General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
19SaD82
CRUX
comments
Comments by "19SaD82" (@19SaD82) on ""Wagner Killed 32,000 Ukrainian Troops" | No Room For Retreat In Bakhmut? | US Leaks Suspect Nabbed" video.
It's just russian claims again. To deflect from the fact that russian troops were bled out in Bakhmut. For people who are able to think, it's pretty obvious - russian trolls on the other hand will swallow everything the Kremlin throws at them. If they would be able to think then they would start to ask themselves how it is possible that Wagner, some months, ago were holding a frontline of 90k, whereas of today they are down to roughly 5km and in those 5km they are supported by regular russian units, as well.
12
@tiglishnobody8750 No, the UK isn't saying that. Russia is hoping for it but even Prigozhin confirmed that Ukraine is still in Bakhmut. And if you look at the daily happenings in Bakhmut, you see that Ukraine has no interest in leaving. They getting pushed and they are pushing back. At the moment it's more like Mar'inka - a town Russia is unable to get for more than one year. Just to give you some perspective: The fight for Mar'inka started in march of last year and Russia is stuck in the middle of that town for more than 10 months already. 10 months. That gives a nice picture of what Bakhmut can easily turn into. No, Ukraine isn't pulling out because Ukraine knows how bad the russian army actually is.
7
@paulbrou6723 90k troops in a town with 70k citizens? Do you think at least once before posting?
3
@alitharealist4730 150 million people. How much of them are women. How much of them are children? How much of them are old men beyond any military capability? How much of them have war related jobs? How much of them are specialists for the russian economy? How much of them have fled? How much of them have died or became unfit for further service? How much of them are in the police sector and thus not able to join the military as Russia needs a strong police force in Russia itself? How much of them don't want to die? Suddenly you look at a number that is way, way smaller in regards to people being able to be send to Ukraine... This myth about Russia being able to field a huge army is just a myth.
3
@nashazzi8399 No, repeating propaganda isn't being "non-bias". You should try to reiterate your understanding of words.
3
@againstviralmisinformation510 No, there aren't just 50k Wagner troops (now way, way less than that, btw). You somehow forget the 40k prisoners Wagner did recruit from russian prisons. And more than 3/4 of those were killed or wounded and not being able to fight anymore. The rest went away after their contract ended after 6 months. And Wagner itself had losses, too. Massively. Down to the point that numbers ranged from 7.5k to 10k left. And those are just Wagner losses in and around Bakhmut. The regular russian units had losses, as well. And stop your bs about Ukraine would have higher casualties. All military experts and milblogger confirm that Russia has way higher losses. Even pro-russian sources. Your claim is wrong.
2
@mdumisenihlophe4001 Strange comment, considering the fact that Russia is losing pretty badly, but whatever flooats your boat, I guess.
2
@mymotivatonal7 yawn The Soviet Union lost against sandal wearing Talibans in Afghanistan and what followed because of that: The Soviet Union collapsed. The US didn't... You lost...
2
@dixonmelvin7198 He is a racist anti-semit - he has no consciousness. He was a narcissist who wanted to be worshipped by others. Missing self-consciousness, too.
1
@againstviralmisinformation510 How about you visit pro-russian milbloggers? You know how to find them, right? And, just in case, you didn't see it: PRO-RUSSIAN milbloggers. Just in case, you would vomit something like CNN or BBC around when I'm talking about: Inform yourself. (And in case you didn't realize: It wasn't me who said that there would be 100k dead Wagners. I answered to your comment - maybe read what I wrote.)
1
@thetwopunchman6113 Exactly. And this "tactic" isn't sustainable for Russia. Russian officials are thinking of still living in the Soviet Union - but they don't get that exactly this isn't the case anymore. Russia is a shallow hull to what the Soviet Union would have been able to pull off.
1
@thetwopunchman6113 The relation between Russia and China is pretty perfect, I would say - for China. Russia ended as a chinese resource colony and if Russia should manage to let itself collapse (which is a given if Russia should drag on this war for a longer period of time), China will seize the eastern parts of Russia and bring them back home under chinese government. And Belarus will face a lot of innerpolitical problems - with belarusian fighters who were fighting for Ukraine coming back home... and being somewhat "curious" with Luka for his stance on this war. And in some years, when a pro-european government was able to establish itself in Belarus, Belarus will, most probably, join the EU and NATO, as well. Putin f'ed up big times with this sh*tshow he produced.
1
Russian troops have blocked the roads towards Bakhmut? Again? Without actually blocking them because russian troops are too far away from them? Strange that those roads aren't blocked at all, but who cares about facts, right?
1
@yaqob3275 Somehow I couldn't copy you in all your whining. Wanna try again - and this time without crying and begging that I don't quote you anymore?
