Comments by "" (@titteryenot4524) on "Inside the violent world of London's luxury watch thieves | BBC News" video.

  1. This was a timely report by the BBC.👍
    36
  2. That’s akin to the ‘she was asking for it’ argument apropos rape. Surely, it’s the responsibility of the robber not to rob and not the wearer of a watch not to wear that watch. By your logic, anarchy lies, as you’re essentially suggesting it’s the victim’s fault.
    4
  3. They steal watches to sell the crime.
    4
  4.  @fredo1070  In many parts of the world, they do. Moreover, again you’re blaming the law-abiding citizen, not the criminal. You’ve got it the wrong way round.
    3
  5.  @fredo1070  Uh huh. You descend to political party points scoring and ignore the fact you’re victim blaming. Nice dodge, m8.👍
    3
  6.  @fredo1070  Not trolling anyone, m8. Just pointing out your pernicious, dangerous logic.
    3
  7.  @6Tabazan6  😉
    3
  8. Er, I think you’ll find Aled Jones is a singer who also works as a presenter. You sound like a rather bitter poor person.
    3
  9. It can all be summed up in that most pretentious, wanky, ‘look-at-me’ word that became fashionable a couple of decades ago: ‘designer’. The new one they use to fool us with stuff, well actually 2 new ones, are ‘bespoke’ and ‘boutique’. Oh, and ‘artisan’. Any time you see these words being used to flog you stuff, you know you’ll be paying over the odds.
    3
  10. Dunno. All I know is that if you steal a Rolex and get caught by the fuzz, you’ll be doing time.
    2
  11. Really? Do they offer fat transvestites to prisoners these days? Sign of the times.
    1
  12.  @sdfilmproductions4193  Lol. I think you’ll find Armani’s pretty ‘luxurious’ comparatively, mate! Certainly if we’re talking clothes. Yeah, they might flog watches as well but that’s on the back of what they are mainly known for. 🤣👍 I think you’re splitting hairs here.😉 Just for the record: Patek charges £6.5m for one of his watches; if you’re paying more than, say, about 100 quid for a wristwatch you seriously need your head checking. After that, it becomes about conspicuous consumption, especially when it comes to something with one single very basic function.
    1
  13.  @sdfilmproductions4193  Lol. You’re splitting hairs again. Picking a fight where there isn’t one, for some reason. Ok, Patek isn’t/wasn’t 1 guy, it was 2. And? I’ve just seen one of their used watches for on sale for a million quid. That’s a pretty pointless outlay if you’re sane in the brain. And you, dear boy, are living in cloud cuckoo land if you seriously think you can’t get a decent wristwatch that’ll last decades for about 100 quid or less. I’m a case in point; I have a watch I’ve had for about 25 years. A wind-up thingy. I’ve just checked what it currently retails at: 75 quid! Ta da! Now trot on and go and produce some films, or something, cuz yer clearly outta yer depth here, son.🍿
    1
  14.  @zeitgeist5134  👍
    1