Comments by "" (@ayoolukoga9829) on "Whole street swallowed up by GIANT sink hole in Manchester" video.

And Moses said, Hereby ye shall know that the Lord hath sent me to do all these works; for I have not done them of mine own mind. If these men die the common death of all men, or if they be visited after the visitation of all men; then the Lord hath not sent me. But if the Lord make a new thing, and the earth open her mouth, and swallow them up, with all that appertain unto them, and they go down quick into the pit; then ye shall understand that these men have provoked the Lord. And it came to pass, as he had made an end of speaking all these words, that the ground clave asunder that was under them: And the earth opened her mouth, and swallowed them up, and their houses, and all the men that appertained unto Korah, and all their goods. They, and all that appertained to them, went down alive into the pit, and the earth closed upon them: and they perished from among the congregation. Numbers 16:28-33
9
@Simon-df2ku Evidences for Jesus the Son of God and the Bible: We have Historical Evidence that Jesus died and Ressurected: Flavius Josephus 1st Century Historian - Testified of Jesus Christs Existance and Ressurection Tacitus, Roman Historian wrote between 115 - 117ad - Testified of Jesus Christ's Existence. Jewish Biblical Literature, Tanakh Period 70-200ad Sanhedrin 43a - Testified Jesus Christ Existed and Death. Archaeological Evidence: Dr Nelson Glueck, Archaeologist - It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which comfirm and clearly outline, or in exact detail historical statements in the Bible, and by the same token, proper evaluation of biblical descriptions has often lead to amazing discoveries. (continued)
2
@Simon-df2ku Millar Burrows, Professor Archaeology, Yale University - On the whole however archaeological work has unquestionably strengthened confidence in the reliability of the scriptural record. More than one Archaeologist has found his respect for the Bible, increased by the experience of excavation in Palestine. Archaeology has in many cases refuted the views of modern critics, it has shown in a number of instances, that these views rest on false assumptions and unreal artificial schemes of historical development, this is a real contribution and not to be minimised. William Ramsay, Aclaimed Archaeologist - Luke (Author of Book of Luke) is an historian of the first rank, not merely are his statements of facts trustworthy he is possessed of the true historic sence. In short this author should be placed along with the very greatest of historians. (continued)
2
@Simon-df2ku ARCHEOLOGY The fulfillment of these things is not only attested in the eyewitness account of Josephus, but is also perfectly confirmed in the archaeological record. Kathleen Kenyon, a leading archaeologist, in whose honor the British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem was later renamed the Kenyon Institute, wrote the following:(Kathleen M. Kenyon, Jerusalem: Excavating 3000 Years of History (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), p. 185ff.) (Continued)
2
@Simon-df2ku Manuscriptual Evidence: The Bible is Comprised, Supported and Consistent with the Majority of Manuscripts Dating as far back from 1st Century. Manuscripts including: Syria Peshitta - 2 Century Vetus Latin - 2nd - 3rd Centuries Vetus Syra - 2nd - 4th Centuries Magdalene Papyrus - 1st - 2nd Centuries Church Fathers - 1st - 5th Centuries Papyri (Most Ancient) And is the Majority of all Manuscripts according to Leading Authorities: Nestle and Aland - Novum Testamentum Graece, 28th Edition, Pages 51, 55, 46 The Standard and Authority of all Manuscript Scholars. Quote: King James Bible is the 'MAJORITY of all manuscripts'. King James Bible - 'Reading supported by the MAJORITY of all manuscripts'. King James Bible is the 'MAJORITY'. Not to Mention the Bible Is Evidence as the Prior Evidences Mentioned above add Credence to the Bible.
