Comments by "" (@michaelhill8441) on "Mark Levin: Supreme Court leak is a 'grave assault'" video.

Each one lied about this topic in their confirmation hearing.
7
I am not a fan of conservative justices pushing their religious beliefs on me.
4
@pefo1674 their god
2
There are always pardons like trump did.
2
I hear you. You fought for people's rights. Not for them to be stripped away.
2
Republicans are toast in the midterms
2
@fearthekrazy1896 ya, a draft that has a majority consensus on overturning it. We should ever have e a court that's leaning that way
1
@Capitalismrules you didn't answer my question. In my scenario she would have broken no state law. Unless you want one state to be able to impose their laws on others? That's a slippery slope.
1
@commonsense6967 unless it's unconstitutional. This has been reaffirmed by 18 different justices in the past. Now we have ones that are imposing THEIR religious beliefs upon a woman's right for self governance. The analogy goes, if a woman is forced to have the kid how about the man can be forced to get castrated?
1
@Capitalismrules like I asked the other poster, would it not be fair to impose castration on the man in that man too as obviously he was irresponsible as well?
1
@Capitalismrules they were part of having the kid aswell. A woman is now being forced to have an unwanted child. To prevent this from happening again castration is not a stretch once people don't have self governance of their own body. Hell it's not even that ludicrous of a proposition. That would be better than them having two more just like it right?
1
@Capitalismrules because it is a woman's has a constitutional right to governance of her own body.
1
@Capitalismrules ya but if someone from a restricted state goes out of state and comes back, then what?
1
@Capitalismrules absolutely there are repercussions to having unwanted children. Our system is full of them. Each of them more thank likely headed for a crappy life that might include jail. This would force that upon thousand if not millions of women. How is it right to force a woman to risk her life for a pregnancy she doesn't want or can afford.
1
@adeledorman6447 please don't co flame a woman's right to self governance to your fictional right to ignore health regulations. The vaccine isn't a person growing in you and is obviously very safe.
1
@fearthekrazy1896 it is what's happening. When we have states going rougue on constitutional rights it's dangerous. First with DeSantis punishing Disney for having an opinion to this.
1
@DirtySerb etc they also know what perjury is too.
1
@beavis408 go back to school and learn how to think for yourself.
1
@danaustin8109 Jesus man, go back to civics class. That was the declaration of independence. Our constitution does however have the 14th ammendment. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides a fundamental "right to privacy" that protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose whether to have an abortion. This right is not absolute, and must be balanced against the government's interests in protecting women's health and protecting prenatal life.
1
@donalddouds6033 sorry, we might as well be separate nations then. If that's what you want, good luck cause you will be broke quick
1
The decision is a grave assault.
1
@tocomment2209 first, they all lied about their stance on roe vs wade if it's overturned. Second, if you're from a red county, you don't pay any taxes because you're broke. So federal dollars are primarily from blue counties.
1
@pefo1674 I guess not
1
@armandoreyes2750 pfft I hope it was a justice and they give you the finger and walk.
1
@edemontfort9482 man are you guys brainwashed. You thrive on the anger fox provides you every day. It's fricking gross
1