Comments by "Ōkami-san" (@mweibleii) on "Unbelievable! Cops Exchange "Tricks of the Trade" on Open Internet Forum!" video.

  1. You want to live in a Socialistic paradise, well, The Police State is the force needed to enforce Progressive Socialism for the Good of 'Society' because 'We use the Roads'. And if we don't like living in a Police State, then we can go live in Somalia.
    1
  2. 1140Cecile The US is a virtually unbridled capitalistic State.... Hahahaha....ROTFLMAO! You think that's true do you? Try opening a business without a licence. The government adds millions of new lines of code and regulations EACH YEAR. Millions and millions. Want to sell liquor? Get a State licence. Want to cut hair? Get a licence. Hell, in some places in the USSA you need a licence to sell arranged flowers or fix as computer. Does THAT sound unbridled to you??? Well, on top of that we use fiat currency not 'capital'. We have a central bank - not free market banks with free market money. We have centralized planning in almost ALL aspects of our lives, from our over priced crapped Government schools to who can practice law, medicine, all of it. The State determines who you can legally marry. What you can eat. What drugs you can access. Everything in your house is 'regulated' from your toilet paper to the height of your cupboards.  Unbridled capitalism - what a joke. Try HYPER-regulated Progressive Fascist State. Well guess what? To enforce all these regulations 'for the Good of Society' we need to live with a Police State.
    1
  3. Andi Amador The "Right" is no different from the "Left" - BOTH right and left Statists are so-called Progressive Socialists. All that matters if what they decide the State should enforce and call Progressive. If it's the Right, then it's marriage laws and drug laws. If it's the Left then it's different marriage laws and other drug laws.  Left and Right sides of the exact same Statist coin.  Enjoy the Police State America.
    1
  4. Andi Amador Oh you don't preach Police Brutality do you?  Okay, suppose someone opens a Pizza store and they refuse to sell pizza's to Blacks, Asians and homosexuals. What do YOU want the Police to do about it?  Let's hear what YOU think the Progressive State should do to legally rectify this? 
    1
  5. thrisbt1 Lets see what +Andi Amador thinks our 'Progressive' socialist State should do. Do feel free to present your own argument/s.
    1
  6. Andi Amador Talk about a sloppy strawman. 1) I didn't say anything about 'shooting' someone because you didn't like their service. That would be against the law. 2) I also didn't say anything about lawlessness. Contract law, laws that protect property rights and sound money are all perfectly compatible with civil society. 3) I also didn't say anything about removing licencing. Receiving a qualification is perfectly compatible with a civil society. The AMA, a private medical organization of physicians, as an example, qualifies and licences members. 4) No, it would not be legal to sell goods and/or services fraudulently as that's both a breach of contract law and potentially property damage if it leads to someone being harmed.  IOWs, yes, you can hang your shingle up, but you can not claim to be a qualified medical doctor as that would be fraud.  So, if you're done with the strawmen, please feel free to address the timely and quite simple example that was taken from contemporary news just this last week. See, unlike you and your 'Wild West' red herring, I posted a meaningful question, one that is being dealt with by the State, as we speak.  Oh, and to make sure we're clear, my family isn't white and I have no time for superstitious non-sense like belief in asinine memes such as God/s.
    1
  7. Andi Amador So, again, suppose someone opens a Pizzeria and refuses to sell pizza's to Blacks, Asians and homosexuals. What do YOU want the Police to do about it? I'm genuinely curious as to the kind of 'remedies' a Progressive Socialist like yourself think are Progressive ways in dealing with social problems like ignorance and bigotry. Let's hear what YOU think the Progressive State should do to legally rectify this?
    1
  8. Abortion is no big deal It's not Murder Okay, and?
    1
  9. Andi Amador So, suppose someone opens a Pizzeria and refuses to sell pizza's to Blacks, Asians and homosexuals. What do YOU think the Progressive State should do to legally rectify this? I think, we both know what Progressive Socialists think should be done. It's the Police State we're living in. So, the argument stands: The Police State we are living in is the condition required to enforce so-called "Progressive" socialist policies "for the Good of Society" because "We used the Roads" and if we don't like it we can "Go live in Somalia". 