2
@Simon-le8ne Evidences for Jesus the Son of God and the Bible: We have Historical Evidence that Jesus died and Ressurected: Flavius Josephus 1st Century Historian - Testified of Jesus Christs Existance and Ressurection Tacitus, Roman Historian wrote between 115 - 117ad - Testified of Jesus Christ's Existence. Jewish Biblical Literature, Tanakh Period 70-200ad Sanhedrin 43a - Testified Jesus Christ Existed and Death. Archaeological Evidence: Dr Nelson Glueck, Archaeologist - It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which comfirm and clearly outline, or in exact detail historical statements in the Bible, and by the same token, proper evaluation of biblical descriptions has often lead to amazing discoveries. (continued)
2
@Simon-le8ne Millar Burrows, Professor Archaeology, Yale University - On the whole however archaeological work has unquestionably strengthened confidence in the reliability of the scriptural record. More than one Archaeologist has found his respect for the Bible, increased by the experience of excavation in Palestine. Archaeology has in many cases refuted the views of modern critics, it has shown in a number of instances, that these views rest on false assumptions and unreal artificial schemes of historical development, this is a real contribution and not to be minimised. William Ramsay, Aclaimed Archaeologist - Luke (Author of Book of Luke) is an historian of the first rank, not merely are his statements of facts trustworthy he is possessed of the true historic sence. In short this author should be placed along with the very greatest of historians. (continued)
2
@Simon-le8ne ARCHEOLOGY The fulfillment of these things is not only attested in the eyewitness account of Josephus, but is also perfectly confirmed in the archaeological record. Kathleen Kenyon, a leading archaeologist, in whose honor the British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem was later renamed the Kenyon Institute, wrote the following:(Kathleen M. Kenyon, Jerusalem: Excavating 3000 Years of History (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), p. 185ff.) (Continued)
2
@Simon-le8ne Manuscriptual Evidence: The Bible is Comprised, Supported and Consistent with the Majority of Manuscripts Dating as far back from 1st Century. Manuscripts including: Syria Peshitta - 2 Century Vetus Latin - 2nd - 3rd Centuries Vetus Syra - 2nd - 4th Centuries Magdalene Papyrus - 1st - 2nd Centuries Church Fathers - 1st - 5th Centuries Papyri (Most Ancient) And is the Majority of all Manuscripts according to Leading Authorities: Nestle and Aland - Novum Testamentum Graece, 28th Edition, Pages 51, 55, 46 The Standard and Authority of all Manuscript Scholars. Quote: King James Bible is the 'MAJORITY of all manuscripts'. King James Bible - 'Reading supported by the MAJORITY of all manuscripts'. King James Bible is the 'MAJORITY'. Not to Mention the Bible Is Evidence as the Prior Evidences Mentioned above add Credence to the Bible.
2
@robertkustos2931 Evidences for Jesus the Son of God and the Bible: We have Historical Evidence that Jesus died and Ressurected: Flavius Josephus 1st Century Historian - Testified of Jesus Christs Existance and Ressurection Tacitus, Roman Historian wrote between 115 - 117ad - Testified of Jesus Christ's Existence. Jewish Biblical Literature, Tanakh Period 70-200ad Sanhedrin 43a - Testified Jesus Christ Existed and Death. Archaeological Evidence: Dr Nelson Glueck, Archaeologist - It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which comfirm and clearly outline, or in exact detail historical statements in the Bible, and by the same token, proper evaluation of biblical descriptions has often lead to amazing discoveries. (continued)
2
@robertkustos2931 Millar Burrows, Professor Archaeology, Yale University - On the whole however archaeological work has unquestionably strengthened confidence in the reliability of the scriptural record. More than one Archaeologist has found his respect for the Bible, increased by the experience of excavation in Palestine. Archaeology has in many cases refuted the views of modern critics, it has shown in a number of instances, that these views rest on false assumptions and unreal artificial schemes of historical development, this is a real contribution and not to be minimised. William Ramsay, Aclaimed Archaeologist - Luke (Author of Book of Luke) is an historian of the first rank, not merely are his statements of facts trustworthy he is possessed of the true historic sence. In short this author should be placed along with the very greatest of historians. (continued)
2
@robertkustos2931 ARCHEOLOGY The fulfillment of these things is not only attested in the eyewitness account of Josephus, but is also perfectly confirmed in the archaeological record. Kathleen Kenyon, a leading archaeologist, in whose honor the British School of Archaeology in Jerusalem was later renamed the Kenyon Institute, wrote the following:(Kathleen M. Kenyon, Jerusalem: Excavating 3000 Years of History (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967), p. 185ff.) (Continued)
2
@robertkustos2931 Manuscriptual Evidence: The Bible is Comprised, Supported and Consistent with the Majority of Manuscripts Dating as far back from 1st Century. Manuscripts including: Syria Peshitta - 2 Century Vetus Latin - 2nd - 3rd Centuries Vetus Syra - 2nd - 4th Centuries Magdalene Papyrus - 1st - 2nd Centuries Church Fathers - 1st - 5th Centuries Papyri (Most Ancient) And is the Majority of all Manuscripts according to Leading Authorities: Nestle and Aland - Novum Testamentum Graece, 28th Edition, Pages 51, 55, 46 The Standard and Authority of all Manuscript Scholars. Quote: King James Bible is the 'MAJORITY of all manuscripts'. King James Bible - 'Reading supported by the MAJORITY of all manuscripts'. King James Bible is the 'MAJORITY'. Not to Mention the Bible Is Evidence as the Prior Evidences Mentioned above add Credence to the Bible. None of what you say disproves Christianity, Carbon Dating, Age of the Earth, Millions of Year ect ect.
2
@Simon-df2ku 'so some people who never met Jesus or witnessed his death testified that it was all real up to 200 years later? I’m afraid your bar on evidence is really low' Your Bar is EVEN Lower. 'I fully accept the possibility that a person called Jesus existed' Then the Burden of Proof is on you to Prove that the Jesus of the Bible was not who he Said he was. Until then I have More Evidence that Proves that the Jesus that Existed Was God who he Claimed to be Historical, Archaeological, Manuscriptual etc, than you have that Jesus was Not God and that he Did not Claim to be!
1