Comments by "" (@shaunstark4263) on "Pfizer to seek full FDA approval as Moderna reports high efficacy in teenagers" video.

  1. Is tyranny the new normal?
    12
  2. Does normal include governmental control over everything you do?
    5
  3.  @karencarpenter5845  Jesus is who set me free.
    3
  4. Interesting how many pro vax "commenters" there are that attack instead of hold honest conversation Almost like it's some kind of militant bot tactic to suppress dissenters or something...
    2
  5.  Roger Out  lots of confused people these days.
    2
  6.  @easymoney8535  I really have no need to prove anything to you, as I am not the one trying to get you to take injections of unknown concoctions. Also, youre lying. What names did I call you? What attacks did I make?
    2
  7.  @easymoney8535  also, your judgement of depth, character, or lack thereof are just as questionable as your your own character. You believe the television, so how good can your judgement be?
    2
  8.  @easymoney8535  Excerpt from google "In October 2020, Johnson & Johnson agreed to settle more than 1,000 talcum powder lawsuits for $100 million. ... J&J still faces more than 27,100 federal talcum powder lawsuits in multidistrict litigation and many more in state courts as of February 2021." If I can yield these results in 30 seconds of honest "googling", I cant imagine what your hard work has yielded. Another example of confirmation bias is how you cannot find such easily searched and readily available information. Because you dont look for what you dont believe.
    1
  9. "Safe" and "effective" are subjective terms. Psychological and legal manipulations.
    1
  10. "It hasn't been proven that gunshots kill people, only that some have died after receiving one"
    1
  11.  @easymoney8535  the best part is everything you say perfectly applies to your rhetoric. So you're not only a liar, but a hypocrite. Notice your "credible sources" say exactly what every source says on television. I know, you probably weren't aware because you dont watch t.v. lol When you cant win, you'll resort to ad hominem character assassination. Classic. You cant prove a single "life saved" from the vax, but there are many deaths attributed to it. Coincidence?
    1
  12.  @easymoney8535  still waiting on your mention of the vax ingredients and how it works. Or maybe just another accusatory ad hominem character assassination. Let's see.
    1
  13. Heres what google says about just one of your "credible sources" "Pfizer has been a “habitual offender,” persistently engaging in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribing physicians and suppressing adverse trial results. Since 2002 the company and its subsidiaries have been assessed $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards."
    1
  14. Here is what google says about FDA approval... "On average, about 4,500 drugs and devices are pulled from U.S. shelves each year. The recalled products have U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and in many cases, are widely ingested, injected or implanted before being recalled."
    1
  15. Heres a highlight from the editor of the journal of american physicians and surgeons regarding the CDC: "The CDC openly admits that it is fudging the COVID-19 death figures," he writes. The statistics have been made to look really scary by adding speculative guesses to the official database. "Those false numbers are sanctioned by the CDC." Dr. Huntoon notes that the CDC became authorized to accept private gifts in 1983, opening wide the door to corruption and conflicts of interest. Ethics and disclosure requirements are ineffective and non-uniform. A report by the Office of the Inspector General, published in 2010, showed a "systematic lack of oversight" of the ethics program. "Even when the CDC identifies conflicts of interest for advisory committee members, some allege that the CDC 'automatically' grants annual waivers to the participants. And the CDC's policy on 'prohibited sources' of donations to the CDC Foundation, which allows 'prohibited' donations, makes a complete mockery of the CDC's entire ethics process," he writes."
    1
  16. So far I have proven that the FDA approves 4500 faulty medicines and medical devices each year, only to later find that they harmed people causing them to be recalled. So far I have brought in to question the ethics and business practices of the CDC as well....
