that mean you just ignore anything and everything that doesn't fit your narratives, by using that as an excuse to do so? No! Why? Personal responsibility. Fact check the things that you're claiming to not be true. It's not that hard. We all carry tiny supercomputers around in our hands all the time now. Fact check the info. If it's a video, search the original and its origin. If it's a document, search the original and its origin. All you're doing is looking for an excused only to believe what you want to believe and not to believe the rest.
1
@truthman9827 if you mean do I see most news stations reporting on major events and stories like they're supposed to do... Then yes... am I willing to LEAP to the bounds and conclusions that you are in regards to why they're reporting on the giant new stories that need to be reported on? No! Again... Provide evidence this is the case with these news stations? Take personal responsibility for your personal media consumption.
1
@truthman9827 you are making giant Wonder leaves from a cold war-era crazy to today's journalism. You are trying too much all of it into this tiny little cookie cutter box that none of it fits in, which you would see if you stop having confirmation bias for 2 seconds. This is why you can't prove a thing that you're saying. You were making massive assumptions based on very little bits of information, that you have cherry-picked. Which is why I go back to asking you, why do you feel the need to believe these very specific things that you clearly cannot prove to be true?
1
@truthman9827 You just took a tiny bit of info from forever ago and count to a bunch of massive assumptions you don't actually have any proof for. That's the problem. You have proven nothing other than something that happened in the 40s. All the rest is you just jumping to conclusions based on that. You have confirmation bias. For some reason you need to believe these things to be true, so much to the point that you don't care that you can't provide any evidence for them. Just speculation
1
@truthman9827 Its speculation bc you are making leaps towards all media. It's wonder leaps bc you have no proof who is doing what. Your only allowing for 1 possibility you are so convinced your right. Except you're really not. If you were you wouldn't have spent this much time trying to convince me of something. What you're really trying to do is convince yourself.
1
@truthman9827 That's just you getting defensive bc what I said sounded to true to you. Why else would you go to my channel and (ironically) cherry pick what you find there. The whole story behind that is easy to find in each of those videos which are combined under less than 2 minutes. Except you chose to paint a completely fictional picture and leave very important things out. Only further demonstrating your propensity for doing so. As for me, in this case I'm not the one trying to convince someone of anything. I'm simply pointing out your flawed logic as you flounder to try and insist that it isn't flawed. In general, sure we're all trying to convince ourselves of things. We can all also be wrong.
1
@truthman9827 You mean the boggy man you can't prove actually exists but keep trying to convince yourself is real? Why do you need to believe this fiction again?
1
@truthman9827 You can try and patronize me but it doesn't change the fact that you can't prove anything that you're claiming to be true. So why do you need to believe it is true? Why is vinegar a good possibility that you could be wrong or it could be anything else?
1
@truthman9827 Its not about believing its about what you can prove to be true. Why do you need to believe all these particular fictional things?
1
@truthman9827 except believing something to be treated as an actually make it true. So why do you feel the need to believe this very particular piece of fiction?
1
@truthman9827 Nope! It's not a belief that it's fiction if you can't prove it with sex and data to be true. That's just 💥literally💥 the definition of fiction.
1
@truthman9827 " believe me it's not" 👈 why would I do that? You had damn near a week now to provide evidence for your claim and has thus far been able to produce nothing but wild speculation based on 60 year old comments, and even getting that out of you is like pulling teeth. I don't even know you. Why am I believing what you're saying?
1
@truthman9827 and why in the world do you keep running from my question? Why are you choosing to believe this very specific fiction? Because so far you cannot only not prove it to be fact but you can't even explain why you're choosing to believe this fiction?
1
@truthman9827 Nope... We've been over this enough for you to know it by now... And your just intentionally ignoring it. Truth can be proven. You can not prove your claims. It's been almost a week. So... Why do you choose to believe this her specific fiction?
1
@truthman9827 and, by the way, you get to b** about me not answering your questions when I've asked the same question at least 10 times and you keep ignoring it. You just "answered" it once... Just now.
1
@truthman9827 as for what you just said " why do you trust CNN" 👈 please provide evidence at any point in our back-and-forth where I said I trust CNN? If it is not there please explain why you're trying to put words into my mouth? Could it be because you're trying to set up that paper tiger in order to have an actual argument?
