Youtube comments of Jason Dashney (@jasondashney).
-
306
-
304
-
189
-
189
-
144
-
114
-
96
-
85
-
79
-
76
-
72
-
66
-
64
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
53
-
49
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
43
-
37
-
35
-
32
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
I'm Scandinavian but live in a Canadian city that is 80% Indian, 10%, Asian, and 10% everybody else. In my day-to-day life, I am extraordinarily outnumbered, and there are many shopping centers, where you will never ever see a white person, because they are very clearly not the target audience for the businesses. That means most of the businesses in my area are Indian, and most of the women are Indian, and most of the rental units are owned by Indians. Somehow I'm still the oppressor. I did a renovation in a high school here and they had charts on the wall showing privilege, and, of course white males were at the top. I absolutely promise you that my skin colour does not help me where I live in any capacity whatsoever.
19
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
I wish I could be as zen as you. As a fellow Canadian, I'm livid I had to get the jab in order to be employed. I guess where I'm at is I'm down to forgive anyone who comes to their senses and owns up to what they did. Until then, I hate them. I'm sorry. To me it's like running red lights all day long because "I just didn't know any better". It doesn't take combing through research papers to figure out that what you are seeing with your own eyes is insane. Literally day one I thought our response was nuts. 2 weeks to flatten the curve? I laughed my ass off at the time, because obviously in two weeks, we would be exactly in the same position and that wouldn't solve anything. I simply can't believe that the majority of humanity is so stupid that they can't see the unbelievably illogical and hypocritical things that were coming from every single authority. This has all actually helped me because I've always been a cynical person, but I held onto some semblance that the world was somewhat logical but now I understand the true depths of how corrupt the world is and I'm better off for it. And I mean, corrupt all the way down to the busy family member who doesn't have time to look into the news. This stuff was so blatantly obviously wrong that it didn't require anything but looking around you when you went to Walmart. I think humanity isn't ready for our brain power yet. We are still essentially idiotically, lizards. There's not a single quote, busy parent" out there who didn't see at least a few things that didn't add up. If that happens and you ignore it.(by the billions), and it hurts the world, then to hell with you. You're part of the problem. If there were more trucker protest, I would go to them too.
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I watched a CBC documentary that was painting this evil, grim picture, and laughing, because they had absolutely no footage to back it up. They were literally showing people smiling and being happy and bouncy castles, and all of that, while the narrator was talking about how it was a potential fire storm, and how it was so dangerous and needed to be curtailed. Weeks, and thousands of people, and not one single incident for the media to latch onto. If anything at all would've happened, that was doggy, they would've been all over it. There are not words to express what pathetic empty shells of human beings I think the Canadian media is. And every single person who cast a vote for Trudeau, is an empty vessel of a human being from here on out, because it's absolutely undeniable after what we've seen.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I like comment sections because if you read enough, you get different intelligent perspectives. A few people in the comments have talked about the percentages, and whether the effects of CO2 are logarithmic and blah blah blah. My main take away is that this is a complicated subject and nobody in that room had a really good grasp of it, ha ha. It's incredible to me that after decades of hearing about climate change, the absolute basics are known by so very few. On one hand, you have the alarmists who keep making dire predictions that don't even come close to coming true. Giant red flag. And on the other hand, you have people fighting those alarmists who also don't have a very good grasp of things.
Are plants die at 0.2, and we have gone to 0.4. But how much activity does it take to move that needle? You hear answers that are all over the map. The experts, don't agree on how much of an impact humans have. At all. Different experts, have estimates that vary from double to triple and more. That's not a consensus.
