Comments by "" (@ayoolukoga9829) on "Protesters burn down buildings in lockdown protest in Solomon Islands" video.

The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light. Romans 13:12
56
@Simon-df2ku But we all Can't Quote Truth: Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. John 16:13
4
@Simon-df2ku Historical Evidence for the Son of God Jesus Christ and his Ressurection: Flavius Josephus 1st Century Historian - Testified of Jesus Christs Existance and Ressurection Tacitus, Roman Historian wrote between 115 - 117ad - Testified of Jesus Christ's Existence. Jewish Biblical Literature, Tanakh Period 70-200ad Sanhedrin 43a - Testified Jesus Christ Existed and Death. Archaeological Evidence: Dr Nelson Glueck, Archaeologist - It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which comfirm and clearly outline, or in exact detail historical statements in the Bible, and by the same token, proper evaluation of biblical descriptions has often lead to amazing discoveries. (continued)
4
@Simon-df2ku Manuscriptual Evidence: The Bible is Comprised, Supported and Consistent with the Majority of Manuscripts Dating as far back from 1st Century. Manuscripts including: Syria Peshitta - 2 Century Vetus Latin - 2nd - 3rd Centuries Vetus Syra - 2nd - 4th Centuries Magdalene Papyrus - 1st - 2nd Centuries Church Fathers - 1st - 5th Centuries Papyri (Most Ancient) Not to Mention the Bible Is Evidence as the Prior Evidences Mentioned above add Credence to the Bible. In Other Words, Evidence.
3
@Simon-df2ku Manuscriptual Evidence: The Bible is Comprised, Supported and Consistent with the Majority of Manuscripts Dating as far back from 1st Century. Manuscripts including: Syria Peshitta - 2 Century Vetus Latin - 2nd - 3rd Centuries Vetus Syra - 2nd - 4th Centuries Magdalene Papyrus - 1st - 2nd Centuries Church Fathers - 1st - 5th Centuries Papyri (Most Ancient) As Evidence for the Bible. The Most you can do is say that the Said Historians were not alive at the Time which is nothing more that a False Premises to a Fallacious Point. 'the truth, if you are going to be honest, is that you have no way of providing any actual evidence especially as we have no way to test the supernatural' This is Besides the Point I have Evidence for Christianity , You Provide No Evidence against Christianity 'which only leaves you with faith' This is about the Only true thing you have Said within this Conversation.
2
@Simon-df2ku ARCHEOLOGY The fulfillment of these things is not only attested in the eyewitness account of Josephus, but is also perfectly confirmed in the archaeological record. Kathleen Kenyon, a leading archaeologist, in whose honor the British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem was later renamed the Kenyon Institute, wrote the following: (Kathleen M. Kenyon, Jerusalem: Excavating 3000 Years of History (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), p. 185ff.) (Continued)
2
@Simon-df2ku Millar Burrows, Professor Archaeology, Yale University - On the whole however archaeological work has unquestionably strengthened confidence in the reliability of the scriptural record. More than one Archaeologist has found his respect for the Bible, increased by the experience of excavation in Palestine. Archaeology has in many cases refuted the views of modern critics, it has shown in a number of instances, that these views rest on false assumptions and unreal artificial schemes of historical development, this is a real contribution and not to be minimised. William Ramsay, Aclaimed Archaeologist - Luke (Author of Book of Luke) is an historian of the first rank, not merely are his statements of facts trustworthy he is possessed of the true historic sence. In short this author should be placed along with the very greatest of historians. (continued)
2
@Simon-df2ku Manuscriptual Evidence: The Bible is Comprised, Supported and Consistent with the Majority of Manuscripts Dating as far back from 1st Century. Manuscripts including: Syria Peshitta - 2 Century Vetus Latin - 2nd - 3rd Centuries Vetus Syra - 2nd - 4th Centuries Magdalene Papyrus - 1st - 2nd Centuries Church Fathers - 1st - 5th Centuries Papyri (Most Ancient) Not to Mention the Bible Is Evidence as the Prior Evidences Mentioned above add Credence to the Bible. 'archeology has never proven the existence of a god or that jesus was divine, if it had then someone would have been given a nobel prize. im fine with the idea jesus may have been a person but that doesnt make him a god' Red Herring. Archaeology Evidence Provides More Evidence towards the Bible that it is a true Book than it is not true. The Burden of Proof would be on you to Prove that Jesus was not the God who he Claimed to be. 