1
@tiglishnobody8750 Uhm - nope. Russia has taken control of 75% of Bakhmut. And that's it. If Russia doesn't manage to take full control of Bakhmut and the surrounding area it's totally worthless as it makes no difference if Russia captures 75% or just 10%. For Bakhmut being usable by Russia Ukraine needs to be completely away from Bakhmut. Which circles back to: It's just 75% and thus worthless as of now. And Bakhmut can easily turn into another Mar'inka. Especially since Wagner has almost completely bled out and Russia is back on relying on the regular russian army. And we all know how good they are, right? Vuhledar, anyone? Mar'inka anyone? Somehow you russian trolls still haven't learned your lessons in those ast 14 months: Claiming victory before an actual victory could even occur let's you make appear foolish. You have no patience. And you lack in victories. And both leads to announcing victories when there are none. Why aren't you able to be patient? Serious question. Russia claimed so many times that it would have taken Mar'inka, Kamianske, Bakhmut, Bilohorivka and many other settlements that I've lost count. And Russia still haven't managed to take any of these settlements. Do you consider this behaviour being professional? Or would you consider someone who always claims things which aren't true as being a laughing stock of humanity?
1
@yaqob3275 So, you don't know how defense works? Gotcha. Btw: Did you know that pro-russian sources confirm those high losses for the russian army? Strange, isn't it? Makes you almost sound like you wouldn't know anything about what is happening in Ukraine. Yeah, really strange.
1
@nashazzi8399 yawn This shows your scale of intelligence if you don't get that debunking Kremlin propaganda isn't propaganda in itself. And isn't it interesting that actual pro-russian sources often enough contradict Kremlin-propaganda you russian trolls are sowing? But, actually, I don't expect you to understand this.
1
@sorinsviolin4114 Sure, sure. Too bad that Russia is losing, right? And too bad that russian sources are confirming this, correct? And really too bad (but pretty hilarious, tbh) that you're unable to grasp this. Btw.: How's Bakhmut doing? Already captured? No? Awww - too bad, right?
1
@mymotivatonal7 Aww, did it hurt that Russia already collapsed in the past? But... wait... Russia did already collapse twice in its past. The US still exist. You lost...
1
@alitharealist4730 The reason why Russia invaded: Because Putin is a greedy wannabe tzar, imprisoned in his own wet dream of a Soviet Union tzardom. And because of the industrial capacity of the Donbas, the landbridge to Crimea for the only deep sea navy port in Sevastopol and the ressources Ukraine found on its own territory mere months before Russia invaded for the first time in 2014. Those are the reasons. Simple as that. And exactly this is why Russia gets slapped around pretty hilariously right now.
1
@khahynight009 Why believing? It's a fact. A fact that is shared by the russian military itself, the russian state media and pro-russian milbloggers. Care to explain how all those people who know what is going on confirm that Russia is losing - and you aren't able to?
1
@JackKante Wagner was bled out - some months ago they were able to hold a frontline of 90km, now they are only holding a line of 5km and even there they are supported by regular russian units. Do the maths for yourself - but, actually, as you're a russian troll, you're unable to do any maths at all...
1
@MrThartofwar Spoken like a true russian troll: Too dumb to acknowledge numbers and to understand the implications of those. Bakhmut isn't the symbol of ukrainian resistance - Bakhmut is a small town. Just a small town. With way more and bigger towns and cities to follow if Russia should actually try to conquer the Donbas. And just for the sake of mentioning: Bakhmut is still in ukrainian hands and russian troops are bleeding out furthermore.
1
@ЯБезымянный-о5ф Yep, and the russian army is demilitarizing itself pretty hilariously while the ukrainian army gets upgraded. You're just too dumb to realize it. Before the war Russia was handled as the 2nd strongest army in the world - now it's down several ranks to be barely in the top 10's. Before the war Ukraine was rank 30-ish, now it is sitting on rank 15 and climbing. Now tell me: Who gets demilitarized and who gets stronger?
1
@ЯБезымянный-о5ф Somehow you miss that Europe is ramping up production of shells and Europe is easily able to outproduce Russia by a far stretch. Even more so because Russia is already at its peak of what it can produce - and this peak is far from anything Russia needs. Easy math. Ukraine isn't wasting any elite troops - Ukraine is using territorial defense forces as elite units are way more important for assaults - and guess where those elite units are right now? No, not on the defense... Whereas Russia bled out its own special forces in the past 14 months and is completely down on mobiks. Inferior troops with inferior equipment. Easy math, again. And western equipment is pouring into Ukraine on a constant basis - numbers don't lie. Why are you lying, instead? And in regards to 1500 russian tanks... are you drunk, brainwashed or seriously stupid? There are no 1500 tanks entering russian service. Russia would need yearly 1500 to 1600 tanks to offset its tank losses, but Shoigu himself confirmed that Russia has no cpabilities to produce anything near that amount. In fact: Russia isn't even able to produce a single tank completely as of now and is reliant on upgrading T-54's instead. How about informing yourself before spouting nonsense? Unable to do so or are you getting paid for posting nonsense? Russia has already lost - listen more to the pro-russian sources themselves (no, not Kremlin-TV, but actual and real russian sources...)