Even worse is you will see people citing some Scientific paper, yet someone else can do a deep dive into that paper, and expose how the sentiment given about that paper was the complete opposite of what it said in the paper. It's so unbelievably hard to find out about this stuff. I hear incredibly compelling evidence on both sides and it's really frustrating.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2:20. I love ya Dave, but this is your most off-base video I've seen by far. Don't get me wrong, I hate Bill Gates with a passion. I think he's evil, but in this clip he's trying to decrease mortality rates. When you do that, people have less kids. When they know that both of their kids will probably live to be adults, they don't have 4 or 5 just in case. That's how it's been all over the world. He's correct in everything he says there. Dude, seriously, chill out. Bill is a lizard person, but in this particular clip he's advocating for the exact opposite of what you're saying. He's saying that these countries already have a hard time feeding the kids, so if people have less of them there's more food to go around and there are more resources to educate them etc. I never thought I'd be on the side of Bill Gates vs Dave Rubin but in this case I'm 100% will Bill because he is empirically correct.
Also, I've been a Mac guy for 25 years now but saying everyone left Windows is nuts. They have 75% of the market, Mac has about 15%.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gregg6398 It's basically impossible to avoid all the companies doing this shit. Coke, Walmart, Disney, B of A, Phizer, Lowe's, Nike, Patagonia, Adidas, Reebok, Pepsi/Frito-Lay, Facebook, PayPal, and let's not forget they very platform you are on. Google/YouTube are some of the worst offenders at all. Believe me I hate what these companies do but it's basically impossible to avoid all of them, and there are many, many more.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Then you're just not paying attention. There are plenty of patriots in politics, but these days they are mostly on the right, and the ones that are on the left get pilloried by their own side, like Tulsi Gabard. The people at the top who control everything are just uniparty. It doesn't matter who you vote for, the outcome is roughly the same, but there absolutely are people just one or two steps below that that keep bringing up these issues in congressional meetings and trying to tackle the serious stuff but they can't get past the barrier of the establishment. Go on the Forbes, breaking news, YouTube channel and you'll see politician after politician, making very salient points and trying to hold people to a couch, but nothing ever happens. They get scolded and then go about their lives and nothing happens to them. It's like how absolutely nobody was punished for the 2008 financial crisis. In fact, Obama hired those same people and now the problem is even worse, and Trump did nothing to stop it either. The people at the top are all garbage.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"controversial" podcast host? He's the #1 host on planet earth and he's only controversial to a minority of people (again, #1 most popular on planet earth). And you guys wonder why nobody trusts the media anymore. Joe has fuck-you money so he can afford to straight up tell Sanjay that the network lies about medical issues, and that it happens under Sanjay's watch.
Fuck me, the first 2 things you say are GARBAGE. He's not a skeptic of the vaccines. He said he didn't see a need to take it since he's already had covid, and has said before that he originally was scheduled to take it. He has never, ever told people who were worried about covid that they should not take the vaccine. What a fucking clown show this network is.
Holy shit, I'm watching this and now it's the second clip and Sanjay is so gross. He says "we're allowed to have a nuanced conversation about this" while absolutely ignoring Joe's nuanced point. Joe just said that kids fare really well when they come down with Covid. Sanjays says "you mean they don't die?". Fuck you. That is so disingenuous that it's disgusting. Technically what Joe is talking about does include the fact the kids don't die, but you know goddamn well that's not the crux of the point and you're trying to shift the focus because he has you stammering which means he has you dead to rights. Then the next guy says it's like trying to herd cats. You kidding me?!?! He could not have been sticking more to the point. I cannot express to you how little respect I have for anyone involved with CNN. There's zero objectivity here. You guys also happened to ignore the most famous part of this interview which is Joe ripping CNN for blatantly lying. I get your motivation, obviously, but it's still slimy. If I touched CNN I imagine it to smell bad and be sticky.
5:59 Joe was talking specifically about children and healthy younger people. Your data, is it age dependent? And you guys talking about mental gymnastics? C'mon.
The very last thing that pencil neck geek on the left says is that it doesn't matter if Joe is joking because the millions of people who watch him may not now. THIS hits the nail on the head of why I hate the mainstream narrative. It's so condescending. You guys act like everybody else is too fucking stupid to understand the things that you understand. Fuck each and every one of you.
