Comments by "DankEngine" (@dankengine5304) on "Ukrainian Marines SACRIFICED in Pointless Propaganda Stunt" video.

This channel just loves to make stuff up huh
2
@yellowtunes2756 - Except he’s not
1
@Ebro452 - Its not the truth. All of his videos are him sucking up to Russia and this is more proof is isn’t a valid source.
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 - You hold Kyiv? Kharkiv? Kherson? You hold those?
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 - No, but Russia lost them all. Yall are still hung up on Bakhmut. A small city turned to rubble.
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 - You realize the strategy of the new general of Ukraine is to trade land for men right? Its defense in depth. Its on purpose. Russia shouldn’t be moving so slow in the first place if they’re so strong. This whole war is a Russian failure.
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 - Absolutely not lmao. I’ve been hearing the Ukrainian front is “near collapse” for months. All this proves is Russia is throwing men at the problem, taking massive casualties, in exchange for a few kilometers of land. This is the Ukrainian strategy.
1
@efghggdxlmfn33 - The Russians didn’t leave because of concern for the dam. They left because of lack of supplies from Ukrainian bombs targeting the only bridges in the area. No, Ukraine did not take “atrocious losses”. They made significant advances north east of Kherson and then held their ground until Russia ran out of supply, slowly wearing them down. That was their plan and it worked. The NYT did not admit anything. They’re not a valid source anyways. The fact you’re being so specific is already proof you have no good information on the war. Information like this DOES NOT EXIST PUBLICLY. You definitely don’t have access to super secret information. I’m not saying Ukraine didn’t take losses, but they weren’t “atrocious”.
1
At the cost of tens of thousands of men, but seeing as we’re all pro-Russian here we’ll just forget about that.
1
@iggyrb263 - Good to know “one tank” is unimportant. How about 2? 3? You know. Like the western tanks.
1