'you do realise that any book that contains stories is going to have some factual accounts? Read some Charles Dickens and you can learn all about how people used to live, but at the end if the day its all fiction' Charles Dickens never Claimed to be a Book on Truth. 'lets say that jesus existed as a person, now demonstrate he was a god' For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for? But if we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it. Romans 8:24-25 'we have lots of testimony and 'eye witness accounts' of visiting aliens, i assume as that seems to be your bar on evidence that you believe in alien abduction too?' I'm Not against the Belief in Aliens: And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose. Genesis 6:1-2 And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay. Daniel 2:43 'lastly, if you are going to use archeology as 'evidence' then how do you reconcile the fact that archeology claims the earth is billions of years old, and not just 6,000, or are you just choosing to ignore that bit?' The Bible Never Claims the Earth is 6,000 Years Old. Place your faith in Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins and you will not Perish Have a Good Day
2
@Simon-df2ku Millar Burrows, Professor Archaeology, Yale University - On the whole however archaeological work has unquestionably strengthened confidence in the reliability of the scriptural record. More than one Archaeologist has found his respect for the Bible, increased by the experience of excavation in Palestine. Archaeology has in many cases refuted the views of modern critics, it has shown in a number of instances, that these views rest on false assumptions and unreal artificial schemes of historical development, this is a real contribution and not to be minimised. William Ramsay, Aclaimed Archaeologist - Luke (Author of Book of Luke) is an historian of the first rank, not merely are his statements of facts trustworthy he is possessed of the true historic sence. In short this author should be placed along with the very greatest of historians. (continued)
2
@Simon-df2ku Manuscriptual Evidence: The Bible is Comprised, Supported and Consistent with the Majority of Manuscripts Dating as far back from 1st Century. Manuscripts including: Syria Peshitta - 2 Century Vetus Latin - 2nd - 3rd Centuries Vetus Syra - 2nd - 4th Centuries Magdalene Papyrus - 1st - 2nd Centuries Church Fathers - 1st - 5th Centuries Papyri (Most Ancient) Is Evidence that Christianity is true. 'otherwise Genesh is real, and so is Thor, Just Based on you Previous Fallacy, This Point is Void. 'there is evidence that Muslims exist so is Islam real also?' They may have Evidence that Muslims exist, But they have No Evidence that God Exists. 'how many gods are there then?' 1 And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord. Matthew 12:29 'i never refuted Christianity, only its beliefs' You Refute its Beliefs therefore you Refute Christianity. Are you Deliberately Playing Dumb? 'you want me to refute 'historical evidence for the son of god jesus christ and his resurrection' ,well you are just making claims that he is the son of god and was resurrected...first you have to prove that he was the son of god...which you havent' I Have: Historical Evidence for the Son of God Jesus Christ and his Ressurection: Flavius Josephus 1st Century Historian - Testified of Jesus Christs Existance and Ressurection Tacitus, Roman Historian wrote between 115 - 117ad - Testified of Jesus Christ's Existence. Jewish Biblical Literature, Tanakh Period 70-200ad Sanhedrin 43a - Testified Jesus Christ Existed and Death. 'nor have you provided any evidence that there is even a god to have a son' Yes I have: Historical Evidence for the Son of God Jesus Christ and his Ressurection: Flavius Josephus 1st Century Historian - Testified of Jesus Christs Existance and Ressurection Tacitus, Roman Historian wrote between 115 - 117ad - Testified of Jesus Christ's Existence. Jewish Biblical Literature, Tanakh Period 70-200ad Sanhedrin 43a - Testified Jesus Christ Existed and Death. 'nor have you provided any evidence that resurrection is even possible' This is a Strawman Argument, I have Provided Evidence that there has already been a Resurrection And the Bible Says there is Going to be another Resurrection: Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live. John 11:25 And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day. John 6:40 'you keep quoting the bible which means nothing as the bible isnt evidence that the bible is true You Keep attacking this Strawman as if I Said the Bible is Evidence that it is True, And this Statement just Shows your Hypocrisy as Even you have Said the Bible to be True. 