Comments by "D Mc" (@dmc8092) on "On Feminism and Feminists (Pt. 3) | Sargon of Akkad | YOUTUBERS | Rubin Report" video.

  1. psychoh13 As far as the property taxes, that went with ownership. As far as the children--men don't pay for everything either and at that time period did not participate in raising them, and women had no rights to a child if she left her husband. As far as the draft--men would not have allowed women in the military in the first place and in the second place being drafted shouldn't be a prerequisite for voting. Now, why don't you just read a book on history and get some information outside of the MRA movement.
    3
  2. +psychoh13 I think Straughan, while good on current issues has a shaky hold on history.
    2
  3. psychoh13 She claimed that men were going to just give women the right to vote so the suffragettes were unnecessary. 
    2
  4. psychoh13 This is all guessing. The fact is that women were given the right to vote because they demanded it. To pretend otherwise is dishonest.
    2
  5. psychoh13 Your argument sounds similar to the right wingers who say that slavery would have ended eventually. We don't know that this is true and there's no way to prove it. One thing that is true is that justice delayed is justice denied.
    2
  6. psychoh13 To dismiss what these women did is just ignorant of history. I didn't compare it to slavery, I compared your reaction to the reaction of people who try to dismiss the work of the abolitionists.
    2
  7. psychoh13 But, also, thank you for proving that it's not just Staughan who's ignorant about history.
    2
  8. psychoh13 She dismisses it, and so do you. I think it's fine to say that many modern feminists have gone to far and to point at the excesses of the movement but to dismiss the accomplishments of past feminists is just naive. 
    2
  9. psychoh13 Because at one time women were not allowed to own property and anything they owned was considered the property of their husband. If the man chose to sell the property he would have been able to even if the wife didn't want to.
    2
  10. psychoh13 Men worked to support the family because women were expected to stay at home--if a woman did work her earnings were considered her husband's property.
    2
  11. psychoh13 Are you actually trying to say the vote should be tied to the draft? For men or women? Voting should be the rights of citizenry and not tied to service in the military or property ownership.
    2
  12. psychoh13 What does it mean to be responsible for your own "uptake" and if you're not allowed to work how are you supposed to take care of yourself?
    2
  13. psychoh13 Thank you for pretty much admitting that she does dismiss the advances that the early feminists made. That was my original point and you've shown me to be correct. And thank you for showing that you, too, dismiss the work of suffragettes. That's really all I intended to say from the beginning.
    2
  14. psychoh13 You are. And when a woman owned property she had to pay taxes on it. When a man wasn't drafted, he still was able to vote.
    2
  15. He's right on about the weird feminist support of Islam, there's also the weird LGBT support of Islam.
    1
  16. psychoh13 Now you'll have to back that up because it's not borne out by history.
    1
  17. It's always a red flag to me when someone divides people up into 3 categories and then strawmans their reason.
    1
  18. I never heard of Anita Sarkesian until the gamergate people started bringing her up on every single youtube video. How important was she before gamergate made her important?
    1
  19. SARAH PALIN DOESN'T ESPOUSE REGRESSIVE IDEOLOGY? WTF is he talking about? Has he heard her? She's not a libertarian, she's a right wing social conservative.
    1