Comments by "Julian The Apostate" (@juliantheapostate8295) on "Hitler's Socialism | Destroying the Denialist Counter Arguments" video.

  1.  @paidgovernmentshill_6950  Well no, Marxism is the control of the means of production by the proletariat. Class based socialism was not the original socialism
    83
  2. TIK, YoungRippa59 has a channel where one of his videos comes to the same conclusion. Might be worth reaching out and sharing info
    43
  3. <Checks to see if this is still the best video on YouTube> Yep, it is.
    26
  4. Everything changes. The appeal of socialism to the masses reduces drastically once they realise that Nazism is socialism. They then realise the entire left/right dichotomy has been falsely defined for nearly a century. They realise who the bad guys really are. They realise that people of other classes and races are not enemies. They realise that people are individuals and that everybody matters. It is the most important argument in 1,000 years
    9
  5.  @TheImperatorKnight  It makes sense - I am continually recommended left-wing nonsense channels and have to actively down vote them to stop them from appearing
    6
  6.  @Alexa-vo4kk  Well yes but actually, no. Nazism is a type of socialism. Most socialists are not Nazis - most tend to be Marxists, although some are fascist
    4
  7. Still the best video on YouTube? Aye
    3
  8.  @genericnamehere7602  Razorfist is one incredibly sharp guy
    3
  9.  @genericnamehere7602  I've been following him for a while. I'm a metalhead myself. State EC now!
    2
  10. An excellent observation
    2
  11. City states were typically formed into leagues though. Some with more autonomy, and some with less (looking at you Athenai)
    2
  12. The ones calling the shots are very wealthy - it's only their rank and file who are poor
    1
  13. 'but you don't own your computer unless you built it from the ground-up – it's leased to you' Stay off the weed mate. The monthly cost is zero and I'm free to sell it whenever I want. That's the very definition of ownership
    1
  14.  @SteveSmith-ty8ko  Stalin didn't like them either
    1
  15.  mike mcmike  Oh wow you said 'incel' now we're all convinced
    1
  16.  @dylandelaney833  That would be the Orwell who mitigated his own inheritance tax liability? A poor socialist, but an excellent capitalist
    1
  17. Mercantlism
    1
  18. Whether you own it directly or just control the people who do, what's the difference?
    1
  19.  mike mcmike  'Yess cause only socialism has “control”.....' Fascism, another left-wing ideology also has a lot of control. So, you're right, not just Marxism
    1
  20.  @ElizaDolittle  I mostly agree with you, but government-controlled capitalism is basically just lesser socialism. Although I am aware that this is a pretty semantic point to make
    1
  21. 'but fascism depends on it and is very nationalistic while socialism is meant to be internationalist., I take it you don't class Franco's Spain as fascist then, as it wasn't exactly known for launching wars
    1
  22. When Stalin decided that would be useful propaganda for the 'Great Patriotic War'
    1
  23. 'He persecuted every single left-leaning group (the aforementioned Communists, the Social Democrats,)' You mean like how the Bolsheviks persecuted the Mensheviks? Woops!
    1
  24. '1. If value is tied to scarcity, then where is the value in motherhood? Exactly. Nothing. ' Are you high? A child of your own is the most valuable and least abundant thing I can think of
    1
  25. So if my bank balance is -£50,000 I am in profit am I? GTFO with your 'no right and wrong definitions' Sophist nonsense
    1
  26. People who DON'T recognise a bias are the biased ones - not the reverse
    1
  27. Atlee was so well-loved that we re-elected Churchill the next chance we got!
    1
  28. Nuh-uh. All Marxists did was define race as class!
    1
  29.  @markboggs746  It's pathetic isn't it?
    1
  30. One of the many problems with Marx is his fixation on Labour Theory of Value. So the person who risked his savings starting the company, or the person who came up with the idea for the business, they don't matter? Only the people who work there do? Why then would you bother starting a business?
    1
  31. Those damned Marxist speculators at the Federal Reserve you mean. You need to read the sources before you debate something. For this example, I suggest Rothbard
    1