Comments by "19SaD82" (@19SaD82) on "Russians Fear A Ukrainian Kamikaze Drone Onslaught Is Imminent, Propose Saiga-12 Shotgun As Counter" video.

@MrJayjay0420 What is around Bakhmut and Avdiivka is not even close to what Ukraine has in store for further defense lines. The assault groups are another story, on top of that. Assault forces that are planned for the counter attack aren't contributed to those two spots. Whatever should happen in Avdiivka and Bakhmut won't deter those ukrainian offensives. In that regard Ukraine is completely different from the russian army. For the better of it. And Ukraine doesn't need to take Crimea with the offensive. It doesn't even need to reach the border to Crimea - it just needs to cut the landbridge between the Donbas and Crimea, completely shut down the Kerch bridge and that's it, then. Russian naval support for establishing any form of supply won't work - neither via the Azov Sea, the Black Sea or the Kerch strait. Ships and boats will be sitting ducks. This basically means that Ukraine will take out all the forces in Kherson and Crimea by just waiting it out and hammering them with drones and HIMARS until they surrender. Or until intel suggests that the rest will be complete pushovers. Basically meaning: Ukraine won't have to bring a substantial force to deal with the southern parts of Ukraine - freeing enough troops and equipment to push at other frontlines, as well.
4
@evilfingers4302 You didn't answer his question. What's desperate about using some or few or many or a sh*tload of drones? Drones are destroying equipment, killing soldiers, disrupting supply chains and so on. That wouldn't be desperate - it would be a major strategical advantage.
3
@MrJayjay0420 As the counter offensive didn't even start as of yet - how could it be bogged down?
3
Short answer: No. Long answer: Nope.
2
You can. Easily. Here are some: Parrot Anafi Evo series – Autel Skydio Freefly Alta Draganfly Impossible aerospace Aguadrone
1
Yep, because then Russia wouldn't have any aircraft anymore.
1
@againstviralmisinformation510 Can you explain how the US is starving people in Yemen? And in Afghanistan? Aren't you boasting nonstop that the US wouldn't be inside of Afghanistan? How could they starve those nations when not being even remotely close to them? Do you, at least sometimes, spot the contradictions in your own narrative? No? Well...
1
@againstviralmisinformation510 Nope. To make it even obvious to you (in the slight hope, that would be the case) - can you name any sanctions the US has enacted against Yemen or Afghanistan? (And please, before posting some generic bs: Your claim was that the US would starve those nations - so keep said bs in that frame, yeah?) Can you? I'm all ears...
1
@againstviralmisinformation510 Maybe I wasn't clear in my last post: Can you name the sanctions the US has enacted at Yemen and Afghanistan? (No, frozen assets aren't sanctions and they have nothing to do with starving anyone as you should look whose assets are frozen and what assets those are.) Especially in regards to your claim that the US would starve those nations - thus not answering with some generic bs but with something that would be connected to your (false) claim. Can you? Let's go...
1
@againstviralmisinformation510 Yes, I still have my question: Which sanctions and against whom did the US apply? As for this news article: The US didn't sanction the bank - it didn't even confiscated international reserves. It froze the money of individuals which had money in this bank. No international reserves but money of Taliban leaders who are and were vialiting human rights. The afghan government is free to use actual government money to feed the people. Nothing is sanctioned in that regard. And to Yemen - still no sanctions that I can see. Delivering weapons is what Iran is doing to the Houthis, as well. Are they sanctioning Yemen or Saudi Arabia by doing this? If you want to scream at the US for weapon contracts - where is your screaming against Iran for doing the same? Especially Iran as those weapons are used for destabilization of the region, whereas US weapons are used by the Saudis to stabilize the region again. And if Saudis or whoever blockade anything - that's not the fault of the US. As the US isn't sanctioning anyone in Yemen. On the contrary, the US is delivering aid to Yemen via non-profit organizations. The same is true for Afghanistan, too, btw. As long as you can't name any sanction that is aimed against the people or population in any of those two regions, it's just generic anti-US bashing of yours. And spoiler: More than this isn't to that at all.
1