    1
  17. "Thousands of doctors agree that camel cigarettes are the best"
    1
  18. So far johnson &johnson hasn't fared well, either. "According to Reuters, the records show that Johnson & Johnson knew about the asbestos in their products from 1971 to the 2000s. As a carcinogen, asbestos has links to the increased risk of developing mesothelioma, ovarian cancer, peritoneal cancer, and testicular mesothelioma." consumer-protection-related offenses$5,769,0005 Heres just a few lawsuits against them for various reasons... Top 5 Primary Offense TypesPenalty TotalNumber of Recordsoff-label or unapproved promotion of medical products$3,136,000,00010False Claims Act and related$558,705,36812drug or medical equipment safety violation$411,269,80012Foreign Corrupt Practices Act$70,450,0003price-fixing or anti-competitive practices Heres another excerpt regarding their lawsuits: "The company faces 25,000 lawsuits alleging the household products cause cancer, and it's still in the process of appealing a massive verdict out of Missouri. After a St. Louis jury in 2018 ordered the drugmaker to pay $4.7 billion, an appeals court reduced the figure to $2.1 billion last summer."
    1
  19. Let me know if you need more "sources"
    1
  20.  @easymoney8535  I suppose you dont believe google directly stating the FDA approves 4500 faulty medications and medical devices every year, either. I suppose you dont believe google when it shows you the 25000 lawsuits currently against just one vax manufacturer, either. Or maybe you dont believe the article on the CDC and its questionable ethics oversight, either. Would you like some more? Or is your confirmation bias kicking in?
    1
  21.  @easymoney8535  were you referring to the editor of the american journal of physicians and surgeons? Funny how you try to point out one thing to discredit when I just showed you many things which discredit your position. It's ok though, because I have almost endless sources.
    1
  22. Google "CDC corruption" for a list of hundreds of sources, articles, news, and legal documentation. Google "FDA corruption" for a list of the same regarding the FDA.
    1
  23. I wonder if the billions of dollars across thousands of lawsuits have any credibility to them. Or the thousands of accounts as to the corruption of both the FDA and CDC. Or maybe the criminal histories of each of the vax contributors. Probably not enough to cut through the confirmation bias....
    1
  24.  @easymoney8535  your website (sciencebasedmedicine) has been called "an echo chamber of confirmation bias" by many reviewers as well. One example on quora regarding the question "is sciencebasedmedicine.org credible?" "No. It’s an echo chamber for the most regressive and insane ideas from Big Medicine. Like a cult or religious sect. Should be called faithbasedmedicine. org. Long answer: Appears to be an "astroturf" site that advances the cause of pharma-based medicine through methodical and often irrational assaults on all other approaches. The site is cloaked in an aura of scientific rigor, but is clearly a fierce and dogmatic defense of status quo allopathy. These guys are extremists and ideologues. Much of the editorial content is focused around discrediting, mocking, condemning. Little space is given to what they actually believe in. By process of elimination, they appear to believe in very little, seemingly only the most rigidly circumscribed allopathic orthodoxies. One of the main tactics is to lump all non-mainstream approaches together as "CAM", as if they are some unified whole that can be easily dismissed. It's a term of propaganda and belies the site's alleged objectivity. They write sententious and overbearing articles heavy on technical jargon that look and sound convincing but are just hit pieces that often prove or settle nothing. They are ostensibly concerned with rooting out quackery, but only when it appears outside the mainstream system. They write article after article decrying the terrible evils of homeopathy and acupuncture, but scant few on the rampant corruption and iatrogenesis and quackery and lethality in conventional medicine. This hypocrisy kills credibility."
    1
  25.  @easymoney8535  notice how you discredit anyone with a contrary opinion to yours immediately, and accept anyone's opinions which agree with yours just as quickly? It's called confirmation bias. Notice you accuse me of it, but you openly display it with your every comment. Also notice your dismissive, pompous, dogmatic, presumptuous, pretentious, condescending, and prideful pontifications and assertions? That's how I know you're a lying hypocrite. Just in case you were wondering. The funniest part is I can call you on ten obvious things, but you never notice.... blissfully unaware. Worshipping your god of pharmakeia without ever second guessing yourself.... Your feigned empathy will never be an excuse to inject the children of world with unknown concoctions. There are countless proven accounts of medical malpractice, yet you act as if your medicine is always correct. Allopathy doesnt heal anyone. Your psychological manipulations are obvious to me, and all those like me. Your anecdotal evidence is rendered worthless due to your suspicious character. Guess who told us about you guys? GOD.
    1
  26. Anyone want to tell us what's in the vaccine?
    1
  27.  @easymoney8535  so, tell us what is in the vax and how it works.