1
@truthman9827 you claiming something to be the right side of History does not actually make it the right side of history. As we've already demonstrated for almost a week now, you say a lot of things you can't backup, yet still try to insist their true.
1
@truthman9827 I trust any semi reliable news source the same. As much as I can fact check their info.
1
@truthman9827 Why do you choose to believe this particular piece of fiction?
1
@truthman9827 The truth can be proven. You just keep repeating the same thing, over and over again, trying to hope it into existence. Except reality doesn't work that way. No matter how many times you say it doesn't make it true. So therefore it is fiction. So once again, why do you choose to believe this very particular fiction?
1
@truthman9827 Nope... What makes it fiction is that you can't prove it to be true. But nice try with the projection. I know you are but what am I is not an adult argument.
1
@truthman9827 you literally just repeated back what I've been telling you that you've been doing. You can't provide evidence that what you're saying is true. Therefore it's fiction. What makes you want to believe this very specific fiction?
1
@truthman9827 Sure you did. Blame the algorithm. Like there's not a million ways to get around it. You're going to have to find another excuse.
1
@truthman9827 why do you feel the need to believe this particular work of fiction?
1
@truthman9827 So after a 👉week👈 you 👉suddenly come up with all these great "examples"👈 that 💥conveniently💥 the algorithm "deleted". An algorithm that has a million simple ways to get around... which you have now neglected to even try to do, and, instead, have decided just to continue with your silly lie about the "algorithm", while spouting some more of your brainwashed conspiracy theory, like it's fact again. Also you can run away from answering the basic question that you've been running from this whole time.
1
@truthman9827 what makes you want to believe this particular bit of fiction?
1
@truthman9827 Again... I'm not watching an hour worth of something without any specific examples point it out which represents the claims that you have made but has not been able to provide any evidence for, blue that this particular current media is corrupt and or involved in some kind of conspiracy to paint a false narrative. Provide timestamps of these examples.
1
@truthman9827 answering the question with a lie, is not answering the question. It's just you continuing to lie to yourself about something that you cannot provide any evidence for.
1
@truthman9827 why do you need to believe this specific fiction?
1
@truthman9827 👉Its been a week.👈 You have already put up several things you called "evidence", which did not turn out to be. Including another video. In this video I had to ask you eight different times to give 👉1👈 example of the "evidence" in there. The one you provided finally, didn't turn out to be anything. Now you expect me to watch an hour-long video without giving any example of anything in that one or even a timestamps for it. Doing so directly after 💥lying💥 about the algorithm deleting "a whole list of examples", then not taking the opportunities you had to rewrite them in a way the algorithm wouldn't "delete" them. No one with any kind of Common Sense wood waste an hour of their time watching a video that you, a completely not credible person at this point in time, says has evidence in it, without at least getting some kind of example of said evidence. You need to prove your claims. Which absolutely makes it your problem. This is just another excuse out of an entire week worth of excuses as to why you can't provide evidence for your claims.
1
@truthman9827 Give me 👉1👈 example (just 👉1👈 example) of what is in this video which provides 💥proof💥 of the very specific and current media that you claim to be in some kind of conspiracy to present a false narrative with clandestine powerful people, and I will be more than happy to watch it.
1
@truthman9827 why do you choose to believe this very specific form of fiction?
1
@truthman9827 I just gave you a small list of the many reasons why I'm not going to watch an hour of a video without you being able to give me one small example as to what is in it that proves our claim. It's your issue to prove it if you can't that's not my problem. I could give you the entire list of the entire week if you like?
