Comments by "Steve Watson" (@stevewatson6839) on "How Hitler’s “Table Talks” broke history" video.

  1. “Nota bene that this is not to say that Zitelman’s statements were not reasonable in the light of the then available evidence, but the point is to underline just how much of what historians had considered to be facts about Hitler in reality have turned out to be cleverly devised Nazi propaganda” p23, Hitler Redux, pbk. ed., 2021, Routledge. This immediately follows Nilsson’s reference to Weber (2010) and Joachimsthaler (2000) at the bottom of the facing page. You are being disingenuous, Lewis; you do not have to wait for the book’s Conclusion; Nilsson makes himself clear immediately. You don’t take a mere five pages of three hundred and odd out of context and declare victory either. I could excerpt your rant from 14:27 on and forward it to Dick Carrier along with a couple of others of your very infrequent bloopers, looking to ensure your place on his list of reviled “amateur” “cranks” “who don’t know how to do history” to similar effect. That would be just as unfair to your hundreds of hours of content and 80 hour plus weeks on it’s research and creation as you are being here to Nilsson. I've sent a fuller note to your SubscribeStar. I find both Nilsson and Zitelman very useful, and very useful correctives to the recieved narrative. Much as you are.
    2