My God is everything about this video dreadful. Also, to hell with the girl who says Joe is not a doctor. Joe has doctors that agree with him and those who don't, and she isn't a doctor either so that same argument goes both ways. I lost braincells watching this shit show. There's a reason I don't watch any MSM outlet. They are all gross.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1:51 I'm on board with a lot of Jordan's fights, but go fuck yourself on this one. You are saying that if they were left to their own devices that the industry would have improved itself dramatically on its environmental impacts? Show me the evidence. All around the world, almost all environmental improvements have come due to government regulation. That forces companies to innovate. I like small government and all that, but when it comes to the environment, capitalism has consistently shown it desperately needs environmental regulation. The innovations don't come out of nowhere. The odd time something new will come out that was borne of a better, more efficient way of doing something that is better environmentally, but on the whole it's because of regulation. I'm so sick and fucking tired of people spouting off about how they hate regulation when in fact they rely on it constantly. Free-market capitalist are the worst for this. They bitch about the government bitch about the government bitch about the government, but then assemble a giant team of lawyers to protect their intellectual property, their patents, to protect themselves from slander and libel, to use contracts to force outlets into exclusivity deals etc. I just hate the disingenuous nature underpinning the arguments about regulation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Rand Paul is trying to distract from his own failings? THAT'S why he's going after Fauci?! FFS come up with something better than that. So Rand Paul is thinking "Man, people are all mad at me. I better come up with something to deflect that anger. I know, I'll go after Fauci!"? Fuckssakes.
"A really good communicator"? The guy who lied about masks? The guy who has never emphasized how people need to keep up their immune systems to better, ya know, fight pathogens? That's your great communicator?
This guy is having a semantic argument about gain of function but he very carefully avoids addressing the core of the question. Is this because he wanted to but gosh darn he lacks Fauci's incredible communication skills? I'm not saying this guy is wrong or lying. I'm certainly not qualified to say that, but I wish that instead of this podcast he had gone on Darkhorse to argue with Brett. Heather would've probably jumped the table so she can't be there, haha. I just want to see someone ask this guy the tough questions in a way he can't wriggle out of. He's probably not evil, but he's probably not a saint either.
Okay, officially fuck this guy and I'm only 23 minutes in. He says there are no credible attacks you can lay on Fauci. How about the mask statement? I don't care how justified it was in their minds, he still lied about it and he is still supposed to be the top official so of course it's OK to attack him based on that. And he kept insisting in the early days that it was theoretically technically possible for this to be a lab leak but that thinking that it was our insisting that it was probably a lab leak made you some sort of conspiracy nut even though, as this guy admits, three times there have been leaks of coronaviruses. I don't trust anyone who puts anyone else on such a pedestal. Even if Fauci has been unfairly vilified for certain things, he absolutely has also fairly warranted criticism for others. At 25:12 he says Fauci has told the truth at every moment, then a couple minutes later admit Fauci said you don't wear masks partly cuz the hospitals needed them. I can't think of a better example of talking out of both sides of your mouth at the same time. And Fauci literally chuckled when saying it, as if the suggestion was ridiculous. That was the part that struck me at the time. That he was so dismissive of the concept as to openly mock it. I'm really, really hoping for a sign of hope in this podcast. A sign that I need to put the pitchfork away and admit the complexity of the issue and maybe find some middle ground. I have not found that. All I've found is a guy who seems like he's so steeped in the politics that it's become one with his life and he doesn't even see it anymore. I believe that he believes what he's saying. I don't think he's malevolent or purposefully misleading. I just think he's so far down the rabbit hole that he can't see the forest for the trees.
WTF?! Just as I'm starting to empathize with this guy a little bit when he's talking about trying to get his message out to the vaccine hesitant, he says that there have been dozens of vaccines. Come on man, you know damn well that the issue is the fact that most of the vaccines were created with a brand new technology, and that the ones that weren't, were created at a much faster time scale than anything else in history and that includes longer term studies of their safety and efficacy. Dude you almost had me, but every time I start to move a bit towards your side you say something that drops my jaw. There's no way you can fundamentally misunderstand people's basic, obvious hesitancy like that. You are certainly not a stupid man, so what gives?