'why is this so hard for you to understand?' Nothing is Hard for me to Understand apart from your Inability to see that: Historical Evidence for the Son of God Jesus Christ and his Ressurection: Flavius Josephus 1st Century Historian - Testified of Jesus Christs Existance and Ressurection Tacitus, Roman Historian wrote between 115 - 117ad - Testified of Jesus Christ's Existence. Jewish Biblical Literature, Tanakh Period 70-200ad Sanhedrin 43a - Testified Jesus Christ Existed and Death. Archaeological Evidence: Dr Nelson Glueck, Archaeologist - It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which comfirm and clearly outline, or in exact detail historical statements in the Bible, and by the same token, proper evaluation of biblical descriptions has often lead to amazing discoveries. (continued)
2
@thomasrobert4654 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you. Matthew 5:44
2
@Simon-df2ku 'i dont doubt some things in the bible are not true' It not whether you doubt or not Whether the things of the Bible are true or Not, It is whether you have Evidence that the things of the Bible are Not true. 'but where is the evidence of a god' I Just Gave it to You 'where is the evidence that jesus was divine in any way?' I Just Gave it to You 'Flavius testimony does not constitute evidence, neither does Tacticus, neither were there Strawman Argument Just because they were not there does not make it not true, Josephus and Tacitus were both Historians that Testified to Jesus Existence and Resurrection that Provides Evidence for the Bible, You were not there at the Time of Abraham Lincoln but you know that he was a President of the United States So your Point is a False Premises. 'and really you dont think jewish biblical literature has an agenda?' Red Herring. This is Besides the Point Jewish Biblical Literature Provides Evidence for Christianity It is not about whether Jewish biblical literature had an agenda of not, It is whether you have Proof that what the Jewish Biblical Literature Said was the Truth or Not. 'furthermore there is no evidence to suggest that resurrection is even a thing' Flavius Josephus 1st Century Historian - Testified of Jesus Christs Existance and Ressurection Tacitus, Roman Historian wrote between 115 - 117ad - Testified of Jesus Christ's Existence. Jewish Biblical Literature, Tanakh Period 70-200ad Sanhedrin 43a - Testified Jesus Christ Existed and Death. 'we have no confirmed accounts only 2nd/3rd hand stories from people who claim these things happened but have never provided any proof' This is More Proof than you have that it did not Occur. 'if you are going to quote books and peoples opinion i can quote just as many from various scientific sources that state there is no evidence at all, Strawman Argument This is Besides the Point You Provide no evidence that the Son of God Jesus Christ Never Existed. You Provide No Evidence that Flavious and Tacitus were Wrong You have No Proof that Jewish Literature was Wrong. 'so that gets us nowhere' No, That Gets you Nowhere. 'so....what actual evidence do you have?' Historical Evidence for the Son of God Jesus Christ and his Ressurection: Flavius Josephus 1st Century Historian - Testified of Jesus Christs Existance and Ressurection Tacitus, Roman Historian wrote between 115 - 117ad - Testified of Jesus Christ's Existence. Jewish Biblical Literature, Tanakh Period 70-200ad Sanhedrin 43a - Testified Jesus Christ Existed and Death. Archaeological Evidence: Dr Nelson Glueck, Archaeologist - It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which comfirm and clearly outline, or in exact detail historical statements in the Bible, and by the same token, proper evaluation of biblical descriptions has often lead to amazing discoveries. (continued)
1
@Simon-df2ku ARCHEOLOGY The fulfillment of these things is not only attested in the eyewitness account of Josephus, but is also perfectly confirmed in the archaeological record. Kathleen Kenyon, a leading archaeologist, in whose honor the British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem was later renamed the Kenyon Institute, wrote the following: (Kathleen M. Kenyon, Jerusalem: Excavating 3000 Years of History (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), p. 185ff.) (Continued)
1
