Comments by "RiC David" (@RiC_David) on "CreepShots: Reddit Forum Photo Leads To Teacher Investigation" video.

  1. Well considering that a lot of people like to look at underwear and when girls wearing skirts sit on chairs their underwear may be visible due to their legs being apart then *yeah* it is sexual. Explicit? No, it's not explicit but it's definitely sexual. I think you're being a creep if you take those unwanted photos. I don't think it makes them some sort of evil supervillian but it does make them a classless twat.
    1
  2. I think if you don't know that somebody's going to town over the memory of your hotness (or over a photo they've surreptitiously taken if they really don't respect people's privacy) then ethical or unethical, at least they're blissfully unaware. Posting it somewhere is totally uncool in my book but again I have to admit that what you don't know won't hurt you. It's a total dick move. Of course, reporting on it only ensures that the people WILL find out so..probably shouldn't have covered this!
    1
  3. You have a lot of faith in your longevity. Are you sure you won't be a human brain in a cybernetic body yourself?
    1
  4. Not exactly. The goal, consciously or not, is to attract people. The thing is, most girls/women have their own idea of how a boy/man should respond to that attraction; they want them to swoon or to flirt with them or talk about how hot she is. They may even be fine with them cracking one out if they find the guy attractive, otherwise they'll deem him 'creepy' and a perv. That's all horse shit and it's fine to wank over it, but that's more in line with their actual goal.
    1
  5. Irrational? Everyone who reads my posts knows full well that I *debate*. I don't use emotion nor subjectivity and my opinions can change if new information proves me wrong. Let's do this rationally - I'd LOVE that. Sexual partners? LISTEN to me: a-t-t-r-a-c-t-i-v-e. I'm not saying they're suitable for sex, I'm saying they are ATTRACTIVE. Full breasts, Plato. Child bearing hips, Plato. YOU TELL ME how these magically lack attractive properties until an arbitrary age. It's basic biology!
    1
  6. Boy, you bailed TWICE when debating this with me - I put a question to you that you couldn't answer without showing that you were about disgust/prejudice and not morality and you dodged it TWICE. If you read my posts (look up trolling, this ain't it) then you know I don't want sex with children. Do I think 15/16 year olds are attractive? Yes. Do the vast majority of males? Yes. Sexually developed and fertile physiques - go ahead and tell me they don't attract on an evolutionary level. Go on...
    1
  7. Everywhere's full of "pedos". This has nothing to do with paedophilia - finding PRE-PUBESCENTS attractive, but the reality is that finding teenagers attractive is not remotely unusual. People tend not to talk about it, publicly at least, but it's been the norm since humans have existed and it's certainly not changing because of social expectations. The most attractive female age has been shown by multiple studies on males to be 17 - that's an average. We're all "pedos".
    1
  8. If I was this guy I'd just crack one out before going into class. I mean Lord knows I find legs gorgeous (does anybody not?) and I think teens are the best looking humans on this planet but really man, can he not just see without having to take a photo? What a fool he is - now he's screwed up his career all because his sex drive was in overload. Guys do the damndest things.
    1
  9. Convincing aren't I? None of my opinions or beliefs are set in stone anyway. If somebody changed my mind on an issue then I'd admit that I had it wrong and change my stance - it's happened before. Shit, I went from a straight theist to a bisexual agnostic in one year - I love cold honesty. The problem is that most people don't base their beliefs on honest, objective, critical analysis - it's more like "how does this make me feel? Angry? Okay then fuck them, they're fucked up fucking fucks!".
    1
  10. L-I-S-T-E-N - **I am not TALKING about having SEX with teenagers, I am TALKING about them LOOKING ATTRACTIVE** Are you incapable of reading? And you have the nerve to call me a troll. I think Johnny Depp's attractive - I'm not currently having sex with him; do you see the distinction? I acknowledge the fact that somebody is attractive but, knowing Depp is heterosexual, I'm not advocating my sticking my penis in him. If you can't tell the difference then get a new username.
    1
  11. We're not "all pedos" because I'm deliberately misusing the word as he did. The majority of males DO NOT only find females attractive after age 18, conveniently the age of consent for sex (sex =/= attraction). Some 18 year olds look 14, some look 22 - how could attraction begin at a set age when appearance is wildly different? Developed and fertile physiques i.e. breasts, hips attract males on an evolutionary level - is that supposed to be dependent on local social norms and expecations?
    1
  12. It's okay though - so long as you can point your finger at somebody else, you can claim the moral highground.
    1
  13. Japan is already working away as we speak. The funny thing is, I'm not even very fussed about sex - people think this is all about sex for me because most people are preoccupied with sex. I'm not asexual but I think sex is overrated and I'm not a people person. You watch though, people would want to crucify someone who had sex with a teenage simluation/robot too - it's not about morality it's about disgust. It's socially acceptable disgust which is why they think it's above other prejudice.
    1
  14. Once again, when pushed to confront the reality that you too find at least SOME teenage girls attractive, you bail on the debate. Google "Emma Watson 2012" - EVERYONE do this. The girl is 22; TELL me she does not look like a teenager. Do men openly find her attractive? Yes. Because she's over 18. If she looked that way at 15 (she pretty much did), most men would DENY any attraction. Most men don't assess what their eyes see, they check a girl's age and then adjust accordingly. #Truth.
    1
  15. It's self evident, it's just a case of whether or not people want to accept it. The reality is you have 18yos who look 22, 22yos who look 15, and 14yos who look 18 - to say "I only find 18+ year old girls attractive" doesn't even make *sense*. Attraction is an unchosen response to physical appearance. One can't decide whether a girl's attractive or not once they've learned her age - yet that's what people do. I was just the same as them, I'm friends with them, I know how the game's played.
    1
  16. I'm not talking about me - my attractions aren't centred around fertility but those of normal men are; I'm talking about the majority of men, I'm talking about *you*. Answer the question. If they have developed features, would you or would you not find those features attractive? You can't let yourself say yes because you won't allow yourself to identify as attracted to teens, just as I previously wouldn't. Look at this girl "watch?v=uj2F0NvVvoY&feature=plcp" from TYT's recent vid. #Attractive.
    1