Around the 34 minute mark he makes this overtly political. He talks about "misinformation" and is most certainly only calling out media that doesn't support his agenda, cuz CNN etc have also done their fair share of garbage reporting to instil fear, and then he equates this to the 2020 election's legitimacy, especially after 2016 had the exact same problem according to Hillary herself (but we won't mention that, I guess).
The next thing Lex says is about humility and he's absolutely bang on.
OMG, then this guy says Joe was anti-vaccine. He is NOT. He thinks everyone who is vulnerable should absolutely take it, but that he himself is healthy and doesn't need it. He was proven correct with regards to himself. Even this guy is unfairly painting Joe. So fuck this guy. I've made my decision just under 1/2 way in because he's said soooo many questionable things already, starting right at the beginning. Holy fuck. Right after that he goes off about how Ivermectin is not known about yet as far as efficacy and that the information thus far supporting it doesn't come from science. What? Paging Dr Pierre Kory and many others. This guy absolutely lacks any form of humility. It's cool for him to say they are still working on the data, but he makes it seem like anything that goes against the popular narrative can't possibly come from science, even though many people who've been skeptical of things or have stumped for Ivermectin could not be more highly credentialed. Maybe Ivermectin turns out to be a dud, but to dismiss the push as unscientific is infuriating. He won't give the other side and inch. In any way.
"The vaccine doesn't care how healthy you are"? Please find better wording because that's just nonsense. FFS the data says otherwise. Outlier cases have healthy people getting fucked up but look at the hospitalizations and deaths and tell me you can't draw conclusions as to who those people are. Then he tries to bolster his claim using anecdotal evidence, the type he purportedly abhors. The longer I listen the less I like this man and that sucks so much. I was really hoping to sympathize with the position he's in but I find my sympathies few and far between. I'll stop ranting now because I'm barely halfway through and look what I've already written.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
5:40
Why are corporations afraid of the mob? I mean that in all seriousness. Name me ONE company that produces hard goods that got killed due to wokeness. One. I'll wait.
It doesn't happen. Chic-Fil-A did just fine after taking a stance on gay marriage or whatever the hell it was. This is the biggest case of "the only thing to fear is fear itself" ever. Netflix told it's employees it prefers Dave Chapelle to Wokesters. Netflix ain't going anywhere. These companies are cowards. A company that relies on ad revenue may, MAY have a slight bit of legitimate worry, but I don't think even then. Certain entertainers or media outlets might lose a little bit at first, but not in the end. Ben Shapiro has ungodly sums of money. He finds advertisers. These leftists have these monster, corporations, convinced that if they get cranky, then every company will abandon. No, they won't. Those companies are pathetic cowards. Again, name me one single hard goods company, or any company for that matter, even media, that went tits up because it said something very middle of the road and reasonable and something the left would have agreed with six years ago.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
5:07 "excuse me, it's now my turn to speak". Buddy, she was dead quiet the whle time you were talking then as soon as she started talking you interrupted her constantly so you didn't earn the right to say it's your turn to speak in the most arrogant tone imaginable. IDGAF who's right or wrong, you're being a douche.
Then this woman refused to address his point. He says life expectancy has gone up and she retorts with "(they are) behind hundreds of years". That's got zero to do with the argument, and it's also silly because their culture wasn't advancing, in the western sense. In hundreds of years they still would've had early mortality, end of story.
