Comments by "James Neave" (@JamesNeave1978) on "Russia's Attempt to Surround Eastern Ukraine" video.

  1.  @andrewbeketa4418  "That has nothing to do with the conflict" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👍 Course not. Totally irrelevant, nothing to do with it being under Donbass and Kharkiv. Nothing to do with denying Europe energy security. Nope nope nope. 🤣
    7
  2.  @nematolvajkergetok5104  You are very Wrong in several interesting ways. Let's count them shall we? They captured hundreds and hundreds of vehicles disabled by one of: 1) No fuel 2) No battery 3) No tyres 4) Mud 5) No Spares But make no mistake, many MANY MANY vehicles had no fuel. I don't understand why you don't know this.
    3
  3.  @belisarius1453  Say hello to... Modern flak cannons.
    2
  4. 100 thousand dollar tractor but yeah (tractors are EXPENSIVE)
    2
  5. Any concession to Russia is a disaster They get something for nothing, free land because they attacked. Once it works, they can just take forever. That's why you're giving Ukraine all that money, because you can't fight then yourself.
    2
  6. T-62 however, is a slightly upgraded T-55. Ones an advanced MBT (for the 1950s, world's most advanced tank by a long way at the time) The other is a medium tank and of the same line as the T-34.
    2
  7.  @kameronjones7139  Indeed, it's a terrible design, wasting space and weight on two identical 30mm ACs because you can't build a proper dual feed or open bolt or some other stupid reason. Still just a T-72, still going to get destroyed by an RPG or atgm.
    2
  8. Can't wait for these bmp-ts to get wiped out by RPGs.
    1
  9.  @randyross5630  Yeah, they pretend to soldier and Russia pretends to pay them. Sorry, no, there is no 'good bit' of the Russian army. What you're seeing now is survival of the fittest, those who are good at ducking.
    1
  10.  @SHN0o1  Because of a terrorist attack on New York and they didn't invade Libya. Sorry, America didn't invade either place 'for oil' Especially seeing as they have not taken any. Maybe next time don't let wahabist extremists attack free developed nations and you won't get your teeth kicked in.
    1
  11. I know T-64 is old but T-64 and T-62 are VERY different tanks
    1
  12. It's the same with the Russian navy. In the Royal Navy, they say routine is maddening, chalking seals every week. And you never really understand why unless you actually get shot at (by something that isn't instant death) That's why our stuff doesn't sink. And their BMPs do.
    1
  13. The T-90M. Still a T-72. Still vulnerable to: NLAW STUGNA-P JAVELIN RPG-7 Carl-Gustav That German one. That drone + an AT grenade.
    1
  14.  @yeoshenghong4802  We're going to laugh when the bmpt gets wiped out by NLAW from a high window.
    1