Youtube comments of Darkpaw1 (@darkpaw1522).
-
2800
-
628
-
214
-
119
-
90
-
78
-
58
-
57
-
49
-
37
-
36
-
35
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
28
-
27
-
24
-
21
-
20
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@crusaderkiller5816 Long story, my mom stole my college money and forced me to drop out. Then she took 75% of my work money for "bills", though I barely could hold a job because we moved literally every year. Ended up in a section 8 building with her, now stuck in the projects. No job, no education, you know the stereotype; and worst is, it wasn't my fault. My mom was even doing everything in her power to discourage me from joining the military. She was trying to keep me stuck like her.
In the end I finally escaped her and joined the Marine Corp. I made enough money to repay my college debts and graduate college. I also since cut my mom completely from my life.
Sorry if it's a bit off topic. Reason why the projects in particular was so bad because it felt like my mom was trying to stear my life into being like...hers. Living in bad neighborhoods and such, stuck in poverty, etc. And I done everything in my power to avoid it. Seeing my inevitable fate to be stuck in poverty staring me down everyday was a nightmare. Bloods on the stoop outside the entrace, the building full of addicts, it was too much. I didn't want THIS to be my future. Honestly, if the military thing didn't work out I planned to kill myself.
6
-
6
-
6
-
Well to be fair "White" generally means someone with a lighter skin. Heck, I knew a "white" girl who actually was albino black.
Most "white" people are mixed to be honest. I once dated a white girl who was %25 black, and rest was a mix of italian and white. Heck I remember not too long ago people considered Italian and white people different in the US. I also remember even further back when red headed Irish gingers were very discriminated, and not just a ginger joke played for mild laughs.
Basically, what I'm trying to say is "white" is becoming more and more subjective. Heck, every race is in the US is subjective. I don't think a single person born in the United States is 100% anything. Really odd we still even have race here, especially very blurred ones like Asian, Black, or White; which devalues the actual race. What I'm saying is we should eliminate race altogether or define it far more concretely. Because right now we're in the middle using vague phrases with no meaning to define a skin color that inaccurately describes a person. And personally, I would like the former, as I feel race just further enforces discrimination by categorizing someone for little reason.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Vic2point0 A disagreement of one person isn’t bad, but a collective is a powder keg. It shouldn’t be like that but it is. Simply put, it only takes one bad person to easily corrupt the bunch. Some don’t even do it with ill intentions. Most if the time they do it to fit in, and not stand out. “No LGBT people around the world, what is one little joke gonna hurt”, kind of mentality. This behavior very often grows. Again, not saying you’re like that; but people around their friends act way different than they do solo. Just a word of mindful wisdom. After all we are all human.
Those laws are very transphobic. They’ve been created very clearly to target the transgender community. By your logic segregation was okay because “separate but equal”; yeah, see how bad that went. And honestly, controlling whether someone can wear slacks or a skirt is a very dumb law that serves no purpose. America is the land of free. These laws and bills are just separating people, when we should be working together to unite each other. If you were treated as less than American because of your gender you’d feel discriminated too, because that’s exactly what it is.
That’s exactly the point. As I stated, you disagreeing alone is not a problem. When you get a collective of people who disagree about transgender people that’s when it becomes an issue, as those people spiral faster and deeper towards bigotry. It’s like levels. Take race for example, someone can be a 1 and be mildly uncomfortable around black people, a very mild racist; but you put a bunch of 1’s in a room and they quickly can become the KKK over time. That’s essentially where people like you are at. You’re a 1 (presumably), disagreeing about trans people, very mildly transphobic; but you put the lot of 1s like you in a room and the chances of radical transphobia increases rapidly.
In the end as long as you can at least stop the worst transphobes that makes me comfortable. Someone saying slurs in public, trying to do something discriminatory in a bathroom, and especially regarding harassment or violence just be there for trans people. I think we can at least both agree that everyone deserves to be treated with respect and kindness. You don’t have to agree with trans way of life to a good citizen. I think as long as you can do at least that you don’t have to worry about being influenced by the bad people.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Nwkcurly I never mentioned crime.
Gentrification is inevitable if you want a neighborhood to improve. Whatever state of "keeping it real" is it isn't improving a neighborhood.
I lived in the hood too. Areas that were gentrified were far better. Kids were happier, people had better jobs, there were less crime. Expensive? Yes. But you can't get something from nothing. While the places that pushed back gentrification were inevitably consolidated and became cheaper. Criminals moved in, and now it's essentially 3 kilometers of traps houses and welfare queens.
You're young so you may not see the entire picture. But later on you'll get some ecomics class from your college. I mentioned it in a previous post but to keep it short:a neighborhood that improves is more valuable, thus raising property taxes, thus raises rent.
If you ever want the "hood " to be an actual "neighborhood" you have to improve it. All that time and money has to come from somewhere, and the people in it have little of either. Gentrification is the only way. The only exception is if somehow a whole xommunity became wealthier simultaneously, thus freeing up time and money to invest in their neighborhood, which rarely happens especially in places near urban areas.
Of course, you can reject gentrification all the same. My neighborhood did. Tried improving it themselves. And it's still the hood 20 years later, and far worst.
2
-
2
-
2
-
If an environment improves, the taxes to maintain the environment improves. If taxes raise the mortgage/ rent worth is higher.
For example, say a bad neighborhood gets a park built. That park was likely built by city taxes. Thus, the nearby owns now have to pay higher taxes to maintain it. If they don't then the park turns into a terrible place. If they do then the neighborhood improves at the cost of everyone. If they don't get the park then the neighborhood stays the same.
Most bad neighborhoods tend to want nice things like clean streets, parks, policing, etc. So they get it. Thus the neighborhood improves. Leading to the homes being worth more, either by the bank or the owners.
So two scenarios happen: The neighborhood rejects this plan and remains bad and cheap. Or they accept it and improve and gain value.
If the latter you have gentrification. The people who raise their value along with the neighborhood's will grow in wealth. The ones that don't and remain the same will decline. If you decline the law of capitalism will expel you to a area of your means.
The benefit and edge here is it happens slowly. You can either move before it happens, or after. You value either way. You can see it coming long before the effects become burdensome, no matter what your income is, home owner ir not.
Either way, it HAS to happen. It's either that or reject it and remain terrible. A neighborhood cannot improve without investing months into it. And if it improves so does the value of everything in it. Want less drug dealers on the streets? That cost money? Less gangs? Money? Cleaner sidewalks? Money. Better schools? Money. Nothing comes for free. The only other solution outside government tax based aid is gated communities, which themselves cost money, it's why they're so expensive.
Either way you have to invest in your neighborhood.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1