FFS, this has devolved into Fox or MSNBC nonsense. Children, all of them. Petulant children who refuse to address what the other is saying, and they are constantly talking over each other. Both of these people are clowns. The guy actually annoys me more because he's so condescending. She has a different opinion and she's an annoying firebrand SJW, but his demeanour bugs me more.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"legally protest"? I hate him with the fire of 10000 suns. He revoked the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to MAKE it illegal. I can't believe Canadians voted for this garbage stain 3 times. I no longer care about my country. If it breaks up, so be it. I have a hard time respecting anybody who voted for this guy. How he can talk about free speech and misinformation, then mention the truckers is breathtaking. He literally pays off the media to be nice to him. He's as close to a dictator as you can get in a democracy. He controls the media which is how most people get their news. He's got his foot on the scale, that's for sure. I wish Canada had term limits. And now he's in bed with Jagmeet Singh and the NDP and they are the only two Canadian politicians who I wouldn't care if they got hit by a truck. I normally would feel sadness if anybody had that happen no matter how much I hated them, but not those two. I feel they are truly evil, evil people and I do not say that lightly. I'm very tolerant with almost all views. I like a lot of people who are very different from me politically, but those two are absolute scumbags. If you listen to him and like what he says, you can go to hell. He's the first person I can think of who I'd lose friends over, just for their opinion.
I hope he gets his way, then another party gets in power and silences him and demonizes him into the ground. Now let me be clear: I don't actually want anyone to do any of that stuff, but if it happened to him I would find it beautiful and poetic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ishanloomba788 "Are mothers not as capable as fathers at raising kids or something? What is the causal relationship between the two?"
The biggest factor is simple economics. If mom is able to stay home, there is always a guiding, nurturing figure around. Next best is two parents working and providing for all the necessities, and in both cases the child gets a balanced understanding of masculinity and femininity etc.
But when you get to a single working mom who doesn't have the resources nor time to give the kids their best possible environment, plus the missing hole of the masculine side of life, it's so tough. And to go through all that and try to be a positive, happy, caring mom would be unbelievably hard. Kids need security and balance, and it's hard to raise a family on a single income these days. Did you grow up in a household where money was tight, or non existent? I did and it NOT a good environment.
Simply put: two parents can provide more resources of time/money/diversity/balance in the household and all 3 of those things are a positive. And it's not a conservative talking point. It's something that's extremely clear when looking at the data. Two parent household provide better outcomes (of course there are plenty of outliers, but they're just that. Outliers).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The comments are below is correct. If you took away the metropolitan Toronto area votes Trudeau got, he wouldn't have come within a country mile of getting elected. And even then, our voter turnout isn't the best so literally only one in five adults you see walking down the street actually voted for him. He keeps getting reelected even though he has lost the popular vote. Notice how in America they lose it that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote and lost the election, but you don't hear a peep about how the same thing happened in Canada and nobody on the right was crying foul about it. They just accepted that that's our rules and it is what it is.
I live in Vancouver which is pretty far left, and Victoria, which is our provincial capital, is insanely far left. I mean ridiculously. No blue collar area comes anywhere close to voting for him. He gets annihilated everywhere outside the white collar major urban centres. I truly believe that after how he treated the trucker convoy he would've gotten destroyed in an election, but I fear that people will have forgotten about that by the time the next election rolls around. You can call an election whenever you want in Canada so two years into his four year mandate they called a snap election in the middle of a pandemic and won. I think every single person that voted for him isn't absolute scumbag. If you didn't research him, then you shouldn't have voted, and if you did research him and still voted, then I think you are a terrible person. I never ever ever thought I'd say that about somebody just based on their vote, but this guy is literally an insane authoritarian. He suspended our charter of rights and freedoms to combat a peaceful protest that he literally refused to engage in any capacity. The government never once met with anyone. How does that happen in a democracy? Imagine an American president suspending the bill of rights because of unbelievably peaceful protesters? The truckers very deliberately went out of their way to not leave garbage, to clean the streets of ice, and to be good to the neighbourhood other than honking their horns. They want to protest vaccine mandates and the Prime Minister called them racist and misogynist. Even if that was 100% true, but still has nothing to do with their message. The fact Canadians went along with it discussed me and I do not care anymore if this country breaks up. I never thought I would say something like that. I've always been a proud Canadian. Not anymore.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Likewise, is it right to tax same money twice?". Hmmm. You mean because it just sits there and doesn't appreciate or do anything, but then gets taxed again? I see your point because it's not like it was invested in anything, but I guess I'd have to say that from the perspective of the dead person, they've already paid taxes on it so it's free and clear for them, but the recipient just gets a windfall, so for them it's a new windfall gain so it's technically "new" money to them so it's not really being paid twice on the same money. (and for reference, I think gov'ts suck balls and are money grubbing cocksuckers, haha)