    1
  28.  @easymoney8535  would you like to go through the list of words and I will define them and inform you as to how they apply to you? I only waste my time because I care about you.
    1
  29.  @easymoney8535  the FDA has not approved any of the vaccines. They have only been allowed for emergency use due to legal gymnastics.
    1
  30.  @easymoney8535  there are many credible reports of the CDC corruption. I'm sure you'll discredit each one individually, so please do. You should do yourself a favor and not consider highly documented liars and criminals as credible sources of Truth. For a laugh look up the etymology of the word pharma.
    1
  31.  @easymoney8535 again, projection. You are forcing lies. No one has to take your religious injections. Furthermore, if you honestly investigated, I wouldn't have to prove the whole world to you. Nor do I care to. your real character or lack thereof overshadows your feigned empathy and intellect. You must have skimmed past the last where I told you God informed us. Dont worry, you'll see soon. Blessings to you, and yours.
    1
  32. "Safe" and "effective" are subjective terms. Legal and psychological manipulations.
    1
  33. @Easy Money I thought your reading comprehension was fine... you are obviously religious in your devotion to pharmakeia. Your "religion" cares to force injections upon the whole world. You believe liars. And attempt to force feed their lies as Truth to anyone who will listen. Yes, God informed US, meaning many of us, simultaneously. Your accusations won't help, as I was already shown all of your tactics, as well. Anyone disagreeing with your narratives is either a fool or mentally ill.... youre just a typical bigot bot. Theres an army of mockers, scoffers, and arrogant manipulators pushing many agendas online. It's called social engineering. You guys are just practice for us.
    1
  34.  Roger Out  you can take risks with your loved ones.
    1
  35.  Roger Out  associating the risk with the deaths from peanut allergies... "Safe" and "effective" are purely subjective terms...
    1
  36. "Safe" and "effective" are subjective terms. Psychological and legal manipulations.
    1
  37.  @easymoney8535  the vaccine devout... You're the liar. Pushing things you know nothing about, regardless of the lifelong consequences. The arrogance. If it turned out you were wrong, and millions died, I doubt it would even cross your mind how many you convinced to their deaths with your worship. Tell us what's in the vaccine, and how it works.
    1
  38. Plausible deniability, for example, is when they say stuff like "people died after the shot, but we cant/wont prove it was from the shot." "Many have side effects after the shot, but it has not been proven to be because of the shot" "not enough evidence" or "has yet to prove a link"... notice their pet theories also have yet to be "proven", but their conversation continues forward as if they have been. It's a one sided propaganda machine.
    1
  39.  @karencarpenter5845  I know Him personally. Jesus Christ is the Truth, the Way, and the Life!
    1
  40. Anyone here want to tell me how the vaccine works and what is in it? I'm interested in being educated on my important decisions.
    1
  41.  @easymoney8535  mockery and ridicule are but the tools of the fool. Your poor demeanor and lacking character speak volumes to your poor judgement. Therefore, I dont consider your opinions as those of depth.
    1
  42.  @easymoney8535  too bad you discredit your opinions so often, or else someone may value them.
    1
  43.  Roger Out  I like "geoengineering" or "stratospheric aerosol injection" or "solar radiation management" better.
    1
  44.  Roger Out  kind of like the big bang
    1
  45.  Roger Out  lol you're funny.
    1
  46. The bots always use the same tactics....
    1
  47.  Roger Out Yes, it broke my feeble little mind, oh great one.
    1
  48.  Roger Out  actually, I was referring to the many well documented programs about which much information and open admissions are available. No, I wont read them to you.
    1
  49.  Roger Out  why ask me? If you truly wanted to know, you'd look. As for your anecdotal evidentiary opinion, your obvious lack of character has put in to question your psychological bias, and therefore I cannot take you seriously.Furthermore, I dont consider opinions as facts, or even "facts" as Truth. ,
    1
  50. "Safe" and "effective" are subjective terms. Psychological and legal manipulations.
    1
  51.  @easymoney8535  I actually attacked your methodology. Your "facts" are just repeated propaganda, so I dont need to attack them. I just point out the errors in your thinking. "Pushing things you personally have no knowledge of, which can have a life and death consequence." Like a religious devout, who has no personal knowledge, except for repeated propaganda.
    1