@Simon-df2ku 'sorry but you dont seem to understand what evidence is, you have not provided anything that demonstrates the existence of a god' Strawman Argument I have Provided Evidence for Christianity Evidence you are Unable to Refute. 'all you have provided is opinion' 'sorry but you dont seem to understand what an Opinion is' Flavius Josephus 1st Century Historian - Testified of Jesus Christs Existance and Ressurection Tacitus, Roman Historian wrote between 115 - 117ad - Testified of Jesus Christ's Existence. Jewish Biblical Literature, Tanakh Period 70-200ad Sanhedrin 43a - Testified Jesus Christ Existed and Death. Is not an Opinion It is a Fact you are Yet unable to Contest. 'the bible doesnt prove the bible' Strawman Argument. 'and any book can say anything without it being true' Another Strawman Argument The Bible Claims to be True The Bible is True And you Provide No Evidence to Suggest Otherwise. 'there a lots of things in the bible that will be true, place names, locations, historical figures Pharaoh's for example, but that doesnt get us any closer to anyone being a god More Evidence than you have for the Existence of God than not the Existence of God. 'archeology will for sure prove some of the places existed, i am not contesting that. the spider-man book talks about New York, so by your evidential standards spider-man must therefore also exist' sorry but you dont seem to understand what a standard is. The Bible Claims to be True Spiderman does not Claim to be True. 'archaeology also points to the earth being billions of years old and not created by a god 6,000 years ago.....how do you reconcile that?' Unless if I have Dementia, If I'm not Mistaken you have just asked this Question and I answered it The Bible Never Claims the Earth is 6,000 Years Old. 'and really....you are going to quote religious text as evidence that religious beliefs are true and tell me that to contest that is a 'red herring'.....seriously?' No I'm asking you to Contest: Historical Evidence for the Son of God Jesus Christ and his Ressurection: Flavius Josephus 1st Century Historian - Testified of Jesus Christs Existance and Ressurection Tacitus, Roman Historian wrote between 115 - 117ad - Testified of Jesus Christ's Existence. Jewish Biblical Literature, Tanakh Period 70-200ad Sanhedrin 43a - Testified Jesus Christ Existed and Death. Archaeological Evidence: Dr Nelson Glueck, Archaeologist - It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which comfirm and clearly outline, or in exact detail historical statements in the Bible, and by the same token, proper evaluation of biblical descriptions has often lead to amazing discoveries. (continued)
1
@Simon-df2ku Millar Burrows, Professor Archaeology, Yale University - On the whole however archaeological work has unquestionably strengthened confidence in the reliability of the scriptural record. More than one Archaeologist has found his respect for the Bible, increased by the experience of excavation in Palestine. Archaeology has in many cases refuted the views of modern critics, it has shown in a number of instances, that these views rest on false assumptions and unreal artificial schemes of historical development, this is a real contribution and not to be minimised. William Ramsay, Aclaimed Archaeologist - Luke (Author of Book of Luke) is an historian of the first rank, not merely are his statements of facts trustworthy he is possessed of the true historic sence. In short this author should be placed along with the very greatest of historians. (continued)
1
@Simon-df2ku ARCHEOLOGY The fulfillment of these things is not only attested in the eyewitness account of Josephus, but is also perfectly confirmed in the archaeological record. Kathleen Kenyon, a leading archaeologist, in whose honor the British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem was later renamed the Kenyon Institute, wrote the following: (Kathleen M. Kenyon, Jerusalem: Excavating 3000 Years of History (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), p. 185ff.) (Continued)
1
@Simon-df2ku 'oh and for the record i dont have a burden of proof to prove jesus wasnt a god as he claimed, it is in fact the exact opposite, im not the one making a claim, im just refuting in based on a lack of evidence' 'Flavius testimony does not constitute evidence, neither does Tacticus, neither were there' 'furthermore there is no evidence to suggest that resurrection is even a thing...we have no confirmed accounts only 2nd/3rd hand stories from people who claim these things happened but have never provided any proof' 'sorry but you dont seem to understand what evidence is' 'all you have provided is opinion' 'if you are going to be honest, is that you have no way of providing any actual evidence' These are all Claims you have Made Providing No Evidence For, But for the Sake of Conversation, Let us just say that I am Being a Little Nit Picky. If you make the Claim that Jesus is Not God, Then you will have to Prove this The Burden of Proof would be on you to Prove this. The Bible Claims that Jesus is God, And there is Evidence towards this. 