Comments by "dkosmari" (@dkosmari) on "Banned C++ Contributor Speaks Out" video.

Now just watch as Stroustrup himself is going to get kicked out. He has no principles.
40
The Woke Group 21.
10
@AsAs-nd7gy "Just accept your guilt and apologize to the bolshevik inquisitors" is not being neutral.
8
He literally isn't. He said, "why didn't you confess to your crimes so the show trial could be concluded quickly and we could go back to work?" He's an enabler, and his legacy will be taken from him, and burnt to the ground.
3
@PaulieMcCoy Are you using ANSI C++ from 1990? I doubt it.
2
@volodyanarchist Stroustrup said people should not have taken offense AND the author should have admitted to his guilt and changed the title as was demanded.
2
You'd think so, but guess who wrote the code of conduct? The same people that are always getting offended.
2
It's literally not called "CPP". It's literally called "C++".
2
Stroustrup is a weak man with no fortitude. He was actually convinced, by saboteurs, to remove unsigned integers from the language. He said "we should remove unsigned integers, only have signed types", openly in a C++ conference a few years ago. Everyone in the audience was confused, and thought he was joking at first. Andrei Alexandrescu was the one that openly confronted him and said "you can remove unsigned integers over my dead body."
1
C++ is an ISO standard, it's bigger than IEEE. Programming languages evolve to match the changing technology, the changing demands, and even to correct mistakes and incorporate new ideas. C++ in particular, was created precisely to incorporate the best ideas of other languages. It was meant to be an every-evolving language from the very start. Initial Bjarne Stroustrup had the final word, but as more and more work was needed to deal with all the contributions and language extensions, he formed a committee, to submit a formal standard to the ANSI in 1990, and a year later to the ISO. There's a lot of work to create a proper ISO standard, people need to get paid to make time to write technical texts, to go to meetings and discuss complex problems within the language. In order to have a voice in the Standards Committee, you have to pay to be a member; that's how they pay the people to work on the standard. Usually individuals don't pay by themselves, they're part of organizations (like corporations, research institutions, governments) that "sponsor" them. Corporations want their own engineers being part of the standards committee, to ensure the committee is focusing on problems they want solved. Compiler vendors (like Microsoft and Google) want their own engineers in the committee so their own proprietary extensions are incorporated in the standard (so they have the feature implemented in their own compiler first, and don't have to change to something different.) Without updates to the language, C++ would not have hash tables, would not have multi-threaded support, would not have atomic operations, no lambdas, no regular expressions, etc.
1
Stroustrup bent over to the snakes, and is continuing to bend over. I have no more respect for him. He deserve to have his legacy destroyed by the very people he enables.
1
@Sgt_Glory The very people who go "offended" are equating Jews to something negative. That's what real antisemitism looks like.
1
Cry harder, commie. The truth is coming out.
1
Karl Marx said, on the "On The Jewish Question", that Jews would not have space to continue being Jews, in the post-revolutionary world. Are you smart, commie? Can you tell me what he meant by that?
1
Plenty of corporations have been trying to sabotage C++ for more than 2 decades. The head chair of the C++ Standards Committee is Herb Sutter, who works for Microsoft. Microsoft sells a product language, "C#", which they advertise as a "C++ killer language." Another corporation that bought their way into the Standards Committee is Google. Google has two product languages that they advertise as "C++ killer languages", Go and Carbon.
1
Spoken like a true commie. "Stop resisting and bend over, nothing can stop our revolution. If you resist, you're a bad person."
1
"Programs are not people. Removing undefined behavior is not genocide." It's like I'm taking crazy pills, why does that need to be clarified? People that are equating Jews to Undefined Behavior are the same kind of people that equate black people to monkeys. They're blatantly confessing to their own bigotry, by claiming everyone else is just as racist as they are. And as I suspected, Herb Sutter (a Microsoft employee) is participating in this sabotage. Sad to see Stroustrup being such a pushover. His legacy is being burnt to the ground and he's doing nothing to stop it.
1
@javierflores09 Shut up commie. You tried to publicly assassinate this man' reputation and now you're blaming the victim. He did nothing wrong, he has every right to defend himself publicly, as he was attacked publicly. We will not submit to your struggle sessions.
1
@GameDevChad Without a working group there's no ISO C++ standard. ISO usually doesn't let some random organization to publish something as an international standard. They have to show to ISO that it's open to the entire industry that wants to support said standard. Otherwise we will reverto to having a dozen incompatible flavors of C++. Back in the day, we had Borland C++, Microsoft C++, CodeWarrior C++, GNU C++, Symantec C++, ... it wasn't fun.
1
That's a Christian principle. These people are rabid anti-Christians. They love collective guilt and collective punishment. They justify punishing an innocent person as revenge for what some other guilty person did, or might do.
1
@joseoncrack If you didn't notice, most of the people in the C++ Standards Committee are also part of the C Standards Committee. If one is infected, the other is infected too.
1
@volodyanarchist Are you mentally challenged?
1
@gamemechanic4919 That's what any sane person would interpret. What does a commie like you interpret from his words?
1
Watch any recent (past 4 years or so) C++ conference talk, on Youtube, you'll quickly see a lot of men dressed up as women, with fake feminine names, and custom pronouns. That's the clowns.
1
Google is probably one of the entities organizing the sabotage against C++. He would be a fool to work with the people responsible for the smearing campaign against him.
1
Karl Marx said that the Jews would not be allowed to continue being Jews, in the post-revolution world. That's a coded way to say "genocide." I can quote a dozen of antisemitic remarks Karl Marx made against the Jews.
1
I'm pretty sure Herb Sutter, the chair of the C++ Standards Committee (also works for Microsoft) made the fake offer in an attempt to save face precisely because a lot of people within the committee are upset. This is a clear case of sabotage, and Herb is an accomplice, Bjarne is an enabler. Anyone offended by trivialities should be kicked out summarily and permanently.
1
What is this "political orthodoxy" you're talking about?
1
This is happening exactly to sabotage C++ (and C will be next) to prop up the competing products, like C#, Go, Carbon, etc. It didn't start with C++17, it started a few years prior to C++11. That's why they introduced an unsafe thread class, and the worst possible hash table implementation in `std::unordered_map`. Coroutines in C++ is a disaster too. `std::async()` is so bad, Microsoft, of all companies, created a better replacement. They deprecated character set conversion routines/classes without adding a replacement. And they still refuse to add named parameters to functions (despite already having named member initialization for structs). Concepts almost didn't make it into the language, Stroustrup and a few others had to pretty much do it all by themselves, because they couldn't get the committee to make any useful decision. Basically, the standards committee has a bunch of useless clowns that have doing nothing but drag down the work to a screeching halt, for more than 2 decades now. This fake "I'm offended" performance is just yet another tactic to do the same thing.
1