Speaking of taxing the same money twice, I'm Canadian and here if you buy a brand new car you pay tax on the full value, then you sell it 2 yrs later and that person pays tax on the new depreciated value, and so on down the line. The gov't may get tax money 5 different times on something that's already had the tax paid on it, plus you pay extra fees when transferring ownership so it's for damn sure not meant to cover actual costs. Strictly a money grab. You don't pay taxes on a used air compressor, so why a car?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
4:40. "The chaos of the Trump years". Yeah, because people with TDS lost it at everything he said and did. 98% of all Trump complaints are about what a jerk face he is. IDGAF about anything but policy and people have very few complaints about his actual policies, and the economy certainly did well under him. I don't get where the boogeyman is. Things were objectively good under him, worse now, and people don't want to go back to the good times because they don't like him? I think it is exceedingly pathetic that people literally use elections as a popularity contest, as far as how they like the person, not how they like those person's policies when looked at objectively.
Edit: F'ing hell. The lady on the left came right out and confirmed my suspicion. "I'd put policy aside and choose democracy", ironically on the guy who peddled his influence to make money with his son, and whose party right now are trying to insist that the guy who literally told his followers to stay peaceful, and go home with trying to stage an insurrection, and they're trying to bar him from even running. Anybody who buys that is unfit to vote. If you cannot see the extreme irony and hypocrisy in that, then I don't know what to tell you. I'm not telling you to vote for Donald Trump, I'm just saying that you better look at both of their policies and decide who makes the most sense to you. Thinking this is a threat to democracy and then it will be saved by voting for the party trying legal shenanigans to bar the person who's gonna beat the pants off them in the election is just gross and dishonest..
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Right Minded - I disagree that "wealth is created through productive work". I don't care how productive people are, if they are chasing money that their own country has created out of thin air, then "getting" more money is just inflation. That's different from increased wealth. Each new dollar makes the existing ones worth less and less. A dozen eggs equals a loaf of bread. It does today, and it did 50 years ago. The food didn't become any more valuable, we just hand over more dollars to buy it now. I just don't see how going into debt increases wealth the same as bringing in foreign assets, debt free, does. Plus, the paying off of debts with increased amounts of dollars (each having decreased values) isn't a sound strategy, it's a borderline ponzi scheme.
Maybe we just aren't connecting on what "productive" means. To me it means creating something where nothing was before. A policeman isn't "productive", and they don't contribute to government coffers because their whole paycheque came from those coffers in the first place.
I'm not sure whether we disagree, or just aren't on the same page with the semantics. Text is so cumbersome.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
49:25 "that's not compassion". That's the exact same wording I use all the time. I work construction in Vancouver Canada, and right outside my job site. There are absolute cracked out zombies all day every day. I'm not talking functioning people that do drugs, I mean the ones that are bent right over and can't even stand up straight anymore because they're spinal fluid is gone, and they've got marks all over them, and they sleep with their face pressed into the ground with her leg up behind themselves in some position a cat should only be able to get into. These people are enabled by welfare and cheap rent. The government gives them enough money for a roof over their heads, and they give them free food and asked nothing of them. So you're horribly addicted to drugs, and you have money and zero responsibilities. What the f@#k do you think is going to happen? The policies make my blood boil, especially since those clowns think they're doing a good thing and being kind and tolerant. They are not. They are helping it get way, way, way worse as time goes on. We call them zombies because they don't even seem human anymore they're so far gone. There's so far gone you often don't have any sympathy for them at all. It's like they are stray animals or something. Whatever it is, that makes you human, many of them lost it sometime ago. It's awful. I hate the government so very much.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1