'the bible doesnt explicitly say the earth is 6000 years old, but if you do the maths that is the answer you will get to' I could say that you Provide No Evidence of this, But you are Wrong You see, Before there was a Void and a Darkness upon the Sea: In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and VOID; AND DARKNESS was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. Genesis 1:1-2 There was an actual Heaven and Earth As in: For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited. Isaiah 45:18 When God created the Heavens and the Earth, he didn't Create it as a Void in darkness, He Created it to be Inhabited And it was Inhabited: Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof; When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy? Job 38:4-7 The Morning Stars and the Sons of God Inhabited the Heavens and the Earth. Also Satan Existed before the Current Heavens and Earth (before 6000 years ago) Satan: Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord God; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty. Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created. Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee. Ezekiel 28:12-15 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. Isaiah 14:12-15 So how long the Morning Stars and Sons of God Existed before the Current Heavens and Earth could very well be Millions of Years, So either you are just Unwittling Ignorant Or you are Just a Liar. 'its on just about every bible study website so im surprised you dont think that is a widely held christian belief' Evidence You have to be careful where you are getting your Doctrine from. 'I'm Not against the Belief in Aliens' - that really doesnt surprise me, but i asked about belief in alien abduction' Im not against it.
1
@Simon-df2ku 'OMG i am clearly wasting my time here, you have no idea what an argument or evidence is' Second time you have Said this, Second time you have provided No Evidence of this Statement. 'I have Provided Evidence for Christianity Evidence you are Unable to Refute.'; christianity isnt evidence that christianity is true' Strawman Argument, I never Said Christianity is Evidence that Christianity is True, I Said: Historical Evidence for the Son of God Jesus Christ and his Ressurection: Flavius Josephus 1st Century Historian - Testified of Jesus Christs Existance and Ressurection Tacitus, Roman Historian wrote between 115 - 117ad - Testified of Jesus Christ's Existence. Jewish Biblical Literature, Tanakh Period 70-200ad Sanhedrin 43a - Testified Jesus Christ Existed and Death. Archaeological Evidence: Dr Nelson Glueck, Archaeologist - It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which comfirm and clearly outline, or in exact detail historical statements in the Bible, and by the same token, proper evaluation of biblical descriptions has often lead to amazing discoveries. (continued)
1
@Simon-df2ku Millar Burrows, Professor Archaeology, Yale University - On the whole however archaeological work has unquestionably strengthened confidence in the reliability of the scriptural record. More than one Archaeologist has found his respect for the Bible, increased by the experience of excavation in Palestine. Archaeology has in many cases refuted the views of modern critics, it has shown in a number of instances, that these views rest on false assumptions and unreal artificial schemes of historical development, this is a real contribution and not to be minimised. William Ramsay, Aclaimed Archaeologist - Luke (Author of Book of Luke) is an historian of the first rank, not merely are his statements of facts trustworthy he is possessed of the true historic sence. In short this author should be placed along with the very greatest of historians. (continued)
1
@Simon-df2ku ARCHEOLOGY The fulfillment of these things is not only attested in the eyewitness account of Josephus, but is also perfectly confirmed in the archaeological record. Kathleen Kenyon, a leading archaeologist, in whose honor the British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem was later renamed the Kenyon Institute, wrote the following: (Kathleen M. Kenyon, Jerusalem: Excavating 3000 Years of History (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), p. 185ff.) (Continued)
1
