Comments by "DankEngine" (@dankengine5304) on "HistoryLegends" channel.

  1. Damn good choice of words
    5
  2. You act like this isn't over their own fucking homes lmao. Ukraine will never surrender.
    5
  3. Because its a lie. The "breakthrough" was already stabalized.
    5
  4. Dude, Russia is a major military power and hasn’t even taken Ukraine. 90% of the land they occupy was taken with little to no resistance. Ukraine can and will win. The truth is that it’s impossible for Russia to win lmao
    5
  5. Learn how? To lie? Because he’s doing a pretty good job at making us think Avdiivka is about to fall lmao
    5
  6. They also abandoned the siege of Chernihiv!
    5
  7. Despite 90% of what this guy says is wrong.
    5
  8. Oh that would be soooo funny
    5
  9. This guy thinks this war is like a game. This is a war for survival. I guarantee almost none of those soldiers will surrender.
    5
  10.  @vojinzivanic3011  - Russia bombing civilians and making them lose water food and power does not mean Russia is winning lmao
    5
  11. He probably changed sides because he realized Russia might actually not win this war lmao
    5
  12.  @steviejohnson378  - BAKHMUT IS ABOUT TO FALL! never falls That's how this is gonna play out lmao
    5
  13.  @historylegends  - please just go back to history man. That’s why I subbed. Not this war.
    5
  14. NON BIASED? LMAO!
    5
  15. Copy Paste Russian Propaganda.
    5
  16. That's ironic given that Russian losses is far higher in Bakhmut lol
    5
  17. Kharkiv was a trap, Kherson was a trap. That’s what I heard from Vatniks. Its not a trap.
    5
  18.  @nadjiguemarful  - Dude it’s a jet. They have to hit their targets visually with an unguided bomb.
    5
  19. The attack was already stopped.
    5
  20.  @hectorzero8545  - Okay so why hasn’t Russia advanced anywhere but Bakhmut lol
    4
  21. You say that like its Ukraine’s fault for being invaded
    4
  22. Russia wanted war instead of negotiating not Ukraine. Russia is paying the price.
    4
  23. Ukraine is also worried about losses, unlike the Vietcong and Russia.
    4
  24. If you think Russia has a chance against NATO, you'd be wrong. The USA could solo Russia.
    4
  25. Okay this is how I KNOW you’re lying considering that there is absolutely zero information on how this offensive is going lol. Also this first video shows nothing considering there is a forest right behind them and a hill in front showing nothing else.
    4
  26. This guy doesn’t know how war works. He’s never seen it and is assuming that because he knows about WW2, he’s a strategic genius. Despite this war being more like World War 1. He is extremely wrong all the time.
    4
  27. Lmfao you actually are crazy
    4
  28. There’s pretty much nowhere else. Everywhere else either failed or nothing happened.
    4
  29. Seems like Ukraine is doing just fine ngl
    4
  30. History Legends for the love of God. 5 KM is a lot to you? They lost a good portion of this already AND the front there stabilized.
    4
  31.  @truecaliber1995  - Funnily enough Ukraine doesn’t actually have to push Russia out. They just have to outlast them. Ukraine has no reason to surrender. Russia has every reason to leave.
    4
  32. Awesome! More T-90s for the Ukrainians to steal! Also, 10 to 1 advantage in firepower? But Ukraine is still holding Bakhmut? Whaaaaat? Sounds more costly to Russia if it took them so long to even get soldiers in the goddamn city.
    4
  33. This is bait right?
    4
  34. The fact that he even talks so highly of the Russians is just proof that he was hoping to gain clout and look like a tactical genius. He thought Russia would win. He's only pro Russian because it gets him views. What a joke.
    4
  35.  @Wraith8s  - Not anymore. I meant at the beginning of the war.
    4
  36.  @RAIDENCHEEKS  - They are holding the line and retook Kherson. They are clearly winning lmao.
    4
  37. Proof that this channel is pro Russian
    4
  38. Imperial? My brother in Christ the USA isn’t annexing foreign countries unlike Russia lol. Russia is the imperialist one.
    4
  39. Because its failing and hasn't moved like, at all.
    4
  40. The attack was already stopped. Also Russia has lost many attritional wars before. Wars are not based on attrition.
    4
  41.  @akkoismydaughter3573  - That's fair but what he "knows" is usually basic common sense information about warfare. He's no genius nor has he studied this extensively.
    4
  42.  @recordno  - Do you really trust HistoryLegends? Do you really?
    4
  43.  @historylegends  - Even still, it’d be cool to hear about battles from this war that have already concluded like the Antonov airport.
    4
  44.  @adamhajek127  - you guys had it tough. Not just during WW2, but after. Bless you guys.
    4
  45. Well, they are. Russians have lost countless soldiers and over a hundred vehicles already.
    4
  46.  @Kriegter  - Yeah they kinda shot themselves in the foot there huh
    4
  47.  @imme12  - Damn that's crazy because there is absolutely zero information from the offensive in Kherson out right now. That makes everything you typed false.
    4
  48.  @imme12  - ohhh okay you're a Russian bot got it. The Spetsnaz would get wiped by SWAT team members. I've learned this after seeing how Russian forces actually suck at fighting. Also Ukrainians took a village in Kherson today so saying they can't break the lines is pretty ignorant. I'm sure they can. You need to realize that Russia is not as strong as they originally said they were.
    4
  49. This is just not true at all lmao. What are you? A bot?
    3
  50. Aged poorly
    3