1
@manserizawa2327 No, it's not rotation when the troop number is decreasing pretty badly over time. Rotation leaves at least the same amount of troops at a frontline - else you could get pushed back. Some months ago Wagner units were rotating - and they were still able to operate with the same strength. Nowadays the number of Wagners is shrinking more and more and Wagner has to rely on regular units to bolster its own sector of the frontline. They became less and less and less. No rotation - being demolished, instead.
1
@luke4442 Ah, another dumb troll. It may be surprising to you, but the ukrainian claims are pretty consistent with neutral and even pro-russian claims. That's the difference between ukrainian claims and Kremlin propaganda...
1
@manserizawa2327 And that is the point: Wagner isn't able to reinforce their positions anymore. That's why regular russian units appear more and more in Bakhmut. And this translates into: Wagner is bleeding out. No rotation.
1
@manserizawa2327 Your previous reply is nonsense as you fail to acknowledge that the shrinking number to Wagner troops isn't due to rotation.
1
@manserizawa2327 But exactly this is the point of the original comment: Wagner is bled out almost completely and can't keep up with advancing. Let's remember: The only unit that was able to make any progress in this russian winter offensive: Wagner. Now Wagner is almost completely bled out - and regular russian units who performed abysmal in those past eight months are now trying to do what Wagner did. Which won't and can't pay off. Russias best units were destroyed in senseless attacks on a single middle sized twon - which is still in ukrainian hands. Russia can't no longer keep up the offensive. The winter offensive failed. Spectacularly.
1
@hernandocortez6351 Some. Not many. Near Avdiivka and near Vuhledar. Not very impressive if you look at those places, right?
1
@tiglishnobody8750 It's only you russian trolls who are making something out of it. That story isn't being mentioned by any ukrainian for almost a year already. And why is that? Because all ukrainians know what the Ghost of Kyiv actually was: A sign of hope and resolve. That did pay off, btw. Big times. Only you russian trolls took it literally - because you're the most gullible species on earth. Joke's on you.
1
@netxixis8069 Those russian trolls and their numbers... And their inability to read a map... 75% of Bakhmut is under russian control. Which is as worthless as having 10% under russian control - since Russia would need a complete total of 100% to make Bakhmut usable for any strategic or operational value. And from reaching this Russia is still very far away. (And judging by looking at Mar'inka - this "very far" can easily become a "impossible to achieve this year or even ever".)
1
@thf1933 Russia doesn't carry a non stop mobilization? Are you drunk? The "partial" mobilization from last year didn't end. That's one thing. Now they are enforcing the next mobilization to get another 400k troops. And did you look at the laws Russia did introduce in the last days? Laws that violate the russian constitution, even? Are you deliberately blind or did the vodka turn your eyesight into mush?
1
@yaqob3275 Ah, back to lying again? And you still don't know how many months we have per season? Which cave do you call home?
1
@yaqob3275 Was this the answer to my question? Then: Nope. There are more months per season than just one month. Wanna try again?
1
@nelayanpejuang4194 How do you call those russians who surrender via the "I want to live!" initiative? Or who are fleeing Russia because of being mobilized? Well, I call them smart - but in your logic they would be traitors, too. What you're doing here is portraying dumb elitism - even more dumb when considering how wrong you are.
1
@shreyanshdubey5654 As you call all people, who are residing in the actually reality and can prove their claims with facts and evidence, trolls, your comment is worthless in itself. Well done.
1
@againstviralmisinformation510 Either you're lying or you didn't inform yourself. The 50k Wagners don't include the prisoners. Those 50k Wagner troops entered Ukraine before Prigozhin even was allowed to recruit prisoners. And in regards to who is doing the fighting in Bakhmut: Once it was Wagner - now it's what is left of Wagner (which isn't much) and regular russian units (because there isn't much left of Wagner). Simple facts you could inform yourself if you would be able to. How about informing yourself, next time? Else you make it really easy for all of those who debunk you russian trolls all the time.
1
@againstviralmisinformation510 What is your excuse for not informing yourself? No, Wagner isn't doing the fighting in Bakhmut anymore - solely. For more than a week already there are regular russian units and Spetsnaz operating in Bakhmut itself. I'm not even talking about regular russian units and VDV who are now operating around Bakhmut because Wagner troops were getting butchered to that extend that they weren't able to attack inside of Bakhmut and to hold the flanks at the same time - no, I'm talking about the city itself. Confirmed attacks via regular russian units and Spetsnaz inside of Bakhmut. Wagner contribution gets fewer and fewer. Oh... you didn't know? Well, inform yourself... And in regards to the numbers of Wagner troops: Wagner had recruiting going on in Russia before they were allowed to recruit prisoners. They already were in the tens of thousands before the floodgate of criminals was opened. And after the criminals and the majority of the Wagner contractors were killed, Prigozhin opened 42 recruitement posts in Russia itself to get another 30 k members, if possible. Numbers don't lie...
1
@thetwopunchman6113 Unfortunately for Russia: That's not how it works. As the loss ratio is way in favour of Ukraine. Confirmed via pro-russian sources, In fact, that's how Russia is losing its military - by sending waves after waves of soldiers who get butchered. True WW2 style.
1