    1
  10. Abortion is no big deal It's not Murder Neither Sweden or Norway have a minimum wage, are you suggesting the USA eradicate the minimum wage? Get this, adults in Sweden are given the freedom to bicycle GASP without a helmet! Try doing that in New York. As a matter of fact, here's a Progressive Socialist slogan from New York:  "Bike Helmets Save Lives! & it's the Law!" & It's the Law See how Progressiveness works? It's called threat of violence for the "Good of Society". This is how Progressives "solve" social problems. It's why we're spending $600 billion on the Wars in 2015. It's why we have the largest Prison Population in the world. Want to know what happens if you tell a Police State Office to f*ck off and keep riding your bike in the Land of the Free? Well, let's put it this way, you may end up shot in the back of your non-helmet wearing head. You know, "For the Good of Society".  Welcome to Progressive Socialism and the Police State needed to enforce it. Welcome to the USSA. 
    1
  11. thrisbt1 Not by threatening to have them shot for not associating with me. Only a complete sociopath thinks like that.
    1
  12. thrisbt1 Yeah, it's pretty simple, I wouldn't buy my pizza's from their pizzeria. 
    1
  13. thrisbt1  No, I thought you asked me how I would personally rectify this.  To my question: "Okay, suppose someone opens a Pizza store and they refuse to sell pizza's to Blacks, Asians and homosexuals. What do YOU want the Police to do about it?  Let's hear what YOU think the Progressive State should do to legally rectify this?" My answer is, given the information presented here, the Police are to play no role in this particular transaction. 1) Ethically, there is nothing immoral occurring.  2) Aesthetically, the store owner is, in my opinion, acting in a despicable manner. I would personally, not shop there. I would instead, make it a point to buy pizza directly from competitors. If possible, I would work towards educating the next generation not to follow this particular superstitious belief system. Perhaps I'd promote competing superstitions like Buddhism. Or other belief systems such as bayesian epistemology. I understand that the slow learning process (which involves up regulating the production of AMPA receptors - this takes a while) is not as satisfying as the immediate base feeling one gets when violence is perpetrated (which is why our News and society is filled with images of violence). But, if we want to live in a civil peaceful society, then we have to act civil. Perhaps a  logical biconditional argument could be made here?  Anyway, if worse came to worse, I could invest in a smart phone app that allows me to refuse business with any of the people who volunteer to supply goods and services to the pizza shop owner. Perhaps even shutting off electricity to the shop once the contract has finished. Or not renewing a rental agreement. Etc.... Though, this should only be done in an extreme situation. The best option is to buy my pizza elsewhere.  Ultimately, it may take generational learning (this is due to low levels of synaptic plasticity in the adult brain).  I hope that has answered your question satisfactorily. 
    1
  14. LiberalLionMMXX Strawman much?  1) You used the word utopia, not me.  2) I certainly did not say Licences would not be issued, only that you would not be required to obtain one by the State. Here, let me show you how faulty (and simplistic) your reasoning is: "You think licensing professionals is a bad idea?  Good luck when the dropout down the road decides that he's a brain surgeon" 3) No, I think private licensing is a GOOD IDEA. As a matter of fact, that's how we do it currently.  4) I think giving the State a monopoly on who can issue licenses is a bad idea.  5) You can get on a plane, fly overseas and have brain surgery done today by a surgeon who is not licensed to practice in the USA. As a matter of fact, many people do go overseas and have major surgery performed.  6) Good luck getting an insurance company to pay for a non-licensed drop out to perform your surgery. That is never going to happen. I wouldn't even raise that one to the level of strawman argument. It was insulting - to your intellect and makes you look puerile. You should apologize to your Ego immediate.  7) It would be illegal to pretend to be licensed as that is contract fraud.  Lastly, you have no idea about how MD's are qualified. I on the other hand actually qualify MDs. So, unlike you, I am one of your regulators in this instance. If you think having a monopoly on who can practice is driving UP quality - well, you're the one living in a Progressive utopian bubble. But, I'll give you a clue. In 1990 about 90,000 Americans died that year due to medical error. In 2010 that number was 480,000.  The only one living with dreams of Utopia are you Regressive socialists. And more often than not, you think you know much more than you do. My suggestion is vote Hillary and hope the nation does us the favor of collapsing soon. Until then, enjoy our Progressive Socialistic NSA Police State. It's going to be here for a long long time to come. 
    1