1
@truthman9827 but it's cool, then all you have to do is named one piece of evidence in there that does that? I'll wait
1
@truthman9827 The list of the entire week that proves your lack of credibility. And the reason I will insist on 👉1👈 example in the video you have presented, that you claim finally has this proof. 1. Making the initial assumption that I trust CNN. An assumption you will repeat several times, before actually asking. 2. Admitting to be Anon, but claiming to fact-check the media. Yet have spent an entire week not being able to prove one claim. 3. Repeating the cult term "The Great Awakening" 4. Claiming that I'm delusional even though you can't provide any evidence to your claim in over a week. 5. You've actually made several claims repeatedly but I've only ever asked you to provide evidence for one of them and you have not even been able to do that, and again, a week's time. 6. When I first asked you to provide evidence for your claim about the current media, the very first thing you tried to do was get me to prove your claim for you. 7. You claimed it died in 2016 Donald Trump won big time. I pointed out that in 2020, Joe Biden beat Donald Trump by the exact same margin and then asked you if you would agree that that meant in 2020 that he lost big time. You ignored that question. It wouldn't be the last question you ignore. 8. You would go on to make another baseless assumption about how I hate all Republicans even though I literally am surrounded by Republicans where I live. Which you would have known if you would have asked. You chose not to because it fit your false narrative better. Literally everybody I know voted for Trump in 2016. Friends and family included. You didn't bring that up after that. 9. You then insist that the direction of the world proves your claims the but can provide no solid evidence for that. 10. You're also present a slew of parotid Trump conspiracy theories for which you also prove absolutely none of. Hunter Biden's laptop, Russian collusion hoax, pizzagate... Just to name a few. 11. You then go back to trying to insist that it's my job to prove your claims. 12. After I tell you I won't, you start bringing up a video called out of the shadows and Mark a timestamp for me to watch. I do so on the claim that you said is there is not. The only thing that is there is something over 60 years old that has no direct implication for today's journalism. 13. Then you go on to insist for another day that that is direct evidence for it even though it isn't. 14. Upon which I point out the fact that you've spent almost a week trying to prove something that you can't and that you don't actually believe it because if you did you wouldn't need that kind of validation from a total stranger. At which point you tried to deflect from that and tell me that it's my validation that I need because I keep pointing out the fact that you can't prove your claim. 15. You try several other underhanded and desperate attempts to deflect to me, such as going to my page and giving a false account of what's there, intentionally. 16. At which point your tactic changes a bit when you start to try and insist that it is my belief that I don't believe what you believe. At which point I point out that it's not a belief if it's something you can't prove. It's simply the truth that what you were saying is a work of fiction. 17. During the entire time we are having this exchange I am insisting upon 2 thing. For you to provide evidence for one of your claims and to answer a question, which is, why do you need to believe this very specific form of fiction. A question that you tried to ignore at least a dozen times before finally giving some acknowledgement of it, but not an answer. What you call answering it is simply insisting that the thing that is fiction and that you can't screw is not fiction and is the truth. 18. When I push you to answer the question, you try and deflect to me not answering a question from the start. Which is the false narrative you presented about me believing CNN. Would you drop after I actually answer the question. 19. Instead going back to trying to deflect to me by trying to insist that I'm contradicting myself because I believe you not being able to prove your claim makes it fiction. As to which I point out that that is the literal definition of fiction. 20. Continuing down your road of fiction isn't fiction narrative, you insist that I can keep saying it's fiction but it doesn't make it fiction. As to where I point out yet again that the thing that makes it fiction is the fact that you can't prove it. 21. Which brings us to an entire week later where you present this length of an hour long video claiming that this is some kind of Truth. I insist after all of that happening the week prior is that you give me one example that is in this video that proves your claims about the media and you start insisting that if I don't want to watch it then it's not your problem. So I will say again, provide one example which is in the video you claim has the proof of your claim after an entire week, and I will spend an hour watching it.
1
@truthman9827 If this evidence is in here and you know it is, why can't you sight 1 claiming their that proves it?
1
@truthman9827 Na! That's just the face saving way your trying to justify running away without being able to prove a thing you have claimed. And your claims of not caring went out the window about a week ago. No one sticks around trying to convince someone of something they have no proof of for an entire week if they don't care. That's just a silly claim.
1
@truthman9827 If you want me to spend an hour of my time watching this video, you will name one thing in there that provides proof for any of your claims? It shouldn't be that hard, right? You've already watched it and you know it's in there so all you have to do is rattle off one thing, right? Unless you're completely full of s***, that is.
1
@truthman9827 why do you feel the need to believe this particular work of fiction?
1
@truthman9827 This is how this was always going to end. You trying to find the best way to save face and run away.
1
@truthman9827 If you where right, you'd be able to prove it now. You can't.
1
@truthman9827 BTW... you are eventually going to leave one of these times you keep trying to say goodbye, right? 🙃
1