Comments by "James Neave" (@JamesNeave1978) on "The US Marines Bold Risky Plan to Defeat China" video.

  1.  @streamobject0014  That's just cos the finns ARE the trees... Actually it's because they have no space for defense in depth and have to rely on a fighting retreat across valleys and rivers. Except now they get to do that with the rest of NATO charging in the other direction. Although I'd like to think we'd have done it anyway, Ukraine is starting to sour my opinion of my NATO brethren. Even my British siblings have not exactly lived up to my expectations.
    3
  2. You forgot to ask, "also can the Finns have these tanks plz?"
    2
  3. And there's 450 "excess" M1A1s they can be "sold" (via the EDA) to Ukraine for $100 a piece + transport costs.
    2
  4. Yeeeees, Marines + F-35B, get some.
    1
  5. The STO/VL version of the F-35, the B, was specifically designed for the US Marines and The Royal Navy. It is the only replacement for the Harrier. You cannot replace the Harrier with an F-16, 15 or 18. Marines are built around the fast response times of Harrier CAS from a unrefined FOB. Fuel, Bullets and a Shed.
    1
  6.  @The_Annoyed_chef  Very nice. Also start stockpiling drone parts in all those bunkers.
    1
  7. Looking at the Royal Marines, yes, this is exactly the right thing to do. Otherwise the USMC is just More Army
    1