Comments by "" (@theylied1776) on "Dick’s Sporting Goods, Walmart get sued by 20-year-old" video.

  1. Judge, I disagree. He does not have a very good case based on age discrimination alone. The law allows corporations to have Aged based restrictions and discretion. You can't rent a car unless you're 21 and you can't drink alcohol unless you're 21.
    5
  2. joe lukasik There is No Right in this country to buy or purchase a gun from a specific Merchant. Neither Merchant represents a Monopoly or Duopoly in Oregon, there is no case here.
    3
  3. gxbmb This case is not about the Constitution, if it were, you would have a point. The filing is for age discrimination... not the Second Amendment.
    2
  4. gxbmb Federal law already prohibits anyone under 18 from purchasing a handgun. You must be 21. So again, a merchant can delay purchase until 21.
    2
  5. llewodcm20 Then that's going to be the Crux of the lawsuit because federal law says an individual under 21 cannot legally purchase a handgun. These Merchants are only applying that law to rifles. Have individuals under 21 been purchasing handguns in Oregon? Because if not this lawsuit is about to get a lot more interesting.
    2
  6. Bora Gamerz first of all last time I checked judges were perfect. This is why we have courts of appeal and the Supreme Court. Secondly, federal law states an 18 year old cannot purchase a handgun these Merchants are only applying that law to rifles. But if you disagree please cite the specific statute or law you're referring to. So, unless they can show where an 18 year old in Oregon has purchased a handgun in the past they have no case.
    2
  7. So you're claiming there is so such thing as States Rights? "State law does not trump federal law". I hate to burst your bubble but NO, the DEA cannot arrest people within the States of Colorado or California for marijuana possession because marijuana was made legal in those two states. The DEA can only arrest someone for possessing marijuana if they transport it over state lines. Just like the FBI can't arrest anyone for prostitution in certain parts of Nevada because it's legal under state law. At least make this interesting, you're making this way too easy for me!
    2
  8. Policy cannot overstep law? You're 100% wrong. Marijuana is legal in Colorado but certain Banks, Wells Fargo, Chase, and Bank of America, will not open any accounts to deposit revenue from any Colorado dispensaries even though State law says they can't refuse any legal dispensary. When did I make a comment about buying a car? Again, you can't rent a car until you are 21. They have no case.
    1
  9. I just feel sorry for you now. Again, you are making this way too easy for me. California only made marijuana legal statewide on January 1, 2018. Do you even check facts before you post a comment? So what does an article from 2009 about [medical marijuana] have to do with the California State law that went into effect Jan 1st? That would be nothing! The DEA can only arrest people for possession of marijuana if they are leaving the state. They have no authority to do so within the state of California or Colorado.
    1
  10. Which California law makes illegal immigration legal statewide? Because that's the only way you would have a point about ICE making arrests in California. This should be fun. I can't wait for this answer??
    1
  11. no name Your exact words: "state law does not Trump federal law and thus is why the DEA can still arrest people in that state". Come on, you can't even remember what you wrote? So I will ask you again, what California state law makes illegal immigration legal Statewide? Because that's the only way you have a point with your DEA claim. Cite the specific California legislation or state statute.
    1
  12. no name Let me dumb it down for you. If there is no state law, legislation, or statute allowing activity that is illegal under federal law then that State defaults the federal statutes. The DEA and ICE can still arrest individuals unimpeded, BUT, if there is a state law in place the DEA nor ICE can intervene if that law or statute does not violate the constitution.
    1
  13. no name For a second time, and I really can't dumb this down anymore than this. Your exact words: "state law does not Trump federal law and thus is why the DEA can still arrest people in that state". You made your argument based on [state law] not a city ordinance. But I understand since I destroyed your argument you want to move the goalposts.
    1
  14. no name I'll ask you for a third time, show me the California state law or statue that legalizes illegal immigration?
    1
  15. no name I think you might want to look up your appeals procedure here because you left out appeals court and your little chain of authority there. Do you even look anything up before you just spit out these asinine incorrect comments?
    1
  16. no name And no, it has not been done before with pot after a state has legalized marijuana statewide.
    1
  17. no name Again, your exact words: "state law does not Trump federal law and thus is why the DEA can still arrest people in that state". That comment is the basis of your argument about DEA and ICE, I destroyed your argument so now you want to move the goalposts. Why am I not surprised?
    1
  18. no name I have to keep reminding you of your own comment. Your exact words: "state law does not Trump federal law and thus is why the DEA can still arrest people in that state". I understand why you want to move the goalposts NOW... the comment you based your entire DEA/ICE argument on is severely flawed.
    1
  19. no name Looks like you did read my comment. I'll post it again. "I understand why you want to move the goalposts NOW... the comment you based your entire DEA/ICE argument on is severely flawed".
    1
  20. no name Now, let me remind you of your flawed argument. Your exact words: "state law does not Trump federal law and thus is why the DEA can still arrest people in that state".
    1
  21. Now show me where the DEA has arrested any licensed state regulated growers, dispensary owners since California legalized Majiuana January 1, 2018. Or in Colorado. There's a big difference between Medical Marijuana laws and a state law legalizing marijuana sold at a licensed dealer. So send me an article. Anyone can sell Marijuana illegally like anything else but if you are licensed by the state the DEA can't do jack shit. that would be a violation of States Rights. If that state law is not a violation of the Constitution.
    1
  22. You do realize prostitution is legal in parts Nevada, right? So why doesn't the FBI put an end to it? Answer: States Rights!
    1