@Simon-df2ku Millar Burrows, Professor Archaeology, Yale University - On the whole however archaeological work has unquestionably strengthened confidence in the reliability of the scriptural record. More than one Archaeologist has found his respect for the Bible, increased by the experience of excavation in Palestine. Archaeology has in many cases refuted the views of modern critics, it has shown in a number of instances, that these views rest on false assumptions and unreal artificial schemes of historical development, this is a real contribution and not to be minimised. William Ramsay, Aclaimed Archaeologist - Luke (Author of Book of Luke) is an historian of the first rank, not merely are his statements of facts trustworthy he is possessed of the true historic sence. In short this author should be placed along with the very greatest of historians. (continued)
1
@Simon-df2ku ARCHEOLOGY The fulfillment of these things is not only attested in the eyewitness account of Josephus, but is also perfectly confirmed in the archaeological record. Kathleen Kenyon, a leading archaeologist, in whose honor the British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem was later renamed the Kenyon Institute, wrote the following: (Kathleen M. Kenyon, Jerusalem: Excavating 3000 Years of History (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), p. 185ff.) (Continued)
1
@Simon-df2ku Millar Burrows, Professor Archaeology, Yale University - On the whole however archaeological work has unquestionably strengthened confidence in the reliability of the scriptural record. More than one Archaeologist has found his respect for the Bible, increased by the experience of excavation in Palestine. Archaeology has in many cases refuted the views of modern critics, it has shown in a number of instances, that these views rest on false assumptions and unreal artificial schemes of historical development, this is a real contribution and not to be minimised. William Ramsay, Aclaimed Archaeologist - Luke (Author of Book of Luke) is an historian of the first rank, not merely are his statements of facts trustworthy he is possessed of the true historic sence. In short this author should be placed along with the very greatest of historians. (continued)
1
@Simon-df2ku ARCHEOLOGY The fulfillment of these things is not only attested in the eyewitness account of Josephus, but is also perfectly confirmed in the archaeological record. Kathleen Kenyon, a leading archaeologist, in whose honor the British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem was later renamed the Kenyon Institute, wrote the following: (Kathleen M. Kenyon, Jerusalem: Excavating 3000 Years of History (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), p. 185ff.) (Continued)
1
@Simon-df2ku Manuscriptual Evidence: The Bible is Comprised, Supported and Consistent with the Majority of Manuscripts Dating as far back from 1st Century. Manuscripts including: Syria Peshitta - 2 Century Vetus Latin - 2nd - 3rd Centuries Vetus Syra - 2nd - 4th Centuries Magdalene Papyrus - 1st - 2nd Centuries Church Fathers - 1st - 5th Centuries Papyri (Most Ancient) 'and archeology falls clearly on the side of science' Strawman Argument. 'and evolution than that of creation' You Provide No Evidence of this Statement. 'and a testimony someone existed isnt proof that they were divine' Strawman Argument. A Testimony that Someone Resurrected from the Dead is Proof that they are Divine And Once Again, 'More Evidence than you have for the Existence of God than not the Existence of God' 'as far as i can see you are back to faith again' Unless if I have Dementia, If I'm not Mistaken did I not Say that this is about the Only true thing you have Said within this Conversation? 'please also look up what a straw man argument is because you keep saying it in completely the wrong context' You Provide No Evidence of this Statement Place your faith in Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins and you will not Perish Have a Good Day.
1
@thomasrobert4654 'listen mateif just one of you god wallah's could prove your fairytale gods existed then the whole world would fall to their knees and start genuflecting all over the bleedin' Not Really, Even if you Prove Gods Existence, Some People will Still want to Shake their Fists at God, Like You and this other Non Believer Fellow on this Thread. 'place but until them we must kill the traitors or they will kill us' God has already been Proven Place your faith in Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins and you will not Perish! And Please for the Love of God, Don't Kill Anyone: Thou shalt not kill. Exodus 20:13
1
@thomasrobert4654 You Prove My Point.
1